A Controlled Study in CPR-Survival in Propensity Score Matched Full-Code and Do-Not-Resuscitate ICU Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) causes significant injuries and increased cost among transiently resuscitated patients that do not survive their hospitalizations. Descriptive studies show zero and near-zero percent survival for CPR recipients with high Apache II scores. Despite these factors, no controlled studies exist in CPR to guide patient selection for CPR candidacy. Our objective was therefore to perform a controlled study in CPR to inform recommendations for CPR candidacy. We hypothesize that the protective effects of CPR decrease as illness severity increases, and that Full-Code status provides no survival benefit over Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) status for patients with the highest predicted mortality by Apache IV score. METHODS: We performed propensity-score matched survival analyses between Full-Code and DNR patients after stratifying by predicted mortality quartiles using Apache IV scores. Primary outcomes were mortality hazard ratios. Secondary outcomes were Median Survival Differences, ICU LOS, and tracheostomy rates. RESULTS: Among 17,710 propensity-score matched ICU encounters, DNR status was associated with greater mortality in the first through third predicted mortality quartiles. There was no difference in survival outcomes in the fourth quartile (HR 0.99, p = .96). There was a stepwise decrease in the mortality hazard ratio for DNR patients as quartiles increased. CONCLUSION: Full-Code status provides no survival benefit over DNR status in individuals with greater than 75% predicted mortality by Apache IV score. There is a stepwise decrease in survival benefit for Full-Code patients as predicted mortality increases. We propose that it is reasonable to consider a very high predicted mortality by Apache IV score a contraindication to CPR given the lack of survival benefit seen in these patients. Larger studies with similar methods should be performed to reinforce or refute these findings.

Early Mobility for Critically Ill Patients: Building Staff Commitment Through Appreciative Inquiry.

BACKGROUND: Immobility contributes to many adverse effects in critically ill patients. Early progressive mobility can mitigate these negative sequelae but is not widely implemented. Appreciative inquiry is a quality improvement method/change philosophy that builds on what works well in an organization. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether appreciative inquiry would reinvigorate an early progressive mobility initiative in a medical intensive care unit and improve and sustain staff commitment to providing regular mobility therapy at the bedside. Secondary goals were to add to the literature about appreciative inquiry in health care and to determine whether it can be adapted to critical care. METHODS: Staff participated in appreciative inquiry workshops, which were conducted by a trained facilitator and structured with the appreciative inquiry 4-D cycle. Staff members' attitudes toward and knowledge of early progressive mobility were evaluated before and after the workshops. Performance of early progressive mobility activities was recorded before and 3 and 10 months after the workshops. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants completed the program. They rated the workshops as successfully helping them to understand the importance of early progressive mobility (98%), explain their responsibility to improve patient outcomes (98%), and engender a greater commitment to patients and the organization (96%). Regarding mobility treatments, at 3 months orders had improved from 62% to 88%; documentation, from 52% to 89%; and observation, from 39% to 87%. These improvements were maintained at 10 months. CONCLUSION: Participation in the workshops improved the staff's attitude toward and performance of mobility treatments. Appreciative inquiry may provide an adjunct to problem-based quality improvement techniques.

A Comparison of Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement Strategies with Intra-Arterial Measurement.

INTRODUCTION: It is difficult to obtain an accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement, especially in the prehospital environment. It is not known fully how various BP measurement techniques differ from one another. STUDY OBJECTIVE: The study hypothesized that there are differences in the accuracy of various non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement strategies as compared to the gold standard of intra-arterial (IA) measurement. METHODS: The study enrolled adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with radial IA catheters placed to measure radial intra-arterial blood pressure (RIBP) as a part of their standard care at a large, urban, tertiary-care Level I trauma center. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was taken by three different NIBP techniques (oscillometric, auscultated, and palpated) and compared to RIBP measurements. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test with dependent samples to detect differences between RIBP measurements and each NIBP method. The primary outcome was the difference in RIBP and NIBP measurement. There was also a predetermined subgroup analysis based on gender, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis requiring IA line placement, and current vasoactive medication use. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled to detect a predetermined clinically significant difference of 5mmHg in SBP. The patient population was 63.6% male and 36.4% female with an average age of 58.4 years old. The most common primary diagnoses were septic shock (47.7%), stroke (13.6%), and increased intracranial pressure (ICP; 13.6%). Most patients were receiving some form of sedation (63.4%), while 50.0% were receiving vasopressor medication and 31.8% were receiving anti-hypertensive medication. When compared to RIBP values, only the palpated SBP values had a clinically significant difference (9.88mmHg less than RIBP; P < .001). When compared to RIBP, the oscillometric and auscultated SBP readings showed statistically but not clinically significant lower values. The palpated method also showed a clinically significant lower SBP reading than the oscillometric method (5.48mmHg; P < .001) and the auscultated method (5.06mmHg; P < .001). There was no significant difference between the oscillometric and auscultated methods (0.42mmHg; P = .73). CONCLUSION: Overall, NIBPs significantly under-estimated RIBP measurements. Palpated BP measurements were consistently lower than RIBP, which was statistically and clinically significant. These results raise concern about the accuracy of palpated BP and its pervasive use in prehospital care. The data also suggested that auscultated and oscillometric BP may provide similar measurements.

Comparison of a self-inflating bulb syringe and a colorimetric CO2 indicator with capnography and radiography to detect the misdirection of naso/orogastric tubes into the airway of critically ill adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a mechanism of discovering misdirection into the airway of naso/orogastric (NG) tubes before they reach their full depth of placement in adults. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed in humans, evaluating both the self-inflating bulb syringe (SIBS) and a colorimetric CO2 detector. A prospective convenience sample of 257 NG tube placements was studied in 199 patients in medical ICUs of a tertiary care medical center. Findings were compared to a "standard" (ie, end tidal CO2 results of a capnograph and the results of a chest radiograph performed at the completion of the tube placement). RESULTS: On the first tube placement attempt in any patient, the SIBS had a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 87.0% in detecting nonesophageal placement, while the colorimetric device exhibited 99.4% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity. On subsequent insertions, the SIBS showed 95.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while the colorimetric device exhibited 97.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The colorimetric device was eight times more expensive than the SIBS. CONCLUSIONS: The SIBS and the colorimetric CO2 detector are very good at detecting NG tube malpositioning into the airway, although the colorimetric device is slightly more sensitive and specific. Neither method adds substantial time or difficulty to the insertion process. The colorimetric device is substantially more expensive. The decision as to which method to use may be based on local institutional factors, such as expense.

Applicability of prediction rules in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring intensive care: a pilot study.

Little attention has been paid to developing prediction rules that could assist in deciding which patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) need intensive care. Four existing prediction rules were examined to determine if any could predict the need for intensive care in these patients. The prediction rules studied were British Thoracic Society (BTS), Conte et al, Leroy et al, and Fine et al. Thirty-two patients admitted to the medical or coronary intensive care unit (ICU) during 1 year with pneumonia Diagnosis Related Group 079 or 089 were evaluated. The sensitivity of each rule for identifying a need for ICU admission in our group was BTS .72 using both rules together, Conte et al .47, Leroy et al .56, and Fine et al .84. It was concluded that these rules poorly identify the need for ICU admission for patients with severe CAP. Of the 4 rules tested, the BTS rule was the simplest, and the Fine et al rule was the most sensitive. None of them performed well enough to be used for decision making in individual patients.

Effects of a multifaceted, multidisciplinary, hospital-wide quality improvement program on weaning from mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a mechanical ventilation weaning management protocol that was implemented as a hospital-wide, quality improvement program on clinical and economic outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective, before-and-after intervention study. Data from a preimplementation year are compared with those of the first 2 yrs after protocol implementation. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Patients older than 18 yrs in diagnosis-related group 475 and group 483, who were admitted to the adult medical, surgical, and cardiac intensive care units (ICU) in a university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: After the baseline year, a weaning management program was implemented throughout our institution. Primary endpoints were mortality, days on mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, hospital costs, and the percentage of patients requiring tracheostomy. MAIN RESULTS: The number of patients increased from 220 in the baseline year (year 0) to 247 in the first year (year 1), then to 267 in the second year (year 2). The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score increased from 22.2 to 24.4 in year 1 (p =.006) and to 26.2 in year 2 (p <.0005). When year 0 was compared with year 1, mean days on mechanical ventilation decreased from 23.9 to 21.9 days (p =.608), hospital length of stay decreased from 37.5 to 31.6 days (p =.058), ICU length of stay decreased from 30.5 to 25.9 days (p =.133), and total cost per case decreased from $92,933 to $78,624 (p =.061). When year 0 was compared with year 2, mean days on mechanical ventilation decreased from 23.9 days to 17.5 days (p =.004), mean hospital length of stay decreased from 37.5 to 24.7 days, mean ICU length of stay decreased from 30.5 to 20.3 days, total cost per case decreased from $92,933 to $63,687, and percentage of patients requiring tracheotomy decreased from 61% to 41% (all p <.0005). There was also a reduction in the percentage of patients requiring more than one course of mechanical ventilation during the hospitalization from 33% to 26% (p =.039), a total cost savings of $3,440,787 and a decrease in mortality between all 3 yrs from 32% to 28% (p =.062). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted, multidisciplinary weaning management program can change the process of care used for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation throughout an acute care hospital and across multiple services. This change can lead to large reductions in the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and hospital costs, even at a time when patients are sicker.