Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary administration of an abciximab bolus during a primary percutaneous coronary intervention results in a high local drug concentration, improved perfusion, and reduction of infarct size compared with intravenous bolus application. However, the safety and efficacy of intracoronary versus standard intravenous bolus application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing this intervention has not been tested in a large-scale clinical trial. METHODS: The AIDA STEMI trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients presenting with STEMI in the previous 12 h with no contraindications for abciximab were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by a central web-based randomisation system to intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab bolus (0·25 mg/kg bodyweight) during percutaneous coronary intervention with a subsequent 12 h intravenous infusion 0·125 µg/kg per min (maximum 10 µg/min). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent infarction, or new congestive heart failure within 90 days of randomisation. Secondary endpoints were the time to occurrence of the primary endpoint, each individual component of that endpoint, early ST-segment resolution, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, and enzymatic infarct size. A masked central committee adjudicated the primary outcome and its components. Treatment allocation was not concealed from patients and investigators. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00712101. FINDINGS: Between July, 2008, and April, 2011, 2065 patients were randomly assigned intracoronary abciximab (n=1032) or intravenous abciximab (n=1033). Intracoronary, as compared with intravenous abciximab, resulted in a similar rate of the primary composite clinical endpoint at 90 days in 1876 analysable patients (7·0%vs 7·6%; odds ratio [OR] 0·91; 95% CI 0·64-1·28; p=0·58). The incidence of death (4·5%vs 3·6%; 1·24; 0·78-1·97; p=0·36) and reinfarction (1·8%vs 1·8%; 1·0; 0·51-1·96; p=0·99) did not differ between the treatment groups, whereas less patients in the intracoronary group had new congestive heart failure (2·4%vs 4·1%; 0·57; 0·33-0·97; p=0·04). None of the secondary endpoints or safety measures differed significantly between groups. INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, intracoronary as compared to intravenous abciximab did not result in a difference in the combined endpoint of death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure. Since intracoronary abciximab bolus administration is safe and might be related to reduced rates of congestive heart failure the intracoronary route might be preferred if abciximab is indicated. FUNDING: Lilly, Germany. University of Leipzig-Heart Centre. University of Leipzig, Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Optimal timing of invasive angiography in stable non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Leipzig Immediate versus early and late PercutaneouS coronary Intervention triAl in NSTEMI (LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial).

AIMS: The optimal timing of intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains uncertain. The aim of this multicentre trial was to assess whether an immediate invasive approach is superior to an early invasive or a selective invasive approach with respect to reduction of large infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either an immediate (<2 h after randomization; n= 201), an early (10-48 h after randomization; n= 200), or a selective invasive approach with high invasive percentage (n= 201). The primary outcome was the peak creatine kinase (CK)-myocardial band (MB) activity during index hospitalization; key secondary clinical endpoints were the composite of (i) death and non-fatal infarction; (ii) death, non-fatal infarction, and refractory ischaemia; (iii) death, non-fatal infarction, refractory ischaemia, and rehospitalization for unstable angina within 6 months. The median time from randomization to angiography was 1.1 h in the immediate vs. 18.6 h in the early and 67.2 h in the selective invasive group (P< 0.001). There was no significant difference in the peak CK-MB activity between groups. The key secondary clinical endpoints were similar between groups at 6-month follow-up: death and infarction: 21.0 vs. 16.0 vs. 14.5%; P= 0.17; death, infarction, refractory ischaemia: 20.9 vs. 21.5 vs. 22.0%; P= 0.98; death, infarction, refractory ischaemia, rehospitalization: 26.0 vs. 26.5 vs. 24.5%; P= 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In NSTEMI patients, an immediate invasive approach does not offer an advantage over an early or a selective invasive approach with respect to large myocardial infarctions as defined by peak CK-MB levels, which is supported by similar clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00402675.

Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, embolic stroke is thought to be associated with left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi. We assessed the efficacy and safety of percutaneous closure of the LAA for prevention of stroke compared with warfarin treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were eligible for inclusion in this multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial if they had at least one of the following: previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, or were 75 years or older. 707 eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio by computer-generated randomisation sequence to percutaneous closure of the LAA and subsequent discontinuation of warfarin (intervention; n=463) or to warfarin treatment with a target international normalised ratio between 2.0 and 3.0 (control; n=244). Efficacy was assessed by a primary composite endpoint of stroke, cardiovascular death, and systemic embolism. We selected a one-sided probability criterion of non-inferiority for the intervention of at least 97.5%, by use of a two-fold non-inferiority margin. Serious adverse events that constituted the primary endpoint for safety included major bleeding, pericardial effusion, and device embolisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00129545. FINDINGS: At 1065 patient-years of follow-up, the primary efficacy event rate was 3.0 per 100 patient-years (95% credible interval [CrI] 1.9-4.5) in the intervention group and 4.9 per 100 patient-years (2.8-7.1) in the control group (rate ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% CrI 0.35-1.25). The probability of non-inferiority of the intervention was more than 99.9%. Primary safety events were more frequent in the intervention group than in the control group (7.4 per 100 patient-years, 95% CrI 5.5-9.7, vs 4.4 per 100 patient-years, 95% CrI 2.5-6.7; RR 1.69, 1.01-3.19). INTERPRETATION: The efficacy of percutaneous closure of the LAA with this device was non-inferior to that of warfarin therapy. Although there was a higher rate of adverse safety events in the intervention group than in the control group, events in the intervention group were mainly a result of periprocedural complications. Closure of the LAA might provide an alternative strategy to chronic warfarin therapy for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. FUNDING: Atritech.

Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Abciximab Intracoronary versus intravenously Drug Application in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (AIDA STEMI) trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous abciximab reduces major adverse cardiac events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intracoronary abciximab bolus application during PCI results in high local drug concentration, improved perfusion, reduction of infarct size, and less microvascular obstruction. The hypothesis of this trial is that abciximab bolus intracoronary in comparison to standard intravenous application will improve the outcome of patients undergoing primary PCI in STEMI. STUDY DESIGN: The Abciximab Intracoronary versus intravenously Drug Application in STEMI (AIDA STEMI) study is a 1,912-patient, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab administration during primary PCI with subsequent intravenous infusion for 12 hours. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to 1 of the 2 treatments. The primary efficacy end point of AIDA STEMI is the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, or new congestive heart failure within 90 days of randomization. The primary safety outcome assessment will be major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The AIDA STEMI study addresses important questions regarding the efficacy and safety of intracoronary abciximab bolus administration during primary PCI in patients with STEMI, potentially optimizing the route of administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the catheterization laboratory.

Rationale and design of the OPTION study: optimal antitachycardia therapy in ICD patients without pacing indications.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent the treatment of choice for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death but ICD therapy is also plagued by inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Dual-chamber (DC) ICDs are considered to exhibit an enhanced discrimination performance in comparison to single-chamber (SC) ICDs, which results in reduction of inappropriate detections in a short- to mid-term follow-up. Comparative data on long-term follow-up and especially on inappropriate shocks are limited. METHODS: The aim of the OPTION study is to assess whether an optimized treatment with DC ICDs improves patient outcome and decreases the rate of inappropriate shocks in comparison to SC ICDs. DC ICD therapy optimization is achieved by optimal customizing of antitachycardia therapy parameters, activation of discrimination algorithms, antitachycardia pacing in the slow ventricular tachycardia zone, and avoidance of right ventricular pacing with the SafeR algorithm mode. The OPTION study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel study, will randomize 450 patients on a 1:1 allocation to either an SC arm with backup pacing at VVI 40 beats per minute (bpm) or to the DC arm with SafeR pacing at 60 bpm. Patients will be followed for 27 months. Primary outcome measure is the time to first occurrence of inappropriate shock and a combined endpoint of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: The study will evaluate the relative performance of DC in comparison to SC ICDs in terms of inappropriate shock reduction and patient outcome.

ASD and PFO closure with the Solysafe septal occluder - results of a prospective multicenter pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: We report the results of a prospective multicenter pilot study performed in Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland with a new self-centering device for transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect (ASD) or a patent foramen ovale (PFO) called the Solysafe Septal Occluder. INTERVENTIONS: The device was successfully implanted in 44 patients. In 15 patients with a median age of 40 years (range 6-76 years), a Solysafe device was successfully implanted in an ASD. The median size of the stretched defects was 17 mm (range 10-21 mm). Three 15-mm devices, eight 20-mm devices, and four 25-mm devices were used. Procedure time ranged from 40 to 107 min (median 66 min) and fluoroscopic time from 5.3 to 17.5 min (median 12 min). In 29 patients with a median age of 47 years (range 15-78 years), a Solysafe device was implanted in a PFO. The procedure time ranged from 21 to 155 min (median 51 min) and fluoroscopic time from 3.1 to 31.3 min (median 7.6 min). RESULTS: At discharge, 1 of the 29 patients (3%) had a small shunt. No patient in either the ASD or the PFO group had any major complication. Six months after implantation, the overall closure rate with the Solysafe septal occluder in both groups was 100% (44/44). CONCLUSION: With the self-centering Solysafe Septal Occluder, PFOs, and ASDs with a stretched diameter of up to 21 mm can be effectively closed with very high occlusion rates.

Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive bypass surgery and coronary-artery stenting are both accepted treatments for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. We compared the clinical outcomes after these two procedures. METHODS: A total of 220 symptomatic patients with high-grade lesions in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery were randomly assigned to treatment--110 to surgery and 110 to stenting. The combined clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac events, such as death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and the need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion within six months. RESULTS: A major adverse cardiac event occurred in 31 percent of patients after stenting, as compared with 15 percent in the surgery group (P=0.02). The difference was predominantly due to a higher rate of repeated revascularization of the target vessel for restenosis after stenting (29 percent vs. 8 percent, P=0.003). The combined rates of death and myocardial infarction did not differ significantly between groups (3 percent in the stenting group and 6 percent in the surgery group, P=0.50). Adverse events occurred more frequently after surgery. The percentage of patients free from angina after six months was 79 percent in the surgery group, as compared with 62 percent in the stenting group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated high-grade lesions of the proximal left anterior descending artery, both minimally invasive bypass surgery and stenting are effective. Stenting yields excellent short-term results with fewer periprocedural adverse events, but surgery is superior with regard to the need for repeated intervention in the target vessel and freedom from angina at six months of follow-up.

Comparison of bare-metal stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: a 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing stenting with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending lesions have shown a significantly higher reintervention rate for stenting and similar results for mortality and reinfarction at short-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up data are sparse. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending stenosis were randomized to either surgery (n=110) or bare-metal stenting (n=110). At 5 years, follow-up data were obtained with respect to the primary end point of death, reinfarction, or repeated target vessel revascularization. Clinical symptoms were assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification. Follow-up information was completed for 216 patients (98.2%), and mean follow-up was 5.6+/-1.2 years. With respect to mortality (surgery, 12%; stenting, 10%; P=0.54) and reinfarctions (surgery, 7%; stenting, 5%; P=0.46), there were no differences between treatment strategies. The need for repeated target vessel revascularization was significantly higher after stenting (32%) compared with surgery (10%; P<0.001). Clinical symptoms improved significantly in both treatment groups compared with baseline; however, there was a favorable trend for surgery (stenting: CCS, 2.6+/-0.9 to 0.5+/-0.8, P<0.001; surgery: CCS, 2.6+/-0.9 to 0.3+/-0.6, P<0.001; P=0.05, stenting versus surgery). CONCLUSIONS: At the 5-year follow-up, minimally invasive bypass surgery and bare-metal stenting showed similar results for the end points of mortality and reinfarctions. However, the reintervention rate is higher after stenting, and the relief in clinical symptoms is slightly better after surgery.

Potential applicability and utilization of left atrial appendage occlusion devices in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The WATCHMAN left atrial appendage occluder device (Atritech, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) is currently being tested in a Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical trial, the PROTECT AF trial, for patients who are diagnosed with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, rigorous screening and the study design have resulted in the exclusion of a large number of patients. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess the potential utility of this device among those who were eligible but excluded for trial criteria and the reasons for exclusion. METHODS: Screening logs from the respective sites participating in the PROTECT AF trial were collected and analyzed for potential utilization outside of a research trial. Only 31 patients were enrolled into the research trail from the screening of 1798 total patients. RESULTS: Information from the excluded patients was examined and it was determined that 79% of these patients would be eligible for the device outside the research trial. Twenty-one percent of patients were not able to receive the device because of long-term warfarin need, contraindications to warfarin, unsuitable anatomy as determined by echocardiography, or the inability to take short-term aspirin and clopidogrel for protocol requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Should a device like the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage occluder be approved, approximately 79% of all patients with atrial fibrillation would be eligible for device placement.

Relation between detection rate and inappropriate shocks in single versus dual chamber cardioverter-defibrillator--an analysis from the OPTION trial.

The programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) influences inappropriate shock rates. The aim of the study is to analyse rates of patients with appropriate and inappropriate shocks according to detection zones in the OPTION trial. All patients received dual chamber (DC) ICDs randomly assigned to be programmed either to single chamber (SC) or to DC settings including PARAD+ algorithm. In a post-hoc analysis, rates of patients with inappropriate and appropriate shocks were calculated for shocks triggered at heart rates ≥ 170 bpm (ventricular tachycardia zone) and at rates ≥ 200 bpm (ventricular fibrillation zone). In the SC group, higher rates of patients with total and inappropriate shocks were delivered at heart rates ≥ 170 bpm than at rates ≥ 200 bpm (total shocks: 21.1% vs. 16.6%; p = 0.002; inappropriate shocks: 7.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.016; appropriate shocks: 15.2% vs. 13.5%; p = n.s.). No such differences were observed in the DC group (total shocks: 14.3% vs. 12.6%; p = n.s.; inappropriate shocks: 3.9% vs. 3.6%; p = n.s.; appropriate shocks: 12.2% vs. 10.4%; p = n.s.). The higher frequency of patients with total shocks with SC settings than with DC settings that benefit from PARAD+ was driven by a higher percentage of patients with inappropriate shocks in the VT zone (170-200 bpm) in the SC population.

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Regular exercise in patients with stable coronary artery disease has been shown to improve myocardial perfusion and to retard disease progression. We therefore conducted a randomized study to compare the effects of exercise training versus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting on clinical symptoms, angina-free exercise capacity, myocardial perfusion, cost-effectiveness, and frequency of a combined clinical end point (death of cardiac cause, stroke, CABG, angioplasty, acute myocardial infarction, and worsening angina with objective evidence resulting in hospitalization). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 101 male patients aged < or =70 years were recruited after routine coronary angiography and randomized to 12 months of exercise training (20 minutes of bicycle ergometry per day) or to PCI. Cost efficiency was calculated as the average expense (in US dollars) needed to improve the Canadian Cardiovascular Society class by 1 class. Exercise training was associated with a higher event-free survival (88% versus 70% in the PCI group, P=0.023) and increased maximal oxygen uptake (+16%, from 22.7+/-0.7 to 26.2+/-0.8 mL O2/kg, P<0.001 versus baseline, P<0.001 versus PCI group after 12 months). To gain 1 Canadian Cardiovascular Society class, 6956 dollars was spent in the PCI group versus 3429 dollars in the training group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCI, a 12-month program of regular physical exercise in selected patients with stable coronary artery disease resulted in superior event-free survival and exercise capacity at lower costs, notably owing to reduced rehospitalizations and repeat revascularizations.

Heparin-coated stent placement for the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries of symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: The role of stents, especially of heparin-coated stents for the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries, is still unclear. Therefore, we performed this prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the angiographic and clinical outcome after treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries (2.0 to 2.6 mm) of symptomatic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 588 patients to angioplasty (n=195), bare stenting (n=196), or heparin-coated stenting (n=197). The primary end point was minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at 6 months. With comparable baseline parameters, the two stent arms showed a larger postinterventional MLD, larger acute gain, and smaller residual percent diameter stenosis, although a residual stenosis of 12+/-16% was achieved in the angioplasty arm, including a 27% crossover rate to stenting. Eighty percent of patients had follow-up angiography, which documented a borderline significantly larger MLD and smaller percent diameter stenosis for the two stent groups (1.34+/-0.48 mm and 42+/-20% after angioplasty, 1.47+/-0.48 mm and 36+/-20% after bare stenting, and 1.45+/-0.54 mm and 38+/-23% after heparin-coated stenting; P=0.049 and P=0.038, respectively), but restenosis rates were not different (32%, 25%, and 30%). Thrombotic events occurred in 1.0% after angioplasty and 0.5% after bare or heparin-coated stenting. Survival without myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization at 250 days was 84.6% (angioplasty), 88.3% (bare stenting), and 88.3% (heparin-coated stenting; log-rank P=0.39). CONCLUSION: Compared with angioplasty with provisional stenting, bare and heparin-coated stenting confer superior angiographic results and a nonsignificant 24% reduction in clinical events, with no difference between bare and heparin-coated stenting in the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries.

Prospective randomized comparison of early and late results of a carbonized stent versus a high-grade stainless steel stent of identical design: the PREVENT Trial [corrected].

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after coronary interventions with stent implantation is still the main obstacle of interventional cardiology. The aim of this study was to compare a carbonized and high-grade stainless steel stent of identical design with regard to early and late adverse events. METHODS: In this prospective randomized trial the carbonized MAC stent (amg GmbH, Raesfeld-Erle, Germany) was compared with the stainless steel MAC stent of identical design. Primary end point was diameter stenosis at follow-up; secondary end points were angiographic parameters, rate of restenosis, and major cardiac adverse events (MACE; myocardial infarction, reintervention, and death). RESULTS: Between August 1999 and June 2002, 396 patients were randomized in 2 centers of Germany. Diameter stenosis at follow-up (38.6% +/- 23.4% vs 39.1% +/- 22.2%, P = .49) as primary end point, relative late lumen loss (26.8% +/- 23.7% vs 27.7% +/- 22.3%, P = .26), absolute late lumen loss (0.92 +/- 0.71 vs 0.92 +/- 0.66 mm, P = .58), net gain (1.4 +/- 0.8 vs 1.4 +/- 0.8 mm, P = .96), as well as restenosis rates (18.0% vs 19.0%, P = .81) and MACE (13.5% vs 12.2%, P = .71) were not significantly different between the carbonized and the pure stainless steel study arm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis of superiority of the carbonized stent over a stainless steel stent of identical design with regard to restenosis and MACE could not be proved. Inactive coating of stents seems to have no advantage over pure stainless steel stents, which was also demonstrated in other trials. The future probably lies in active coating of stents with drugs that reduce the neointimal proliferation process.

Evaluation of the Coroflex Theca-Stent for reduction of restenosis (ECORI).

BACKGROUND: Various stent coatings have been shown to significantly reduce restenosis rates in comparison to non-coated devices. Therefore, the short- and mid-term performance of the new polyphosphazene-coated Coroflex Theca-Stent was investigated. METHODS: 103 patients [63.9 +/- 11 yrs, 5/103 (4.9%) lesion type A, 52/103 (50.5%) type B1, and 46 of 103 (44.6%) type B2] were enrolled for elective single stent deployment into de-novo coronary lesions (stenoses: greater than or equal to 70%, < 100%; reference diameter greater than or equal to 2.75 mm, less than or equal to 4 mm; lesion length: < 16 mm). RESULTS: Deployment and procedural success were 100%, in 57/103 (55.3%) patients without pre-dilatation. 3/103 (2.9%) patients were lost to follow-up. During the 7.1 +/- 2.3 months clinical follow-up, 3 of 100 (3.0%) patients underwent premature target lesion revascularizations, 4 /100 (4%) had non-target lesion-related deaths, and 1 of 100 (1%) suffered myocardial infarction. Among the 77 of 100 (77.0%) patients who underwent angiographic follow-up, the initial stenosis declined from 87.3 +/- 5.7% to 14.2 +/- 8.3% after stenting, and increased to 32.8 +/- 22.7% after 6.4 +/- 1.3 months. The late loss and late loss index were 0.6 +/- 0.7 mm and 0.2 +/- 0.4, respectively; the recurrence rate was 12 of 77 (15.6%), with reintervention required in 11 of 77 (14.3%) of these patients. CONCLUSION: The Coroflex Theca-Stent provides excellent procedural results and a low restenosis rate. Further development of this polymer as the final coating and as the basis for drug-eluting stents seems justified.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: Technical aspects and prevention of periprocedural complications with the watchman device.

Transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage has been developed as an alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and as a primary therapy for patients with contraindications to chronic oral anticoagulation. The promise of this new intervention compared with warfarin has been supported by several, small studies and two pivotal randomized trial with the Watchman Device. The results regarding risk reduction for stroke have been favourable although acute complications were not infrequent. Procedural complications, which are mainly related to transseptal puncture and device implantation, include air embolism, pericardial effusions/tamponade and device embolization. Knowledge of nature, management and prevention of complications should minimize the risk of complications and allow transcatheter left atrial appendage closure to emerge as a therapeutic option for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for cardioembolic stroke.

Prospective randomized comparison of early and late results of 4 different stent designs.

BACKGROUND: Late results of interventional procedures using coronary stents are largely determined by the rate of restenosis. So far, few data are available addressing the effect of stent design on this crucial variable and on early and late adverse events after stent implantation. METHODS: From 1996 through 1998, a total of 965 lesions in 925 patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to treatment with 1 of 4 different stent designs (Micro stent II [M] AVE, Düsseldorf, Germany; Sito [S] Sitomed, Rangendingen, Germany; Pura Vario [PV], Devon, Hamburg, Germany; Inflow [ID] Inflow Dynamics, München, Germany). The primary end point of the study was the degree of diameter stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography 6 months after stent implantation. RESULTS: Diameter stenosis at 6 months follow-up was not different in the 4 study arms (M 40.3 +/- 24.1, S 42.8 +/- 27.0, PV 42.6 +/- 26.9 and ID 42.3 +/- 26.8, P =.7). No significant differences could be detected in net lumen gain and late lumen loss, resulting in comparable restenosis rates (>or=50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up (M 26.0%, S 30.5%, PV 31.3%, and ID 28.7%, P =.7). Early adverse events like stent loss, stent thrombosis, periinterventional acute myocardial infarctions and emergency coronary artery bypass graft also showed no significant differences. Multivariate regression analyses revealed reference vessel diameter <3.0 mm, overall stented length, a history of bypass grafting, localization of the target lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery, type C lesions, dissection before stent implantation, and diabetes mellitus to be independent predictors for restenosis. CONCLUSION: Stent design does not have significant influence on development of restenosis. Adverse event rates were similar with all stent types used in this trial.

Short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon support in ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction.

In patients with an infarct-related ventricular septal defect, an intra-aortic balloon pump provides immediate and long-term hemodynamic improvement, resulting in an enhanced effective cardiac output and a reduced left-to-right-shunt and shunt flow ration. In patients who can be stabilized or remain stable, there is no habituation to the effects of the intra-aortic balloon pump; thus, later surgical closure of the ventricular septal defect might be possible in some patients.

Influence of residual stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation on development of restenosis and stent thrombosis.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of residual stenosis after single-stent implantation on the rate of stent thrombosis, as well as restenosis within a 6-month follow-up period. Coronary angiograms of 2,157 patients with 2,523 lesions treated with a single stent were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography before, immediately after stent implantation, and at a planned 6-month follow-up. Lesions were classified into 4 subgroups according to the degree of residual stenosis after stent implantation: group 1, gross oversizing <-15%; group 2, slight oversizing -15% to <0%; group 3, mild residual 0% to <15%; group 4, moderate residual 15% to <30%. Stent thrombosis rates were not significantly different among the 4 subgroups (group 1: 0 of 60 [0%]; group 2: 2 of 388 [0.5%]; group 3: 8 of 1,370 [0.6%]; group 4: 8 of 705 [1.1%]; p = NS for all). An adequate dosage of ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily) and aspirin (100 mg/day) led to a lower rate of stent thrombosis (6 of 2,189 cases) than inadequate dosages or missing therapy (12 of 343 cases). In 1,882 stenoses with angiographic follow-up (77.7%), gross oversizing of stents lead to a significantly higher increase of percent stenosis (p <0.001) associated with a higher restenosis rate (group 1: 34.7% vs groups 2, 3, and 4: 32.5%, 28.2%, and 29.6%, respectively). A multiple regression analysis was performed. Optimal results with regard to stent thrombosis and restenosis were achieved with mild residual stenoses between 0% and 15% after stent implantation. Oversizing of stents is no longer necessary with an adequate dosage of ticlopidine and aspirin.

Comparison of early and late results of a Carbofilm-coated stent versus a pure high-grade stainless steel stent (the Carbostent-Trial).

The long-term success of coronary interventions with stents is largely determined by the development of restenosis. The aim of this study was to compare a Carbofilm-coated and a pure stainless steel stent with regard to early and late adverse events. In this prospective, randomized trial, the Carbofilm-coated Carbostent and Sirius stent (same stent design, newly developed delivery system) were compared with the stainless steel stents S660, S670, and S7 (newly developed delivery system, same principal stent design with a few changes). The primary end point was relative late luminal loss, and secondary end points were diameter stenosis at 6 months, rate of restenosis, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (myocardial infarction, reintervention, and death). From March 2000 to June 2002 at 18 centers in Canada and Europe, 420 patients were randomized. Relative late luminal loss (Carbofilm 28.9 +/- 23.0% vs stainless steel 26.7 +/- 20.2%, p = 0.95) as the primary end point, absolute late luminal loss (1.00 +/- 0.72 vs 0.93 +/- 0.62 mm, p = 0.95), net gain (1.32 +/- 0.82 vs 1.40 +/- 0.74 mm, p = 0.75), and the degree of stenosis (40.7 +/- 22.9% vs 38.0 +/- 20.1%, p = 0.92), as well as restenosis rates (23.5% vs 15.9%, p = 0.09) and MACEs (20.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.11) were not significantly different. Thus, the Carbofilm coating of stents does not lead to an improvement in angiographic results or a reduction of restenosis rate and MACEs. These results agree with other trials using inactive coatings on stents, which also could not demonstrate any advantage over pure stainless steel stents.

Contemporary outcome of cardiac catheterizations in 1085 consecutive octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of patients > or = 80 years require cardiac catheterization. Since little is known about the overall safety of these procedures in this population, we assessed the procedure-related risks and determined predictors for complications. METHODS: We studied 1085 consecutive patients > or = 80 years (82.6+/-2.6 years; 526 males, 544 females), who underwent 1384 cardiac catheterizations in a tertiary specialist university hospital (3% of 43,517 procedures). RESULTS: A total of 373 patients (35%) required percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and 331 (31%) received coronary artery bypass surgery. Thirty-one patients died during hospital stay. Procedure-related complications including vascular injuries occurred in 2.1% after CATH and 11.6% after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the widespread notion that cardiac catheterization exposes patients > or = 80 years to an unwarranted risk, these data demonstrate an acceptable complication rate. Patients #10878;80 years of age should thus not be refused to undergo cardiac catheterization merely based on their age.