Zambia cervical cancer control program resource mapping - Leveraging support to achieve the 90-70-90 elimination target.

BACKGROUND: Zambia has one of the highest incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer at 65.5 and 43.4 per 100 000 respectively. In line with efforts of the cervical cancer elimination strategy the Zambia national cervical cancer sub-committee undertook a resource mapping exercise of projected spending on the prevention and control program. The aim was to elicit the available resources over a prospective 4-year period and compare it to the projected costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 4-step approach was used for this activity. This included creation of tool adapted for the local program, orientation of stakeholders to the tool, population of the tool by stakeholders and collation, comparison and reporting of submitted data. Comparative analysis to the cervical cancer control costing report 2019-2023 was conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of resources in the stipulated period were allocated to prevention efforts. Isolated with diagnostic, treatment and palliation (14 %) the prevention allocation increased to 81 %. Community and stakeholder engagement was 5 % whilst technical assistance and health information were 12 % and 9 % respectively. The dispensation to research was the lowest at 0.7 %. For health system levels, secondary and primary levels were projected at 40 % and 12 % respectively following the central allotment of 45 %. Community and stakeholder engagement took up 3 %. The secondary prevention to tertiary intervention ratio was 4:1 in the projection compared to approximately 2:1 in the actual budgeted costs for the same period, showing a two-fold discordance. CONCLUSION: To achieve the accelerated elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem policy cohesiveness is necessary. This can be facilitated with continuous stakeholder involvement in planning, implementation and review. POLICY SUMMARY: In order to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem policy cohesiveness is vital and this can be achieved by continuous stakeholder involvement in planning, implementation and review.

Patient Advocacy Approaches to Improving Care for Breast and Cervical Cancer in East and Southern Africa.

PURPOSE: Breast and cervical cancer are the most common cancers among women in East and Southern Africa, where mortality remains high because of late diagnosis and limited access to treatment. We explored local approaches to breast and cervical cancer advocacy to identify the most pressing issues and opportunities for increasing the impact of civil society activities in the region. METHODS: Focus group discussions were conducted with participants of the 2016 Women's Empowerment Cancer Advocacy Network (WE CAN) Summit in Nairobi, Kenya. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed for emergent themes. Results were presented to participants of 2019 WE CAN summit for cross-validation. RESULTS: Four focus group discussions were conducted with 50 participants. Thirty-six (70%) identified as advocates, 30 (59%) as cancer survivors, 14 (27%) as nongovernmental organization representatives, 13 (25%) as researchers, 4 (8%) as clinicians, and 6 (8%) as policymakers. Although most participants focused on cancer awareness and screening/early detection, some noted that treatment was often unavailable and advocated for a broader strategy to improving access to care. Challenges to designing and implementing such a strategy included knowledge gaps in addressing late diagnosis and access to care, difficulty collaborating with like-minded organizations, approaching policymakers, and addressing treatment financing. Cancer coalitions, although rare, were crucial to building collaborations with ministries of health, policymakers, and international organizations that advanced breast and cervical cancer care. CONCLUSION: Participants indicated that they would benefit from additional training about resource-appropriate best practices for improving breast and cervical cancer care and outcomes. Coalition-building and collaborations, including with oncologists and other medical professionals involved in cancer care, were crucial to leveraging limited resources, sharing lessons learned, and developing local solutions to common challenges.