RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic diarrhea is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). The exact etiology of chronic diarrhea in macaques remains unidentified. The occurrence of diarrhea is frequently linked to dysbiosis within the gut microbiome. Research into microbiome signatures correlated with diarrhea in macaques have predominantly been conducted with single sample collections. Our analysis was based on the metagenomic composition of longitudinally acquired fecal samples from rhesus macaques with chronic diarrhea and clinically healthy rhesus macaques that were obtained over the course of two years. We aimed to investigate potential relationships between the macaque gut microbiome, the presence of diarrhea and diet interventions with a selection of commercially available monkey diets. RESULTS: The microbiome signature of macaques with intermittent chronic diarrhea showed a significant increase in lactate producing bacteria e.g. lactobacilli, and an increase in fermenters of lactate and succinate. Strikingly, two lactose free diets were associated with a lower incidence of diarrhea. CONCLUSION: A lactose intolerance mechanism is suggested in these animals by the bloom of Lactobacillus in the presence of lactose resulting in an overproduction of intermediate fermentation products likely led to osmotically induced diarrhea. This study provides new insights into suspected microbiome-lactose intolerance relationship in rhesus macaques with intermittent chronic diarrhea. The integration of machine learning with metagenomic data analysis holds potential for developing targeted dietary interventions and therapeutic strategies and therefore ensuring a healthier and more resilient primate population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plants need different survival strategies in habitats differing in hydrological regimes. This probably has consequences for vegetation development when former floodplain areas that are currently confronted with soil flooding only, will be reconnected to the highly dynamical river bed. Such changes in river management are increasingly important, especially at locations where increased water retention can prevent flooding events in developed areas. It is therefore crucial to determine the responses of plant species from relatively low-dynamic wetlands to complete submergence, and to compare these with those of species from river forelands, in order to find out what the effects of such landscape-scale changes on vegetation would be. METHODS: To compare the species' tolerance to complete submergence and their acclimation patterns, a greenhouse experiment was designed with a selection of 19 species from two contrasting sites: permanently wet meadows in a former river foreland, and frequently submerged grasslands in a current river foreland. The plants were treated with short (3 weeks) and long (6 weeks) periods of complete submergence, to evaluate if survival, morphological responses, and changes in biomass differed between species of the two habitats. KEY RESULTS: All tested species inhabiting river forelands were classified as tolerant to complete submergence, whereas species from wet meadows showed either relatively intolerant, intermediate or tolerant responses. Species from floodplains showed in all treatments stronger shoot elongation, as well as higher production of biomass of leaves, stems, fine roots and taproots, compared with meadow species. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong need for the creation of temporary water retention basins during high levels of river discharge. However, based on the data presented, it is concluded that such reconnection of former wetlands (currently serving as meadows) to the main river bed will strongly influence plant species composition and abundance.