Association between lung immune prognostic index and survival of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Lung immune prognostic index score (LIPI), calculated using the derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase level, is reported for use in numerous malignancies, while its role on metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with pembrolizumab remains limited. We aimed to investigate association between LIPI and outcomes in this setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 90 patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab at four institutions. The associations between three LIPI groups and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORRs) or disease control rates (DCRs) were assessed. RESULTS: Based on the LIPI, good, intermediate, and poor groups were observed in 41 (45.6%), 33 (36.7%), and 16 (17.8%) patients, respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly correlated with the LIPI (median PFS: 21.2 vs. 7.0 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.001; OS: 44.3 vs. 15.0 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001 in the LIPI good vs. intermediate vs. poor groups). Multivariable analysis further revealed that LIPI good (vs. intermediate or poor, hazard ratio: 0.44, p = 0.004) and performance status = 0 (p = 0.015) were independent predictors of a longer PFS. In addition, LIPI good (hazard ratio: 0.29, p < 0.001) were shown to be associated with a longer OS together with performance status = 0 (p < 0.001). The ORRs tended to be different among patients with Good LIPI compared with Poor, and DCRs were significantly different among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: LIPI, a simple and convenient score, could be a significant prognostic biomarker of OS, PFS, and DCRs for mUC treated with pembrolizumab.

Prognostic Impact of the Administration of Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Aim: The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Results: Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Conclusion: Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy.

Complex glomerular pathology of thrombotic microangiopathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis forms tumor-like mass in a renal transplant donor with severe renovascular hypertension.

The pathogenesis of glomerular hypertension-mediated FSGS and its histological variations in humans remains unknown. A 47-year-old man developed nephrotic syndrome, renal dysfunction, and malignant hypertension 2 years after donating a kidney to his son. The donor's remnant kidney developed renal mass at an upper pole which was fed by an aberrant artery that branched from the root of the renal artery. Furthermore, the main non-aberrant renal artery demonstrated severe stenosis that caused renovascular hypertension, resulting in malignant hypertension. Upon radiological examinations, a tumorous mass was detected. Because of progressive renal dysfunction, nephrectomy was performed. The kidney revealed a diffuse distribution of complex FSGS lesions, i.e., a random combination of cellular/collapsing FSGS and glomerular thrombotic microangiopathy, confined to the renal mass, whereas such lesions were absent in the non-mass portion. This indicated that severe glomerular hypertension alone caused FSGS with TMA features. Heterogeneous FSGS lesions let us surmise that glomerular hypertension promoted simultaneous damages in endothelial cells and podocytes, which synergistically progressed to glomerulosclerosis. This unique case uncovers causal relationships between unusual glomerular hypertension and severe forms of FSGS that was possibly caused by the disruption of homeostasis sustained by podocytes and endothelial cells.

Effect of post-transplant double filtration plasmapheresis on recurrent focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in renal transplant recipients.

In the present study, we reviewed the effect of post-transplant double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) on recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in the transplanted kidney allograft. Sixteen patients with post-transplant recurrent FSGS were enrolled in this study. Out of 16 patients with recurrent FSGS after transplantation, five did not receive DFPP and lost their grafts, while 11 did receive DFPP and four of these patients lost their grafts. Seven patients were able to maintain normal renal function for an average observation period of 57.1 +/- 40.7 months (range 7-125 months). In five patients who had a significant reduction in urinary protein after DFPP, the urinary protein level decreased from 26.60 +/- 23.05 g/day (range 3.34-62.6 g/day) to 2.95 +/- 3.42 g/day (range 0.02-8.64 g/day) and renal function was maintained. The beneficial effects of DFPP on graft outcome were more likely to occur if the patients experienced a marked drop in urinary excretion. Thus, post-transplant DFPP appears to be effective for reducing urinary protein levels and improving long-term graft survival. With the small numbers in this trial, however, none of the findings were statistically significant. We recommend the use of post-transplant DFPP to prevent the progression of recurrent FSGS.