[Association between cardio-ankle vascular index and markers of thrombosis in hospitalized patients COVID-19].

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and the marker of procoagulant state - D-dimer in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved adult patients admitted to the University hospital with clinically diagnosed or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. We compared groups of patients with normal and elevated CAVI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between risk factors and elevated D-dimer levels; odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to determine the strength of association. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 152 patients [64 (42.1%) men and 88 (57.9%) women], mean age 59.10±12.74 years. 45 (29.6%) had elevated CAVI. Patients with elevated CAVI were older, had more comorbid diseases, a higher Charlson comorbidity index and D-dimer levels. Age, the comorbidity index, and CAVI above 9.5 were associated with elevated D-dimer levels in patients with COVID-19. In a multivariate logistic regression, CAVI above 9.5 was an independent predictor of increased D-dimer in patients with COVID-19 (OR 2.513, 95% CI 1.050-6.012; p=0.038). CONCLUSION: In this study, for the first time, the association between a vascular stiffness marker, elevated CAVI, and increased D-dimer levels in COVID-19 patients was shown. This relationship may be a consequence of endothelial dysfunction and can be used as an additional marker of coagulopathy developing as part of COVID-19.

[Predictors of thromboembolic complications in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection].

AIM: To identify predictors of the development of thromboembolic complications (TECs) in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center observational retrospective study included 1634 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the availability of the feasibility study. The criterion for inclusion of patients in the main group was the presence of venous feasibility studies in 127 patients (group I), the comparison group consisted of 1507 patients in whom the course of COVID-19 was not complicated by the development of feasibility studies (group II). RESULTS: When performing computed tomography of the chest organs, it was revealed that patients with a feasibility study had a higher percentage of lung tissue damage than patients in the comparison group: 55% [37.5; 67.5] and 37.5% [25.0; 47.5], respectively (p<0.001). The average values of C-reactive protein in I patients group were 129 [60.1; 211] ng/l, which was significantly higher than in II patients group - 41.0 [12.2; 97.6] ng/l (p<0.001), interleukin-6 - 176 [52.9; 471] pg/ml and 39.4 [11.0; 107] pg/ml (p<0.001), respectively. A one-factor regression analysis proved a significant contribution of comorbid pathology to the development of feasibility studies in patients with COVID-19. The presence of three nosologies at the same time: arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD) and chronic kidney disease increased the probability of a feasibility study by 4.81 times (odds ratio 4.8117, 95% confidence interval 3.2064-7.2207), in patients with arterial hypertension, CHD, chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes - by 5.63 times (odds ratio 5.6321, 95% confidence interval 3.1870-9.9531). CONCLUSION: The presence of severe comorbid pathology significantly increased the risk of developing a feasibility study in patients with COVID-19. The most significant predictors of the development of feasibility studies in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection. They are: CHD, arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes.