Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J ECT ; 39(2): 102-105, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729716

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Etomidate and methohexital are the 2 commonly used anesthetics for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the United States. The objective of this study was to examine how anesthetic choice between etomidate and methohexital is associated with real-world clinical outcomes. METHODS: This naturalistic retrospective cohort study examined longitudinal electronic health records for 495 adult patients who received 2 or more ECT treatments from 2010 to 2019 in Kaiser Permanente North California, a large integrated health care system. Study outcomes included 12-month posttreatment depression remission as measured by the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, psychiatric and all-cause emergency department visits, and psychiatric and all-cause hospitalizations. RESULTS: Anesthetic choice was not significantly related to depression severity, emergency department visits, or psychiatric hospitalizations at 12 months after completing ECT. In exploratory analyses, we found that etomidate compared with methohexital was associated with higher rates of patient discomfort adverse effects-postictal agitation, phlebitis, and myoclonus (2.4% vs 0.4%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We present the first large comparison of etomidate and methohexital as anesthetics for ECT and their associations with real-world outcomes. Our study showed no significant difference on depression remission, emergency department visits, or hospitalizations 12-months posttreatment. Thus, clinicians should focus on other patient or treatment characteristics when deciding on anesthetics for ECT. Further investigation is needed to confirm our exploratory findings that etomidate use was correlated with a higher rate of patient discomfort adverse effects relative to methohexital.


Assuntos
Eletroconvulsoterapia , Etomidato , Propofol , Adulto , Humanos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Etomidato/efeitos adversos , Metoexital , Eletroconvulsoterapia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Prev Med ; 162: 107151, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35809821

RESUMO

It is unknown whether use of e-cigarettes increases susceptibility to COVID-19. In a large clinical sample of young adults, we evaluated whether current or ever e-cigarette use was associated with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19. To address the confounding of combustible smoking, the sample was restricted to never smokers. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the electronic health records of 74,853 young adults (aged 18-35 years), without a history of cigarette smoking, who were screened for e-cigarette use (current, former, never) in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) healthcare system from 3/5/2020 (baseline) to 11/30/2020 (pre-vaccine). COVID-19 risk was estimated in time-to-event analyses using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, adjusted for socio-demographics and medical comorbidities. E-cigarette status in the cohort was: 1.6% current, 1.2% former, and 97.2% never. During follow-up, 1965 (2.6%) patients acquired COVID-19. We did not find evidence that current (vs never) e-cigarette use was associated with risk of COVID-19 (aHR = 1.12 95%CI:0.77-1.62). However, we did find suggestive evidence that former (versus never) e-cigarette use may be associated with greater risk of COVID-19 (aHR = 1.39 95%CI:0.98-1.96). While e-cigarette use is associated with health risks for young adults, results from this study suggest that current use of e-cigarettes may not increase susceptibility for COVID-19 among young adults who have never smoked cigarettes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fumar Cigarros , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Vaping , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fumar Cigarros/efeitos adversos , Fumar Cigarros/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Vaping/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 85(1)2024 01 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301189

RESUMO

Objective: People with psychosis or bipolar disorder (severe and persistent mental illness [SPMI]) are at high risk for poor psychiatric and chronic illness outcomes, which could be ameliorated through improved health care quality. This study assessed whether a telehealth, collaborative care program managed by psychiatric clinical pharmacists (SPMI Population Care) was associated with improved health care quality for adults with SPMI in a large California health system.Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data to compare 968 program enrollees at 6 demonstration sites (Population Care) to 8,339 contemporaneous patients with SPMI at 6 non-program sites (Usual Care). SPMI diagnoses were based on ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. Primary outcomes were optimal psychotropic medication adherence, guideline-recommended glycemic screening, annual psychiatrist visit, and emergency department use. Difference-in-difference analyses assessed change in outcomes from 12 months pre- to 12 months post-enrollment using overlap weighting with high dimensional propensity scores to balance participant characteristics across groups. Participant data were collected from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022.Results: From pre- to post-enrollment, Population Care was associated with greater achievement of psychotropic medication adherence and glycemic screening (+6 and +9 percentage points), but unexpectedly with a decrease in annual psychiatrist visits (-6 percentage points) and no significant change in emergency department use, relative to Usual Care. More than 75% of Population Care participants attended an intake and ≥ 1 follow-up visits. Participants with psychosis (26% of sample) had similar results as those with bipolar disorder.Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist-led telehealth collaborative care has potential to improve psychopharmacologic treatment adherence and recommended disease preventive screening for people with psychosis or bipolar disorder.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Transtornos Psicóticos , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Transtorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacêuticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico
4.
Acad Pediatr ; 2024 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458489

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined atypical antipsychotic prescribing by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved-use (on-label) status for adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from electronic health records (EHRs) of adolescents aged 10-17 years in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. New outpatient atypical antipsychotic prescription orders during 2013-2021 were evaluated. Prescriptions were categorized as on-label if linked in EHRs to autism, psychosis, bipolar disorder, or Tourette's diagnoses; otherwise, they were potentially off-label (herein, off-label). Trend analysis of monthly prescribing rates assessed slope change at pandemic onset for the cohort and by sex and age groups. RESULTS: Among 5828 patients, 74.5% of new antipsychotic orders were off-label in 2021. Overall prescribing decreased significantly until early 2020 (slope = -0.045, P < .01) but then significantly increased through 2021 (post-March 2020 slope change = 0.211, P = .01). Off-label prescriptions increased at a similar rate during the COVID-19 time period, but on-label prescriptions did not change significantly. Males and younger adolescents (ages 10-14 years) showed significant decreases until early 2020, while females and older adolescents (ages 15-17 years) did not. Females and younger adolescents exhibited significant increases in overall and off-label prescribing rates following pandemic onset; older adolescents exhibited increases in overall prescriptions while males had no detectable changes. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic prescribing declined slightly but then increased significantly following COVID-19 onset for overall and off-label prescriptions. Pandemic onset differentially impacted antipsychotic prescribing by sex and age, with overall and off-label prescribing driven by increases among female and younger adolescents.

5.
J Addict Med ; 18(1): 28-32, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37801372

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess agreement between self-report and urine toxicology measures assessing use of 2 illicit simulants (methamphetamine and cocaine) during early pregnancy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of 203,053 pregnancies from 169,709 individuals receiving prenatal care at Kaiser Permanente Northern California between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, assessed agreement ( κ , sensitivity, and specificity) between self-reported frequency and urine toxicology measures of methamphetamine and cocaine early in pregnancy. RESULTS: Prenatal use of the illicit stimulants was rare according to toxicology (n = 244 [0.12%]) and self-report measures (n = 294 [0.14%]). Agreement between these measures was low ( κ < 0.20). Of the 498 positive pregnancies, 40 (8.03%) screened positive on both measures, 204 (40.96%) screened positive on toxicology tests only, and 254 (51.00%) screened positive by self-report only. Relative to toxicology tests, sensitivity of any self-reported use was poor with 16.39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.75%-21.04%) of pregnancies with a positive toxicology test self-reporting any use in pregnancy. Relative to self-report, sensitivity of toxicology tests was also poor with 13.61% (95% CI, 9.69%-17.52%) of pregnancies who self-reported any use having positive urine toxicology tests. The sensitivity improved slightly at higher frequencies of self-reported use: daily, 17.50% (95% CI, 5.72%-29.29%); weekly, 25.00% (95% CI, 11.58%-38.42%); and monthly or less, 11.06% (95% CI, 6.89%-15.23%). Specificity was high (>99%), reflecting the high negative rate of use. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that using self-report and toxicology measures in combination likely provides the most accurate information on methamphetamine and cocaine use in early pregnancy. Findings also highlight the need to provide supportive nonstigmatizing environments in which pregnant individuals feel comfortable disclosing substance use without fear of punishment.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína , Cocaína , Metanfetamina , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Metanfetamina/efeitos adversos , Autorrelato , Estudos Transversais , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/epidemiologia
6.
Psychiatr Serv ; 74(8): 801-808, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37016828

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined time trends and patient characteristics related to guideline-recommended cardiometabolic risk factor monitoring among youths treated with antipsychotic medications. METHODS: This observational study assessed participant sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and year of antipsychotic medication initiation, with receipt of glycemic and lipid testing within 2 years of initiation as the primary outcome. Electronic health records and pharmacy data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California for 4,568 youths (ages 10-21 years) who began antipsychotic medication treatment during 2013-2017 were included. RESULTS: Mean±SD age of the sample was 17.0±3.0 years, 52% were male, and 50% were Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander; Black; Latino; or another or unknown race-ethnicity. Overall, 54% of the sample completed glycemic and lipid monitoring within 2 years of medication initiation (41% within 1 year). With each study year, monitoring rates increased by 5% in this cohort, after the analyses were adjusted for participant factors (p=0.001). In the fully adjusted analysis, youths with a psychotic disorder were 23% more likely to receive cardiometabolic monitoring than those without a psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder (p<0.001). Monitoring was also more common among younger versus older adolescents and among those with risperidone (vs. quetiapine) medication, obesity, or more frequent use of outpatient health care. Youths with (vs. without) substance use disorder were 19% less likely to complete monitoring (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiometabolic monitoring increased modestly over time, but close to half of the studied youths did not receive glycemic or lipid testing. Additional clinical strategies may be needed to increase monitoring overall and among harder-to-reach youth subgroups.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Transtornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Feminino , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Risperidona , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Lipídeos/uso terapêutico
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(11): e2244086, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445706

RESUMO

Importance: Prenatal cannabis use is associated with health risks for mothers and their children. Prior research suggests that rates of prenatal cannabis use in Northern California increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unknown whether increases varied with the local cannabis retail and policy environment. Objective: To test whether pandemic-related increases in prenatal cannabis use were greater among pregnant individuals with greater retail availability of cannabis around their homes or among those living in jurisdictions that allowed storefront retailers. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional, population-based time series study used data from pregnancies in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care system screened for cannabis use before (January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020) and during (April 1 to December 31, 2020) the early COVID-19 pandemic. Proximity to the nearest retailer and number of retailers within a 15-minute drive from one's home and local cannabis storefront retailer policy (banned vs permitted) were calculated. Interrupted time series models were fit using multiplicative and additive Poisson regression, adjusting for age and race and ethnicity. Exposures: The COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prenatal cannabis use based on universal urine toxicology tests conducted during early pregnancy at entrance to prenatal care. Results: The sample (n = 99 127 pregnancies) included 26.2% Asian or Pacific Islander, 6.8% Black, 27.6% Hispanic, 34.4% non-Hispanic White, and 4.9% other, unknown, or multiracial individuals, with a mean (SD) age of 30.8 (5.3) years. Prenatal cannabis use before (6.8%) and during (8.2%) the pandemic was associated with closer proximity to a retailer, greater retailer density, and residing in a jurisdiction that permitted vs banned retailers. There was a greater absolute increase in cannabis use from before to during the pandemic among those within a 10-minute drive (<10 minutes: adjusted rate difference [aRD], 0.93 cases/100 patients; 95% CI, 0.56-1.29 cases/100 patients; ≥10 minutes: aRD, 0.40 cases/100 patients; 95% CI, 0.12-0.68 cases/100 patients; interaction P = .02). Otherwise, relative and absolute rates increased similarly across categories of cannabis retailer proximity/density and local policy (interaction P > .05). Conclusions and Relevance: Prenatal cannabis use was more common among individuals living in areas with greater retail availability of cannabis. Although relative rates increased similarly during the pandemic regardless of local cannabis retail and policy environment, there was a larger absolute increase associated with living closer to a storefront cannabis retailer. Continued monitoring of local cannabis policy, the retail environment, and prenatal cannabis use is needed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cannabis , Alucinógenos , Criança , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Adulto , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Agonistas de Receptores de Canabinoides , California/epidemiologia , Vitaminas , Analgésicos
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(12): e2248055, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542384

RESUMO

This cross-sectional study uses data from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care system with universal screening via self-report and urine toxicology at prenatal care entrance to examine trends in cocaine and methamphetamine use among pregnant individuals from 2011 to 2019.


Assuntos
Cocaína , Metanfetamina , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Autorrelato , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA