VEGF-A Links Angiolymphoid Hyperplasia With Eosinophilia (ALHE) to THSD7A Membranous Nephropathy: A Report of 2 Cases.

Autoantibodies against thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) cause membranous nephropathy (MN); however, the mechanisms involved in THSD7A expression and immunization are uncertain. We present 2 cases of THSD7A-associated MN accompanied by angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE), a benign tumor characterized by proliferation of plump endothelial cells. Prednisolone therapy, but not surgical resection of ALHE tumors, successfully suppressed eosinophilia and proteinuria in both cases. Because ALHE is characterized by the proliferation of plump endothelial cells, we focused on the roles of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in MN pathogenesis. We found that plump endothelial cells in ALHE modestly expressed THSD7A in both cases. We also found that eosinophils in ALHE expressed VEGF-A, which upregulated THSD7A expression, especially under T-helper type 2-prone conditions in cultured endothelial cells. Furthermore, double-positive cells for THSD7A and CD83 surrounded the proliferated small vessels. Our results suggest that VEGF-A-induced THSD7A expression outside the kidney may be important for MN pathogenesis.

Optimal sampling time and clinical implication of the SCN5A promoter haplotype in propafenone therapeutic drug monitoring.

PURPOSE: The clinical usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of propafenone, a sodium channel blocker, has been unclear due to the lack of information regarding optimal blood sampling time and therapeutic concentration range. Antiarrhythmic effects of sodium channel blockers are affected by the activity of the cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A). We investigated the optimal sampling time and the clinical implication of the SCN5A promoter haplotype in propafenone TDM. METHODS: We evaluated serum concentrations of propafenone, the SCN5A promoter haplotype, and antiarrhythmic efficacy in 55 patients with supraventricular tachy-arrhythmias. Blood samples obtained 1.5-6 and 10-24 h after the last dose were categorized as peak and trough samples, respectively. RESULTS: The peak propafenone concentration was significantly higher in effectively treated patients than that in patients showing insufficient response (337 ± 213 vs. 177 ± 93 ng/mL, P = 0.005), but the trough propafenone concentration was not significantly different between the two groups (68 ± 48 vs. 42 ± 36 ng/mL). Clinically relevant propafenone efficacy was achieved significantly more often in SCN5A haplotype B carriers than in wild-type haplotype A homozygotes (90 vs. 60%, P < 0.05). Among the haplotype A homozygotes, peak propafenone concentration was higher in effectively treated patients than that in patients showing insufficient response (299 ± 177 vs. 177 ± 93 ng/mL, P = 0.061). CONCLUSION: The present study found that antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone was associated with peak propafenone concentration rather than trough concentration and was affected by the SCN5A promoter haplotype.

Simultaneous determination of serum propafenone and its metabolites using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Propafenone, a class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, is metabolized to 5-hydroxypropafeone (5-OHP) and N-depropylpropafenone (NDPP). Simultaneous determination of serum propafenone and its metabolites was performed using HPLC equipped with a conventional octadecylsilyl silica column and ultraviolet detector. The wavelength was set at 250 nm. Propafenone and its metabolites in the serum were extracted using diethyl ether. The mobile phase solution, comprising 1-pentanesulfonic acid sodium salt (0.1 m), acetonitrile and acetic acid (280:185:2.5, v/v/v), was pumped at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The recoveries of propafenone, 5-OHP and NDPP were greater than 85, 82 and 60%, respectively, with the coefficients of variation (CVs) less than 5.4, 1.9 and 2.9%, respectively. The calibration curves were linear for a concentration range of 12.5-1500 ng/mL for propafenone and 2-500 ng/mL for 5-OHP and NDPP (r > 0.999). CVs in the intraday assays were 1.0-3.8% for propafenone, 0.6-2.0% for 5-OHP and 0.6-1.7% for NDPP. CVs in interday assays were 1.3-7.7% for propafenone, 1.1-6.5% for 5-OHP and 5.4-8.0% for NDPP. The present HPLC method can be used to assess the disposition of propafenone and its metabolites for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring of propafenone.

Effect of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism on peak propafenone concentration: no significant effect of CYP2D6*10.

Aim: The study aims to investigate the clinical implication of nonfunctional poor metabolizer (PM) alleles and intermediate metabolizer (IM) alleles of CYP2D6, including the CYP2D6*10 allele which shows substrate-dependent decrease in enzymatic activity, in antiarrhythmic therapy using propafenone. Materials & methods: We examined serum propafenone concentrations and metabolic ratio, which was expressed as serum concentrations of propafenone to 5-hydroxypropafenone, in 66 Japanese patients with tachyarrhythmias. Results: The peak propafenone concentration and metabolic ratio in CYP2D6 PM allele carriers were higher than those in extensive metabolizer (EM)/EM, EM/IM and IM/IM genotype groups. Conclusion: Results suggest that CYP2D6 PM alleles affect peak propafenone concentration, but the CYP2D6 IM allele CYP2D6*10 has no clinical implication in propafenone dosing.