The needs of carers of men with prostate cancer and barriers and enablers to meeting them: a qualitative study in England.

The aim of this study was to explore the needs of carers of men with prostate cancer and to identify barriers and enablers to meeting these needs. Carers were recruited to focus groups or interviews. These were recorded, transcribed and analysed by two researchers using Nvivo QSR6 and the Framework approach to index, chart and analyse data to identify emergent themes of the needs of carers, and barriers and enablers to meeting these needs. Fifteen carers took part in focus groups and 19 were interviewed. Carers' needs varied and were often unmet because of barriers to existing services. Carers needed: information; emotional support; practical support; effective medical care for the patient. Barriers to carers meeting their needs included: lack of awareness of sources of help; lack of understanding of information; reluctance to ask for help; prioritising the patient's needs. Enablers included better signposting to information and sources of support, and assessment of their needs. Interventions to address these needs should be developed taking account of the barriers and enablers identified here, and the experience of reported interventions for carers of other cancer patients. Carers should be offered an assessment to establish their needs and directed to appropriate sources of help.

Potentially avoidable emergency department attendance: interview study of patients' reasons for attendance.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the reasons for attendance at the emergency department (ED) by patients who could have been managed in an alternative service and the rate of acute admissions to one acute hospital. DESIGN: Interview study. SETTING: One acute hospital (University Hospitals of Leicester) in the East Midlands. PARTICIPANTS: 23 patients and/or their carers. METHODS: A purposive sample of patients attending the ED and the linked urgent care centre was identified and recruited. Patients in the sample were approached by a clinician and a researcher and invited to take part in an interview. Patients of different ethnicities and from different age groups, arriving at the ED via different referral routes (self-referral, emergency ambulance, GP referral, out-of-hours services) and attending at different times of the day and night were included. The interviews were recorded and transcribed with the individuals' permission and analysed using the framework analysis approach. RESULTS: Patients' anxiety or concern about the presenting problem, the range of services available to the ED and the perceived efficacy of these services, patients' perceptions of access to alternative services including general practice and lack of alternative pathways were factors that influenced the decision to use the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Access to general practice, anxiety about the presenting problem, awareness and perceptions of the efficacy of the services available in the ED and lack of alternative pathways are important predictors of attendance rates.

Primary prevention of type-2 diabetes and heart disease: action research in secondary schools serving an ethnically diverse UK population.

BACKGROUND: Escalating rates of childhood obesity are likely to have an impact on the prevalence of coronary heart disease and type-2 diabetes. We aimed to identify barriers to healthy lifestyles and evaluate the effectiveness of an action research approach to lifestyle modification in secondary schools. METHODS: An action research partnership between schools and university researchers involved pupils aged 11-15 in five inner-city secondary schools serving a predominantly South Asian population in Leicester, UK. Data collection included baseline and follow-up diet and physical activity questionnaires. Focus groups and observational visits were used to identify barriers, assist with developing tailored interventions and review the impact of the study. RESULTS: Working with secondary schools presented challenges but a useful partnership was sustained. Qualitative feedback suggested that this had raised awareness of healthy lifestyle issues in participating schools. Barriers in pupils included low prioritization of health when making lifestyle choices. Sub-optimal diet and activity habits were identified at baseline. Overall, these persisted at follow-up, although some limited positive changes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Using action research methods in this context is challenging but can facilitate useful data collection and may have a modest impact on lifestyle behaviours.

Drugs to support smoking cessation in UK general practice: are evidence based guidelines being followed?

BACKGROUND: Prescribing drugs to support smoking cessation is one of the most cost effective interventions in primary care, but there is evidence they are underused. Little is known about how far guidelines have been adopted. AIMS: To examine the context in which nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion are prescribed in UK general practice and whether guidelines are being followed. DESIGN: Patient questionnaire survey. SETTING: Twenty five general practices from the Trent Focus Collaborative Research Network in South Yorkshire and East Midlands, UK. METHODS: Participating practices posted a questionnaire to up to 40 patients prescribed NRT and bupropion respectively in the previous 3-9 months. RESULTS: The response rate for people prescribed NRT was 44.7% (323/723) and for bupropion 42.5% (77/181). Patients reported initiating the prescription request in 258 cases (65%), whereas GPs were reported as suggesting it in 49 (12%), smoking cessation services (SCS) in 38 (10%), and practice nurses in 36 (9%). Of those who could recall the content of the consultation in which NRT or bupropion was prescribed, 191 (79%) reported receiving advice on treatment use and 209 (68%) were encouraged to set a quit date. Follow up by SCS was recommended to 186 (64%) and practice follow up was offered to 212 (63%), but 41 (15%) reported no offer of follow up support. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients reported receiving advice and follow up in line with guidelines. However, relatively few prescriptions were suggested by GPs or practice nurses and, in a significant minority of cases, neither follow up by the practice nor additional support from SCS was recommended. More active implementation of guidelines could increase the impact of general practice on the prevalence of smoking.