Limited Impact of Breast Cancer and Non-breast Malignancies on Survival in Older Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results of a Large, Single-Centre, Population-Based Study.

AIMS: To analyse the disease-free survival and overall survival in older adults with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy, focusing on the relevance of non-breast malignancy (NBM) with respect to survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analyses were based on 1205 women aged 65 years and older with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy between 1999 and 2015. Patients were divided into three age categories: 65-70, 71-75 and >75 years. Multivariate survival analysis was carried out using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The two youngest age categories showed excellent results, with a 12-year disease-free survival of 84.6 and 86.3%, respectively. We noted a 17.2% incidence of NBM, particularly for colon cancer and lung cancer. Most (72.9%) occurred after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Of those 72.9%, about 50% died as a result of NBM within 2 years of the diagnosis of NBM. The overall 12-year NBM-specific survival was 92.0%. The 12-year overall survival was 60.0% for all and for the three abovementioned age categories was 73.3, 54.4 and 28.4%, respectively. The cause of death for all was predominantly non-malignancy-related morbidity. CONCLUSION: The impact of breast cancer on life expectancy was limited, in particularly for women aged 65-75 years. The relevance of NBM on survival was limited.

Survival of non-Western first generations immigrants with stomach cancer in North East Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Isolated groups, such as first generation non-Western immigrants, are at risk for suboptimal utilisation of the health care system resulting in a worse outcome. METHODS: From 1989 to 2007, all patients with stomach cancer were selected from the Comprehensive Cancer Centre North-East cancer registry. Associations between country of birth and patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were determined using χ(2) analysis. Relative survival analysis was used to estimate relative excess risk of dying according to country of birth (non-Western vs Western). RESULTS: After adjusting for confounding factors (patient, tumour and treatment related), the risk of dying was lower for first generation non-Western immigrants (relative excess risk 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.70) compared with Western patients. CONCLUSION: Although the better survival of first generation non-Western immigrants with stomach cancer remains unexplained, it argues against accessibility problems within the Dutch health care system.

Effect of hospital characteristics on outcome of patients with gastric cancer: a population based study in North-East Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is an important factor in the curative treatment of gastric cancer. However a variety of aspects of surgical treatment that potentially influence outcome are still not well defined. This study aims to assess the influence of hospital type, referral pattern and proximal or distal location of the tumour on the ultimate survival. METHODS: From January 1994 to January 2007, a total of 5245 patients were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre North-East Netherlands. Hospitals in this region were categorized into three types: teaching university (TU), teaching non-university (TNU), and non-teaching hospitals (NT). The influence of hospital type, referral for surgery and location of the tumour on the relative survival of operated patients was studied. RESULTS: Of the 5245 patients, 2334 patients underwent surgery. For operated patients, the 5-year relative survival was 42.5% for the TU versus 34.0% and 35.5% for respectively TNU and NT hospitals (p = 0.064), with no difference (p = 0.38) in relative survival (25.6-31.9%) in the proximal tumours. A significant difference was found between the hospitals in the 5-year relative survival in the distal tumours; 59.7% in the TU versus 36.4% in the TNU and 36% in the NT (p = 0.03 univariate), however this was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.184). High referral centres did not perform better as far as survival is concerned than low referral hospitals. In conclusion the hospital type in our region did not significantly influence outcome of surgery for gastric cancer.