Variability in endoscopic assessment of Nissen fundoplication wrap integrity and hiatus herniation.

BACKGROUND: Upper endoscopy (EGD) is frequently performed in patients with esophageal complaints following anti-reflux surgery such as fundoplication. Endoscopic evaluation of fundoplication wrap integrity can be challenging. Our primary aim in this pilot study was to evaluate the accuracy and confidence of assessing Nissen fundoplication integrity and hiatus herniation among gastroenterology (GI) fellows, subspecialists, and foregut surgeons. METHODS: Five variations of post-Nissen fundoplication anatomy were included in a survey of 20 sets of EGD images that was completed by GI fellows, general GI attendings, esophagologists, and foregut surgeons. Accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and inter-rater agreement across providers were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 31 respondents in the final cohort. Confidence in pre-survey diagnostics significantly differed by provider type (mean confidence out of 5 was 1.8 for GI fellows, 2.7 for general GI attendings, 3.6 for esophagologists, and 3.6 for foregut surgeons, P = 0.01). The mean overall accuracy was 45.9%, which significantly differed by provider type with the lowest rate among GI fellows (37%) and highest among esophagologists (53%; P = 0.01). The accuracy was highest among esophagologists across all wrap integrity variations. Inter-rater agreement was low across wrap integrity variations (Krippendorf's alpha <0.30), indicating low to no agreement between providers. CONCLUSION: In this multi-center survey study, GI fellows had the lowest accuracy and confidence in assessing EGD images after Nissen fundoplication, whereas esophagologists had the highest. Diagnostic confidence varied considerably and inter-rater agreement was poor. These findings suggest experience may improve confidence, but highlight the need to improve the evaluation of fundoplication wraps.

Beyond the Eckardt Score: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Esophageal Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and summarize their role in assessing undifferentiated dysphagia and common esophageal disorders, including achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). RECENT FINDINGS: Given the subjective nature of swallowing disorders, accurate diagnoses often rely on capturing the patient experience. As a result, the number of PROMs used to characterize esophageal symptoms is increasing with a recent particular emphasis on EoE. Overall, esophageal-focused PROMs are used to interpret patient symptoms and quality of life, diagnosis, and symptom changes over time. There are limitations with each instrument, including factors affecting validity, reliability, accessibility, patient participation, and logistical implementation. PROM instruments can be helpful tools in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disorders. Instruments should be chosen based on factors such as target population and setting, including research, clinical, and quality improvement efforts. Future research should address how best to implement PROMs and integrate the obtained data with patient care.

Evaluating treatment protocols for rectal squamous cell carcinomas: the Duke experience and literature.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Within colorectal cancer histologies, squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) are rare compared to adenocarcinomas, with only about 200 cases reported to date. Because rectal SCC is rarely encountered, there is a lack of literature and clinical consensus surrounding its optimal treatment approach. Staging and management of SCC can be partly analogous to both rectal adenocarcinoma and anal canal SCC, which leads to a dilemma in how to best approach these patients. As large randomized prospective trials are unrealistic in the setting of this rare malignancy, this study evaluates an institutional experience and reviews the existing literature to help guide future management approaches. METHODS: This retrospective study compared various treatment regimens for rectal SCC patients treated at Duke University Medical Center from January 1, 1980 through December 31, 2016. Patients ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed, nonmetastatic rectal SCC were included. Due to small sample size, all statistical analyses were descriptive. For our systematic review, a comprehensive search of PubMed from 1933 to March 2018 was performed, with selected articles referenced to ensure all relevant publications were included. A qualitative analysis was performed to examine patient diagnoses, treatments, and disease- and treatment-related outcomes. RESULTS: Eight patients were included. Three patients underwent initial, curative attempt surgery and two of these patients required colostomy. With follow-up ranging from 7.1 to 31.5 months, one patient was alive with no evidence of disease while two developed local/regional recurrences. Five patients received definitive chemoradiation. Of these, three patients developed local/regional and/or metastatic recurrence. Two patients achieved complete response on imaging and currently remain disease-free (follow-up of 31.5 and 33.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although the review of our institutional experience is limited by small numbers, our analysis suggests that definitive chemoradiation therapy is the preferred treatment approach to rectal SCC based on improved disease-related outcomes, sphincter preservation and morbidity profiles. This conclusion is supported by a systematic literature review.

Investigating a chimeric anti-mouse PDGFRα antibody as a radiosensitizer in primary mouse sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Olaratumab (LY3012207/IMC-3G3/Lartruvo™) is a fully human monoclonal antibody specific for platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα). Phase Ib/II trial results of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) supported accelerated FDA approval of this regimen. Radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used for high-risk localized STS. However, olaratumab has not been tested with concurrent RT. Here, we evaluate the chimeric anti-mouse PDGFRα antibody 1E10Fc as a radiosensitizer in a primary mouse model of STS. METHODS: Primary STS were initiated in mice. When tumors reached 70 mm3, mice were allocated into treatment groups: 1) isotype, 2) 1E10Fc, 3) isotype + RT, 4) 1E10Fc + RT. 1E10Fc or isotype was given biweekly. RT (25 Gy delivered in 5 daily 5 Gy fractions) was initiated on Day 0 with first drug treatment. Tumors were measured 3× per week. Upon reaching 900 mm3, tumors and lungs were harvested. A two-way ANOVA was performed to compare tumor growth delay. Primary tumors were stained for CD31 and PDGFRα and lungs were assessed for micrometastases. A Chi-square test was performed to compare the development of micrometastases in the lungs after treatment with 1E10Fc or isotype. FINDINGS: RT significantly delayed time to tumor quintupling compared to no RT (p < 0·0001) [two-way ANOVA], but no difference in tumor growth was seen between mice receiving isotype or 1E10Fc treatment regardless of concurrent RT. Lower microvessel density was observed in the 1E10Fc + RT group. Fewer mice treated with 1E10Fc had micrometastases, but this difference was not statistically significant (p < 0·09). INTERPRETATION: 1E10Fc did not act as a radiosensitizer in this primary STS model. FUNDING: This study was funded by a research agreement from Eli Lilly and Company.

Functional airway obstruction observed with hyperpolarized 129 Xenon-MRI.

Hyperpolarized 129 Xenon-MRI (HP 129 Xe MRI) is an emerging imaging modality that allows assessment of both ventilation and gas transfer. Most research to date has focused on non-malignant pulmonary diseases. However, the capability of evaluating the two primary physiological processes of the lung (ventilation and gas transfer) makes HP 129 Xe MRI a promising imaging modality in the management of patients with lung cancer.

Consolidation Radiation Therapy for Patients With Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma in Complete Metabolic Response According to PET-CT or Gallium Imaging.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of consolidation radiation therapy (RT) in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the setting of a complete metabolic response (CR) to chemotherapy (ChT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV HL treated with ChT alone or combined modality therapy (CMT) between 1992 and 2012 were reviewed. Only patients in a CR according to positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) or gallium imaging were included. Clinical end points were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model was performed. RESULTS: Ninety patients were identified (46 CMT; 44 ChT alone). Median follow-up was 50 months. ChT (median 6 cycles) consisted primarily of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; 74%) or an ABVD hybrid (10%). Post-ChT imaging consisted of PET-CT (71%) or gallium (29%). RT plans primarily included all initially involved sites of disease with a median dose of 21 Gy (range, 13-31 Gy). CMT was associated with improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 88% vs. 65%, respectively; P < .001) and overall survival (97% vs. 78%, respectively; P = .002) compared with ChT alone. In multivariate analysis, age younger than 45 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.74; P = .013) and CMT (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.96; P = .04) were independently associated with improved PFS. Secondary malignancies were comparable in both cohorts (5 with CMT, 4 with ChT), whereas cardiac events were slightly more frequent with CMT (5 vs. 2). CONCLUSION: Low-dose RT, administered to all sites of original involvement, was associated with improved PFS, even in the setting of a metabolic CR after ABVD.