Ki-67: role in diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up after treatment of breast cancers.

AIM: To evaluate the literature data about diagnostic value, prognosis value and interest in follow-up of Ki-67 antibody after treatment for breast cancer. METHODS: We performed a literature search in pubmed using the keywords : Ki-67, anti-Ki-67, breast cancer, prognosis, proliferation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy. RESULTS: Ki-67 is routinely used as a static marker of proliferative activity and in follow-up-monitoring before and after treatment by chemotherapy and more recently hormonotherapy. Ki-67 was also used at a cut-off of 14% to differentiate between luminal A and B breast cancers. A high Ki-67 expression is probably related to a poorer prognosis but also a better response to neoadjuvant chemo and/or targeted therapy. More recently, genomic analysis is more reliable to classify the molecular breast cancer subtypes avoiding the possible cases of discordant Ki-67 rate. Ki-67 is also interesting in predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemo and hormone therapy. CONCLUSION: Ki-67 evaluated by immunohistochemistry is important in routine in countries without bimolecular plateforms despite technical insufficiencies. When available, genomic grading is better to classify molecular subtypes and determine breast cancer prognosis in adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting.

[Aromatases inhibitors for breast cancer in menopausal patients]. / Les inhibiteurs de l'aromatase dans le traitement adjuvant du cancer du sein de la femme ménopausée.

AIMS: To analyze the litterature data concerning the results of the main international randomized trials of adjuvant Aromarase Inhibitors (AI) in adjuvant setting for early breast cancer and the impact on daily practice in the management of breast cancer. METHODS: We selected through a litterature review 30 publications concerned the topic of AI RESULTS: They concerned the large ATAC, BIG, MA17 and IES concerning anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane . AI have been compared to tamoxifen in upfront of swich intents and showed a superiority to reduce, mortality rate, controlateral breast cancer risk, a better tolerance profile compared to tamoxifen and a sigificant benefit in term of disease-free survival. These results made a revolution in the adjuvant BC treatment, leading to the systematic use of upfront AI in menopaused patients. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant hormonotherapy in menopaused patients is now based on AI and proved its superiority to tamoxifen in term of distant, controlateral risks reduction and disease-free survival, less for overall survival.