Single Antigen-Mismatched Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using High-Dose Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Is a Suitable Alternative for Patients Lacking HLA-Matched Donors.

The optimal prophylaxis regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the setting of mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is not defined. The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in haploidentical transplantation has proven feasible and effective in overcoming the negative impact of HLA disparity on survival. We hypothesized that PTCy could also be effective in the setting of MMUD transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 86 consecutive adult recipients of alloHSCT in our institution, comparing 2 contemporaneous groups: PTCy MMUD (n = 26) versus matched unrelated donor (MUD) (n = 60). Graft source was primarily peripheral blood (92%). All PTCy MMUD were HLA 7/8 (differences in HLA class I loci in 92% of patients) and received PTCy plus tacrolimus ± mofetil mycophenolate as GVHD prophylaxis. No differences were observed between PTCy MMUD and MUD in the 100-day cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV (31% versus 22%, respectively; P = .59) and III to IV (8% versus 10%, P = .67). There was a trend for a lower incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD at 1 year after PTCy MMUD in comparison with MUD (22% versus 41%, P = .098). No differences between PTCy MMUD and MUD were found regarding nonrelapse mortality (25% versus 18%, P = .52) or relapse rate (11% versus 19%, P = .18). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 2 years were similar in both cohorts (67% versus 54% [HR, .84; 95% CI, .38 to 1.88; P = .68] and 72% versus 57% [HR, .71; 95% CI, .31 to 1.67; P = .44], respectively). The 2-year cumulative incidence of survival free of moderate to severe chronic GVHD and relapse tended to be higher in the PTCy MMUD group (47% versus 24%; HR, .60; 95% CI, .31 to 1.14; P = .12). We conclude that HLA 7/8 MMUD transplantation using PTCy plus tacrolimus is a suitable alternative for those patients who lack a MUD.

High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Matched and Mismatched Unrelated Donor Transplantation.

The optimal prophylaxis regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the setting of single-locus mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is unclear. The use of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) after haploidentical transplantation is effective at overcoming the negative impact of HLA disparity on survival. Limited information is available regarding the efficacy of this strategy in alloHSCT from MMUDs. Most of the published studies have used the triple immunosuppressant model of haploidentical transplant combining PTCy with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate. In our study, we propose the use of a simpler GVHD prophylaxis protocol comprising PTCy in combination with tacrolimus for MMUD and matched unrelated donor (MUD) alloHSCT. We performed a retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive recipients of alloHSCT from unrelated donors (MMUD, n = 55; MUD, n = 54) in a single center. Graft source was primarily peripheral blood (98%). No differences were observed between the MMUD and MUD groups with respect to 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD; 31% versus 32%, respectively, P = .9), grade III to IV aGVHD (9% versus 7%, P = .7), and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 2 years (18% versus 14%, P = .6). Both groups showed similar cumulative incidence of 1 year nonrelapse mortality (13% versus 9%; P = .5) and 3-year relapse rates (24% versus 25%, P = .7). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years for MMUD and MUD were 56% and 57% (P = .9) and 64% and 65% (P = .6), respectively. The 3-year probability of survival free of moderate/severe cGVHD and relapse was 56% and 55%, respectively. GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and tacrolimus achieves low rates of severe aGVHD and cGVHD, as well as good survival outcomes, in recipients of both MMUD and MUD peripheral blood alloHSCT. This strategy overcomes the negative impact of single-locus HLA disparity.

Immunologic escape and angiogenesis in human malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma escape mechanisms include immunosuppressive and angiogenic cytokine production. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) expression by immunohistochemistry, and soluble circulating plasma levels of VEGF, bFGF, IL-10, and transforming growth factor-beta2 in patients with different stages of melanoma. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from 42 patients with primary melanoma and 9 with cutaneous metastases were studied by immunohistochemistry. In another 46 patients with melanoma (8 stage I and II; 18, III; and 20, IV) and in 10 healthy control participants, bFGF, VEGF, IL-10, and transforming growth factor-beta2 circulating levels were analyzed. RESULTS: bFGF was positive in 85% and VEGF in 47.5% of 42 primary melanomas. Of 10 patients with primary melanoma (Breslow depth 1.5-3 mm) 6 were VEGF positive and had metastases develop, whereas 4 were VEGF negative and had no metastases at 5 years of follow up. VEGF, bFGF, and IL-10 plasma levels in patients with stages III and IV melanoma were higher than the control group (P <.05 and P <.01, respectively). An inverse relationship was found between VEGF and IL-10. Specifically, in 7 patients with IL-10 levels higher than 10 pg/mL, VEGF levels were less than 49 pg/mL (P <.05); in 9 patients with VEGF levels higher than 100 pg/mL, IL-10 levels were less than 6.7 pg/mL (P <.01). CONCLUSION: VEGF expression in 1.5- to 3.0-mm Breslow depth melanomas may be considered as an unfavorable prognostic factor. Immunosuppressive (IL-10, transforming growth factor-beta2) and proangiogenic (bFGF, VEGF) cytokines are increased in metastatic melanoma. Inverse plasma levels between IL-10 and VEGF in patients with metastatic melanoma are shown in vivo for the first time, the significance of which must be further investigated.