Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Uterine Cervix (AIS) Treated by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Strategy: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the results of treatment of adenocarcinoma in situ by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the safety of a conservative strategy. METHODS: Identification of all cases of adenocarcinoma in situ treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure at our institution and follow-up by a conservative strategy. Completeness of the identification of all cases was secured by data from the National Pathology Registry. The treatment strategy was based on cytologic follow-up performed by a general practitioner and, irrespective of margin status of the cone, only the results of the postoperative surveillance were indicative of further treatment. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were identified. The overall recurrence rate with a mean follow-up time of 87.8 months was 7.6% (17/224). The recurrence rate in patients with involved margins was significantly higher than in patients with uninvolved margins, 15.7% vs 5.2%, respectively. Six recurrences were diagnosed at first examination 6 months postconization in patients with involved margins. They were treated with hysterectomy in 4 cases and reconization in 1 case. If involvement of margins alone had been an indication of further therapy (hysterectomy or reconization) immediately after conization, the conservative management strategy prevented 46 surgical procedures. Two cases of invasive cancer were diagnosed during follow-up, 150 months and 196 months after primary treatment, and after normal follow-up examinations. These 2 cases must be considered de novo cases and cannot be considered treatment failures. CONCLUSION: The conservative management strategy thus seems safe, and unnecessary surgical procedures were avoided.

Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy impair long-term survival for ovarian cancer patients? A nationwide Danish study.

OBJECTIVE: In Denmark, the proportion of women with ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has increased, and the use of NACT varies among center hospitals. We aimed to evaluate the impact of first-line treatment on surgical outcome and median overall survival (MOS). METHODS: All patients treated in Danish referral centers with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer from January 2005 to October 2011 were included. Data were obtained from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database, the Danish National Patient Register and medical records. RESULTS: Of the 1677 eligible patients, 990 (59%) were treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS), 515 (31%) with NACT, and 172 (10%) received palliative treatment. Of the patients referred to NACT, 335 (65%) received interval debulking surgery (IDS). Patients treated with NACT-IDS had shorter operation times, less blood loss, less extensive surgery, fewer intraoperative complications and a lower frequency of residual tumor (p < 0.05 for all). No difference in MOS was found between patients treated with PDS (31.9 months) and patients treated with NACT-IDS (29.4 months), p = 0.099. Patients without residual tumor after surgery had better MOS when treated with PDS compared with NACT-IDS (55.5 and 36.7 months, respectively, p = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, NACT-IDS was associated with increased risk of death after two years of follow-up (HR: 1.81; CI: 1.39-2.35). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in MOS was observed between PDS and NACT-IDS. However, patients without residual tumor had superior MOS when treated with PDS, and NACT-IDS could be associated with increased risk of death after two years of follow-up.

The results of treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer after centralisation of primary surgery. Results from North Jutland, Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to evaluate the results of treatment of ovarian carcinoma after the introduction of centralised primary surgery in the County of North Jutland, Denmark. METHOD: Prospective study of consecutive cases of ovarian cancer undergoing primary surgical treatment at the Gynecologic Oncologic Center after the introduction of centralised primary surgery. Results of treatment recorded up to the date of last examination or death. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2002, 107 patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer underwent primary surgery at the Gynecologic Oncologic Center, Aalborg. This corresponds to 95.5% of patients with invasive carcinoma in the County of North Jutland. All patients with Stage I to Stage IIIB disease had a complete, macroscopically radical cytoreduction performed. In patients with Stage III and IV invasive tumors, the optimal debulking rate was 79.5%, and, in Stage IIIC and IV, the optimal debulking rate was 78.2%. Intra-operative and post-operative complications were generally few. Post-operative death, defined as death within 30 days after surgery, was observed in 4 cases (3.7%). After primary surgery, platinum-based chemotherapy was given in most cases. For Stage I to IV invasive cancer, the median survival was 46 months. In patients with Stage IIIC and IV disease, the median survival was 32 months. In optimally debulked Stage IIIC and IV disease, the median survival was 41 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a survival benefit after introduction of centralised primary surgery. Compared to existing national and regional data on survival in ovarian cancer, the results indicate an increase in median survival for all stages of approximately 15 months. Centralisation of primary surgery to centres with the necessary expertise may be the most significant way to increase survival in ovarian cancer in Denmark.