Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(4): 623-5, 2015 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25963288

RESUMO

Although patients with certain cardiac valve abnormalities have increased risk of infective endocarditis (IE), it is unknown whether these abnormalities are associated with specific pathogens in IE cases. We report a strong association between mitral valve prolapse and viridans group streptococcal IE in a population-based cohort from Olmsted County, Minnesota.


Assuntos
Endocardite/epidemiologia , Endocardite/microbiologia , Prolapso da Valva Mitral/complicações , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Estreptococos Viridans/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am Heart J ; 170(4): 830-6, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine if there have been contemporary shifts in infective endocarditis (IE) epidemiology in our local population; an analysis of cases from 2007 to 2013 was conducted. METHODS: This is a population-based review of all adults (≥18 years) residing in Olmsted County, MN, with definite or possible IE using the Rochester Epidemiology Project from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2013. RESULTS: We identified 51 cases of IE in Olmsted County, MN, between 2007 and 2013. Median age of IE cases was 68.8 years (interquartile range 55.6-76.5), and 41% were females. Age- and sex-adjusted incidence of IE was 7.4 (95% CI 5.3-9.4) cases per 100,000 person-years. From a multivariable Poisson regression model, incidence of IE did not change significantly during the study period (P = .222) but was significantly higher in males and those of older age (P < .001). The annual incidences (per 100,000 person-years) were 2.5 for Staphylococcus aureus, 1.1 for viridans group streptococci, 1.6 for Enterococcus species, and 0.8 for coagulase-negative staphylococci. Only 19.6% (10/51) of Olmsted County patients underwent valve surgery between 2007 and 2013 as compared with 44.4% (197/444) of non-Olmsted County patients treated at Mayo Clinic Rochester. CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, no significant change in the overall incidence of IE in Olmsted County, MN, between 2007 and 2013 was seen, and it was similar to that seen between 1970 and 2006. Male gender and older age were associated with increased IE risk. With a lesser extent of cases attributable to viridans group streptococcal IE compared with previous years, S aureus was the predominant pathogen in IE cases during 2007 to 2013. The relatively low valve surgery rate was disparate from that reported from large, tertiary care centers (including our own) with non-population-based cohorts, which are subject to referral bias and can influence the expected characterization of IE.


Assuntos
Endocardite/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Morbidade/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
3.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 37(8): 955-62, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24665867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) pocket infections are often related to recent CIED placement or manipulation, but these infections are not well characterized. The clinical presentation of CIED pocket infection, based on temporal onset related to last CIED procedure, deserves further study. METHODS: The MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort) prospectively enrolled subjects with CIED infection. Subjects were stratified into those whose infection occurred <12 months (early) or ≥ 12 months (late) since their last CIED-related procedure. RESULTS: There were 132 subjects in the early group and 106 in the late group. There were more females (P = 0.009) and anticoagulation use (P = 0.039) in the early group. Subjects with early infections were more likely to have had a generator change or lead addition as their last procedure (P = 0.03) and had more prior CIED procedures (P = 0.023). Early infections were more likely to present with pocket erythema (P < 0.001), swelling (P < 0.001), and pain (P = 0.007). Late infections were more likely to have pocket erosion (P = 0.005) and valvular vegetations (P = 0.009). In bacteremic subjects, early infections were more likely healthcare-associated (P < 0.001). In-hospital and 6-month mortality were equivalent. CONCLUSION: A total of 45% of patients with CIED pocket infection presented >12 months following their last CIED-related procedure. Patients with early infection were more likely to be female, on anticoagulation, and present with localized inflammation, whereas those with late infection were more likely to have CIED erosion or valvular endocarditis.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Mycoses ; 57(11): 687-98, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25040241

RESUMO

As invasive mucormycosis (IM) numbers rise, clinicians suspect prior voriconazole worsens IM incidence and severity, and believe combination anti-fungal therapy improves IM survival. To compare the cumulative incidence (CI), severity and mortality of IM in eras immediately before and after the commercial availability of voriconazole all IM cases from 1995 to 2011 were analysed across four risk-groups (hematologic/oncologic malignancy (H/O), stem cell transplantation (SCT), solid organ transplantation (SOT) and other), and two eras, E1 (1995-2003) and E2, (2004-2011). Of 101 IM cases, (79 proven, 22 probable): 30 were in E1 (3.3/year) and 71 in E2 (8.9/year). Between eras, the proportion with H/O or SCT rose from 47% to 73%, while 'other' dropped from 33% to 11% (P = 0.036). Between eras, the CI of IM did not significantly increase in SCT (P = 0.27) or SOT (P = 0.30), and patterns of anatomic location (P = 0.122) and surgical debridement (P = 0.200) were similar. Significantly more patients received amphotericin-echinocandin combination therapy in E2 (31% vs. 5%, P = 0.01); however, 90-day survival did not improve (54% vs. 59%, P = 0.67). Since 2003, the rise of IM reflects increasing numbers at risk, not prior use of voriconazole. Frequent combination of anti-fungal therapy has not improved survival.


Assuntos
Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Equinocandinas/uso terapêutico , Mucormicose/tratamento farmacológico , Voriconazol/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Anfotericina B/história , Antifúngicos/história , Quimioterapia Combinada/história , Equinocandinas/história , Feminino , Fungos/classificação , Fungos/genética , Fungos/isolamento & purificação , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucormicose/epidemiologia , Mucormicose/microbiologia , Mucormicose/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Voriconazol/história , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 14: 126, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25580090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older age is associated with chronic illnesses and disability, which contribute to increased admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Our primary objective was to compare the characteristics, ICU management and outcomes of critically ill patients ≥ 80 year-old with those of younger patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a tertiary-care ICU from 1999 to 2011. The characteristics, ICU management and outcomes of patients ≥ 80 year-old were compared with those 50-64.9 and 65-79.9 year-old. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the adjusted risk of Do-Not-Resuscitate orders and hospital mortality in patients ≥ 80 year-old compared with the younger groups. RESULTS: During the study period, patients aged ≥ 80 years (N = 748) represented 7.9% of all ICU admissions and 12.8% of patients aged ≥ 50 years. Chronic cardiac (32.2%) and respiratory (21.8%) diseases were more prevalent in them than the younger groups (p < 0.0001). The most common reasons for their ICU admission were cardiovascular (30.9%) and respiratory (40.4%) conditions. Sepsis was commonly present in them on admission (32.9%). Mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy were commonly provided (76.9% and 16.0%, respectively). During ICU stay, Do-Not-Resuscitate orders were more frequently written for patients aged ≥ 80 years (35.0%) compared with 21.9% for 50-64.9 year-old group, p < 0.0001, and 25.4% for the 60-79.9 year-old group, p < 0.0001. On multivariate analysis, patients aged ≥ 80 years were more likely to receive these order compared with the 50-64.9 year-old patients (adjusted OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.45-2.31) and the 65-80 year-old patients (adjusted OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.32-2.04). The hospital mortality increased gradually with age and was highest (54.6%) in patients ≥ 80 year-old (p < 0.0001). Patients ≥ 80 year-old had higher risk of hospital mortality compared with patients aged 50-64.9 years (adjusted OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.73-2.69) and with those aged 65-79.9 years (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.23-1.86). CONCLUSIONS: Patients ≥ 80 year-old represented a significant proportion of ICU admissions. Although they received life sustaining measures similar to younger groups, they had higher adjusted mortality risk compared with the younger groups.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Ordens quanto à Conduta (Ética Médica) , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Circulation ; 126(1): 60-4, 2012 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22689929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association published updated guidelines for infective endocarditis (IE) prevention in 2007 that markedly restricted the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in certain at-risk patients undergoing dental and other invasive procedures. The incidence of IE caused by viridans group streptococci (VGS) in the United States after publication of the 2007 American Heart Association guidelines has not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a population-based review of all definite or possible cases of VGS-IE using the Rochester Epidemiology Project of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Patient demographics and microbiological data were collected for all VGS-IE cases diagnosed from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2010. We also examined the Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospital discharge database to determine the number of VGS-IE cases included between 1999 and 2009. We identified 22 cases with VGS-IE in Olmsted County over the 12-year study period. Rates of incidence (per 100 000 person-years) during time intervals of 1999-2002, 2003-2006, and 2007-2010 were 3.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-5.17), 2.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-4.10), and 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-1.64), respectively (P=0.061 from Poisson regression). The number of hospital discharges with a VGS-IE diagnosis in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database during 1999-2002, 2003-2006, and 2007-2009 ranged between 15 318 to 15 938, 16 214 to 17 433, and 14 728 to 15 479, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of data complete through 2010, there has been no perceivable increase in the incidence of VGS-IE in Olmsted County, Minnesota, since the publication of the 2007 American Heart Association endocarditis prevention guidelines.


Assuntos
American Heart Association , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Estreptococos Viridans , Endocardite/prevenção & controle , Endocardite Bacteriana/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Vigilância da População/métodos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 35(3): 269-74, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22150338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis is the most serious manifestation of cardiac device infection and metastatic seeding of distant sites has been reported. However, the association between device-related endocarditis and spinal abscess has not been fully described. METHODS: We reviewed hospital records at three high-volume cardiovascular referral centers from January 2005 to October 2010. Device-related endocarditis was confirmed in all cases with positive blood cultures and transesophageal echocardiogram revealing lead and/or valvular vegetations. Six patients with spinal abscesses in association with device-related endocarditis were identified. RESULTS: A total of 384 patients met the clinical criteria for device-related endocarditis. Among these, infection was complicated by spinal abscess formation in six (1.5%) cases. The mean age of patients was 69.3 ± 11.8 years (47-82 years). The predominant clinical manifestations in these six patients included a recent history of fever (six), malaise (four), and neurological or meningeal signs (five). Spinal abscesses were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging in two and computed tomography scans in four of the cases. The causative pathogens were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (three), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (one), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (two), and Enterococcus fecalis (one). All patients underwent complete device removal with no procedure-related complications. Two patients died in the hospital, two were discharged with permanent neurological deficits, and the remaining two recovered with no permanent neurologic sequelae. CONCLUSION: Device-related endocarditis must be considered in patients who present with a spinal abscess and bacteremia. Early recognition of this scenario is imperative in order to avoid permanent neurological sequelae and patient mortality. Early imaging, appropriate parenteral antimicrobial therapy, and expedited removal of all cardiac hardware are pivotal for optimal management.


Assuntos
Abscesso/microbiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Marca-Passo Artificial/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/microbiologia , Abscesso/diagnóstico , Abscesso/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/etiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/complicações , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 34(4): 450-9, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21208230

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) is a serious complication of cardiac device infection and is associated with increased mortality. At present, there exist no criteria to predict CIED-IE in patients who present with CIED infection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of CIED infection seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1991 and 2008. CIED-IE was classified using pathologic and clinical criteria. Clinical predictors of CIED-IE were identified using logistic regression, and quantified using a summary score and plotted against the distribution of CIED-IE. RESULTS: Ninety-three (22.4%) of the 416 patients with CIED infection had CIED-IE. Host factors including chronic immunomodulator therapy exclusive of corticosteroid (odds ratio [OR], 3.79 [confidence interval (CI) 1.10, 13.04]), chronic corticosteroid therapy (OR, 2.15 [CI 0.93, 5.00]), hemodialysis (OR, 3.24 [CI 1.39, 7.55]), or remote infection (OR, 1.77 [CI 0.99, 3.14]) were associated with increased odds of CIED-IE. Patients with CIED-IE were at increased odds of presenting with fever (OR, 3.78 [CI 1.93, 7.40]), or malaise (OR, 1.87 [CI 1.02, 3.41]), and have findings of leukocytosis (OR, 3.61 [CI 1.51, 8.62]). In marked contrast, they were at decreased odds of exhibiting signs/symptoms of infection at the generator pocket site (OR, 0.19 [CI 0.10, 0.36]). Summary scores of 6 and 11 predicted CIED-IE in approximately 50% and 90% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Certain comorbid conditions and systemic manifestations of infection were associated with CIED-IE. In contrast, pocket site infection was negatively associated with CIED-IE. These findings should assist clinicians in identifying patients who would more likely benefit from further investigation of CIED-IE with transesophageal echocardiography.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de Sobrevida
9.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 34(2): 133-42, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20942819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection rates are increasing faster than implantation rates. More effective antimicrobial prophylaxis may help reduce CIED infections and improve clinical outcomes. The AIGIS(Rx)(®) antibacterial envelope is a polymer mesh implanted in the generator pocket with the CIED. After implantation it releases two antibiotics, minocycline and rifampin, that have been shown to reduce infections associated with other medical devices. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to determine the rate of CIED implantation success and CIED infection in procedures utilizing the antibacterial envelope. METHODS: This study enrolled consecutive CIED procedures utilizing the antibacterial envelope at 10 US academic, community, and Veterans Affairs medical centers. Procedures following an explantation for a prior CIED infection or off-label use of the antibacterial envelope were excluded. RESULTS: The 624 eligible procedures (age 70 ± 13 years, 68.1% men, 27.2% renal insufficiency, 35.4% oral anticoagulant use, 67.8% replacement/revision procedures) utilized pacemakers (35%), implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD)(29%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator devices (CRT-D)(36%). Nearly half of the patients (49%) had at least three predefined risk factors for CIED infection. CIED implantation was successful in 621 procedures (99.5%[95% confidence interval (CI) 98.8-99.9]). There were three major infections (0.48%[95%CI 0.17-1.40]) after 1.9 ± 2.4 months follow-up. The infections followed one ICD revision and two CRT-D replacements. There were seven deaths; none was a result of the antibacterial envelope or the CIED procedure. CONCLUSIONS: CIED procedures that utilized an antibacterial envelope had a high rate of CIED implantation success (>99%). Although the follow-up to date is short, there was also a low rate of infection (<0.50%) in this population at high risk for CIED infection.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Miocardite/epidemiologia , Miocardite/prevenção & controle , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Implantes de Medicamento/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 13(4): 317-23, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21526349

RESUMO

Improvements in manufacturing and implantation techniques, coupled with an increasing prevalence of atherosclerosis in an aging population, have led to increased utilization of prosthetic vascular grafts. The infection rates of vascular grafts are low. However, when they do occur, high rates of morbidity and mortality can be expected. The purpose of this article is to review the published literature regarding epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of prosthetic vascular graft infections. Moreover, we provide a practical approach to the diagnosis and management of these complicated infections based on empirically grounded evidence.

11.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg ; 10(2): 233-239, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33842217

RESUMO

Left ventricular assisted devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for management of patients with advanced heart failure. However, infection remains one of the most commonly reported complications. Diagnosis, as well as treatment of LVAD infections is challenging. There are multiple diagnostic modalities that have been used to assist with accurate diagnosis of LVAD infections. Treatment of the infection can be especially challenging in these patients, given the presence of the implantable device that cannot be easily replaced or removed. There are no clinical trials assessing the best approach to diagnosis, treatment or long-term management of LVAD infections. In this article we review the most recent diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches, as well as offer our guidance on diagnosis and treatment of LVAD infections.

12.
Cureus ; 13(2): e13088, 2021 Feb 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33728111

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac-implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this review, we describe the risk factors and pathogenesis of CIED infections and review the rationale and the evidence for the use of antibiotic-eluting envelopes (ABEs) in patients at increased risk for CIED infections. FINDINGS: The majority of CIED infections are caused by staphylococci that involve generator pocket and occur due to contamination of the device or the pocket tissues at the time of implantation. Clinical trials have shown that extending the duration of post-operative systemic antibacterial therapy is not beneficial in reducing CIED infection rate. However, ABEs that reduce device migration after implantation and provide sustained local delivery of prophylactic antibiotics at the pocket site, may provide benefit in reducing infection. Currently, there are two types of commercially available CIED envelope devices in the United States. The first ABE device (TYRX™, Medtronic Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ) is composed of a synthetic absorbable mesh envelope that elutes minocycline and rifampin and has been shown to reduce CIED pocket infections in a large multi-center randomized clinical trial. The second ABE device (CanGaroo-G™, Aziyo Biologics, Silver Spring, MD) is composed of decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM) and was originally designed to stabilize the device within the pocket, limiting risk for migration or erosion, and providing a substrate for tissue ingrowth in a preclinical study. This device has shown promising results in a preclinical study with local delivery of gentamicin. Compared with artificial materials, such as synthetic surgical mesh, biologic ECM has been shown to foster greater tissue integration and vascular ingrowth, a reduced inflammatory response, and more rapid clearance of bacteria. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ABE devices provide sustained local delivery of antibiotics at the generator pocket site and appear beneficial in reducing CIED pocket infections. Given the continued increase in the use of CIED therapy and resultant infectious complications, innovative approaches to infection prevention are critical.

13.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(3): ofab038, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33728357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A population-based study of infective endocarditis (IE) in Olmsted County, Minnesota, provides a unique opportunity to define temporal and seasonal variations in IE incidence over an extended time period. METHODS: This was a population-based review of all adults (≥18 years) residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota, with definite or possible IE using the Rochester Epidemiology Project from January 1, 1970, through December 31, 2018. Poisson regression was used to characterize the trends in IE incidence; models were fitted with age, sex, calendar time, and season, allowing for nonlinearity and nonadditivity of their effects. RESULTS: Overall, 269 cases of IE were identified over a 49-year study period. The median age of IE cases was 67.2 years, and 33.8% were female. The overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence of IE was 7.9 cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 7.0-8.9), with corresponding rates of 2.4, 2.4, 0.9, and 0.7 per 100 000 person-years for Staphylococcus aureus, viridans group streptococci (VGS), Enterococcus species, and coagulase-negative staphylococci IE, respectively. Temporal trends varied by age, sex, and season, but on average IE incidence increased over time (P = .021). Enterococcal IE increased the most (P = .018), while S. aureus IE appeared to increase but mostly in the winter months (P = .018). Between 1996 and 2018, the incidence of VGS IE was relatively stable, with no statistically significant difference in the trends before and after the 2007 AHA IE prevention guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, IE incidence, and specifically enterococcal IE, increased over time, while S. aureus IE was seasonally dependent. There was no statistically significant difference in VGS IE incidence in the periods before and after publication of the 2007 AHA IE prevention guidelines.

14.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(7)2021 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312136

RESUMO

A patient presented with fever, generalised rash, confusion, orofacial movements and myoclonus after receiving the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine from Moderna. MRI was unremarkable while cerebrospinal fluid showed leucocytosis with lymphocyte predominance and hyperproteinorrachia. The skin evidenced red, non-scaly, oedematous papules coalescing into plaques with scattered non-follicular pustules. Skin biopsy was consistent with a neutrophilic dermatosis. The patient fulfilled the criteria for Sweet syndrome. A thorough evaluation ruled out alternative infectious, autoimmune or malignant aetiologies, and all manifestations resolved with glucocorticoids. While we cannot prove causality, there was a temporal correlation between the vaccination and the clinical findings.


Assuntos
Encefalite , Mioclonia , Síndrome de Sweet , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Encefalite/diagnóstico , Encefalite/etiologia , Humanos , Mioclonia/etiologia , Síndrome de Sweet/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Sweet/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Sweet/etiologia
15.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 33(4): 407-13, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19793360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), including permanent pacemakers (PPMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), can be the sole manifestation of device infection. METHODS: To assess clinical factors associated with CIED infection, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with both CIED and SAB seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2001 through 2006. CIED infection was defined using microbiological and clinical criteria. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients with SAB and a CIED, 22 patients (35.5%) had CIED infection. The generator pocket was identified as the source of bacteremia in seven (11%) patients. The majority of CIED infections were device-related infective endocarditis (12 of 22, 55%). Thirty percent of patients presenting with SAB greater than 1 year after device implantation had CIED infection; all but one had CIED-related infective endocarditis. Sixty percent of ICD patients (12 of 20) with SAB had CIED infection, compared with 24% of PPM patients (10 of 42, P = 0.01). On univariate analysis factors associated with CIED-related infective endocarditis included device type [odds ratio (OR) for ICD 13.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1, 84.9) and presence of a prosthetic heart valve (OR 6.8 95% CI 1.1, 43.4). CONCLUSIONS: CIED infection is common in patients with SAB. The presence of an ICD and prosthetic heart valve were associated with CIED-related infective endocarditis. Subsequent work should focus on prospectively characterizing the subset of patients with CIED infection who present with SAB as the sole manifestation of their device infection. (PACE 2010; 407-413).


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Marca-Passo Artificial/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia
17.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 83(1): 46-53, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18174000

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe management of patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM)- and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-related endocarditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of infection involving PPMs and ICDs among patients presenting to Mayo Clinic's site in Rochester, MN, between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2003. Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDIE) was defined as the presence of both vegetation on a device lead or valve and clinical or microbiological evidence of CDIE. Of 189 patients with PPM or ICD infection who were admitted during the study period, 44 met the case definition for CDIE (33 PPM, 11 ICD). RESULTS: The mean +/- SD age of patients was 67 +/- 14 years. Staphylococci (36 [82%]) were the most commonly isolated pathogens. Nearly all patients (43 [98%]) were treated with a combined approach of complete hardware removal and parenteral antibiotics. The median duration of antibiotic treatment after infected device explantation was 28 days (interquartile range, 19-42 days). Device leads were removed percutaneously in 34 cases (77%); only 7 cases (16%) required surgical lead extraction. Percutaneous extraction was uncomplicated in 15 patients with lead vegetation greater than 10 mm in diameter. Six patients (14%) died during hospitalization. Twenty-seven (96%) of 28 patients remained infection free at their last visit (median follow-up, 183 days; intraquartile range, 36-628 days). CONCLUSION: Prompt hardware removal and prolonged parenteral antibiotic administration decrease mortality among patients with CDIE. The presence of a large (> 10 mm in diameter) vegetation on a lead is not a contraindication for percutaneous lead extraction.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Endocardite/etiologia , Endocardite/terapia , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Remoção de Dispositivo , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Arch Intern Med ; 167(7): 669-75, 2007 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17420425

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cardiac device infection is not well understood. Bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (hereafter, defibrillators) may reflect device infection. METHODS: Retrospective, population-based cohort study of all adult patients with cardiac devices who resided in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1975 to 2004. The medical linkage-system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project and standardized criteria were used to identify all cases of BSI and device infection. The incidence of device infection was calculated with person-years of follow-up after device implantation. RESULTS: A total of 1524 patients with cardiac devices were included in the cohort. Total person-time of follow-up was 7578 years. The incidence of definite device infection was 1.9 per 1000 device-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.1). The incidence of pocket infection without BSI was 1.37 per 1000 device-years (95% CI, 0.62-3.05), and pocket infection with BSI or device-related endocarditis 1.14 per 1000 device years (95% CI, 0.47-2.74). The cumulative probability of device infection was higher among patients with defibrillators compared with those with pacemakers, P<.001. Twelve (54.6%) of 22 cases of Staphylococcus aureus BSI had definite or possible cardiac device infection vs 3 (12.0%) of 25 cases of bloodstream infection due to gram-negative bacilli (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study to describe the incidence of cardiac device infection. Device infection was common during episodes of S aureus BSI. The rate of cardiac device infection was higher in patients with defibrillators than in those with pacemakers.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
ASAIO J ; 64(6): 735-740, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29095735

RESUMO

Infection is a serious complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. However, an optimal antimicrobial surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimen for LVAD implantation is not well established. We retrospectively reviewed all adults who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation from February 2007 to March 2015 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Left ventricular assist device infection (LVADI) was defined using criteria published by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant. Patients excluded from the analysis included those who did not have HeartMate II or HeartWare device, patients with incomplete documentation of SIP, and those with an actively treated infection at the time of LVAD implantation. We compared risk of LVAD-specific and LVAD-related infections and all-cause mortality between SIP regimens at postoperative day 90 and 1 year using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses. During study period, 239 adults underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at our institution where 199 patients received single-drug and 40 received multidrug SIP regimen. Median patient age was 62 years. Left ventricular assist device infection occurred in three patients (1.5%) in the single-drug group versus two patients (5.0%) in the multidrug group at 90 days (p = 0.4). There was no difference in infection-free (p = 0.4) and overall survival (p = 0.9) between two groups at 1 year. In conclusion, there was no clear benefit of using multidrug regimen as it did not impact infection-free survival or all-cause mortality compared with single-drug regimen. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further define the optimal SIP regimen for LVAD implantation.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 4(2): 201-208, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29749938

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of abandoned cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads on the presentation and management of device-related infections. BACKGROUND: Device infection is a serious consequence of CIEDs and necessitates removal of all hardware for attempted cure. The merits of extracting or retaining presumed sterile but nonfunctioning leads is a subject of ongoing debate. METHODS: The MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort) prospectively enrolled patients with CIED infections at 10 institutions in the United States and abroad between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012. Within a propensity-matched cohort, relevant clinical information was compared between patients who had 1 or more abandoned leads at the time of infection and those who had none. RESULTS: Matching produced a cohort of 264 patients, including 176 with no abandoned leads and 88 with abandoned leads. The groups were balanced with respect to Charlson comorbidity index, oldest lead age, device type, sex, and race. At the time of admission, those with abandoned leads were less likely to demonstrate systemic signs of infection, including leukocytosis (p = 0.023) and positive blood cultures (p = 0.005). Conversely, patients with abandoned leads were more likely to demonstrate local signs of infections, including skin erosion (p = 0.031) and positive pocket cultures (p = 0.015). In addition, patients with abandoned leads were more likely to require laser extraction (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The results of a large prospective registry of CIED infections demonstrated that patients with abandoned leads may present with different signs, symptoms, and microbiological findings and require laser extraction more than those without abandoned leads.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Falha de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Idoso , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA