Evaluation of antibiotic appropriateness at an outpatient oncology centre.

Current evidence supporting antimicrobial stewardship programs focused largely in inpatient setting. With the shift in cancer management from inpatient to ambulatory setting, it is crucial to examine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate antibiotics prescribing. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS). Patients at least 21 years, with an active or past cancer diagnosis and prescribed with at least one oral antibiotic by a NCCS physician from 1st July to 30th September 2019 were included. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed using institutional antibiotic guidelines or published clinical practice guidelines. For cases where antibiotics appropriateness cannot be ascertained using these guidelines, an independent three-member expert panel was consulted. A total of 815 patients were screened; 411 (59.4% females) were included with mean age of 62.4 years. The top three cancer diagnoses were breast (26.5%), lung (15.6%) and head and neck (13.6%). More than half (58.6%) received appropriate antibiotic choice. Of which, 235 (97.5%), 238 (98.8%) and 194 (80.5%) received appropriate dose, frequency and duration respectively. The presence of non-oncologic immunosuppressive comorbidities (OR 4.890, 95% CI 1.556-15.369, p-value = 0.007), antibiotic allergy (OR 2.352, 95% CI 1.178-4.698, p-value = 0.015) and skin and soft tissue infections (OR 2.004, 95% CI 1.276-3.146, p-value = 0.003) were associated with a higher incidence of inappropriate antibiotic choice. This study highlighted that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is prevalent in the ambulatory oncology setting. Predicators identified can aid in the design of targeted strategies to optimise antibiotic use in ambulatory oncology patients.

Symptom burden and medication use in adult sarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Limited data are available on how symptom burden affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with sarcoma. This study aims to describe the symptom burden, HRQoL, and medication use in adult sarcoma patients. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted, and 79 patients were evaluated using three tools: the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale-General (FACT-G). Patients' demographic and clinical information, medication history, and use of concomitant medications were recorded. The proportion of patients with clinically significant RSCL score for a particular symptom was compared with the percentage of patients receiving medication for that symptom. RESULTS: The mean age was 57.3 ± 15.2 years, with majority of the patients diagnosed with stromal tumor (46.8 %), leiomyosarcoma (15.2 %), and liposarcoma (10.1 %). The most prevalent physical symptoms experienced were tiredness (2.38 ± 1.00), lack of energy (2.04 ± 1.02), and difficulty sleeping (2.00 ± 1.15). The most common psychological symptoms experienced were irritability (1.92 ± 1.01), worrying (1.86 ± 0.90), and anxiety (1.68 ± 0.74). Few (6.3 %) patients received hypnotics while 33.0 % of patients reported difficulty sleeping. A proportion of patients (27.9 %) reported experiencing lack of appetite with only 1.3 % received appetite stimulants. CONCLUSION: Adult sarcoma patients experience significant physiological and psychological symptom burden, which has a strong negative impact on HRQoL, with a number of physiological symptoms undertreated with pharmacotherapy.

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments of dermatologic adverse events associated with targeted cancer therapies.

PURPOSE: Dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) in cancer treatment are frequent with the use of targeted therapies. These dAEs have been shown to have significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While standardized assessment tools have been developed for physicians to assess severity of dAEs, there is a discord between objective and subjective measures. The identification of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments useful in the context of targeted cancer therapies is therefore important in both the clinical and research settings for the overall evaluation of dAEs and their impact on HRQoL. METHODS: A comprehensive, systematic literature search of published articles was conducted by two independent reviewers in order to identify PRO instruments previously utilized in patient populations with dAEs from targeted cancer therapies. The identified PRO instruments were studied to determine which HRQoL issues relevant to dAEs were addressed, as well as the process of development and validation of these instruments. RESULTS: Thirteen articles identifying six PRO instruments met the inclusion criteria. Four instruments were general dermatology (Skindex-16©, Skindex-29©, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DIELH-24) and two were symptom-specific (functional assessment of cancer therapy-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-18 (FACT-EGFRI-18) and hand-foot syndrome 14 (HFS-14)). CONCLUSIONS: While there are several PRO instruments that have been tested in the context of targeted cancer therapy, additional work is needed to develop new instruments and to further validate the instruments identified in this study in patients receiving targeted therapies.

Clinical pharmacy services and research for lymphoma patients at a cancer center.

At the National Cancer Centre Singapore, which is currently the largest ambulatory cancer centre in Singapore, clinical pharmacists have taken upon responsibilities to provide direct pharmaceutical care in the center's lymphoma team since 2006. Given the complexity and intricacies of lymphoma treatments, clinical pharmacists are often positioned to ensure supportive care is optimized among these patients. Besides management of chemotherapy-related and supportive care issues, clinical pharmacists play a pivotal role in guiding cost-effective and safe prescribing. In collaboration with the medical team, they are also involved in conducting practice research in order to optimize the delivery of pharmaceutical care. In this report, the dedicated services and research activities conducted by clinical pharmacists of a lymphoma team will be discussed.

Feasibility and acceptance of a pharmacist-run tele-oncology service for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in ambulatory cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine for cancer patients is limited, particularly in Asia. These patients need to be monitored because more are being treated as outpatients, so that any treatment-related side effects can be managed. We assessed the feasibility and acceptance of a pharmacist-run tele-oncology service to monitor chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in ambulatory cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center, prospective study was conducted at a local cancer center. Patients' CINV symptoms were monitored through short message service (SMS) for 5 days post-chemotherapy. Feasibility was measured by patients' adherence to the service, patient satisfaction, and number of pharmacist interventions. Acceptance was measured by the accrual rate. RESULTS: The accrual rate was 37.6% (68/181 patients). Sixty patients (median age, 49.5 years) completed the study. Overall adherence was 73.3%. The majority (90.0%) were comfortable with the duration of SMS monitoring, especially adherent patients (95.5% versus 75.0%, p=0.038). Over half (61.7%) found the SMS advice useful. Twenty-two intervention calls were made by pharmacists for uncontrolled CINV. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-run tele-oncology service for real-time monitoring of CINV is feasible in ambulatory cancer patients. Incorporating the monitoring of other side effects will enhance its value and acceptance by patients for post-chemotherapy symptom management.

Clinical outcomes for cancer patients using complementary and alternative medicine.

CONTEXT: Over half of cancer patients in Singapore use some form of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) to improve their immunity and general health status. The effectiveness of CAM, however, in reducing acute complications is currently unknown. Concerns also exist as to whether CAM may cause toxic effects in patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in general health status, immunity, and organ function over a 6-month period in CAM and non-CAM users with cancer. DESIGN: The authors designed a single-center, retrospective cohort study. The patients had participated previously in a cross-sectional prevalence survey about the types of oral CAM they were using in addition to chemotherapy. The authors used the data from the survey and clinical and medication-use information from patients' medical and pharmaceutical records to complete the current study. SETTING: The study occurred at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS), which is the largest ambulatory cancer center in Singapore and treats two-thirds of the solid-tumor patients in Singapore. The study excluded patients if their medical records were incomplete and/or if the patients had not received any cytotoxic or targeted therapies at the time of survey. PARTICIPANTS: The authors reviewed the records of a total of 403 patients and excluded 46 patients because their records were missing (n=20) or because they had not received any form of anticancer treatment at the time of survey (n=26). They included 357 patients in the current study. The authors did not contact patients for this follow-up study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The authors collected data on clinical characteristics for each patient and assessed the differences between each characteristic at baseline (at the time of the survey) and at 6 months after baseline measurement. The authors evaluated clinical characteristics using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. RESULTS: As a whole, CAM use provided an absolute reduction of infection episodes by 11.9% (P=.045) and of antibiotic use by 10.3% (P=.022). Subgroup analysis showed a reduction of documented infection by 17.9% (P=.02) and a 13% decrease in hospitalizations due to infections (P=.043) among metastatic cancer patients who used CAM. CAM usage was not associated with significant changes of hepatic and renal function. CONCLUSION: CAM use in patients with cancer was associated with a reduction in hospitalizations and requirements for antibiotics. CAM use was not associated with significant changes in hepatic and renal function. There is a need for well-designed, prospective clinical studies to confirm these findings.

Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Data from US Oncology Adjuvant Trial 9735 has shown that four cycles of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (TC) improved disease-free and overall survival when compared against doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in early-stage breast cancer. The febrile neutropenia (FN) rate was 4% in this study without primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) prophylaxis. However, the incidence of docetaxel-induced myelosuppression is recognized to be higher among Asian population. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the impact of G-CSF to reduce FN-related events in Asian cancer patients treated with TC. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on Asian breast cancer patients who have received intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) between 2006 to 2008. Patients did not receive oral antibiotic prophylaxis, and prophylactic G-CSF after chemotherapy was prescribed under the discretion of the primary oncologist. RESULTS: During cycle 1 of chemotherapy, 6.3% patients received G-CSF manifested FN, while 25% patients who did not receive G-CSF manifested FN (RR = 0.252, 95% CI 0.102 to 0.622). Introduction of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis provided an absolute risk reduction of FN events by 18.7%. Chemotherapy doses were maintained throughout all cycles. Patients with pretreatment white blood cell counts (WBC) below 6.0 × 10(3)/mm(3) and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) below 3.1 × 10(3)/mm(3) were associated with higher rates of FN during Cycle 1 (p = 0.009, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that TC was associated with higher rates of FN than reported in the clinical trial. The 25% incidence fulfills the requirement of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF. Routine administration of G-CSF is highly recommended to reduce the rates of FN in breast cancer patients receiving TC.

Clinical predictors of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer often receive emetogenic anthracycline-based chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been commonly reported as one of the distressing adverse effects among patients with cancer. Despite the advent of newer antiemetics and better understanding of the CINV pathophysiology, total eradication of CINV has yet to be achieved. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients who have breast cancer and are receiving adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) bolus chemotherapy, ascertain patients' risk factors affecting CINV response, and study patient adherence to delayed antiemetics. METHODS: This was a single-institution, prospective, observational study conducted at an outpatient cancer center in Singapore from December 2006 to December 2007. Clinical events such as CINV were collated using a standardized diary. Use of rescue antiemetics and unscheduled clinic visits due to CINV were documented. RESULTS: Of a total of 108 participants, 16 patients were lost to follow-up and 1 provided incomplete information; thus, 91 patients were included in the analysis. Delayed antiemetics were given according to the institution's guideline and only 9 (9.9%) patients received aprepitant. Neither acute nor delayed vomiting was reported by a majority of patients and only 4 (4.4%) experienced grade 3 vomiting. The incidence of severe nausea was highest on day 3 of chemotherapy and affected 14.3% of patients. Anxiety and history of chemotherapy-induced nausea were associated with both acute and delayed nausea, and history of motion sickness was associated with delayed vomiting. Approximately 65% of patients were adherent to their prescribed delayed antiemetics. CONCLUSIONS: Most of our patients adhered to their antiemetics and tolerated AC chemotherapy reasonably well, without vomiting; yet nausea persisted. To improve CINV control, clinicians must actively communicate with patients to facilitate accurate assessment of risk factors and CINV response and to encourage adherence to delayed antiemetics.

Successful therapeutic rechallenge after a severe episode of high dose methotrexate-induced choreoathetosis: A case report.

Methotrexate (MTX) is an essential chemotherapy drug used in the treatment of malignancies, but it is known to cause complications to the central nervous system. We report a case of severe MTX neurotoxicity in an adult presenting with choreoathetosis despite a normal clearance of MTX. High dose-MTX has been successfully rechallenged without any neurological sequelae. We reviewed the relevant literature of similar manifestations and summarized their clinical data, magnetic resonance imaging features and treatment given. None of them has recurrence of neurotoxicity. We concluded that it is safe to persist with MTX even after a previous episode of toxic leukoencephalopathy.

Economic Evaluation of Anastrozole Versus Tamoxifen for Early Stage Breast Cancer in Singapore.

OBJECTIVES: In Singapore, breast cancer is the leading female malignancy and its incidence has increased threefold over the past decades. For treatment of postmenopausal, hormone receptor positive early stage breast cancer, tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole are prescribed either as first-line therapy or sequentially. Currently, anastrozole is patented with a higher drug cost compared with tamoxifen. Hence, the aim of this study was to conduct an economic evaluation of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer. METHODS: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was developed by using results from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial. Direct medical costs were estimated by billing data obtained via financial electronic databases. Utility scores were elicited from 20 experienced oncology nurses using the visual analogue scale. Cost per quality-adjusted life-years was calculated by using the societal perspective. A discount rate of 3% for both charges (expressed in 2010 Singapore dollars) and benefits was used. RESULTS: At an additional cost of S $17,597, anastrozole treatment resulted in a gain of 0.085 life-year survival and 0.154 quality-adjusted life-year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of anastrozole was S $207,402 per life-year gained and S $114,061 per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared with tamoxifen. CONCLUSION: This is the first economic evaluation that used 10-year results from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial and utility elicited from the local population. If the World Health Organization's recommendation of 1 to 3 gross domestic product range is an acceptable threshold, anastrozole is deemed cost-effective compared with tamoxifen in the treatment of early stage breast cancer.

Health State Utility Assessment for Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To develop both English and Chinese versions of the descriptions of health states describing different stages of breast cancer and different adverse effects related to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer and 2) to elicit individuals' preferences for these health states from a group of oncology nurses. METHODS: Twenty hypothetical health states and their descriptions were developed on the basis of literature review and oncology expert panel reviews. Health state utilities were obtained from 20 oncology nurses by using the visual analogue scale and standard gamble methods. After recalibration, the adjusted utility scores were on a scale of 0 (dead) and 1 (perfect health). RESULTS: The health states developed represented different disease stages and the presence and type of treatment side effects in breast cancer. For each health state, various general health-related quality-of-life domains, such as pain/discomfort and ability to work, were included in the descriptions, along with a state-specific description. The mean utility score of respondents' "current health" was greater than 0.9, while mean adjusted visual analogue scale-derived utility scores ranged from 0.256 to 0.860 and median adjusted standard gamble-derived utility scores ranged from 0.284 to 0.673. Among the side effects evaluated in the "no recurrence" health state, ischemic cerebrovascular events, pulmonary embolism, and spine fracture had the greatest utility detriment. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate the value that individuals place on the avoidance of disease progression and the side effects of hormonal therapies in breast cancer. The health state descriptions developed can be used in future research to obtain society's utilities for use in a cost-utility analysis.

A prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and economic benefits of rapid infusion rituximab at an Asian cancer center.

Rituximab (Mabthera) is currently approved for the treatment of multiple subtypes of CD20-expressing, B-cell, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This study aimed to investigate whether rapid infusion of rituximab over 90 min is feasible without compromising patient's safety, and to reduce resource utilization at a cancer center. This is a prospective and open label study. Lymphoma patients who have received one cycle of rituximab without experiencing grade 3 or 4 infusional reaction were eligible for the rapid infusion of rituximab. Rapid infusion rituximab is infused over 90 min, with 20% of the dose given over the first 30 min and the remaining 80% over 60 min. A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study with a total of 269 infusions administered. Sixty-nine patients (87.3%) received rituximab in combination with chemotherapy. Average number of rituximab infusions administered to patients was 3.4 cycles. Rapid rituximab infusion schedule was well tolerated without any grade 3/4 infusion-related adverse events observed. An average amount of time saved per patient was 10.2 h. Rapid infusion rituximab over 90 min was well tolerated by patients, and shortened infusions have resulted in substantial reduction of resource utilization.

Evolving roles of oncology pharmacists in Singapore: a survey on prescribing patterns of antiemetics for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) at a cancer centre.

BACKGROUND: National Cancer Centre (NCC) is currently the largest ambulatory oncology treatment centre in Singapore that treats mainly solid tumors and lymphomas. Oncology pharmacists at NCC play an active role in the management of CINV. In order to improve the clinical services delivered by pharmacy, particularly in the utilization of antiemetics, pharmacy department conducted a survey that aimed to understand the prescribing patterns of antiemetics for CINV. OBJECTIVES: ves. The primary aim of this study was to describe medical oncologists' perceptions of factors that can influence prescribing of antiemetics for acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. A secondary aim was to assess medical oncologists' perception of antiemetic counseling by oncology pharmacists. METHODS: This was a single-centered, non-randomized survey conducted at NCC in Singapore. Twenty-seven oncologists in the Department of Medical Oncology (DMO) were invited to participate in this survey. Survey forms were distributed to the medical oncologists at weekly DMO and tumor board meetings in November 2006. RESULTS: Twenty oncologists returned surveys during the study period. Most oncologists closely adhered to the institution guideline on antiemetics utilization; however, results showed a trend of overprescribing acute antiemetics for low emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Oncologists have identified anxiety, age and gender as the top three patient risk factors taken into consideration when they prescribe antiemetics. Majority of oncologists found pharmacists' counseling on antiemetics to be effective. CONCLUSIONS: Through this survey, oncology pharmacists at NCC were able to identify areas of antiemetics utilization that needed refinement. Results from this survey provide opportunities for oncology pharmacists to collaborate with medical oncologists to further improve the management of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting.

Liposomal doxorubicin-associated acute hypersensitivity despite appropriate preventive measures.

Liposomal doxorubicin is becoming popular as a chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of multiple malignancies. This paper describes an episode of hypersensitivity reaction associated with the infusion of liposomal doxorubicin in an ovarian cancer patient, despite preventive measures being undertaken during her first cycle of chemotherapy. Clinicians may overlook the possibility of hypersensitivity reactions associated with liposomal doxorubicin because routine prophylaxis is not provided and reactions are infrequently observed in practice. Close monitoring during the first 15 min of infusion for signs of hypersensitivity should be mandatory for patients receiving their first dose of liposomal doxorubicin. Further research should identify patients who are at risk of experiencing such hypersensitivity.