Adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry for optimizing management of CIN lesions in a high-risk human papillomavirus-positive population.

INTRODUCTION: Immunostaining with p16INK4a (p16), a tumor-suppressor surrogate protein biomarker for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) oncogenic activity, may complement standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology review, and provide more objective criteria to support the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosis. With this study we assessed the impact of p16 immunohistochemistry on CIN grading in an hrHPV-based screening setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis, 326 histology follow-up samples from a group of hrHPV-positive women were stained with p16 immunohistochemistry. All H&E samples were centrally revised. The pathologists reported their level of confidence in classifying the CIN lesion. RESULTS: Combining H&E and p16 staining resulted in a change of diagnosis in 27.3% (n = 89) of cases compared with the revised H&E samples, with a decrease of 34.5% (n = 18) in CIN1 and 22.7% (n = 15) in CIN2 classifications, and an increase of 18.3% (n = 19) in no CIN and 20.7% (n = 19) in CIN3 diagnoses. The level of confidence in CIN grading by the pathologist increased with adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to standard H&E. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to H&E morphology reduces the number of CIN1 and CIN2 classifications with a proportional increase in no CIN and CIN3 diagnoses, compared with standard H&E-based CIN diagnosis alone. The pathologists felt more confident in classifying the material with H&E and p16 immunohistochemistry than by using H&E alone, particularly during assessment of small biopsies. Adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to standard H&E assessment of CIN would be valuable for the diagnostic accuracy, thereby optimizing CIN management and possibly decreasing overtreatment.

[Neurological or interdisciplinary outpatient pain treatment: comparison of treatment success and satisfaction]. / Neurologische oder interdisziplinäre Schmerzambulanz: Vergleich des Behandlungserfolges und der Zufriedenheit.

The aim of this study was to compare the satisfaction and success of treatment for pain patients who were interdisciplinary (anaesthesiological, psychosomatic, neurological, orthopedic) treated or underwent neurological care alone. Methods We selected 183 patients who were treated in our neurological clinic and in our interdisciplinary pain management center (IST). Of these, 142 patients having polyneuropathy, headache or muskuloskelettal pain were included in the final analysis. 39 patients (27.5 %) were treated in the IST and 103 patients were treated exclusively by a neurologist. These patients were asked to complete a questionnaire, and were queried about the satisfaction and pain parameters. Results The neurological and multidisciplinary pain treatment led to a similar improvement in pain (p < 0.001). This effect was independent of the underlying disease. The interdisciplinary outpatient treatment resulted not primarily in an increased patient satisfaction. Conclusions The reduction of pain and patient satisfaction of neurological outpatient pain treatment were comparable with those of a multidisciplinary outpatient therapy. The only significant advantage of the interdisciplinary treatment was lower hospitalization rate after therapy. This result cannot evaluate the efficiency of inpatient or day hospital pain management, but suggests that in many cases a neurological outpatient pain therapy is sufficient, so that neurological outpatient care should be promoted.

Improving preoperative diagnosis in endometrial cancer using systematic morphological assessment and a small immunohistochemical panel.

Preoperative histopathological classification determines the primary surgical approach in endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients but has only moderate agreement between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis. The aim of the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study is to determine whether histopathological assessment and a small panel of diagnostic biomarkers decreases discrepancies between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis in EC. Preoperative endometrial tissue of 378 included patients with EC was stained with 15 different antibodies. Clinically relevant discrepancies in grade or histological subtype between original preoperative and reviewed postoperative diagnosis were observed in 75 (20%) patients. Highest clinically relevant discrepancy was found in grade 2 ECs (20%), compared to 5% and 14% in respectively grade 1 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs). A practical two-biomarker panel with PR and p53 improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.88-0.95) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.86). In preoperative high-grade EC, the diagnostic accuracy of histological subtype was improved by a three-immunohistochemical biomarker panel (PR, IMP3, and L1CAM) (AUC = 0.93; 95%CI = 0.88-0.98) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.81). In conclusion to improve correct preoperative diagnosis in EC, we recommend use of a panel of at least two easily accessible immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR and p53), only in grade 2 ECs. Overall, this will reduce clinically relevant discrepancies in tumor grade and subtype with postoperative diagnosis with 6% (from 20% to 14%). Addition of PR, IMP3, and L1CAM for histological subtyping in high-grade EECs resulted in a further decrease in discrepancies with 8% (from 20% to 12%).

Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B infection among hemodialysis patients in Tabriz: a multicenter report.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important issue in hemodialysis. Risk factors and local prevalence varies between different regions. The current study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of HBV infection and its associated risk factors among hemodialysis patients from five hemodialysis centers in Tabriz, a Northwestern Iranian city. Hepatitis B serologic markers were evaluated in chronic hemodialysis patients. Patients (n = 412) were divided into two groups: Group 1--patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and Group 2--patients with negative HBsAg. The median age was 54.9 years (range, 13-90 years). Thirteen patients (3.2%) were found to be positive for HBsAg. Among the studied factors, the history of war injury was significantly associated with the risk of HBV infection (P = 0.023). In conclusion, our study shows that the risk of HBV infection among Tabrizian hemodialysis patients is a factor of dialysis-independent parameters.