Recommendations for the successful control of a large outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a non-endemic hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: A large outbreak of three epidemic vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) clones affected the study hospital for almost two years. AIM: To describe the strategy to successfully control this outbreak and eradicate VRE from the study hospital. METHODS: Infection control interventions started after detection of VRE in three patients. Hospital-wide surveillance was started after ongoing transmission despite isolation precautions, cleaning and contact tracing. Hygiene education and discipline were enhanced. Despite these interventions, additional measures were required to control the outbreak, such as ward disinfection with hydrogen peroxide vapour and the introduction of a VRE quarantine ward. Ultimately, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for haematological patients on chemotherapy was abandoned. FINDINGS: Over a 22-month period, 242 VRE carriers were identified. Of these, 128 (53%) patients were detected by hospital-wide surveillance alone. Three epidemic clones were detected: ST494-vanA (N = 160), ST78-vanA (N = 23) and ST117-vanB (N = 32). In total, 5614 possible contacts were identified. VRE transmission occurred on 13 out of 23 wards. VRE was cultured from clinical specimens in 22 patients (seven with bacteraemia). Since January 2014, no further transmission of these VRE clones has been observed. CONCLUSION: Infection control measures according to international guidelines were insufficient to expose the outbreak to its full extent and control it. Its full extent only became apparent after sustained hospital-wide screening. Successful control of this hospital-wide VRE outbreak was feasible, but required great effort. Final containment and eradication of the epidemic clones was achieved by environmental decontamination with hydrogen peroxide vapour, strict isolation precautions, a VRE quarantine ward and antimicrobial stewardship.

[Inter-practice variation in polypharmacy prevalence amongst older patients in primary care]. / Bij iedere huisarts evenveel pillen?

PURPOSE: Complex medication management in older people with multiple chronic conditions can introduce practice variation in polypharmacy prevalence. This study aimed to determine the inter-practice variation in polypharmacy prevalence and examine how this variation was influenced by patient and practice characteristics. METHODS: This cohort study included 45,731 patients aged 55 years and older with at least one prescribed medication from 126 general practices that participated in NIVEL Primary Care Database in the Netherlands. Medication dispensing data of the year 2012 were used to determine polypharmacy. Polypharmacy was defined as the chronic and simultaneous use of at least five different medications. Multilevel logistic regression models were constructed to quantify the polypharmacy prevalence variation between practices. Patient characteristics (age, gender, socioeconomic status, number, and type of chronic conditions) and practice characteristics (practice location and practice population) were added to the models. RESULTS: After accounting for differences in patient and practice characteristics, polypharmacy rates varied with a factor of 2.4 between practices (from 12.4% to 30.1%) and an overall mean of 19.8%. Age and type of conditions were highly positively associated with polypharmacy, and to a lesser extent a lower socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation in polypharmacy rates existed between general practices, even after accounting for patient and practice characteristics, which suggests that there is not much agreement concerning medication management in this complex patient group. Initiatives that could reduce inappropriate heterogeneity in medication management can add value to the care delivered to these patients.