RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Kodamaea ohmeri, a yeast frequently mistaken for Candida, has emerged in recent years as an opportunistic fungal pathogen, showing a predilection towards patients with immunosuppression, or those with long-term central venous access. This report describes a central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) due to K. ohmeri, in a young child, which was successfully treated. CASE REPORT: The patient is a 5-year-old male with a history of short gut syndrome, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) dependence who presented to the emergency room with a two-day history of productive-cough, rhinorrhea, and fever. Antibiotic therapy was initiated with cefepime and vancomycin for suspected CLABSI. However, within the first twenty-four hours of his admission, his initial blood culture from his central venous catheter became positive for yeast so fluconazole was added due to suspicion of candidemia. During his admission, his initial central line and peripheral blood culture were later speciated as Kodamaea ohmeri, with susceptibilities to fluconazole (MIC: 4 µg/mL) and micafungin (MIC: 0.125 µg/mL). After evaluating the susceptibilities, he was transitioned to micafungin. CONCLUSIONS: This case report further acknowledges that while rare, K. ohmeri is an emerging pathogen that has the potential to be life threatening if not accurately identified and treated with the optimal, empiric antifungal therapy. Due to potentially high mortality and antifungal resistance, this yeast species should be on the differential in patients that present with a central venous catheter and/or other underlying risk factors. Favorable outcomes can be achieved by removing indwelling catheters and administering optimal antifungal therapy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Journal clubs exist in a variety of forms in medical schools across the United States. Many incorporate a full spectrum of medical specialties, some are specific to certain interest groups or specialties, and many widely vary in whether or not they are school mandated or student-run. While these clubs are ubiquitously scattered throughout medical education, there has been very little quantitative or qualitative analysis regarding the efficacy of these clubs in enhancing medical students' abilities to evaluate clinical literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of attending Surgical Journal Club meetings at Eastern Virginia Medical School from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective. The authors' hypothesis was that regular attendance of these sessions would improve student performance from a multitude of perspectives and demonstrate the value of clinical literature analysis earlier in medical education. METHODS: A fifteen question Likert survey was administered on an optional basis to thirty-six medical students attending journal club. Responses were analyzed anonymously, and there was no incentive or demerit for completing the survey. Data was compiled and the mean, median, and mode for each question calculated with "5" corresponding to "Strongly Agree" and "1" corresponding to "Strongly Disagree." RESULTS: Twenty-seven of thirty-six attendees to our seventh journal club meeting completed the survey. Student responses were overwhelming positive, with all but one question reaching above "Agree" by analysis of the mean responses. CONCLUSION: Journal clubs remain an integral part of medical education but their importance has been diminished in recent years due to the increasing demands of other aspects of the first two years in medical school. We described a medical student run/established journal club that increased students' interest in surgery, their perceived knowledge-base, and comfort in critically analyzing medical journal articles.