Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Chim Acta ; 514: 34-39, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33333041

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Detection of an eventful course in the early days of sepsis treatment is clinically relevant. The white blood cell count (WBCC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are used in daily practice to monitor the intensity of the inflammatory response associated with sepsis. It is not entirely clear which of the two might better discriminate the outcomes of patients with sepsis. METHODS: 30-day mortality was assessed in a cohort of patients who were hospitalized with sepsis in the departments of Internal Medicine in a tertiary medical center. Admission and 72-hour time points were analyzed to discriminate between patients with increased versus decreased 30 days mortality risk. RESULTS: The study included 195 patients. Higher 72 h CRP, WBCC, neutrophil counts and neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio were associated with increased mortality (p < 0.02). Baseline WBCC and CRP failed to discriminate between patients who died and those who survived (AUC = 0.551, 0.479). In multivariate analysis of the 72 h tests, higher WBCC count (OR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.05-1.20, p = 0.001), was associated with increased mortality whereas CRP was not (OR = 1.004, 95%CI 0.998-1.01, p = 0.146). CONCLUSION: Patients who presented a 72-hour leukocyte descent had a better outcome and in this regard, WBCC was superior to 72-hour CRP in predicting 30 days mortality.


Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa , Linfócitos , Sepse , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Neutrófilos/química , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/mortalidade
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(42): e22551, 2020 Oct 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33080689

RESUMO

A first C-reactive protein (CRP) test, as often performed by clinicians during the presentation of patients with an acute bacterial infection, might be misleading. The aim of our study was to explore the dynamic between a second CRP test taken within 12 hours from admission CRP test in a cohort of patients diagnosed with acute bacterial infection in comparison to CRP in a control group of apparently healthy individuals.This was a historical cohort study comprised of all patients admitted to the Sourasky Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Israel, between July 2007 and March 2016. The study cohort included adult patients who were diagnosed as having an infection, assumed to be of bacterial etiology (cellulitis and erysipelas, pneumonia, cholecystitis, pyelonephritis, or septicemia), who had a CRP test during the first 6 hours of hospital admission (baseline CRP), and a successive CRP test up to 12 hours from the first one (recurrent CRP). The control group was of healthy subjects who attended our medical center for a routine annual check-up.The study included 950 patients. Baseline CRP ranged from 0.04 to 454 mg/L. The median CRP velocity was 0.53 mg/L/h. Patients were grouped by baseline CRP into 4 groups (CRP < 10, 10-74.9, 75-199.9, ≥200). There was an increase in median CRP velocity between the first (0.48 mg/L/h) and the second (0.93 mg/L/h) groups, which then was decreased in the next 2 groups (0.46 and -2.58 mg/L/h, respectively). In 45 of 103 (44%) patients of the group of baseline CRP concentration less than 10 mg/dL with bacterial diagnosis, there was a complete overlap with CRP values of apparently healthy individuals during their routine annual checkup.A first single low CRP result cannot exclude the presence of a significant bacterial infection. Patients with acute bacterial infection might present with a relatively low CRP value that at times correspond to normal limit CRP concentrations. A second test, obtained within 12 hours of admission, might serve as an important tool to identify patient with an evolving inflammatory burst commonly seen during acute bacterial infection.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Clin Chim Acta ; 481: 207-211, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572185

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) revisit might be partially preventable. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker which is commonly used as screening tool in the ED. We sought to evaluate the association between CRP level in patients visiting emergency department and 7 days revisit after discharge. METHODS: A historical cohort study of all patients who visited the internal division of the emergency department between June 2007 and July 2017 and had a CRP test. New ED visit was defined when neither any emergency department visit nor any hospital admission was recorded in our files during the previous 90 days. Univariate and multivariate models were used to evaluate the association between CRP and 7 days ED revisit. RESULTS: The study included 135,476 patients with 173,443 new visits. In 101,181 (58.3%) visits the patients were released and 7077 (7%) of them were revisited in 7 days. Even mild elevated CRP (5-25 mg/L) was independently associated with significant risk for revisit (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.20-1.35). CONCLUSION: CRP is an independent predictor for 7 days ED revisit and should be considered at the time of discharge. Prediction models for ED revisit should include CRP as a potential predictor in their models.


Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA