RESUMO
The purpose of this study was to compare barbed sutures to traditional sutures in three domains: time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 34 patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial to assess time to wound closure and cost. In addition, a retrospective chart review of an additional 100 patients was conducted to further assess wound-related outcomes. On average, barbed sutures decreased time to wound closure by 9.72 min (P<0.05) after controlling for length of incision, patient's BMI and number of physicians closing. Further, using barbed sutures saved an average of $549.59 per case. However, increased frequency and severity of wound complications were associated with barbed sutures.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Suturas/efeitos adversos , Cicatrização , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Artroplastia de Quadril/instrumentação , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/instrumentação , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unilateral hip reconstruction in patients with cerebral palsy can be complicated by contralateral subluxation and ipsilateral failure. We sought to identify predictors for failure after unilateral reconstruction in patients with GMFCS IV-V CP with unilateral hip involvement. METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective study on GMFCS IV-V CP patients with unilateral hip reconstruction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiologic data included acetabular index, femoral migration index (FMI), lateral center edge angle (LCE), and pelvic obliquity. The effects of age, sex, pelvic obliquity, scoliosis surgery, and contralateral hip soft-tissue release at the index surgery were analyzed for ipsilateral hip failure and contralateral hip subluxation. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ and t tests. RESULTS: There were 35 patients (M:F, 23:12) with mean age of 110 months (range, 45 to 215 mo) with mean follow-up of 60.5 months (range, 24 to 129 mo). The mean preoperative ipsilateral hip FMI was 60% (range, 40% to 100%) and the mean LCE was -16.7 degrees (range, -85 to 17.2 degrees). Contralateral soft-tissue release was performed in 13/35 patients. Ipsilateral hip failure or contralateral hip subluxation was observed in 51% (18/35) patients. Contralateral hip subluxation developed in 28% (10/35) of patients. Ipsilateral hip failure was observed in 34% (12/35) patients. Four had both ipsilateral failure and contralateral subluxation. Lack of contralateral hip soft-tissue release, reversal of pelvic obliquity angle, and high initial contralateral hip FMI (> 25%) significantly predicted the risk of contralateral hip subluxation (P = 0.03). Similarly, persistence or worsening of preoperative pelvic obliquity significantly predicted ipsilateral hip failure (P < 0.04). There was a strong trend toward contralateral hip subluxation in patients below 8 years of age (P = 0.1) and ipsilateral hip failure in those who had spinal fusion surgery for scoliosis (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of contralateral hip subluxation included lack of contralateral soft-tissue release, reversal of pelvic obliquity angle, and larger initial contralateral hip FMI (> 25%). The only predictor of ipsilateral failure was persistence or worsening of preoperative pelvic obliquity.
Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/cirurgia , Luxação do Quadril/cirurgia , Articulação do Quadril/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Adolescente , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Nível de Saúde , Luxação do Quadril/etiologia , Articulação do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Peripheral nerve blocks improve both pain control and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, few studies have examined the effects of different peripheral nerve block protocols on postoperative range of motion. The present study assessed the impact of a single-shot femoral nerve block (SFNB) versus continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) on postoperative range of motion and the need for subsequent manipulation following TKA. Methods: We retrospective reviewed patient charts to identify patients who had undergone primary elective unilateral TKA by 2 surgeons at a high-volume orthopaedic specialty hospital over a 3-year period. A total of 1,091 patients received either SFNB or CFNB and were included in the data analysis. Identical surgical techniques, postoperative oral analgesic regimens, and rehabilitation protocols were used for all patients. Patients with <90° of flexion at 6 weeks postoperatively underwent closed manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Results: Overall, 608 patients (55.7%) received CFNB and 483 patients (44.3%) received SFNB. Overall, 94 patients (8.6%) required postoperative manipulation for stiffness, including 36 (5.9%) in the CFNB group and 58 (12%) in the SFNB group. The 50% reduction in the need for manipulation in the CFNB group was independent of primary surgeon (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of postoperative range of motion, either at the time of discharge or at 6 weeks postoperatively. A history of knee surgery, decreased preoperative range of motion, and decreased range of motion at the time of discharge were significantly associated with the need for further MUA (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: Despite similar final postoperative range of motion between patients in both groups, our results suggest that CFNB may be superior to SFNB for reducing the need for postoperative manipulation after primary TKA. Furthermore, a history of ipsilateral knee surgery, decreased preoperative range of motion, and decreased range of motion at the time of discharge were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative stiffness requiring MUA after primary TKA. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RESUMO
Proper acetabular preparation is critical to successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). As there is a paucity of literature offering technical guidance on cementless acetabular preparation during THA, we provide a systematic approach herein that utilizes anatomic cues to maximize reproducibility. Common dilemmas during acetabular preparation are addressed, including how to medialize, position sequential reamers, and determine the final reamer size. Considerations unique to arthroplasty in cases of protrusio or dysplasia, as well as acetabular component revision, are also discussed.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Prótese de Quadril , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Humanos , Reoperação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instrumentos CirúrgicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Techniques that allow early muscle activation, such as closed kinetic chain (CKC) and open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises, may play a beneficial role in the early rehabilitation of the reconstructed knee. However, current rehabilitation regimens have not been shown to reverse post-operative quadriceps activation failure and weakness. To investigate whether patients who use a continuous active motion (CAM) device that follows closed kinetic chain principles have better early post-operative functional improvements than patients who use a continuous passive motion (CPM) device that follows the principles of open kinetic chain principles. A prospective randomized controlled trial with non-blinded study staff. A tertiary care clinic at a teaching hospital. A total of 110 patients signed the consent form and 83 patients participated in the study. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to use either the CPM device for 4 hours daily for 3 weeks (control group), or a CAM device for 3 sessions of 20 minutes for 3 weeks (intervention group), starting 24 hours after knee replacement surgery.The primary outcome measure was to identify the superiority, inferiority, or equivalence of one device at week 4 after knee arthroplasty using various functional outcome measures such as kinesthesia, quadriceps strength, coordination, general orthopaedic outcome measures and narcotic consumption. RESULTS: At 4 weeks, all outcome measurements were comparable between the two groups, with the exception of sit-to-stand test: in the treatment group the time was significantly shorter compared to the control group (P=0.016). Balance was significantly better in both control (P=0.001) and treatment group (P=0.032) compared to prior surgery. CONCLUSION: Most clinical centers would like to expedite functional recovery of knee arthroplasty patients without increasing the risk of falls. We observed balance and kinesthesia improvements after surgery using either device which may be important to benefit fast recovery programs. Further research is warranted to see whether additional active closed kinetic chain exercised following knee replacement surgery could improve specific functional outcomes such the observed sit-to-stand test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.