Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 272(1): 32-39, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224733

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare trends in the development of cirrhosis between patients with NAFLD who underwent bariatric surgery and a well-matched group of nonsurgical controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with NAFLD who undergo bariatric surgery generally have improvements in liver histology. However, the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on clinically relevant liver outcomes has not been investigated. METHODS: From a large insurance database, patients with a new NAFLD diagnosis and at least 2 years of continuous enrollment before and after diagnosis were identified. Patients with traditional contraindications to bariatric surgery were excluded. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were identified and matched 1:2 with patients who did not undergo bariatric surgery based on age, sex, and comorbid conditions. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate differences in progression from NAFLD to cirrhosis. RESULTS: A total of 2942 NAFLD patients who underwent bariatric surgery were identified and matched with 5884 NAFLD patients who did not undergo surgery. Cox proportional hazards modeling found that bariatric surgery was independently associated with a decreased risk of developing cirrhosis (hazard ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.52). Male gender was associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.31-3.27). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NAFLD who undergo bariatric surgery are at a decreased risk for progression to cirrhosis compared to well-matched controls. Bariatric surgery should be considered as a treatment strategy for otherwise eligible patients with NAFLD. Future bariatric surgery guidelines should include NAFLD as a comorbid indication when determining eligibility.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/prevenção & controle , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco
2.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 2020: 8883183, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33101558

RESUMO

Multiple doses of alemtuzumab for immunosuppressive therapy of patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant have been associated with a high rate of infection. In transplantation, limited alemtuzumab dosing has been successfully used as induction immunosuppression. The effect of multiple doses of alemtuzumab, used as maintenance therapy to minimize steroid and/or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in solid organ transplant recipients, is unknown. We evaluated the infectious and noninfectious outcomes of 179 pancreas transplant recipients treated with alemtuzumab for induction and maintenance therapy (extended alemtuzumab exposure (EAE)) from 2/28/2003 through 8/31/2005, compared with 159 pancreas transplant recipients with standard induction and maintenance (SIM) therapy performed before (1/1/2002 until 12/31/2002) and after (1/1/2006 until 12/31/2006) the implementation of EAE. EAE was associated with higher risk of overall infections (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33 (1.06-1.66), P=0.01), bacterial infections (HR 1.33 (1.05-1.67), P=0.02), fungal infections (HR 1.86 (1.28-2.71), P < 0.01), and cytomegalovirus infections (HR 2.29 (1.39-3.77), P < 0.01). In addition, EAE was associated with higher risk of acute cellular rejection (HR 2.09 (1.46-2.99), P < 0.01). In conclusion, while a limited alemtuzumab dosing is safe and effective for induction therapy in pancreas transplantation, EAE combined with steroid and calcineurin minimization is associated with a high risk of infectious complications and acute cellular rejection.

3.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 27(9): 2885-93, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26888476

RESUMO

Previous studies reported the risk of ESRD after kidney donation, but not the renal outcomes that precede ESRD. Here, we estimated the risk of proteinuria, reduced GFR, and ESRD in 3956 white kidney donors, assessed the contribution of postdonation hypertension and diabetes to these outcomes, and developed a risk calculator. After a mean±SD follow-up of 16.6±11.9 years, 215 (6.1%) donors developed proteinuria. Men had a higher risk of proteinuria (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18 to 2.05; P<0.001) as did those with higher body mass index (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.13; P<0.001). In all, 1410 (36%) donors reached an eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and 112 (2.8%) donors had either an eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) or ESRD (28 donors developed ESRD). An eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) or ESRD associated with older age (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.09; P<0.001), higher body mass index (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.13; P<0.001), and higher systolic BP (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04; P=0.01) at donation. Postdonation diabetes and hypertension associated with a fourfold higher risk of proteinuria and a >2-fold higher risk of ESRD. Models predicting proteinuria and reduced eGFR performed well (C-index 0.77-1.00). In conclusion, severe reduction in GFR and ESRD after kidney donation were uncommon and were highly associated with postdonation diabetes and hypertension. Furthermore, information available before donation may predict long-term renal outcomes in white living kidney donors.


Assuntos
Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Proteinúria/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Laryngoscope ; 130(6): 1496-1502, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31508825

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare utilization in voice patients with versus without mental health (MH) diagnoses STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study using electronic medical records from large regional healthcare system. METHODS: We examined data on sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, voice-related diagnoses, and patterns of healthcare utilization (including medication use, tests and procedures, and outpatient visits). The study period spanned January 2005 through June 2017. RESULTS: A total of 24,672 patients had at least one voice-related diagnosis. Of these, 11,483 (47%) also had at least one MH diagnosis compared to 14% in the overall repository (P < 0.0001). The most common voice-related diagnoses were nonspecific dysphonia (80%), acute laryngitis (30%), and vocal fold paresis/paralysis (7%). The 11,483 patients with both voice-related and MH diagnoses were more likely to have acute laryngitis and/or nonspecific dysphonia; less likely to have laryngeal cancer and/or paresis/paralysis; and more likely to have seen a primary care provider, to have received medications, and to have undergone radiology studies. In contrast, the 13,189 patients with only voice-related diagnoses had more overall voice-related visits, were more likely to have seen an otolaryngologist, and were more likely to have undergone a voice evaluation with a speech language pathologist. CONCLUSION: Voice patients with MH diagnoses were less likely to see otolaryngology and more likely to have radiology studies than voice patients without MH diagnoses. Further study is warranted to characterize temporal sequences of care in this group of patients and determine whether these differences are attributable to referral patterns from primary care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1496-1502, 2020.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Distúrbios da Voz/complicações , Distúrbios da Voz/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Laryngoscope ; 130(5): 1243-1248, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034963

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Voice patients with voice disorders have a high prevalence of distress and mental health (MH) comorbidities, but it is unknown to what extent distress precedes or follows voice disorder diagnoses. Objectives were to compare 1) proportions of voice patients with MH diagnoses who received MH diagnoses first versus voice-related diagnoses first, 2) voice-related diagnoses and care utilization, and 3) time to specialty evaluation in each group. METHODS: Patients with voice and MH diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions codes in a large health system data repository from January 2005 through July 2017. Sociodemographics, comorbidities, MH- and voice-related diagnoses, and voice-related care utilization were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression modeling. RESULTS: Among the 11,419 patients with both voice and MH diagnoses, 63% (n = 7,251) received MH diagnoses prior to voice diagnoses, compared with 37% with a voice diagnosis first (P < 0.0001). The latter group received more specific voice-related diagnoses (e.g., laryngeal cancer [odds ratio (OR) 4.27], benign laryngeal neoplasm [OR 1.60]), and were more likely to ever see an otolaryngologist than those receiving MH diagnoses first (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Most patients with voice and MH diagnoses received a MH diagnosis first. Patients who receive MH diagnoses first appeared to have different voice-related healthcare compared to those who received voice diagnoses first. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:1243-1248, 2020.


Assuntos
Disfonia/complicações , Disfonia/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Bladder Cancer ; 3(4): 305-310, 2017 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152554

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clostridium Difficile is the most common cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea. This study evaluates the prevalence and predictors of Clostridium Difficile infections in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed of all patients undergoing cystectomy and urinary diversion at a single institution from 2011-2017. Infection was documented in all cases with testing for Clostridium Difficile polymerase chain reaction toxin B. Patient and disease related factors were compared for those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. those who did not in order to identify potential risk factors associated with C. Difficile infections. Chi squared test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 350 patients who underwent cystectomy, 41 (11.7%) developed Clostridium Difficile in the 30 day post-operative period. The prevalence of C. Difficile infection was higher amongst the patients undergoing cystectomy compared to the non-cystectomy admissions at our hospital (11.7 vs. 2.9%). Incidence was not significantly different among those who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer versus those who underwent the procedure for other reasons. Median time to diagnosis was 6 days (range 3-28 days). The prevalence of C. Diff infections was not significantly different among those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. those who did not (11% vs. 10.4% p = 0.72). A significant association between C. Difficile infection was not seen with proton pump inhibitor use (p = 0.48), patient BMI (p = 0.67), chemotherapeutic regimen (p = 0.94), individual surgeon (p = 0.54), type of urinary diversion (0.41), or peri-operative antibiotic redosing (p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Clostridium Difficile infection has a higher prevalence in patients undergoing cystectomy. No significant association between prevalence and exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was seen.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA