RESUMO
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like nivolumab and pembrolizumab are effective treatments for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, they can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. We present a case of a 79-year-old male with recurrent maxillary squamous cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. The patient developed a fever, and pulmonary TB development was confirmed. Prolonged TB treatment was required, and ICI treatment was discontinued. The patient ultimately opted for palliative care due to aggressive tumor growth. TB development during ICI treatment is a rare but important concern, especially in TB-endemic areas. Vigilant monitoring and screening might be essential to manage this risk in cancer patients with R/M SCCHN receiving ICIs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely adapted for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (RM-HNC), and various studies on its prognostic factors have been reported. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors of ICI treatment for RM oral cancer (RM-OC) in a retrospective study. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with RM-OC treated with ICIs (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) at our department from May 2017 to February 2023. The objective response rate (ORR) for ICI treatment and the relationship between several potential prognostic factors, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The investigation enrolled 31 patients, 16 with nivolumab and 15 with pembrolizumab. There were no significant differences in the ORR or disease control rate between the nivolumab and pembrolizumab groups (p = 0.4578 and 0.2524). In multivariate analysis, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) exhibited statistical correlations with PFS, whereas the use of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and PNI demonstrated statistical associations with OS. CONCLUSION: Our findings imply that the use of antibiotics and PPIs, which can modify the gut microbiota, may also serve as a prognostic determinant for ICI treatment in RM-OC, consistent with previous studies. Additionally, PNI may be essential in affecting the survival rates of both PFS and OS and could be an exceedingly valuable inflammatory biomarker for RM-OC.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fluorescence visualization devices are screening devices that can be used to examine lesions of the oral mucosa non-invasively. We observed oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and leukoplakia using the IllumiScan (Shofu, Kyoto, Japan) fluorescence visualization device and examined its usefulness and characteristics. METHODS: We investigated 31 OSCC and nine leukoplakia in patients who were examined using the IllumiScan and treated in our department from January 2017 to February 2018. Images taken with the IllumiScan were analyzed using image analysis software. We also examined the lesions using narrowband imaging (NBI). Additionally, the IllumiScan and NBI images and the non-stained areas of iodine staining method (IOM) were visually evaluated. RESULTS: The average luminance of OSCC in the keratinized mucosa was significantly lower than that of OSCC in non-keratinized mucosa. The average luminance of OSCC was significantly lower than that of leukoplakia. Even in keratinized mucosa where IOM is impossible to use, the OSCC lesion exhibited fluorescence visualization loss. CONCLUSION: The application of the fluorescence visualization device to the oral mucosa may be useful for distinguishing between cancer and normal areas and can be used to detect OSCC in the keratinized mucosa. The use of the IllumiScan in combination with other conventional screening methods may lead to a better diagnosis.