Patient Satisfaction With Long-term Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence: Experience From a Single Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the long term. Efficacy is typically assessed using bowel diary, symptom severity, and quality-of-life questionnaires, and "success" is defined as more than 50% improvement in these measures. However, patient satisfaction may be a more meaningful and individualized measure of treatment efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-reported satisfaction with long-term sacral neuromodulation and compare it to the frequently applied efficacy measures. DESIGN: An observational study of a prospectively maintained database. SETTING: A single tertiary pelvic floor referral unit. PATIENTS: Data from 70 patients (68 women, median age 69 [60-74] years) were available. The median time since implantation was 11 (9-14) years. Nineteen patients reported inactive neuromodulation devices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel diaries, the Manchester Health Questionnaire, and the St. Mark's Incontinence Score were recorded at baseline, after percutaneous nerve evaluation, and at the last follow-up. Patient-reported satisfaction, using a 0% to 100% visual analog scale, with treatment since implantation (overall) and in the 2 weeks preceding completion of the last outcome measures (current) were also assessed. RESULTS: Satisfaction was significantly higher in those with active sacral neuromodulation devices (75% vs 20%, p < 0.001) at follow-up. No significant relationships exist between symptom improvement using conventional measures and patient-reported satisfaction. Current satisfaction was not associated with changes in bowel diary data after percutaneous nerve evaluation. Despite improvements in the St. Mark's Incontinence Score and Manchester Health Questionnaire below the 50% improvement threshold used to define "success," patients reported high (80%) satisfaction. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design with gaps in the available data. CONCLUSIONS: High patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation can be achieved; however, the response to percutaneous nerve evaluation may not predict treatment satisfaction in the long term. The change in questionnaire results, which measure the use of compensatory behaviors and quality-of-life impact, may better correspond to treatment satisfaction. SATISFACCIN A LARGO PLAZO EN LOS PACIENTES CON LA NEUROMODULACIN SACRA PARA LA INCONTINENCIA FECAL EXPERIENCIA DE UN NICO CENTRO TERCIARIO: ANTECEDENTES:La neuromodulación sacra es un tratamiento eficaz para la incontinencia fecal a largo plazo. La eficacia suele evaluarse mediante cuestionarios sobre la frecuencia diaria intestinal, la gravedad de los síntomas o la calidad de vida, y el "éxito" se define como una mejoría >50% en estas medidas. Sin embargo, la satisfacción del paciente puede ser una medida más significativa e individualizada de la eficacia del tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la satisfacción a largo plazo de los pacientes con la neuromodulación sacra y compararla con las medidas de eficacia aplicadas con frecuencia.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.LUGAR:Unidad terciaria única de referencia de suelo pélvico.PACIENTES:Se dispuso de datos de 70 pacientes (68 mujeres, mediana de edad 69 [60-74]). La mediana de tiempo transcurrido desde la implantación fue de 11 (9-14) años. Diecinueve pacientes informaron de dispositivos de neuromodulación inactivos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Diarios intestinales, el Cuestionario de Salud de Manchester y la Puntuación de Incontinencia de St Marks registrados al inicio, tras la evaluación percutánea del nervio y en el último seguimiento. Los pacientes informaron de su satisfacción, utilizando una escala analógica visual de 0%-100%, con el tratamiento desde la implantación (global) y en las dos semanas anteriores a la realización de las últimas medidas de resultado (actual).RESULTADOS:La satisfacción fue significativamente mayor en los pacientes con dispositivos de neuromodulación sacra activos (75% frente a 20%, p < 0,001) durante el seguimiento. No existen relaciones significativas entre la mejoría de los síntomas mediante medidas convencionales y la satisfacción comunicada por el paciente. La satisfacción actual no se asoció con los cambios en los datos de la frecuencia diaria intestinal tras la evaluación percutánea de los nervios. A pesar de que las mejoras en la puntuación de incontinencia de St Mark y el Cuestionario de Salud de Manchester se situaron por debajo del umbral de mejora del 50% utilizado para definir el "éxito", los pacientes declararon un alto grado de satisfacción (80%).LIMITACIONES:Retrospectivo con lagunas en los datos disponibles.CONCLUSIONES:Puede lograrse una alta satisfacción de los pacientes con la neuromodulación sacra; sin embargo, la respuesta a la evaluación percutánea del nervio puede no predecir la satisfacción con el tratamiento a largo plazo. El cambio en los resultados del cuestionario, que mide el uso de conductas compensatorias y el impacto en la calidad de vida, puede corresponder mejor a la satisfacción con el tratamiento. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

The Long-term Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation and establish the outcomes of patients with inactive devices. DESIGN: This is an observational study of patients treated for >5 years. A positive outcome was defined as a more than 50% reduction in fecal incontinence episodes or improvement in a symptom severity score. Data were reviewed from a prospectively managed database. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Data from 74 patients (72 women) were available at long-term follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bowel diary, St. Mark's incontinence score, and Manchester Health Questionnaire data were prospectively recorded at baseline, after percutaneous nerve evaluation, and at last follow-up. RESULTS: Patients were analyzed in cohorts based on time since sacral neuromodulation implantation: group 1: 5 to 10 years (n = 20), group 2: >10 years (n = 35), and group 3: inactive sacral neuromodulation devices (n = 19). Median St. Mark's incontinence score and Manchester Health Questionnaire improved from baseline to last follow-up in group 1 ( p ≤ 0.05) and group 2 ( p ≤ 0.05), but in group 3, results returned to baseline levels at the last follow-up. Similarly, weekly fecal incontinence episodes improved in both active device groups at the last follow-up. However, in group 3, incontinence episodes were no different from baseline ( p = 0.722). Despite active devices, fecal urgency episodes increased at the last follow-up after >10 years since percutaneous nerve evaluation ( p ≤ 0.05). Complete continence was reported by 44% of patients, and at least a 50% improvement was seen in 77% of patients with active devices. LIMITATIONS: This study is retrospective with some gaps in the available data at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the long term, but all outcomes are adversely affected by device inactivity. Therefore, ongoing stimulation is required for continued benefit. See Video Abstract. RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DE LA NEUROMODULACIN SACRA PARA LA INCONTINENCIA FECAL EXPERIENCIA DE UN SOLO CENTRO: ANTECEDENTES:La neuromodulación sacra es un tratamiento eficaz para la incontinencia fecal.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los resultados a largo plazo de la neuromodulación sacra y establecer los resultados de los pacientes con dispositivos inactivos.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio observacional de pacientes tratados durante más de 5 años. Un resultado positivo se definió como una reducción >50 % en los episodios de incontinencia fecal o una mejoría en la puntuación de gravedad de los síntomas. Los datos se revisaron a partir de una base de datos administrada prospectivamente.ENTERNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un solo centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Los datos de 74 pacientes (72 mujeres) estaban disponibles en el seguimiento a largo plazo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Diario intestinal, puntuación de incontinencia de St. Mark y datos del Cuestionario de salud de Manchester se registraron prospectivamente al inicio, después de la evaluación de nervio periférico y en el último seguimiento.RESULTADOS:Los pacientes se analizaron en cohortes según el tiempo transcurrido desde la implantación de la neuromodulación sacra: Grupo 1: 5-10 años (n = 20), Grupo 2: >10 años (n = 35) y Grupo 3: dispositivos SNM inactivos (n = 19). La mediana de la puntuación de incontinencia de St. Mark y Questionnaire Cuestionario de salud de Manchester mejoraron desde el inicio hasta el último seguimiento en el Grupo 1 (p = < 0,05) y el Grupo 2 (p = < 0,05), pero en el Grupo 3 los resultados volvieron a los niveles iniciales en el último seguimiento. arriba. De manera similar, los episodios semanales de incontinencia fecal mejoraron en ambos grupos de dispositivos activos en el último seguimiento. Sin embargo, en el Grupo 3 los episodios de incontinencia no fueron diferentes de los basales (p = 0,722). A pesar de los dispositivos activos, los episodios de urgencia fecal aumentaron en el último seguimiento después de más de 10 años desde la evaluación del nervio periférico (p = < 0,05). Continencia completa se reportó en el 44 % de los pacientes, y al menos una mejora del 50 % en el 77 % con dispositivos activos.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio es retrospectivo con algunas vacíos en los datos disponibles en el último seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:La neuromodulación sacra es un tratamiento eficaz para la incontinencia fecal a largo plazo, pero todos los resultados se ven afectados negativamente por la inactividad del dispositivo. Por lo tanto, se requiere estimulación continua para un beneficio continuo. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Continuous vs stepwise anal acoustic reflectometry: An improved technique for physiological measurement of anal sphincter function?

BACKGROUND: Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) is a technique for measuring the physiological profile of the anal canal, primarily the internal anal sphincter. Evaluation of a new continuous method, recently developed for the urethra, would enable its future application for investigation of rectal reflexes. METHODS: Patients aged 18 and over with fecal incontinence (FI) were included. Stepwise AAR parameters were compared with continuous opening pressure (Op, cmH2 O), opening elastance (Oe, cmH2 O/mm2 ), closing pressure (Cp, cmH2 O), closing elastance (Ce, cmH2 O/mm2 ), hysteresis (Hys, [%]), squeeze opening pressure (SqOp, cmH2 O), and squeeze opening elastance (SqOe, cmH2 O/mm2 ). Vaizey incontinence and Manchester Health Questionnaire scores were also collected. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, 26 females were analyzed. Median age: 60 (range, 32-75). Median AAR parameters of Op (37.50 vs 35.15, P = .031), Oe (1.31 vs 0.84, P < .0001), Ce (1.11 vs 0.88, P < .0001), Hys (37.75 vs 19.04, P < .0001), and SqOe (1.27 vs 1.06, P = .005) were significantly higher with the continuous method. Cp (22.70 vs 27.22, P = .003) is lower and SqOp (96.87 vs 59.47, P = .71) not significantly different. The continuous technique had superior repeatability between cycles for all AAR parameters except Oe, which was equivalent and continuous SqOp had a stronger negative correlation with Vaizey score than stepwise (-0.46, P = .009 vs -0.37, P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: The differences seen between the two techniques are likely to be related to the rate of stretch. The continuous technique appears to represent a more physiological measurement of anal sphincter function than the stepwise technique particularly in the assessment of voluntary squeeze function.

Methodologic Validation of a Faster Pelvic Floor Test: Two Randomized Studies in Anal Acoustic Reflectometry.

BACKGROUND: Anal acoustic reflectometry investigates the opening and closing function of the anal canal using reflected sound waves to measure a cross-sectional area at different pressures. Anal acoustic reflectometry is reliable and repeatable, distinguishes between continence and incontinence and between subgroups of incontinence, correlates with symptom severity, and does not distort the anal canal during investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate anal acoustic reflectometry methodology by asking 2 questions: can anal acoustic reflectometry be used alongside manometry (order study) and can anal acoustic reflectometry be performed faster (filling study). The secondary aim was to assess the response of the anal canal to stretch using anal acoustic reflectometry. DESIGN: This research included 2 prospective randomized studies. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing investigation for fecal incontinence were included. INTERVENTION: For the order study, patients were prospectively randomized to anal acoustic reflectometry, manometry, 2-minute rest and then manometry, anal acoustic reflectometry, or vice versa. For the filling study, patients were prospectively randomized to fast rate anal acoustic reflectometry (5 cm H2O/1 s), manometry, 2-minute rest and then manometry, normal rate anal acoustic reflectometry (5 cm H2O/3 s), or vice versa. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was no difference in anal acoustic reflectometry or manometry variables. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: The order study included 30 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 30-84 y); 77% were women. No difference was found among all of the variables of anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry regardless of which test was performed first. The filling study included 50 patients with a median age of 62 years (range, 30-78 y); 80% were women. No difference was found between fast and normal rates of anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry in any order. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its comparison with water-perfused manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry can be performed at the normal or fast rate of anal acoustic reflectometry in any order. A fast rate of anal acoustic reflectometry did not augment the response of the anal canal to stretch as measured by anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry. This study validates a faster anal acoustic reflectometry technique and vindicates previous data. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A821.

Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the occurrence of surgical revision in a cohort of patients treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence and constipation and to establish the types of procedures performed and indications for surgery. METHOD: From the years 2002 to 2014, 125 patients were identified who had undergone permanent SNS therapy with 36 (28.8 %) patients requiring surgical intervention postimplantation. These cases were retrospectively reviewed (range of follow-up 1-99 months). RESULTS: Over a total of 1512 months of SNS treatment, 51 unplanned surgical procedures were required in 36 patients. At present, 48 procedures have been performed at an average of 2.6 years following implantation and three patients are awaiting surgery. Lead-related problems accounted for 30 (58.8 %) procedures at an average of 1.7 years affecting 22 patients. Battery and implantable pulse generator-related problems attributed to 13 procedures (25.5 %) in 12 patients at an average of 5.0 years. Battery depletion occurred in seven patients at an average of 5.4 years. Surgical revision was required to replace, remove, or resite various components of the SNS system. Indications for surgery included lead damage, pain and loss or lack of SNS efficacy. Explantation was warranted in six patients due to poor SNS efficacy, pain, infection and facilitation of a magnetic resonance imaging scan. This was performed at an average of 1.6 years. CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of patients treated with SNS therapy require surgical revision. These unplanned procedures are associated with substantial unexpected costs that financially burden SNS services.

Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

PURPOSES: Several reports have described a relationship between tumor volume and oncological outcomes for certain cancers. There is paucity of similar data for rectal cancer. We conducted this study to establish whether tumor volume, mesorectal volume, and the tumor volume to mesorectal volume ratio (TV/MRV), evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), affect the oncological outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: We performed volumetric analysis of rectal tumors from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images and assessed their correlation with oncological outcomes, using clinical and radiological databases. RESULTS: The subjects of this study were 25 of 35 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery after staging with MRI, after the exclusion of 7 patients for whom MRI images could not be retrieved and 3 patients who had metastases identified at diagnosis. Tumor volume (TV) was a significant predictor of overall survival hazard ratio (95% CI); 5.8 (1.2-29), (P = 0.03). Mesorectal volume (MRV) and TV/MRV did not correlate with oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found a direct relationship between tumor volume and overall survival, which may be used to stratify rectal tumors for neoadjuvant therapy. A larger prospective study is required to confirm this correlation.

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Introduction: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a common condition with a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). Neuromodulation treatments delivered by members of the multidisciplinary team including sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are options for FI refractory to conservative management. The aim of this study was to assess whether a successful treatment with one neuromodulation modality corresponds with success in the other. Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively managed neuromodulation database identified 15 patients who had undergone both PTNS and SNS. The definition of success of each treatment was a >50% improvement in any of The St. Mark's Incontinence Score, Manchester Health Questionnaire, or weekly faecal urgency or FI episodes. Results: Complete data from 12 patients was available for assessment and PTNS was delivered as the first treatment in nine patients. Overall, seven patients (58%) had successful PTNS treatment, with 10 (83%) having a successful SNS trials. Of the seven patients who had successful PTNS treatment, six patients (85.4%) went on to have success with SNS. Of the five patients who failed PTNS, four (80%) went on to have SNS success. Five (71%) of those who had positive PTNS outcomes had permanent SNS implantation as their final treatment decision. Conclusion: This study suggests that there is no clear relationship between successful PTNS treatment and an SNS trial period which may be explained by differing mechanisms of action or the potential placebo effect of PTNS. Further work is required to investigate any association in larger studies to inform clinical practice.

A comparison of function lumen imaging probe measurements of anal sphincter function in fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a test of anal sphincter distensibility under evaluation by specialist centers. Two measurement protocols termed "stepwise" and "ramp" are used, risking a lack of standardization. This study aims to compare the performance of these protocols to establish if there are differences between them. METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinence were recruited and underwent measurement with both protocols at a tertiary pelvic floor referral unit. Differences in minimum diameter, FLIP bag pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at rest and during squeeze were calculated at various FLIP bag volumes. KEY RESULTS: Twenty patients (19 female, mean age 61 [range: 38-78]) were included. The resting minimum diameter at 30 and 40 mL bag volumes were less in the stepwise protocol (mean bias: -0.55 mm and -1.18 mm, p < 0.05) along with the DI at the same bag volumes (mean bias: -0.37 mm2/mmHg and -0.55 mm2/mmHg, p < 0.05). There was also a trend towards greater bag pressures at 30 mL (mean bias: +2.08 mmHg, p = 0.114) and 40 mL (mean bias: +2.81 mmHg, p = 0.129) volumes in the stepwise protocol. There were no differences between protocols in measurements of minimum diameter, maximum bag pressure, or DI during voluntary squeeze (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: There are differences between the two commonly described FLIP measurement protocols at rest, although there are no differences in the assessment of squeeze function. Consensus agreement is required to agree the most appropriate FLIP measurement protocol in assessing anal sphincter function.

Tobacco smoking and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to delineate the impact of smoking on postoperative outcomes after colorectal resection for malignant and benign processes. BACKGROUND: Studies to date have implicated smoking as a risk factor for increased postoperative complications. However, there is a paucity of data on the effects of smoking after colorectal surgery and in particular for malignant compared with benign processes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2010) database was queried for patients undergoing elective major colorectal resection for colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, or inflammatory bowel disease. Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes were assessed and compared between patient cohorts identified as never-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers. Primary outcomes of incisional infections, infectious and major complications, and mortality were evaluated using regression modeling adjusting for patient characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 47,574 patients were identified, of which 26,333 had surgery for colorectal cancer, 14,019 for diverticular disease, and 7222 for inflammatory bowel disease. More than 60% of patients had never smoked, 20.4% were current smokers, and 19.2% were ex-smokers. After adjustment, current smokers were at a significantly increased risk of postoperative morbidity [odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-1.40] and mortality (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.11-1.94) after colorectal surgery. This finding persisted across malignant and benign diagnoses and also demonstrated a significant dose-dependent effect when stratifying by pack-years of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking increases the risk of complications after all types of major colorectal surgery, with the greatest risk apparent for current smokers. A concerted effort should be made toward promoting smoking cessation in all patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery.

Outcomes associated with resident involvement in partial colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical cases that include trainees are associated with worse outcomes in comparison with those that include attending surgeons alone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify whether resident involvement in partial colectomy was associated with worse outcomes when evaluated by surgical approach and resident experience. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. SETTINGS: This study evaluates cases included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: All patients were included who underwent partial colectomy including both open and laparoscopic approaches. INTERVENTIONS: Residents were involved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the association of resident involvement and major complication events, minor complication events, unplanned return to operating room, and operative time. RESULTS: Cases with residents were associated with major complications (OR 1.18, CI 1.09-1.27, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. However, after including operative time in the model only open cases involving fifth year residents were still associated with major complications (OR 1.13, p = 0.037). Resident involvement was associated with increased likelihood of minor complications (OR 1.3, p < 0.001) and an increased risk of unplanned return to the operating room (OR 1.20, p < 0.001). Operative time was longer for cases with residents on average by 33.7 minutes and 27 minutes for open and laparoscopic cases. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design and lack of data on teachings status, case complexity, and intraoperative evaluation of technique. CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement in partial colectomies is associated with an increased major complications, minor complications, likelihood of return to the operating room, and operative time.

Current and future perspectives on the utility of provocative tests of anal sphincter function: A state-of-the-art summary.

BACKGROUND: The maintenance of fecal continence depends upon coordinated interactions between the pelvic floor, anorectum, and anal sphincter complex orchestrated by central and peripheral neural activities. The current techniques to objectively measure anorectal function rely on fixed diameter catheters placed inside the anal canal with a rectal balloon to obtain measurements of anal resting and squeeze function, and rectal compliance. Until recently it had not been possible to measure the distensibility of the anal canal, or in other words its ability to resist opening against an increasing pressure, which has been proposed as the main determinant of a biological sphincter's function. Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) and the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are two novel, provocative techniques that dynamically assess the anal sphincter complex under volume-controlled distension. In doing so, both provide information on the viscoelastic properties of the anal canal and offer new insights into its function. PURPOSE: This review details the current and potential future applications of AAR and FLIP and highlights the unanswered questions relevant to these new technologies.

Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal excision of rectum has been associated with poor oncological specimens and high local recurrence rates in comparison with restorative surgery. The role of recent changes in operative position has yet to be evaluated. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether a change in the perineal phase from the Lloyd-Davies position to the prone jackknife position might improve excision margins and oncological outcomes. METHODS: A single-institution review of a prospectively maintained database comparing the quality of excision and oncological outcomes after abdominoperineal excision in conventional and prone position was performed. Consecutive abdominoperineal excisions performed for adenocarcinoma of the rectum between January 1999 and April 2008 were included. RESULTS: Abdominoperineal excision cases were assessed including 63 in the Lloyd-Davies position and 58 in the prone jackknife position. The 5-year local recurrence rate was 5% in the prone jackknife group in comparison with 23% in the Lloyd-Davies group (p = 0.03) by life table analysis. For local recurrence, the most significant and independent risk factors were a favorable effect of having the patient in the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.81) and, unfavorably, a positive circumferential resection margin (HR 7.1; 95% CI 2.4-20). Lymph node involvement (N2) was an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR 4.6; 95% CI 2.1-9.5) and relapse of disease (HR 4.0; 95% CI 0.7-9.4). LIMITATIONS: This study has some limitations because it is a retrospective review of a prospective database. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the rate of local recurrence after abdominoperineal excision may be lowered by adaptation of the prone jackknife position.

Sacral neuromodulation for the management of severe constipation: development of a constipation treatment protocol.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common multifactorial gastrointestinal symptom with quality of life implications. Sacral neuromodulation has been used in the management of severe constipation with mixed results. The aim of this study was to review our experience of sacral neuromodulation as a treatment for chronic constipation and develop a chronic constipation management protocol. METHODS: In patients with severe constipation, failure of conservative management including biofeedback and rectal irrigation were considered for neuromodulation. Temporary stimulation lead was placed in the sacral foramen of eligible patients and pre and post stimulation bowel diaries were compared. Patients with ≥50% improvement in bowel diaries had permanent implant. Patients were followed up at 2 and 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly with bowel diaries. RESULTS: Temporary neuromodulation wires were implanted in 21 patients (20 female). Significant bowel diary improvement was seen in 12 (57%) patients (p < 0.01). Eleven permanent implants have been performed. Improvement in symptoms was lost in one patient. No major side effects were observed. Three patients have had reoperations (one wire fracture, one reposition of battery, and one poor initial lead placement). Improvements in bowel diaries have been maintained over a median follow-up period of 38 months (18-62 months). CONCLUSION: Sacral neuromodulation can provide long-term symptom relief in selected patients with severe constipation. Sacral neuromodulation should be incorporated into the treatment algorithm for chronic constipation.

The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes. RESULTS: Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30-82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.

Early results of a rotation flap to treat chronic anal fissures.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of anal fissures has changed dramatically in the past decade. This is primarily due to a better understanding of its pathophysiology and the implications of the various available options. Only a few anal fissures fail to respond to medical therapy. Sphincterotomy and anal dilatation have fallen out of favour due to the risk of incontinence. Island flaps have been proposed to address this, but 60-70% of the flap donor sites break down with complications. We propose using a rotation flap to overcome this problem. METHODS: A local rotation flap from perianal skin was used to fill the fissure defect in 14 patients who were followed up for a period of 6 months to determine fissure healing and incidence of donor site breakdown. RESULTS: Twelve patients had complete resolution of their symptoms. Of two patients who developed fissure recurrence, one also had dehiscence of the donor site. There were no donor site complications in the remaining patients. No patient suffered continence defects as a result of the surgery. CONCLUSION: Rotation flap is a simple, safe and appropriate modality for treating chronic anal fissures. Donor site problems are avoided using this approach. It should be the treatment of choice, particularly in patients who are at risk of incontinence.

Local excision of rectal tumors.

Local excision is increasingly being used to treat rectal cancer. It appears to be an attractive option because of low morbidity and excellent functional results. Controversies remain regarding available techniques, selection criteria and results with or without adjuvant therapy. Role of salvage therapy remains uncertain. This review examines available evidence in an attempt to clarify the role of local excision in the management of rectal cancer.

Baseline quality of life factors predict long term survival after elective resection for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an association between baseline quality of life (Qol) and survival in advanced cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate their predictive value in long term survival after elective colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery for nonmetastatic disease were recruited in 2003/04. Patients completed standardized quality of life questionnaires (HADS, FACTC, MRS, and PANAS) prior to and 6 weeks after surgery. Univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazards) were performed to predict long term survival. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-five (67%) were male and the median age of the group was 70 years. Forty-six (47.5%) patients had died and the mean survival was 1,741 days (median 2159, range 9-2923 days). Preoperative mood rating scale and functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal FACT C emotional well-being and postoperative FACT C additional concerns were independent predictors of long term survival. CONCLUSION: Incorporating psychosocial measures in preoperative assessment of cancer patients could help to identify patients who require assessment with a view to implementing psychosocial interventions. These active interventions to maximize mood and well-being should form an integral part of multidisciplinary treatment in these patients.