Intranasal neomycin evokes broad-spectrum antiviral immunity in the upper respiratory tract.

Respiratory virus infections in humans cause a broad-spectrum of diseases that result in substantial morbidity and mortality annually worldwide. To reduce the global burden of respiratory viral diseases, preventative and therapeutic interventions that are accessible and effective are urgently needed, especially in countries that are disproportionately affected. Repurposing generic medicine has the potential to bring new treatments for infectious diseases to patients efficiently and equitably. In this study, we found that intranasal delivery of neomycin, a generic aminoglycoside antibiotic, induces the expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in the nasal mucosa that is independent of the commensal microbiota. Prophylactic or therapeutic administration of neomycin provided significant protection against upper respiratory infection and lethal disease in a mouse model of COVID-19. Furthermore, neomycin treatment protected Mx1 congenic mice from upper and lower respiratory infections with a highly virulent strain of influenza A virus. In Syrian hamsters, neomycin treatment potently mitigated contact transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In healthy humans, intranasal application of neomycin-containing Neosporin ointment was well tolerated and effective at inducing ISG expression in the nose in a subset of participants. These findings suggest that neomycin has the potential to be harnessed as a host-directed antiviral strategy for the prevention and treatment of respiratory viral infections.

Insulin Requirement and Infrainguinal Bypass Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for peripheral artery disease. The association of DM with major adverse limb events (MALE) after lower extremity revascularization remains controversial, as patients with diabetes are typically analyzed as a single, homogenous group. Using a large national database, this study examines the impact of insulin use and glycemic control on the outcomes following infrainguinal bypass. The hypothesis is that prevalent insulin therapy and elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with an increased risk of MALEs after infrainguinal bypass in patients with DM and could therefore be used for risk stratification. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database files for infrainguinal bypass (2007-2021) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with DM undergoing bypass for peripheral artery disease were included. Patients on dialysis or with prior kidney transplantation were excluded. The characteristics and outcomes of patients with insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus (IRDM) were compared to those of patients not requiring insulin (noninsulin-requiring diabetes mellitus [NIRDM]) prior to the bypass procedure. RESULTS: A total of 9,686 patients with DM (56% IRDM) underwent bypass. Patients with IRDM were significantly younger than patients with NIRDM, more likely to be female (P < 0.01), African American (P < 0.01), and Hispanic (P = 0.031), and more likely to have comorbidities and be categorized into American Society of Anesthesiologist classes IV-V. They were more likely to be treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (P < 0.001). Patients with IRDM had significantly higher perioperative complications with no difference in perioperative mortality between the 2 groups. Beyond the perioperative period, with a mean follow-up of 427 days, patients with IRDM had significantly lower crude rates of primary patency and higher crude rates of major amputation, MALE, and mortality compared to patients with NIRDM. Regression analyses demonstrated that insulin requirement, but not HbA1c, was independently associated with a higher risk of MALE (hazard ratio = 1.17 [1.06-1.29]) and mortality (hazard ratio = 1.28 [1.16-1.43]). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin requirement, but not HbA1c, is significantly associated with MALEs and survival after infrainguinal bypass in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Stratification of patients with DM based on their prevalent insulin use prior to infrainguinal bypass surgery could improve the prediction of outcomes of peripheral arterial bypass surgery in patients with diabetes.

Comparative Outcomes of Peripheral Vascular Interventions in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Inhibitors and Vitamin K Antagonists.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), low-dose Factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) taken with aspirin improved limb and cardiovascular outcomes compared to aspirin alone. Furthermore, in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, FXaI are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for chronic anticoagulation. While studies have evaluated different perioperative anticoagulation regimens in patients treated for PAD, the optimal regimen for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) has not been determined. This analysis compares outcomes of patients after PVI that require chronic anticoagulation with FXaI and VKA. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative-PVI database was used. Patients consistently treated with FXaI or VKA before the procedure, at discharge, and on long-term follow-up were defined as those receiving chronic anticoagulation. Patient demographics, procedural details, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between FXaI and VKA groups. RESULTS: A total of 109,268 patients were analyzed, and 6,885 were chronically anticoagulated with FXaI (N = 2,427) or VKA (N = 4,458). Patients anticoagulated with VKA were more frequently males (65.3% vs. 61.0%, P < 0.001) with end-stage renal disease (9.7% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001) and more likely to be treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (58.1% vs. 52.7%, P < 0.001). Rates of hematoma following PVI were significantly higher in patients taking VKA compared to FXaI (3.5% vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that VKA were associated with increased perioperative hematoma than FXaI (odds ratio = 1.89 [1.30-2.82]). Compared to patients taking VKA, those receiving FXaI had lower rates of major amputation (6.7% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.020) and mortality (7.6% vs. 15.2%, P ≤ 0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients consistently anticoagulated with FXaI had improved amputation-free survival after PVI. Adjusting for significant patient and procedural characteristics, Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that there is an increased risk for major amputation or mortality in patients using VKA compared to FXaI (hazard ratio 1.61, [1.36-1.90]). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic anticoagulation with FXaI as compared to VKA was associated with superior perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing PVI. FXaI should be the preferred agents over VKA for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing PVI.

The Use and Impact of Cilostazol on Patients Undergoing Endovascular Peripheral Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is used for the treatment of intermittent claudication. The impact of cilostazol on the outcomes of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) remains controversial. This study assesses the use and impact of cilostazol on patients undergoing PVI for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database files for PVI were reviewed. Patients with PAD who underwent PVI for chronic limb threatening-ischemia or claudication were included and divided based on the use of cilostazol preoperatively. After propensity matching for patient demographics and comorbidities, the short-term and long-term outcomes of the 2 groups (preoperative cilostazol use versus no preoperative cilostazol use) were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 245,309 patients underwent PVI procedures and 6.6% (N = 16,366) were on cilostazol prior to intervention. Patients that received cilostazol were more likely to be male (62% vs 60%; P < 0.001), White (77% vs. 75%; P < 0.001), and smokers (83% vs. 77%; P < 0.001). They were less likely to have diabetes mellitus (50% vs. 56%; P < 0.001) and congestive heart failure (14% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Patient on cilostazol were more likely to be treated for claudication (63% vs. 40%, P < 0.001), undergo prior lower extremity revascularization (55% vs. 51%, P < 0.001) and less likely to have undergone prior minor and major amputation (10% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive cilostazol. After 3:1 propensity matching, there were 50,265 patients included in the analysis with no differences in baseline characteristics. Patients on cilostazol were less likely to develop renal complications and more likely to be discharged home. Patients on cilostazol had significantly lower rates of long-term mortality (11.5% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001 and major amputation (4.0% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.022). However, there were no significant differences in rates of reintervention, major adverse limb events, or patency after PVI. Amputation-free survival rates were significantly higher for patients on cilostazol, after 4 years of follow up (89% vs. 87%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol is underutilized in the VQI database and seems to be associated with improved amputation-free survival. Cilostazol therapy should be considered in all patients with PAD who can tolerate it prior to PVI.

Clinical Implications of Low Body Mass Index on Endovascular Lower Extremity Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The epidemic of obesity and associated cardiovascular morbidity continues to grow, attracting public attention and healthcare resources. However, the impact of malnutrition and being underweight continues to be overshadowed by obesity, especially in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This study assesses the characteristics and outcomes of patients with low body mass index (BMI ≤ 18.5) compared to patients with nonobese BMI undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PVI due to PAD registered in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were categorized into underweight (BMI ≤ 18.5) and nonobese BMI (BMI = 18.5-30). Patients in both groups were matched 3:1 for baseline demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and indications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done for long-term outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 337,926 patients underwent PVI, of whom 12,935 (4%) were underweight, 215,728 (64%) were nonobese, and 109,263 (32%) were obese. Underweight patients were more likely to be older, female, smokers, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and more likely to present with chronic limb-threatening ischemia than nonobese patients. After propensity matching, there were 18,047 nonobese patients and 6,031 underweight patients. There were no significant differences in matched characteristics. Perioperatively, underweight patients were more likely to require a longer hospital length of stay. Underweight patients had statistically significantly higher 30-day mortality compared to patients with nonobese BMI (3% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of thrombotic complications. As for long-term outcomes, underweight patients had a higher rate of reintervention (20% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) and major adverse limb events (27% vs. 22%, P < 0.001). The 4-year rate of amputation-free survival was significantly lower in underweight patients (70% vs. 82%, P < 0.001), and the 2-year freedom from major amputation (90% vs. 94%, P < 0.001) showed similar trends with worse outcomes in patients who were underweight. CONCLUSIONS: Underweight patients with PAD are disproportionally more likely to be African American, females, and smokers and suffer worse outcomes after PVI than PAD patients with nonobese BMI. When possible, increased scrutiny and optimization of nutrition and other factors contributing to low BMI should be addressed prior to PVI.