Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 386(10001): 1362-1371, 2015 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26164097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cholera is endemic in Bangladesh with epidemics occurring each year. The decision to use a cheap oral killed whole-cell cholera vaccine to control the disease depends on the feasibility and effectiveness of vaccination when delivered in a public health setting. We therefore assessed the feasibility and protective effect of delivering such a vaccine through routine government services in urban Bangladesh and evaluated the benefit of adding behavioural interventions to encourage safe drinking water and hand washing to vaccination in this setting. METHODS: We did this cluster-randomised open-label trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh. We randomly assigned 90 clusters (1:1:1) to vaccination only, vaccination and behavioural change, or no intervention. The primary outcome was overall protective effectiveness, assessed as the risk of severely dehydrating cholera during 2 years after vaccination for all individuals present at time of the second dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01339845. FINDINGS: Of 268,896 people present at baseline, we analysed 267,270: 94,675 assigned to vaccination only, 92,539 assigned to vaccination and behavioural change, and 80,056 assigned to non-intervention. Vaccine coverage was 65% in the vaccination only group and 66% in the vaccination and behavioural change group. Overall protective effectiveness was 37% (95% CI lower bound 18%; p=0·002) in the vaccination group and 45% (95% CI lower bound 24%; p=0·001) in the vaccination and behavioural change group. We recorded no vaccine-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Our findings provide the first indication of the effect of delivering an oral killed whole-cell cholera vaccine to poor urban populations with endemic cholera using routine government services and will help policy makers to formulate vaccination strategies to reduce the burden of severely dehydrating cholera in such populations. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Cólera/administração & dosagem , Cólera/epidemiologia , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Doenças Endêmicas , Saúde da População Urbana , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Adulto Jovem
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 14(3): e0007989, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176695

RESUMO

After the large influx of Rohingya nationals (termed Forcibly Displaced Myanmar National; FDMN) from Rakhine State of Myanmar to Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, it was apparent that outbreaks of cholera was very likely in this setting where people were living under adverse water and sanitation conditions. Large campaigns of oral cholera vaccine (OCV) were carried out as a preemptive measure to control cholera epidemics. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immune responses of healthy adults and children after administration of two doses of OCV at 14 days interval in FDMN population and compare with the response observed in Bangladeshi's vaccinated earlier. A cross-sectional immunogenicity study was conducted among FDMNs of three age cohort; in adults (18+years; n = 83), in older children (6-17 years; n = 63) and in younger children (1-5 years; n = 80). Capillary blood was collected at three time points to measure vibriocidal antibodies using either plasma or dried blood spot (DBS) specimens. There was a significant increase of responder frequency of vibriocidal antibody titer at day 14 in all groups for Vibrio cholerae O1 (Ogawa/Inaba: adults-64%/64%, older children-70%/89% and younger children-51%/75%). There was no overall difference of vibriocidal antibody titer between FDMN and Bangladeshi population at baseline (p = 0.07-0.08) and at day 14, day 28 in all age groups for both serotypes. The seroconversion rate and geometric mean titer (GMT) of either serotype were comparable using both plasma and DBS specimens. These results showed that OCV is capable of inducing robust immune responses in adults and children among the FDMN population which is comparable to that seen in Bangladeshi participants in different age groups or that reported from other cholera endemic countries. Our results also suggest that the displaced population were exposed to V. cholerae prior to seeking shelter in Bangladesh.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Cólera/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Cólera/imunologia , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Refugiados , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Bangladesh , Atividade Bactericida do Sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mianmar , Sorogrupo , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vibrio cholerae O1/classificação , Vibrio cholerae O1/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(12): 2882-2886, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31441679

RESUMO

Background: The new influx of Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals (FDMNs) into Bangladesh started in August 2017 through different entry points of Bangladesh. Considering the imminent threat of infectious diseases outbreaks, the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) decided to vaccinate children against three deadly diseases (measles, rubella and poliomyelitis) and oral cholera vaccine (OCV) for all except <1 year children. After completion of the campaigns, post-vaccination campaign evaluation was carried out to assess the coverage of OCV, OPV and MR vaccines during campaigns.Methods: Post-vaccination campaign evaluation was conducted after completion of the 2nd dose of oral cholera vaccine (OCV2) and oral polio vaccine (OPV2) through a cross-sectional survey. The evaluation was conducted in the Balukhali camps under Ukhiya upazilla. Precision-based sample size was calculated to estimate the vaccine coverage. Ninety-two trained interviewers were involved to collect data from the target of approximately 40000 FDMNs between 18 and 25 November 2017.Results: Data were collected from 39,438 FDMNs during the survey period. The highest coverage was observed for OCVs (94% for OCV1 and 92% for OCV2). On the other hand, lower coverage was observed for the other vaccines; the coverage for OPV1, OPV2 and MR were 75%, 88% and 38%, respectively. Unawareness (30.7% did not know about the campaign) was the most notable cause of lowering down MR vaccine coverage.Conclusion: The experience in Bangladesh demonstrates that vaccine campaigns can be successfully implemented as part of a comprehensive response toward disease outbreak among high-risk populations in humanitarian crisis.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Cólera/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antipólio Oral/administração & dosagem , Refugiados , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Bangladesh , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Mianmar , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(6): 1302-1309, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30261152

RESUMO

Background: Cholera is a considerable health burden in developing country settings including Bangladesh. The oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is a preventative tool to control the disease. The objective of this study was to describe whether the International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), could provide the OCV to rural communities using existing government infrastructure. Methods: The study was conducted in rural sub-district Keraniganj, 20 km from the capital city Dhaka. All listed participants one year and above in age (excluding pregnant women) were offered two doses of OCV at a 14 day interval. Existing government facilities were used to deliver and also maintain the cold chain required for the vaccine. All events related to vaccination were recorded at the 17 vaccination sites to evaluate the coverage and feasibility of OCV program. Results: A total of 29,029 individuals received the 1st dose (90% of target) and 26,611 individuals received the 2nd dose (83% of target and 92% of 1st dose individuals) of OCV. The highest vaccination coverage was in younger children (1-9 years) and the lowest was amongst 18-29-year age group. Somewhat better coverage was seen amongst the female participants than males (92% vs. 88% for the 1st dose and 93% vs. 90% for the 2nd dose). The cost of vaccine cost was calculated as US$1.00 per dose plus freight, insurance, and transportation and the total vaccine delivery cost was US$70,957. Conclusion: This was a project undertaken using existing public health program resources to collect empirical evidence on the use of a mass OCV campaign in the rural setting. Mass vaccination with the OCV is feasible in the rural setting using existing governmental vaccine delivery systems in Bangladesh.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Cólera/economia , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/economia , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Bangladesh , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Vacinas contra Cólera/administração & dosagem , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Masculino , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gestantes , Refrigeração , População Rural , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Glob Health Action ; 12(1): 1574544, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30764750

RESUMO

Bangladesh has historically been cholera endemic, with seasonal cholera outbreaks occurring each year. In collaboration with the government of Bangladesh, the Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) initiated operational research to test strategies to reach the high-risk urban population with an affordable oral cholera vaccine (OCV) "ShancholTM" and examine its effectiveness in reducing diarrhea due to cholera. Here we report a sub-analysis focusing on the organization, implementation and effectiveness of different oral cholera vaccine delivery strategies in the endemic urban setting in Bangladesh. We described how the vaccination program was planned, prepared and implemented using different strategies to deliver oral cholera vaccine to a high-risk urban population in Dhaka, Bangladesh based on administrative data and observations made during the program. The objective of this study is to evaluate the organization, implementation and effectiveness of different oral cholera vaccine delivery strategies in the endemic urban setting in Bangladesh. OCV administration by trained local volunteers through outreach sites and mop-up activities yielded high coverage of 82% and 72% of 172,754 targeted individuals for the first and second dose respectively, using national Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) campaign mechanisms without disrupting routine immunization activities. The cost of delivery was low. Safety and cold chain requirements were adequately managed. The adopted strategies were technically and programmatically feasible. Current evidence on implementation strategies in different settings together with available OCV stockpiles should encourage at-risk countries to use OCV along with other preventive and control measures.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Cólera/administração & dosagem , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , População Urbana , Administração Oral , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Criança , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Voluntários
6.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(1): e0007124, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30703097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cholera remains a substantial health burden in Asia and Africa particularly in resource poor settings. The standard procedures to identify the etiological organism V. cholerae are isolation from microbiological culture from stool as well as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Both the processes are highly lab oriented, labor extensive, time consuming, and expensive. In an effort to control for outbreaks and epidemics; an effective, convenient, quick and relatively less expensive detection method is imperative, without compromising the sensitivity and specificity that exists at present. The objective of this component of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a locally produced rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for cholera diagnosis. METHODS: In Bangladesh, nationwide cholera surveillance is ongoing in 22 hospitals covering all 8 divisions of the country since June, 2016. In the surveillance, stool samples have been collected from patients presenting to hospitals with acute watery diarrhea. Crystal VCTM (Span diagnostics, India) and Cholkit (locally produced RDT) have been used to detect V. cholerae from stool samples. Samples have also been sent to the main laboratory at icddr,b where the culture based isolation is routinely performed. All the tests were carried out for both direct and enriched stool samples. RDT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using stool culture as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 7720 samples were tested. Among these, 5865 samples were solely tested with Crystal VC and 1355 samples with Cholkit whereas 381 samples were tested with both the RDTs. In comparison with culture, direct testing with Crystal VC showed a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 50.6% to 87.9%) and specificity of 86.8% (95% CI: 82.8% to 90.1%). After enrichment the sensitivity and specificity was 68% (95% CI: 46.5% to 85.1%) and 97.5% (95% CI: 95.3% to 98.8%) respectively. The direct Cholkit test showed sensitivity of 76% (95% CI: 54.9% to 90.6%) and specificity of 90.2% (95% CI: 86.6% to 93.1%). CONCLUSION: This evaluation has demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of Cholkit is similar to the commercially available test, Crystal VC when used in field settings for detecting V. cholerae from stool specimens. The findings from this study suggest that the Cholkit could be a possible alternative for cholera endemic regions where V. cholerae O1 is the major causative organism causing cholera.


Assuntos
Cólera/diagnóstico , Vibrio cholerae/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/análise , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Bangladesh , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diarreia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Antígenos O/análise , Antígenos O/imunologia , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sorotipagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA