Effect of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% on initiation of dry eye treatment with topical cyclosporine 0.05%.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of loteprednol etabonate (LE) before the initiation of topical cyclosporine A (tCsA) therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate dry eye disease. Prospective, multicenter randomized double-masked parallel group clinical study (NCT00407043). METHODS: Hundred and eighteen patients with dry eye disease were randomized to receive either LE and tCsA (n=61) or artificial tears (AT) and tCsA (n=57). Hundred and twelve patients completed the study (LE: n=57, AT: n=55) and are included in the data analysis. Patients self-administered either LE or AT for 2 weeks 4 times per day, followed by tCsA twice per day accompanied by either LE twice per day or AT twice per day for an additional 6 weeks of treatment. Primary outcome measures included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, the Likert scale using standardized facial expressions, lissamine green staining, fluorescein staining, and the Schirmer test. Additional measures included global self-assessment, and safety outcomes included slitlamp examination, intraocular pressure, and assessment of visual acuity. RESULTS: Loteprednol etabonate pretreatment significantly reduced tCsA stinging (P<0.05). Both groups showed significantly improved OSDI scores at the 14-, 30-, and 60-day visits. Loteprednol etabonate showed significantly more OSDI improvement than AT. Both pretreatment strategies improved global self-assessment scores, Schirmer test, fluorescein staining, lissamine staining, and adjunctive AT use. Loteprednol etabonate showed superior improvement in Schirmer test, fluorescein staining, and lissamine staining. Intraocular pressure did not increase in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Loteprednol etabonate induction therapy 2 weeks before the initiation of long-term tCsA treatment for chronic dry eye disease provides more rapid relief of dry eye signs and symptoms with greater efficacy than tCsA and AT alone.

Clinical performance after implantation of an EDOF intraocular lens in the dominant eye and a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in the nondominant eye.

PURPOSE: To evaluate subjective and objective outcomes after combined implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) and a combined technology multifocal lens (CT-IOL). SETTING: 2 clinical practices (Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Center For Sight) in the United States. DESIGN: Prospective, unmasked, multicenter, nonrandomized bilateral eye study. METHODS: Patients interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were implanted with an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a CT-IOL in the nondominant eye. Refractive and visual acuity (VA) data at various distances (4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm) were collected 3 months postsurgery, along with the distance-corrected binocular defocus curve and responses to questionnaires related to spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and overall visual function. RESULTS: Data from 37 participants were analyzed. The distance-corrected binocular defocus curve showed a mean VA better than 0.1 logMAR (20/25) at all vergences from +1.00 to -2.50 diopters (D). 36 participants (97%) had an uncorrected binocular VA of 0.3 logMAR or better, at all test distances. 70% of participants (26/37) reported never wearing spectacles at any distance, and 84% (31/37) were "completely" or "mostly" satisfied with their overall vision after surgery. Halos were the disturbance reported most frequently and reported as most bothersome, with difficulty driving at night the most common visual function issue. Difficulty reading was the next most reported issue. Overall eyesight was rated as "excellent" or "good" by 92% (34/37) of participants. CONCLUSIONS: This combined EDOF/CT-IOL approach was well-tolerated by participants and provided some potential benefits relative to bilateral implantation of either lens.

Prospective multicenter study of toric IOL outcomes when dual zone automated keratometry is used for astigmatism planning.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes when toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculations are based on the keratometric output from the Lenstar LS-900 dual zone automated keratometer (Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland). METHODS: Eligible subjects presenting for toric IOL implantation at five sites were measured with a dual-zone automated keratometer. The data were used to plan the power and angle of the toric IOL to be implanted. Refractive and visual acuity status were checked at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 102 eyes had relevant data for analysis. More than 76% of eyes had 0.50 diopter or less of refractive astigmatism at 1 and 3 months, with no difference by level of astigmatism corrected. More than half of the eyes had uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better and 78% were 20/25 or better. A new measure of effectiveness of toric correction power is described that suggested lens selection was appropriate. Results appeared better than those obtained in previous studies when the IOL cylinder power and alignment were calculated using manual keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of eyes from multiple centers, the calculation of toric IOL power using dual-zone automated keratometry measurements produced clinical results that were better than results in the literature where manual keratometry was used.

Visual outcomes, satisfaction, and spectacle independence with a nondiffractive extended vision intraocular lens targeted for slight monovision.

PURPOSE: To evaluate vision, satisfaction, and spectacle independence of the AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens when the nondominant eye is targeted for slight myopia. SETTING: 1 clinical practice in the United States. DESIGN: Prospective unmasked nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients presenting for cataract surgery interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were enrolled, with the dominant eye targeted for emmetropia and the nondominant eye targeted for slight monovision (-0.50 diopters [D]). Visual disturbances, satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated. Visual acuity (VA) was tested at distance (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) at 3 months postoperatively when uncorrected, with both eyes corrected to emmetropia and with 1 eye adjusted for monovision. 2 binocular defocus curves were also collected under the latter 2 conditions. RESULTS: Data from 31 patients were analyzed. The mean refractive spherical equivalent was 0.45 D more myopic in the nondominant eye, resulting in worse uncorrected VA at distance but better uncorrected VA at near. The binocular defocus curve with monovision showed significantly better VA from -2.0 to -3.0 D, and patients reported less need for spectacles (and better vision) at near than reported with binocular emmetropia. Glare, blurred vision, and starbursts were the most reported visual disturbances. Although not correlated with the difference in refraction, glare and blurred vision were significantly correlated with overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Implanting this IOL with a target of slight myopia in the nondominant eye appears to be a viable way to improve near vision, although with an increased potential for visual disturbances.

Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision.

Purpose: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (-0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered. Results: Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported "little" or "no" difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were "completely" or "very" happy with their lens choice. Conclusion: Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction.

Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence After Bilateral Implantation of the Synergy™ Intraocular Lens.

Purpose: To evaluate vision, visual quality, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence after bilateral implantation of the TECNIS Synergy™ intraocular lens. Setting: Two clinical practices in the USA. Design: Ambispective unmasked non-randomized clinical trial. Methods: Patients with a history of uneventful bilateral femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery with the study IOL implanted, targeted for emmetropia, at least 3 months prior to the study visit were enrolled. Monocular and binocular visual acuity (VA) were measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with binocular mesopic VA. Low contrast binocular VA and reading speed in mesopic and photopic conditions were also measured. Patient satisfaction, spectacle independence, visual symptoms, and functional vision questionnaires were completed. Results: Results from 52 subjects were available for analysis. Mean binocular unaided visual acuity was ~0.1 logMAR (20/20) from distance to 33 cm, with 81% of subjects having 0.2 logMAR (20/25) vision or better at all test distances and 92% reporting never needing glasses at any distance. Average reading speed at 40 cm was only 10 words/minute slower in dim light (p = 0.03). Mesopic and low contrast acuity appeared good. Halos were the most frequent and bothersome visual disturbances, with the greatest effect on driving at night. Eighty-eight percent of subjects reported being "completely" or "mostly" satisfied with their overall unaided vision. Conclusion: This hybrid technology IOL provided a range of binocular visual acuity from distance to 33 cm and good functional vision, even in dim light. Patients should be advised of the likelihood of visual disturbances, particularly halos.

The Effects of Angle Kappa on Clinical Results and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens.

Purpose: To objectively determine if angle kappa materially influenced clinical outcomes or patient-reported satisfaction and visual quality of patients implanted with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: This was a non-interventional study of clinical outcomes. Subjects were patients choosing to be bilaterally implanted with a trifocal IOL (PanOptix®) who were then evaluated 3 months postoperative. Angle kappa (AK) was measured before surgery and at the 3-month visit. The 3-month visit included a manifest refraction, and measurement of uncorrected and distance corrected acuity at 4 m, 60 cm and 40 cm. Visual quality and satisfaction questionnaires were also administered. Results: Data from 56 eyes of 28 subjects were analyzed; 26 eyes had an AK magnitude <0.3 mm, 14 had an AK from 0.3 mm to less than 4 mm and 16 had an AK ≥0.4 mm. Neither visual disturbances (eg, glare, halos, starbursts), satisfaction nor spectacle dependence were correlated to the magnitude of angle kappa. The magnitude of postoperative AK was significantly lower than preoperative (0.24 ± 0.12 mm vs 0.30 ± 0.16 mm, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The magnitude of preoperative Angle Kappa had no apparent effect on the refractive, visual acuity or subjective (visual disturbances, quality of vision, satisfaction) clinical outcomes with this trifocal IOL. The magnitude of angle kappa was significantly lower after surgery.

Safety and efficacy of nepafenac punctal plug delivery system in controlling postoperative ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a nepafenac punctal plug delivery system (N-PPDS) after cataract surgery. SETTING: Three U.S. clinical sites. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized (2:1), parallel-arm, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase II pilot study. METHODS: Fifty-six subjects (aged older than 22 years) with expected postcataract correctable distance vision of 20/30 or better and lower puncta allowing dilation up to 1.0 mm received either the nepafenac (N-PPDS group; n = 38 eyes) or a placebo punctal plug delivery system (p-PPDS group; n = 18 eyes). All eyes underwent routine unilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. The primary and secondary efficacy measures were postoperative ocular pain and inflammation, respectively. RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the experimental N-PPDS group and 18 patients in the control group. The N-PPDS group had a significantly higher percentage of pain-free patients than that in the p-PPDS group (22/32 [69%] vs 6/16 [38%] at 3 days, P = .038; and 24/36 [67%] vs 5/16 [31%] at 7 days, P = .018). A higher percentage of patients in the N-PPDS group (15/29 [52%] vs 0/14 [0%] in p-PPDS) was pain free at all visits (P = .001). Anterior chamber cell scores were better in the N-PPDS group (patients with no anterior chamber cells: 18/36 [50%] vs 3/16 [19%] in p-PPDS; P = .034) at 7 days. The plug retention rate was 98% (55/56) at 14 days. Adverse events having a suspected relationship with the punctal plug treatment occurred in 1 case of the N-PPDS group having to do with placement and zero in the p-PPDS group. CONCLUSIONS: The N-PPDS was safe and effective for the management of ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

Cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: objective analysis to determine best formula and keratometry to use.

PURPOSE: To objectively determine which formula/keratometry combination was best for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) sphere power in eyes with a history of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: One practice in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective, unmasked, nonrandomized chart review. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery after previous myopic LASIK were included. Eyes had to have a postoperative refraction at least 3 weeks postoperatively. IOL power was calculated with the ASCRS online postrefractive IOL calculator using anterior keratometry and recalculated using total corneal power (TK). The accuracy of treatment was calculated and compared between different formulas and keratometry methods including intraoperative aberrometry (IA). RESULTS: Data from 101 eyes, 44 of which had TK available, were analyzed. Using TK, the Wang-Koch-Maloney formula had the highest percentages of eyes with expected spherical equivalent refractive errors within 0.50 diopter (D) and 1.00 D of plano (57% and 87%, respectively). With anterior keratometry, the Barrett True-K formula had the highest percentages (64% and 92%, respectively) but was not significantly better than the Wang-Koch-Maloney formula, with expected errors within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D (P > .2, McNemar test). Expected sphere results based on IA were not significantly different than for Barrett True-K within ±0.50 D or within ±1.00 D (P > .2, McNemar test). CONCLUSIONS: Using TK in existing post-LASIK formulas did not seem beneficial. The formulas might have to be optimized for use with TK. The best expected results were obtained with the Barrett True-K and Haigis-L formulas using anterior keratometry. IA did not seem to materially improve results.

Five-Year Outcomes Prospective Study of Two First-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents (iStent®) in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of 2 iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) not controlled on 1 medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, interventional, single-arm, multi-surgeon study (NCT #1252862, clinicaltrials.gov) enrolled eyes with OAG, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of 18-30 mmHg on 1 ocular hypotensive medication, and 22-38 mmHg after medication washout. Eyes underwent standalone implantation of 2 iStent devices and were followed through 60 months postoperatively. Efficacy was quantified by mean diurnal IOP and medication usage. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of eyes with ≥20% IOP reduction versus baseline unmedicated IOP (primary efficacy), and the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤18 mmHg (secondary efficacy) without medication or secondary glaucoma surgery. Safety parameters included visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, visual field, and complications and adverse events. RESULTS: Preoperative mean IOP on 1 medication was 20.6 ± 2.0 mmHg and post-washout unmedicated IOP was 24.1 ± 1.4 mmHg (n = 39). At 5 years postoperative, medication-free mean diurnal IOP reduced to 14.5 ± 2.2 mmHg, constituting a 40% decrease versus preoperative washed-out IOP (p < .0001). In addition, this 5-year medication-free IOP constituted a 30% decrease versus preoperative IOP on 1 medication (p < .0001). At Month 60, 89.7% (26/29) of eyes achieved the primary efficacy endpoint of ≥20% IOP reduction versus baseline unmedicated IOP, and 86.2% (25/29) of eyes achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of IOP ≤18 mmHg, without medication or secondary glaucoma surgery. Throughout follow-up, 89.7-91.3% of eyes were on no medications. Favorable safety included no secondary glaucoma surgeries, minimal adverse events, and stable visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, and visual fields through 5 years postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective interventional study demonstrates persistent 5-year reductions in IOP and freedom from medications, together with favorable safety, following implantation of 2 first-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with OAG on 1 preoperative medication.

Comparing Combination Drop Therapy to a Standard Drop Regimen After Routine Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a combined steroid/antibiotic/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drop relative to a regimen of multiple drops after cataract surgery. SETTING: Single clinical practice in the USA. DESIGN: Prospective randomized contralateral eye study. METHODS: Subjects presenting for bilateral cataract surgery were enrolled with contralateral eyes randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Test eyes received a combination therapy (prednisolone acetate 1%, gatifloxacin 0.5%, and bromfenac sodium 0.075%) while control eyes received the same medications in separate drops (bromfenac sodium was 0.07%). Subjects were examined 1, 15 and 30 days after surgery. Visual acuities were measured, along with the refraction, intraocular pressure, patient pain and satisfaction, macular thickness and corneal pachymetry. The primary measure of interest was the change in macular thickness from baseline to the 15- and 30-day visits. The frequency and severity of reported ocular adverse events were tabulated for each group and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects completed the study. Changes in central macular thickness were similar between groups, with only one control eye exhibiting significant macular edema. No differences in visual acuity, corneal edema, cells or flare were observed between groups. There were eight mild adverse events reported for all eyes of all subjects; the difference in the number of eyes experiencing adverse events was not statistically significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.05 for all comparisons). While subjective symptoms were similar, all subjects indicated that they preferred the combination drop. CONCLUSION: A combination drop showed similar efficacy to multiple drops and was overwhelmingly preferred by subjects.

Visual Acuity, Defocus Curve, Reading Speed and Patient Satisfaction with a Combined Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Multifocal Intraocular Lens Modality.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the vision, defocus curve, reading speed and patient satisfaction after implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL in one eye and a diffractive multifocal in the fellow eye. SETTING: One clinical practice in the USA. DESIGN: Prospective unmasked non-randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects presenting for routine cataract surgery interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were enrolled. Study endpoints included uncorrected and distance-corrected binocular distance (4 m), intermediate (66 cm) and near (40 cm) visual acuity at 3 months. Additional endpoints included the residual refraction, spectacle independence, overall satisfaction with vision, visual symptoms, reading speed and defocus curve. RESULTS: With a best distance correction, 77% (30/39) of subjects had 20/25 or better VA at distance, intermediate and near and nearly all subjects had 20/32 or better VA at all three distances. Defocus curve results showed mean continuous vision of 20/25 or better from plano to -2.50 D. Nearly 80% (31/39) of subjects had 20/25 visual acuity from 0.00 D to -2.50 D. The critical print size was between 0.3 and 0.4 logMAR (20/40 to 20/50 Snellen Equivalent). Spectacle independence was 100% at distance, 95% at intermediate and approximately 70% at near. The percentage of subjects who were "not at all" or "slightly" bothered by visual disturbances ranged from 64% (16/25) for Halos to 88% (22/25) for Starbursts. CONCLUSIONS: EDOF/bifocal IOL blended implantation results in at least 20/25 mean visual acuity from distance to near with good spectacle independence and low reports of severe visual disturbances.

Defocus Curve and Patient Satisfaction with a New Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Targeted for Binocular Emmetropia or Slight Myopia in the Non-Dominant Eye.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the defocus curve and patient satisfaction after implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) toric IOL when both eyes were targeted for emmetropia and when the non-dominant eye was targeted for mini monovision (-0.50D). METHODS: A prospective unmasked randomized clinical trial in three clinical practices in the USA. Subjects presenting for routine cataract surgery were assigned to one of two groups, both receiving bilateral toric EDOF lenses. One group had the non-dominant eye targeted for slight myopia (-0.50D). Measures of interest were the postoperative defocus curve and reported patient satisfaction and visual disturbances. RESULTS: Questionnaire and defocus curve data were available from 37 subjects in the Emmetropia group, while the mini monovision group included questionnaire data from 39 subjects and valid defocus curve data from 14 subjects. Mini monovision subjects had significantly better VA (a half line to a line better, p < 0.05), from a defocus of -1.50 D to -3.00 D. Reported spectacle wear and satisfaction were not significantly different between groups at any distance, but more patients in the mini monovision group reported the ability to function comfortably without glasses at near and overall (near p = 0.02, overall p < 0.01). Halos and starbursts were the two phenomena reported most often for both groups, with reported starbursts slightly more common in the mini monovision group. CONCLUSIONS: A slightly myopic correction in the non-dominant eye improved binocular near vision by 0.5 to 1.0 lines based on defocus curve data. Patients reported better functional vision, but with a slight increase in reported starbursts in the mini monovision group.

Evaluating Rotational Stability of an Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Using a Slit Lamp and Image-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rotational stability of a toric extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), using either slit lamp evaluation or image-processing software. SETTING: Three clinical practices in the USA. DESIGN: Prospective unmasked randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects presenting for routine cataract surgery that were interested in improved near vision received toric EDOF lenses (TECNIS Symfony® Toric) in both eyes. The measures of interest in the current analysis were the change in orientation of the IOL between 1 day, 1 month and 3 months postoperative. Orientation was measured at the microscope on the day of surgery, and with the slit lamp at all other visits. Day 1, 1-month and 3-month images of the lens orientation were captured with a slit lamp camera. Differences in orientation were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 150 eyes had IOL orientation data available. Image analysis showed mean absolute lens orientation changes from 1 day to 1 month and 3 months of less than 2 degrees. The percentage of lenses exhibiting rotation of ≤5 degrees between any measured time points was 97% or higher. Results were similar, but significantly more variable, when IOL orientation was measured at the slit lamp. CONCLUSION: The toric EDOF lens evaluated here demonstrated rotational stability that exceeded the prior ANSI standard. The best method to determine IOL orientation changes was through image analysis. .

Factors associated with intraoperative floppy iris syndrome.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) in patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification. DESIGN: Comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of 899 eyes of 660 patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. METHODS: All routine cases of cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006, were documented. Pertinent patient information, including age, gender, race, medical history, and current medication use (including tamsulosin [Flomax, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany], other alpha(1)-antagonists, angiotensin antagonists, anticholinergics, cholinergic agonists, muscle relaxants, nitric oxide donors, and saw palmetto), were collected at the time of surgery. A telephone survey was used to determine previous use of tamsulosin, other alpha(1)-antagonists, and saw palmetto. Cases were identified intraoperatively as IFIS or non-IFIS following the triad of criteria developed by Chang and Campbell. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of IFIS associated with medication use and medical history. RESULTS: Analysis showed IFIS in 27 patients (4.1%) representing 33 eyes (3.7%). Tamsulosin use (P<0.001) and history of alpha(1)-antagonist use other than tamsulosin (P = 0.01) were shown to strongly correlate with IFIS in our study. Hypertension was noted to be a significant variable via multivariable generalized estimating equations analysis (P = 0.04) with a prevalence of 75.8% in patients with IFIS versus 56.4% in patients without IFIS. Saw palmetto showed a slight, but statistically insignificant, trend that current use or history of use may be associated with IFIS. There were no cases of posterior capsular rupture or vitreous loss. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to tamsulosin highly correlates with IFIS. Use of other alpha(1)-antagonists is also associated with IFIS. Several patients in our series were identified to have IFIS with no history of alpha(1)-antagonist use, indicating that other etiologic factors, or a combination of factors, can also elicit this response. Multivariable regression analysis shows no proven relationship between IFIS and individual use of angiotensin antagonists, anticholinergics, cholinergic agonists, muscle relaxants, nitric oxide donors, or saw palmetto, and diabetes or congestive heart failure.

LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction.

PURPOSE: To analyze the patient reported outcome of satisfaction after LASIK surgery. DESIGN: Systematic review. PARTICIPANTS: Patient data from previously reported studies. METHODS: A literature search conducted for the years 1988 to 2008 that included pertinent LASIK surgery information from the review of 2915 retrieved citations. All abstracts from these citations were reviewed and 1581 were deemed to be relevant for review. Complete copies of each of these relevant (1581) articles were obtained, and after thorough analysis each was rated based on the strength of the study design and weight of evidence. A level I rating was assigned to properly conducted, well-designed, randomized clinical trials; a level II rating to well-designed cohort and case-control studies; and a level III rating to case series, case reports, and poorly designed prospective and retrospective studies. Level I and II rated, peer-reviewed articles were entered into a database, and level III articles were eliminated. A total of 309 articles were incorporated into this database, representing level I and level II well-controlled studies of primary LASIK surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' satisfaction rates and factors associated with dissatisfaction. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 309 database articles (6.1%) reported on both patient quality of life and satisfaction and together encompassed a total of 2198 subjects. The procedures from these 19 articles took place between 1995 and 2003. The overall patient satisfaction rate after primary LASIK surgery was 95.4% (2097 of 2198 subjects; range of patient satisfaction for the 19 articles was 87.2%-100%). The patient satisfaction rate after myopic LASIK was 95.3% (1811 of 1901 patients), and after hyperopic LASIK was 96.3% (286 of 297 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, worldwide, an average 95.4% of patients were satisfied with their outcome after LASIK surgery. With 16.3 million procedures performed worldwide, and more than a decade of clinical studies and technological innovation, LASIK surgery should be considered among the most successful elective procedures. LASIK surgery compares more favorably with other elective surgical procedures in terms of generally higher satisfaction rates.

Correcting astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery: Toric IOLs and corneal relaxing incisions planned with an image-guidance system and intraoperative aberrometer versus manual planning and surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of the combination of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer with the surgeon's standard of care in correcting astigmatism using toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or corneal incisions. SETTING: Single site in United States. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Contralateral eyes of patients having uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery and astigmatism correction were randomly assigned to Group A or Group B. Group A received the surgeon's preferred standard of care. Group B had preoperative planning using an image-guidance system (VERION), intraoperative aberrometry (ORA System with VerifEye+), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The primary endpoint was the residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eyes were treated with toric IOLs and 40 eyes with corneal astigmatic incisions. On average, toric IOLs resulted in almost 0.25 diopter (D) less cylinder than corneal astigmatic incisions (P < .01), with no difference between groups (P = .41). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean spherical equivalent refraction by group (P = .51). At 3 months, the IOL in 4 eyes (11%) (2 in Group A and Group B each) was more than 10 degrees of absolute orientation from the intended orientation. The mean keratometry was 0.16 D higher with the image-guided system compared with optical biometry (Lenstar). The vector difference between the 2 measurements was 0.5 D or lower in all eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer did not significantly improve outcomes compared with the surgeon's standard of care. Based on keratometry, there was good agreement in corneal astigmatism measurements between the image-guided system and the optical biometer.

Evaluating the relative value of intraoperative aberrometry versus current formulas for toric IOL sphere, cylinder, and orientation planning.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review toric intraocular lens (IOL) outcomes and compare actual results to those expected from preoperative calculations and intraoperative aberrometry (IA) in normal eyes. SETTING: Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective data review of earlier clinical trial data. METHODS: Toric IOL planning data and results were obtained from two previous clinical studies of normal eyes receiving toric IOL implants. Back-calculation techniques were used to estimate expected residual refractive sphere and cylinder for preoperative and IA calculations. RESULTS: Toric IOL planning data and clinical outcomes for 132 eyes receiving two different toric IOLs were analyzed. The mean spherical equivalent refractions expected with preoperative planning and IA were not statistically significantly different (P = .44), but a higher percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D of the intended spherical refraction was expected with preoperative calculations (P = .05). The mean expected residual refractive astigmatism based on preoperative calculations was significantly lower than for IA (P < .001), with more eyes expected to have 0.50 D or less of residual refractive astigmatism. CONCLUSION: The use of current-generation formulas for sphere power and toric IOL planning in normal eyes seems sufficient to produce clinical outcomes with toric IOLs that are as good or better than those achieved using IA.

Extended depth-of-focus toric intraocular lens targeted for binocular emmetropia or slight myopia in the nondominant eye: Visual and refractive clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes with a diffractive toric extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) when both eyes are targeted for emmetropia and the nondominant eye is targeted for slight myopia. SETTING: Three clinical practices, United States. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Patients having routine cataract surgery with bilateral Tecnis Symfony toric EDOF IOL implantation were assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In 1 group, the nondominant eye was targeted for -0.50 diopter (D) (mini-monovision). Assessments included uncorrected monocular and binocular visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at distance (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) and the postoperative residual refractive error. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in each group, with 1 dropout. The mean postoperative residual refractive astigmatism was 0.25 D in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. The mean residual refractive astigmatism was 0.50 D or lower in 92% of eyes (72/78) in the mini-monovision group and 95% of eyes (74/78) in the emmetropia group 3 months postoperatively. The mini-monovision group had slightly worse uncorrected visual acuity at 4 m than the emmetropia group (0.16 versus 0.09; P = .002) but better uncorrected acuity at 40 cm (0.25 versus 0.34; P < .001). Binocular uncorrected acuity was not statistically significantly different between groups at 4 m (-0.03 versus -0.01; P = .33) or 66 cm (0.06 versus 0.04; P = .34) but was statistically significant at 40 cm (0.25 versus 0.19; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The EDOF toric IOL provided functional distance, intermediate, and near vision. A slight monovision approach appears to improve near visual acuity.

Comparison of the Infiniti vision and the series 20,000 Legacy systems.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency of the Infiniti vision system and the Series 20,000 Legacy system phacoemulsification units during routine cataract extraction. METHODS: Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients were randomized to have their cataract removed using either the Infiniti or the Legacy system, both using the Neosonix handpiece. System settings were standardized. Ultrasound time, amount of balanced salt solution (BSS) used intraoperatively, and postoperative visual acuity at postoperative days 1, 7 and 30 were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperatively, best corrected visual acuity was significantly worse in the Infiniti group compared to the Legacy group (0.38 +/- 0.23 and 0.21 +/- 0.16, respectively; p = 0.012). The mean phacoemulsification time was 39.6 +/- 22.9 s (range 6.0-102.0) for the Legacy group and 18.3 +/-19.1 s (range 1.0-80.0) for the Infiniti group (p = 0.001). The mean amounts of intraoperative BSS used were 117 +/- 37.7 ml (range 70-195) in the Legacy group and 85.3 +/- 38.9 ml (range 40-200) in the Infiniti group (p = 0.005). No differences in postoperative visual acuity were found. CONCLUSION: The ability to use higher flow rates and vacuum settings with the Infiniti vision system allowed for cataract removal with less phacoemulsification time than when using the Legacy system.