Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Treatment Apixaban Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world evidence is available comparing the safety and effectiveness of apixaban and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer receiving anticoagulation in an extended treatment setting. This study evaluated the risk of bleeding and recurrent VTE in patients with cancer-associated VTE who were prescribed apixaban or LMWH for ≥3 months. METHODS: A US commercial claims database was used to identify adult patients with VTE and active cancer who initiated apixaban or LMWH 30 days following the first VTE diagnosis and had ≥3 months of continuous enrollment and 3 months of primary anticoagulation treatment. Patients were followed from the day after the end of primary anticoagulation treatment until the earliest of: date of disenrollment, discontinuation of index anticoagulant, switch to another anticoagulant, or end of the study period. Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment cohorts. Incidence rates (IRs) for the outcomes were calculated per 100 person-years (PY). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the adjusted risk of recurrent VTE, major bleeding (MB), and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). RESULTS: A total of 13,564 apixaban- and 2,808 LMWH-treated patients were analyzed. Post-IPTW, the treatment cohorts were balanced. Patients receiving apixaban had lower adjusted IRs for recurrent VTE (4.1 vs 9.6 per 100 PY), MB (6.3 vs 12.6), and CRNMB (26.1 vs 36.0) versus LMWH (P<.0001 for all comparisons) during the follow-up period. Patients on apixaban had a lower adjusted risk of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.53), MB (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.61), and CRNMB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85) versus LMWH. CONCLUSIONS: Extended anticoagulation treatment of ≥3 months with apixaban was associated with lower rates of recurrent VTE, MB, and CRNMB compared with LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE.

Hospitalization Among Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients With and Without Connective Tissue Disease Comorbidities Prescribed Oral Selexipag.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have a poorer prognosis than those with other PAH etiologies. This study assessed the impact of CTD on healthcare outcomes among PAH patients with and without CTD comorbidities that were treated with oral selexipag. METHODS: The study utilized Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (2007-2021) from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019, and identified patients with PAH without CTD and PAH with CTD treated with oral selexipag. Patients had ≥ 12-month baseline period with no requirement for a minimum follow-up period. Patients were followed until any of the following events: discontinuation of oral selexipag, or health plan disenrollment, or death, or presence of a diagnosis claim for CTEPH, or study end date, whichever occurred first. PAH-related hospitalizations, PAH disease progression, and healthcare utilizations and costs were assessed in the follow-up period. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the time to hospitalization and generalized linear models were used to examine healthcare costs and utilization between the two cohorts. RESULTS: In the analysis, 237 PAH without CTD, and 80 PAH patients with CTD comorbidities prescribed oral selexipag were included. The PAH without CTD comorbidities cohort was older (65 vs. 63 years old), had proportionately less females (72 vs. 83%), and higher comorbidity burden than PAH with CTD comorbidities (mean CCI index 3 vs. 2). After adjusting for potential confounders, the risk for PAH-related hospitalization (hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, p value 0.641), all-cause hospitalization (HR 1.09, p value: 0.765), and PAH disease progression (HR 1.14, p value 0.522) between the two cohorts were similar. After adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, PAH with CTD comorbidities incurred higher total mean all-cause PAH-related medical care costs compared to PAH without CTD comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, the risk of hospitalization and PAH disease progression were similar between the two cohorts who received oral selexipag. The results from this study corroborate findings of the GRIPHON post hoc analysis of PAH-associated CTD patients and support oral selexipag use in PAH-CTD patients.

Real-World Treatment Outcomes, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs Associated with Antiemetics Among Cancer Patients on Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a recognized adverse outcome among patients with cancer. This retrospective study aimed to quantify the treatment outcomes, resource utilization, and costs associated with antiemetic use to prevent CINV in a broad US population who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Data from the STATinMED RWD Insights Database was collected from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Cohorts included any patients that had at least one claim for fosnetupitant + palonosetron (NEPA) or fosaprepitant + palonosetron (APPA) and evidence of initiating cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate nausea and vomiting visits within 14 days after chemotherapy, and generalized linear models were used to examine all-cause and CINV-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. RESULTS: NEPA was associated with significantly lower rates of nausea and vomiting visits after chemotherapy (p = 0.0001), including 86% greater odds of nausea and vomiting events for APPA during the second week after chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; p = 0.0003). The mean numbers of all-cause inpatient visits (p = 0.0195) and CINV-related inpatient and outpatient visits were lower among NEPA patients (p < 0.0001). These differences corresponded to 57% of NEPA patients and 67% of APPA patients having one or more inpatient visits (p = 0.0002). All-cause outpatient costs and CINV-related inpatient costs were also significantly lower for NEPA (p < 0.0001). The mean number of all-cause outpatient visits, all-cause inpatient costs, and CINV-related outpatient costs was not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study based on claims data, NEPA was associated with lower rates of nausea and vomiting and lower CINV-related HCRU and costs compared to APPA following cisplatin-based chemotherapy. These results complement clinical trial data and published economic models supporting the use of NEPA as a safe, effective, and cost-saving antiemetic for patients undergoing chemotherapy.