Guideline for the management of myasthenic syndromes.

Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare chronic diseases. MG and LEMS have an autoimmune-mediated etiology, while CMS are genetic disorders. A (strain dependent) muscle weakness due to neuromuscular transmission disorder is a common feature. Generalized MG requires increasingly differentiated therapeutic strategies that consider the enormous therapeutic developments of recent years. To include the newest therapy recommendations, a comprehensive update of the available German-language guideline 'Diagnostics and therapy of myasthenic syndromes' has been published by the German Neurological society with the aid of an interdisciplinary expert panel. This paper is an adapted translation of the updated and partly newly developed treatment guideline. It defines the rapid achievement of complete disease control in myasthenic patients as a central treatment goal. The use of standard therapies, as well as modern immunotherapeutics, is subject to a staged regimen that takes into account autoantibody status and disease activity. With the advent of modern, fast-acting immunomodulators, disease activity assessment has become pivotal and requires evaluation of the clinical course, including severity and required therapies. Applying MG-specific scores and classifications such as Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America allows differentiation between mild/moderate and (highly) active (including refractory) disease. Therapy decisions must consider age, thymic pathology, antibody status, and disease activity. Glucocorticosteroids and the classical immunosuppressants (primarily azathioprine) are the basic immunotherapeutics to treat mild/moderate to (highly) active generalized MG/young MG and ocular MG. Thymectomy is indicated as a treatment for thymoma-associated MG and generalized MG with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive status. In (highly) active generalized MG, complement inhibitors (currently eculizumab and ravulizumab) or neonatal Fc receptor modulators (currently efgartigimod) are recommended for AChR-Ab-positive status and rituximab for muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-Ab-positive status. Specific treatment for myasthenic crises requires plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or IVIG. Specific aspects of ocular, juvenile, and congenital myasthenia are highlighted. The guideline will be further developed based on new study results for other immunomodulators and biomarkers that aid the accurate measurement of disease activity.

Caregivers' and physicians' attitudes to rotigotine transdermal patch versus oral Parkinson's disease medication: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world data on caregiver and physician perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of rotigotine transdermal patch (Neupro * ) versus oral Parkinson's Disease (PD) medication. METHODS: Cross-sectional, non-interventional study in routine clinical practice in Germany (NCT01330290). Patients had PD with documented need for care, and had received rotigotine transdermal patch as add-on to oral PD treatment for ≥1 month. Caregivers/nurses and physicians assessed rotigotine transdermal patch versus oral PD medications using questionnaires. Specific questions regarding the possible benefits of transdermal application were asked and comprised questions on: swallowing dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, monitoring therapy, once daily application, application independently from meals, application to sleeping patients, caregiving efforts (caregivers only) and clinical aspects (physicians only). Each question was assessed on a 5 point scale ranging from -2 (major disadvantage) to 2 (major advantage) compared with oral treatment. Primary outcomes were mean total scores of all questions for caregivers/nurses and physicians who provided responses for ≥4 questions. As there are no validated tools to assess physician/caregiver preference in the PD setting, there is no reference against which the current findings can be compared; this study serves to pilot the questionnaires. RESULTS: Questionnaire responses from 128 caregivers/nurses and 41 physicians were documented for 147 patients. One hundred (68%) patients had a caregiving family member; 40 (27%) were cared for by a nurse. Mean PD duration was 8.2 (SD 6.3) years; 136 (93%) patients were taking levodopa. Mean total score of caregivers'/nurses' questionnaires was 1.32 (SD 0.67) and of physicians' questionnaires was 1.46 (0.32) indicating a perceived advantage of rotigotine transdermal patch over oral PD therapy. Mean scores for individual questions were in the range 1.03-1.54 for caregivers/nurses and 1.15-1.87 for physicians. When given a choice about rationale to prescribe, physicians cited pharmaceutical form (patch) in 139 (95%) cases and active agent (rotigotine) in 89 (61%) cases. CONCLUSION: Caregivers/nurses and physicians perceived advantages with rotigotine transdermal patch compared to an oral PD medication as add-on therapy in patients with PD; advantages were observed in aspects of medical treatment as well as in everyday situations of caregiving of PD patients.

Long-term disease history, clinical symptoms, health status, and healthcare utilization in patients suffering from Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Results of a patient interview survey in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: The burden of disease in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) patients is unclear. This study focused on the patient's perspective to obtain patient-reported information on clinical symptoms, burden of illness, impact of LEMS on activities of daily living (ADL), and management of LEMS. METHODS: Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with LEMS patients from two specialized centres in Germany between September and December 2010. RESULTS: Twelve patients participated; mean age 66.7 ± 9.8 years. First symptoms occurred at age 52.5 ± 14.0 years. Mean time between first symptoms and diagnosis was 4.4 ± 6.2 years. Patients reported neuromuscular, cranial, and autonomic symptoms plus general fatigue. Two-thirds of patients reported 10 or more symptoms. The most frequent symptoms were leg weakness (91.7%) and general fatigue (83.3%). Restrictions in ADL were reported always or often in 75% of patients. Over half of the patients (n = 7) reported poor or very poor health status. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were 0.34 ± 0.35, with little day-to-day variation. Patients visited a number of different clinicians; most had been hospitalized at some point in the course of their disease. The most frequent drug treatments were 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP) (83.3%) and pyridostigmine (41.5%). The study has several limitations, including small sample size and the potential influence of recall bias. CONCLUSION: LEMS patients report long individual disease histories. Most patients suffer multiple symptoms which are frequently severe and troublesome, and almost all are restricted in ADL with poor health status. There is high utilization of healthcare resources from diagnosis to ongoing treatment. Physicians should be aware of this rare disease to ensure that patients receive an early diagnosis and prompt and appropriate treatment.

Benefits from sustained-release pyridostigmine bromide in myasthenia gravis: results of a prospective multicenter open-label trial.

INTRODUCTION: For more than 50 years the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine bromide has been the drug of choice in the symptomatic therapy for myasthenia gravis. The sustained-release dosage form of pyridostigmine (SR-Pyr) is only available in a limited number of countries (e.g. in the United States and Germany). Astonishingly, the therapeutic usefulness of SR-Pyr has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: In this non-interventional prospective open-label trial, 72 patients with stable myasthenia gravis were switched from instant-release dosage forms of pyridostigmine bromide to SR-Pyr. The results from the 37 patients younger than 60 years were separately analyzed. RESULTS: The initial daily dose of SR-Pyr was 288.1 ± 171.0mg. The drug switch was unproblematic in all patients. The number of daily doses was significantly reduced from 4.3 to 3.6 (p=0.011). The switch to SR-Pyr ameliorated the total quantified myasthenia gravis (QMG) score from 0.9 ± 0.5 to 0.6 ± 0.4 (p<0.001) in all patients and in the younger subgroup. This was accompanied by a significant improvement in the quality of life parameters. The health status valued by EuroQoL questionnaire improved from 0.626 ± 0.286 to 0.782 ± 0.186 (p<0.001). After switching to SR-Pyr, 28 adverse reactions disappeared and 24 adverse reactions occurred less frequent or weaker, however, 17 new adverse reactions were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the usefulness of SR-Pyr in an individualized therapeutic regimen to improve quality of life regardless of the patient's age in myasthenia gravis.