Successful management of noncirrhotic hyperammonemia syndrome after kidney transplantation from putative Ureaplasma infection.

Noncirrhotic hyperammonemia (NCH) is a rare but often fatal complication of solid organ transplantation. We present a case wherein an infectious cause of NCH was suspected following kidney transplantation (KT) and the patient was promptly started on empirical antibiotic treatment which proved to be lifesaving. A 56-year-old Chinese woman with a past medical history of end-stage renal disease secondary to ischemic nephropathy and cerebrovascular accident received a kidney from a 52-year-old brain-dead donor with a Kidney Donor Profile Index score of 70%. She experienced immediate graft function and was discharged on post-operative day (POD) 4. On POD 10, she presented with a fever, acute onset of confusion, and abdominal pain. Her mental status deteriorated and required emergent intubation. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated. On hospital day 3, a serum ammonia was 889 µmol/L (normal <53 µmol/L). A urine sample was sent for Ureaplasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and moxifloxacin and doxycycline were empirically started. Her ammonia rapidly normalized, and her mental status improved 48 hours after antibiotic initiation. She was extubated 5 days into treatment and was discharged after an 11-day hospitalization. Following discharge, her urine test resulted positive for Ureaplasma parvum or Ureaplasma urealyticum DNA detection with the 16S rRNA gene amplification probe. Mental status changes and hyperammonemia in the first 30 days post-KT should raise suspicion for NCH, and prompt empiric treatment with antimicrobials covering Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma should be considered.

Intravenous Acetaminophen for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Living Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a common complication of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomies (LLDNs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intravenous (IV) acetaminophen administration post-LLDN influenced length of stay (LOS) when used for pain management. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study compared patients undergoing LLDN who had received IV acetaminophen for pain control versus those who did not between June 1, 2011, and November 30, 2015. Patient LOS, 30-day readmissions, frequency of pain assessments, patient-reported pain scores, and opioid administration were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included in the analysis (IV acetaminophen, n = 48; non-IV acetaminophen, n = 42). Patients who did not receive IV acetaminophen were more often older (48.8 ± 12.1 vs 39.3 ± 12.1 years; P = 0.012) and female (71.4% vs 47.9%; P < 0.001). The average LOS was similar between the 2 groups (median = 3.0; interquartile range = [3, 4] vs 3.5 [3, 4]; P = 0.737). The 30-day readmissions were higher in the IV acetaminophen group (16.7%) compared with the group not receiving IV acetaminophen (2.4%; P = 0.033). After the first postoperative day, the frequencies of pain assessments performed were similar among the 2 groups. There was no difference in average pain scores between the groups at any time after LLDN. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving IV acetaminophen were found to have no improvements in hospital LOS, average pain score, or opioid requirements compared with patients not receiving IV acetaminophen. Patients who received IV acetaminophen were also found to have a higher 30-day readmission rate.

Evaluation of Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus After Liver Transplantation: Assessment of Insulin Administration as a Risk Factor.

BACKGROUND: Impaired glucose regulation posttransplantation can affect allograft survival and may lead to the development of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study is to assess the difference in insulin burden between liver transplant patients who develop PTDM and patients who do not. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Adult liver transplant recipients transplanted between January 1, 2005, and August 1, 2013, were included. PTDM was defined as: (1) use of an oral antihyperglycemic agent for ≥30 consecutive days after transplant, (2) use of insulin ≥30 consecutive days after transplant, or (3) hemoglobin A1C≥6.5 any time after transplant. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients included, 48 (42%) developed PTDM. The average 24-hour insulin requirement on the medical floors was 17.2 ± 14.5 units in the PTDM group and 11.3 ± 12.2 units in the PTDM-free group;P= 0.02. The average blood glucose level on the medical floor was 184.7 ± 31.5 mg/dL in the PTDM group and 169.3 ± 31.4 mg/dL in the PTDM-free group;P= 0.013. Multivariate analysis revealed that experiencing rejection was positively associated with the development of PTDM: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.237; 95% CI = 1.214-8.633. Basiliximab was negatively associated with the development of PTDM: AOR = 0.182; 95% CI = 0.040-0.836. CONCLUSION: Univariate analyses suggest that insulin burden is a positive risk factor for the development of PTDM; this association is lost in multivariate analyses. Rejection was a positive predictor, and use of basiliximab was a negative predictor for the development of PTDM.

The utility of recanalized umbilical vein graft to the hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeon.

BACKGROUND: The authors recently published their experience of recanalizing umbilical veins in deceased liver donors, with recanalized umbilical veins as vascular conduits for meso-Rex bypass procedures. They have since found recanalized umbilical veins to be an excellent, easy to harvest vascular conduit that can be used for multiple vascular procedures and repair. Here, they report their experience using this vessel for bypass and vascular reconstruction. METHODS: They have recanalized umbilical veins and used them in a total of 5 Meso-Rex bypasses; 5 pancreaticoduodenectomies; 1 left hepatic trisegmentectomy with right portal vein (PV) resection and reconstruction; 1 right hepatectomy and 1 adrenalectomy, both with partial inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and reconstruction; 1 coronary-Rex bypass shunt for extrahepatic PV thrombosis; and 1 orthotopic liver transplantation with infrahepatic IVC anastomotic dehiscence patched with umbilical vein graft. Umbilical veins were dilated mechanically and used in situ for the meso-Rex bypass surgery; they were ligated in the space of Rex and then dilated ex vivo otherwise to be used as interposition grafts or a vein patch. RESULTS: A total of 15 hepato-pancreato-biliary procedures were done using the recanalized umbilical vein as graft; 2 patients required thrombectomy postoperatively with reexploration, venotomy, thrombectomy with fogarty catheter, and venotomy closure. CONCLUSION: The umbilical vein graft is a fine vascular conduit and can serve many purposes in hepatobiliary surgery.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Ethnic Minorities in the United States After Liver Transplantation: Parsing the Hispanic Paradox.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionally affected by end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, disparities in referrals to liver transplantation (LT), organ allocation, and posttransplant outcomes exist in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients over the age of 18 years undergoing LT in the United States using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 2002 to 2016. We evaluated factors associated with patient and graft outcomes and explored the effect of race and ethnicity along with social variables. RESULTS: During the study time period, 78,999 patients received LT. Of these, 60,102 were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 7988 were African American (AA), and 10,909 were Hispanic. AA had significantly lower patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival at both 1 and 5 years when compared to NHW. Conversely, at 1 and 5 years, patient survival and graft survival were significantly higher for Hispanics compared to NWH. In addition, AA had significantly lower survival outcomes compared to Hispanics. On multivariate analysis after controlling for race/ethnicity, age, AA race, diagnosis, and deceased donor were independent risk factors for patient death and graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite socioeconomic disadvantages seen among Hispanics, this population appears to have improved short- and long-term survival after LT compared to NHW and AA.

Donor-Recipient Matching to Optimize the Utility of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Kidneys.

BACKGROUND: In December 2014, the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was developed to give more precise information on donor kidney quality. Kidneys with KDPI scores ≥ 85 (K ≥ 85) have been reported to have inferior outcomes to kidneys with KDPI scores < 85. METHODS: After the implementation of the new Kidney Allocation System, we developed a protocol to evaluate K ≥ 85 use. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of our institutional criteria and evaluated post-transplant outcomes. K ≥ 85 recipients were stratified based on their 1-year creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates to elucidate characteristics associated with serum creatinine < 1.7 mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rates ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: From December 2014 to December 2019, 304 deceased donor kidney transplants were performed at Hartford Hospital; 58 (19%) were K ≥ 85 with an average KDPI of 91%. There were 4 graft losses; 2 were death censored. Prolonged cold ischemia time and black recipient race were associated with inferior recipient graft function at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: High KDPI kidney use requires a multifaceted evaluation that takes into account donor and recipient characteristics for an ideal match. We have identified several characteristics that may predict optimal post-transplant kidney function.

A peer-based intervention to educate liver transplant candidates about living donor liver transplantation.

The number of liver donors has not measurably increased since 2004 and has begun to decrease. Although many waitlisted patients may be suitable candidates to receive a living donor graft, they are often reticent to discuss living donation with close friends and family, partly because of a lack of knowledge about donor health and quality of life outcomes after donation. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of an educational intervention that uses testimonials and self-report data from living donors in New York State. The study had an independent sample pretest (n = 437) and posttest (n = 338) design with posttest, between-subjects comparison for intervention exposure. All waitlisted patients at 5 liver transplant centers in New York were provided a peer-based educational brochure and DVD either by mail or at the clinic. The outcome measures were liver candidates' knowledge and self-efficacy to discuss living donation with family and friends. The number and proportion of individuals who presented to centers for living liver donation evaluation were also measured. Liver transplant candidates' self-efficacy to discuss living donation and their knowledge increased from the pretest period to the posttest period. Those exposed to the peer-based intervention reported significantly greater knowledge, a greater likelihood of discussing donation, and increased self-efficacy in comparison with those not exposed to the intervention. The results did not differ by age, length of time on the waiting list, education, or ethnicity. In comparison with the preintervention period, living donation increased 42%, and the number of individuals who presented for donation evaluation increased by 74%.

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria. Results of liver resection, salvage transplantation, and primary liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus regarding the best treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis and HCC beyond Milan who had undergone liver resection (LR) or primary orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between November 1995 and December 2005 were included in this study. Pathological tumor staging was based on the American Liver Tumor Study Group modified Tumor-Node-Metastasis classification. RESULTS: A total of 23 HCC patients were primarily treated by means of LR, 5 of whom eventually underwent salvage OLT. An additional 32 patients underwent primary OLT. The overall actuarial survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 35% after LR, and 69% and 60%, respectively, after primary OLT. Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was significantly higher after OLT (65%) than after LR (26%). Of the patients who underwent LR, 11 (48%) experienced HCC recurrence only in the liver; 6 of these 11 presented with advanced HCC recurrence, poor medical status, or short disease-free intervals and were not considered for transplantation. Salvage OLT was performed in 5 patients with early stage recurrence (45% of patients with hepatic recurrence after LR and 22% of all patients who underwent LR). At a median of 18 months after salvage OLT, all 5 patients are alive, 4 are free of disease, and 1 developed HCC recurrence 16 months after salvage OLT. CONCLUSION: For patients with HCC beyond Milan criteria, multimodality treatment-including LR, salvage OLT, and primary OLT-results in long-term survival in half of the patients. When indicated, LR can optimize the use of scarce donor organs by leaving OLT as a reserve option for early stage HCC recurrence.

Clostridium paraputrificum septicemia and liver abscess.

We report the first case of a healthy 23-year-old female who underwent an interventional radiology-guided embolization of a hepatic adenoma, which resulted in a gas forming hepatic liver abscess and septicemia by Clostridium paraputrificum. A retrospective review of Clostridial liver abscesses was performed using a PubMed literature search, and we found 57 clostridial hepatic abscess cases. The two most commonly reported clostridial species are C. perfringens and C. septicum (64.9% and 17.5% respectively). C. perfringens cases carried a mortality of 67.6% with median survival of 11 h, and 70.2% of the C. perfringens cases experienced hemolysis. All C. septicum cases were found to have underlying liver malignancy at the time of the presentation with a mortality of only 30%. The remaining cases were caused by various Clostridium species, and this cohort's clinical course was significantly milder when compared to the above C. perfringens and C. septicum cohorts.

Current outcomes and indications for cryopreserved vein allografts in hemodialysis access surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Cryopreserved vein allografts (cadaveric vein) have emerged as an option for arteriovenous graft reconstruction; however, indications for their use in hemodialysis access remains to be clearly defined. Observations from our own experience have suggested that cadaveric vein grafts (CVGs) provide good outcomes, particularly in patients with a history of infection, recurrent access failure and advanced age. METHODS: This is a 10-year retrospective study. Primary outcomes were (1) to identify characteristics specific to this patient population and (2) to better define indications for use of cadaveric vein in hemodialysis access creation. RESULTS: Indications for creation of CVGs included patient history of either active or recent infection (41.5%), recurrent access failure (43.4%) or surgeon preference secondary to patients' advanced age (9.4%). Observed primary patency rates were 84.9% (30 days), 22.6% (1 year) and 16.0% (2 years). Secondary patency was 93.4% (30 days), 66.0% (1 year) and 52.8% (2 years). Patient death was the highest cause of graft abandonment (52.9%) followed by thrombosis (19.1%), infection (11.7%) and rupture (11.7%). CVG patency at the time of patient death was 83.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of both primary and secondary patency in CVGs are highly comparable to the reported patency rates of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts and allow for lifelong maintenance of dialysis access. Our observed outcome suggests that CVGs should be considered for patients needing vascular access in the presence of infection. CVGs may likewise be viable alternatives to PTFE grafts in the elderly and patients with limited access options.

Quality of life after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants are being increasingly performed. Although considerable data are available on the quality of life after kidney donation, there is little comparable information on liver donors. METHODS: Between August 1998 and July 2000, 48 adults received liver grafts from living donors. At least 2 months after donation, donors were mailed a structured questionnaire and the standardized Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), a generic measure assessing health-related quality of life outcomes using eight scales: mental health, emotional limits, vitality, social function, physical function, physical limits, pain, general health. RESULTS: Thirty donors (62.5%) responded at a mean of 280+/-157 days after donation. Fifteen (50%) of their recipients had major complications (two deaths, four retransplants, nine biliary complications). Regarding overall satisfaction, all said they would donate again. Compared to published U.S. norms (n=2474), our group of donors scored higher than the general population in seven of eight domains on the SF-36. Donors whose recipients had no complications scored significantly higher in mental health (P<0.007) and general health (P<0.008) compared with U.S. norms. Donors whose recipients had major complications scored significantly lower on the mental health scale than those with recipients without major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Donors did not regret their decision to donate; several felt the experience had changed their lives for the better. Donors scored as well as or better than U.S. norms in general health. Quality of life after donation must remain a primary outcome measure when we consider the utility of living-donor liver transplants.

An integrated approach to intestinal failure: results of a new program with total parenteral nutrition, bowel rehabilitation, and transplantation.

Intestinal failure can be treated with bowel rehabilitation, total parenteral nutrition, or intestinal transplantation. Little has been done to integrate these therapies for patients with intestinal insufficiency or failure and to develop an algorithm for appropriate use and timing. We established a multidisciplinary program using bowel rehabilitation, total parenteral nutrition, or intestinal transplantation as appropriate in a large population. Evaluation included clinical, pathologic, and psychosocial assessments and assignment to therapy based on the results of this evaluation. Of 59 patients evaluated for life-threatening complications of intestinal failure, 68% were considered appropriate candidates for transplantation, 10% were managed with rehabilitation, and 17% were maintained on optimized long-term parenteral nutrition. Nineteen transplants were performed, with 78% patient survival and 66% graft survival. Patient survival among isolated intestine recipients was 90%. All patients managed with rehabilitation were weaned from parenteral nutrition within 6 months. Long-term management with parenteral nutrition resulted in a significant number of deaths both among patients waiting for a transplant and those who were poor candidates for transplant. Intestinal rehabilitation, when successful, is optimal. For patients with irreversible intestinal failure, isolated intestinal transplantation holds particular promise. Parenteral nutrition is plagued by high failure rates among this population of debilitated patients compared with the general parenteral nutrition population. Integration of these therapies, with individualization of care based on a multidisciplinary approach and perhaps with earlier isolated intestinal transplantation for patients with irreversible intestinal failure, should optimize survival.

Recanalized umbilical vein conduit for meso-Rex bypass in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Meso-Rex bypass is used to treat patients with clinically important extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). Usually, an autologous left internal jugular vein graft is used to bypass the portal blood circulation from the superior mesenteric vein to the left portal vein. Other vascular conduits have included the autogenous saphenous vein, splenic vein, right gastroepiploic vein, and inferior mesenteric vein. METHODS: A total of 20 umbilical veins with attached livers were harvested from 20 deceased liver donors. Umbilical veins were dilated mechanically and checked for patency and communication with the left portal vein. Vein length and diameter after dilatation were recorded. Cross-sections of 15 recanalized umbilical veins were processed by routine histologic examination and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, as well as processed by immunohistochemistry for CD31 and factor VIII antigens. Subsequently, 3 children with EHPVO underwent this modified meso-Rex bypass using the umbilical vein as a vascular conduit. RESULTS: The mean length of harvested umbilical veins was 15 cm (range, 7-21); the mean length of recanalized and usable umbilical veins was 10 cm (range, 5-15). Recanalization was successful in 16 (80%) of the 20 donor umbilical veins. The mean diameter of the umbilical veins after serial dilatation and recanalization was 1.2 cm (range, 1-2). In 11 (73%) of the 15 recanalized vein specimens, the lumen was lined by endothelial cells. In 2 children, the vascular conduit was constructed entirely with native umbilical vein. In the remaining child, 3 cm of umbilical vein was preserved and anastomosed to a mobilized inferior mesenteric vein due to inadequate length. All 3 children had patent bypass and resolution of clinical manifestations of portal hypertension at a mean follow-up of 21 months. CONCLUSION: Meso-Rex bypass may prove to be a definitive treatment for patients with EHPVO. The use of native umbilical vein as a vein conduit achieved decompression of the splanchnic venous system and should be considered a natural alternative to other interposition vein grafts.

Surgical dilemma: liver resection or liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Intention-to-treat analysis in patients within and outwith Milan criteria.

BACKGROUND: The optimal role of surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is in continuous evolution. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse survival rates after liver resection (LR) and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for HCC within and outwith Milan criteria in an intention-to-treat analysis. METHODS: During 1997-2007, 179 patients with cirrhosis and HCC either underwent LR (n= 60) or were listed for OLT (n= 119). Patients with incidental HCC after OLT, preoperative macrovascular invasion before LR, non-cirrhosis and Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis prior to OLT were eliminated, leaving 51 patients primarily treated with LR and 106 patients listed for primary OLT (84 of whom were transplanted) to be included in this analysis. A total of 66 patients fell outwith Milan criteria (26 LR, 40 OLT) and 91 continued to meet Milan criteria (25 LR, 66 OLT). RESULTS: The median length of follow-up was 26 months. The mean waiting time for OLT was 7 months. During that time, 21 patients were removed from the waiting list as a result of tumour progression. Probabilities of dropout were 2% and 13% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, for patients within Milan criteria, and 34% and 57% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, for patients outwith Milan criteria (P < 0.01). Tumour size >3 cm was found to be the independent factor associated with dropout (hazard ratio [HR] 6.0). Postoperative survival was slightly higher after OLT, but this was not statistically significant (64% for OLT vs. 57% for LR). Overall survival from time of listing for OLT or LR did not differ between the two groups (P= 0.9); for patients within Milan criteria, 1- and 4-year survival rates after LR were 88% and 61%, respectively, compared with 92% and 62%, respectively, after OLT (P= 0.54). For patients outwith Milan criteria, 1- and 4-year survival rates after LR were 69% and 54%, respectively, compared with 65% and 40%, respectively, after OLT (P= 0.42). Tumour size >3 cm was again found to be an independent factor for poor outcome (HR 2.4) in the intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates for patients with HCC are similar in LR and OLT. Liver resection can potentially decrease the dropout rate and serve as a bridge for future salvage LT, particularly in patients with tumours >3 cm.

Benefits of liver transplantation surgical techniques in the management of extensive retroperitoneal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The potential for massive hemorrhage imposes additional challenge in the management of retroperitoneal tumors. This report details technical considerations for the management of upper retroperitoneal tumors using principles of liver transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent surgery for extensive retroperitoneal tumors using techniques for liver transplantation from December 2002 to November 2007 was done. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (14 males and 10 females with a mean age 57 years) underwent major retroperitoneal surgery. Renal cell carcinoma was the most common tumor seen in 17 patients. Mean tumor dimension was 12.4 cm. Abdominal exposure was achieved via bilateral subcostal incision with upper midline extension. Right hepatic lobe mobilization and isolation from the inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed in 23 cases. Fourteen patients had IVC involvement by tumor thrombus, which was infrahepatic in six, retrohepatic in five, and intra-atrial in three patients. Tumor thrombus was removed by cavotomy in seven cases, resection and plasty in four cases, IVC graft reconstruction in two cases, and one patient required IVC and atrial graft reconstruction. Liver resection was needed in seven patients to achieve R0 resection. The Pringle maneuver was used in three patients; total liver vascular isolation with venovenous bypass was required in two cases, transdiaphragmatic intrapericardial IVC control in one case, and cardiopulmonary bypass in one patient. There was no intraoperative or postoperative mortality and mean length of stay was 13 days. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation surgical principles help achieve exposure and vascular control of major vascular structures that enable safe resection of these extensive retroperitoneal tumors.

Doppler ultrasonographic findings on hepatic arterial vasospasm early after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatic arterial vasospasm has not been well recognized clinically as a post-liver transplant vascular complication because of the lack of sufficient data and diagnostic standards. The goal of this study was to provide new evidence and a diagnostic model for the clinical appreciation of hepatic arterial vasospasm and evaluate the role of ultrasonography in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Nine post-orthotopic liver transplant cases were retrospectively reviewed. Multiple clinical measurements were analyzed. Routine Doppler ultrasonography was performed within 24 hours, and additional ultrasonographic examinations were conducted as indicated. Each of the 9 patients was given a single 10 mg dose of nifedipine sublingually and monitored by ultrasonography when vasospasm was suspected on the basis of the Doppler ultrasonographic results. RESULTS: Doppler ultrasonography showed high-resistance hepatic arterial flow with absence of antegrade flow and even reversal of flow during diastole both extrahepatically and intrahepatically in all cases. Ten to 45 minutes after administration of the vasodilator, antegrade diastolic flow was observed along the course of the main hepatic artery and its intrahepatic branches with the resistive indices decreasing on average from 1.0 to 0.76. In addition, the peak systolic velocities increased from 57 cm/s before nifedipine administration to 77 cm/s after administration. CONCLUSIONS: High-resistance hepatic arterial flow (resistive index = 1) early after liver transplantation is indicative of hepatic arterial vasospasm if it responds to vasodilators. Doppler ultrasonography is a useful tool for the diagnosis of this vascular complication.

Living-donor hepatectomy in right-sided round-ligament liver: importance of mapping the anatomy to the left medial segment.

Left-sided gallbladder (LSGB) and right-sided round ligament (RSRL) are very infrequent findings, mostly described in Oriental patients, that have associated anatomical variations. An abnormal portal vein branching, mainly to segment IV, is strongly associated with RSRL. Living-donor liver transplantation requires that both the graft and the remnant liver have adequate vascular supply and volumes. Abnormal vascularization of segment IV then threatens this goal. There have been scarce reports of the feasibility of living-donor hepatectomy under these conditions, all in Oriental populations. We present a case of an Occidental living liver donor with RSRL, and discuss the associated anatomical variations of the portal vascular supply of the liver, with its implications in planning a living-donor hepatectomy.

Potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity by phenytoin, leading to liver transplantation.

We report the case of a 22-year-old man who developed fulminant hepatic failure 3 days after an intentional acetaminophen overdose. The patient had a history of a seizure disorder for which he was taking phenytoin. The acetaminophen level at presentation was in the "nontoxic" range. Emergent liver transplantation was performed 4 days after the ingestion. This is the first reported case of successful liver transplantation for acetaminophen-induced fulminant hepatic failure in the setting of phenytoin therapy.

Intrapericardial control of the inferior vena cava from the abdominal cavity.

Vascular isolation of the liver is a useful technique in major hepatic surgery that involves hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava. In some patients, exposure of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava is suboptimal from the abdominal cavity, and extension into the chest is required. This report details technical considerations of the control of the inferior vena cava within the pericardium from the abdominal cavity, through a vertical incision in the diaphragm, and without the need for a thoracic incision. We review the clinical situations when a transdiaphragmatic, intrapericardial access of the inferior vena cava should be considered.

Long-term results with multimodal adjuvant therapy and liver transplantation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 centimeters.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring 5 cm or larger treated in a multimodality adjuvant protocol. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Transplant has been established as a viable treatment of HCC measuring less than 5 cm, but the results for larger tumors have been disappointing. Several studies have shown promising preliminary results when combining transplant with preoperative transarterial chemoembolization and/or perioperative systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced HCC that is not amenable to resection. However, follow-up in the studies has been limited and the number of patients has been small. METHODS: Beginning in October 1991, all patients with unresectable HCC measuring 5 cm or larger, as measured by computed tomography, were considered for enrollment in the authors' multimodality protocol. Entry criteria required that all patients be free of extrahepatic disease based on computed tomography scans of the chest and abdomen and bone scan and have a patent main portal vein and major hepatic veins on duplex ultrasonography. Patients received subselective arterial chemoembolization with mitomycin C, doxorubicin, and cisplatin at the time of diagnosis, repeated as necessary based on tumor response. Patients received a single systemic intraoperative dose of doxorubicin (10 mg/m(2)) before revascularization of the new liver and systemic doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks as tolerated, for a total of six cycles, beginning on the sixth postoperative week. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled; 37 were eventually excluded, due mainly to disease progression while on the waiting list, and 43 underwent liver transplant. Mean pathologic tumor diameter was 5.8 +/- 2.7 cm. Median follow-up of surviving transplanted patients was 55.1 +/- 24.9 months. There were two (4.7%) perioperative deaths. Median overall survival was significantly longer in transplanted patients (49.9 +/- 10.42 months) than in those who were excluded (6.83 +/- 1.34 months). Overall and recurrence-free survival rates in transplanted patients at 5 years were 44% and 48%, respectively. A tumor size larger than 7 cm and the presence of vascular invasion correlated significantly with recurrence. Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was significantly higher for the 32 patients with tumors measuring 5 to 7 cm (55%) than the 12 patients with tumors larger than 7 cm (34%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with HCC measuring 5 cm or larger can achieve long-term survival after liver transplantation in the context of multimodal adjuvant therapy. Patients with tumors measuring 5 to 7 cm have significantly longer recurrence-free survival compared with those with larger tumors.