Mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis of overall and cause-specific effects.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess the overall and cause-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) among patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: An exhaustive systematic review was undertaken, encompassing studies that scrutinized SMRs, both overall and for specific causes, in patients diagnosed with SLE compared to the general populace. The databases of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane were meticulously searched to collate relevant literature. Following this comprehensive search, a meta-analysis was executed to methodically assess all-cause, sex-specific, ethnicity-specific, and cause-specific SMRs in individuals with SLE. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 29 studies encompassing 72,342 patients with SLE and documenting 7352 deaths. The meta-analysis disclosed a pronounced 2.87-fold elevation in the SMR for all-cause mortality in SLE patients relative to the general population (SMR, 2.866; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.490-3.242; p < .001). Region-specific assessments showed variable all-cause SMRs, with Europe reporting 2.607 (95% CI, 1.939-3.275; p < .001), Asia revealing 3.043 (95% CI, 2.082-4.004; p < .001), and particularly high SMRs noted in North America and Oceania. Gender-focused analyses presented a pooled SMR of 3.261 (95% CI, 2.674-3.848; p < .001) for females, and 2.747 (95% CI, 2.190-3.304; p < .001) for males. Evaluations specific to cause of death illustrated notably elevated SMRs for renal disease (SMR, 4.486; 95% CI, 3.024-5.948; p < .001), infections (SMR, 4.946; 95% CI, 4.253-5.639; p < .001), cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (SMR, 2.931; 95% CI, 1.802-4.061; p < .001), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) (SMR, 1.588; 95% CI, 0.647-2.528; p = .001), and cancer (SMR, 1.698; 95% CI, 0.871-2.525; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis underscores a significant 2.87-fold elevation in the SMR among patients with SLE compared to the general population, transcending differences in sex or geographical regions. Moreover, an appreciable increase in mortality due to specific causes, including renal disease, infection, CVD, CVA, malignancy, and neuropsychiatric SLE, accentuates the imperative for targeted interventions to mitigate these elevated risks in SLE patients.

Standardized mortality ratios in systemic sclerosis: a meta-analysis assessing overall and sex- and disease subtype-specific differences.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the overall and sex- and illness subtype-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: We searched and examined studies that compared the overall and sex- and illness subtype-specific SMRs in patients with SSc to those in the general population using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (until May 2023). We then conducted a meta-analysis of the overall and sex- and illness subtype-specific SMRs in patients with SSc. RESULTS: Overall, 29 studies including 30,673 patients with SSc and 5582 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with SSc had a higher overall SMR than that in the general population (SMR: 2.742, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.224-3.38091, p < 0.001). The SMR significantly increased in populations from Europe, North America, Asia, and Oceania according to regional stratification. A sex-specific meta-analysis revealed a substantial increase in the SMR in both men and women (SMR: 3.598, 95% CI: 3.097-4.180, p < 0.001; SMR: 2.833, 95% CI: 2.4384-3.292, p < 0.001, respectively) and the mortality rate was higher in men compared to women. A substantial increase in the SMR in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) was observed in a disease subtype-specific meta-analysis. In addition, the SMR in the dcSSc group was higher than that in the lcSSc group (SMR: 4.726, 95% CI: 3.795-5.885, p < 0.001; SMR: 1.987, 95% CI: 1.586-2.489, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that the mortality rate in patients with SSc was 2.74-times greater than that in the general population. The mortality rate was higher in men compared to women. Additionally, compared to patients with lcSSc, those with dcSSc showed much higher fatality rates.

Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential biomarkers in Behçet's disease: a meta-analysis.

AIM: The mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have attracted interest as possible indicators of inflammation and disease activity in various diseases. This meta-analysis assessed the association between NLR, MPV, PLR, and Behçet's disease (BD) and their correlation with disease activity and thrombosis. METHODS: A thorough search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant studies. Studies comparing NLR, MPV, and PLR between patients with BD and healthy controls, as well as studies examining these measures in connection with disease activity and thrombosis in BD satisfied the inclusion criteria. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate the effect sizes. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 24 articles. The findings revealed no discernible differences in MPV between the BD and control groups (p = 0.992). NLR was substantially higher in the BD group than in the control group (p < 0.001). PLR was higher in the BD group than in the control group (p = 0.030), indicating that BD is associated with a larger PLR. Patients with active and inactive BD did not vary significantly in terms of disease activity according to the MPV. Comparing MPV between patients with BD with and without thrombosis showed no discernible changes. However, individuals with active BD had a considerably higher NLR and PLR than those with inactive BD (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). The statistical significance threshold for the association between NLR, PLR, and thrombosis in patients with BD was not met. CONCLUSION: NLR and PLR can be regarded as general markers of inflammation according to the results of this meta-analysis.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of olokizumab administered intravenously to RA patients at 64 mg/kg every 2 or 4 weeks (Q2 or Q4W). RESULTS: Five RCTs comprising 2609 patients met the inclusion criteria. Both olokizumab Q2 and Q4W treatments achieved a significant American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) compared with the placebo (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, 95% credible interval [CrI] 2.53-4.09; OR 3.05, 95% CrI 2.43-3.86). However, olokizumab Q2W was associated with the most favorable surface using the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the ACR20 response rate. The ranking probability based on the SUCRA indicated that olokizumab Q2W had the highest probability of being considered the best treatment option for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by olokizumab Q4W, adalimumab, and placebo. The ACR50 and 70 response rates showed a similar distribution pattern to the ACR20 response rate, except that olokizumab Q4W had a higher-ranking probability than olokizumab Q2W for ACR50. The SUCRA rating likelihood of adverse events (AEs) and withdrawal due to AEs showed that a placebo was likely to be the best intervention. CONCLUSION: Both olokizumab Q2 and Q4W were efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for active RA.

Relative efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine as maintenance therapies for lupus nephritis: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance therapies for lupus nephritis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of CNI, MMF, and AZA as maintenance therapies in patients with lupus nephritis were included. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from RCTs. RESULTS: Ten RCTs comprising 884 patients were included in the study. Although the difference was not statistically significant, MMF showed a trend toward a lower relapse rate compared with AZA (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.45-1.22). Similarly, tacrolimus showed a trend toward a lower relapse rate compared with AZA (OR 0.85, 95% CrI 0.34-2.00). Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that MMF had the highest probability of being the best treatment based on the relapse rate, followed by CNI and AZA. The incidence of leukopenia in the MMF and CNI groups was significantly lower than that in the AZA group (OR 0.12, 95% CrI 0.04-0.34; OR 0.16, 95% CrI 0.04-0.50; respectively). Fewer patients with infections were observed in the MMF group than in the AZA group, although the difference was not statistically significant. The analysis of withdrawals due to adverse events showed a similar pattern. CONCLUSION: Lower relapse rates combined with a more favorable safety profile suggest that CNI and MMF are superior to AZA as maintenance treatments in lupus nephritis patients.

Association between systemic sclerosis and venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the published data pertaining to the correlation between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: We conducted manual searches and explored MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to review papers reporting the risk of VTE in patients with SSc. A meta-analysis was performed exploring the relative risks (RRs) of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE in these individuals. RESULTS: Six trials that included 41,105 patients with SSc were eligible for inclusion. A meta-analysis of the six included studies revealed a statistically significant correlation (RR 2.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.608-3.500, p < 0.001) between the risk of VTE and SSc. Regional subgroup study revealed a strong correlation between SSc and VTE risk in Americans, Europeans, and Asians. Additionally, a significant correlation between SSc and PE risk was observed (RR 3.154, 95% CI = 1.320-7.539, p = 0.010). Finally, the meta-analysis revealed a substantial correlation (RR 5.190, 95% CI = 1.513-17.01, p = 0.009) between the risk of DVT and SSc. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that SSc is linked to an increased risk of DVT, PE, and VTE. This finding underscores the importance of close monitoring for the emergence of these conditions in patients with SSc.

All-cause and cause-specific mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for both all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted an extensive search across the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies investigating SMRs for all-cause and/or cause-specific mortality in individuals with RA compared to the general population. Subsequently, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis, examining SMRs across various categories, including all-cause, sex-specific, ethnicity-specific, and cause-specific SMRs in RA patients. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving 486,098 patients with RA and 63,988 deaths met the inclusion criteria. Patients with RA had a 1.522-fold increase in all-cause SMR (SMR 1.522, 95% CI 1.340-1.704, p < 0.001) compared to the general population. Stratification by ethnicity revealed that the all-cause SMR was 1.575 (95% CI 1.207-1.943) in Caucasians and 1.355 (95% CI 1.140-1.569) in Asians. The gender-specific meta-analysis revealed elevated SMR in both women and men. RA patients exhibited an increased risk of mortality attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), respiratory disease, infection, and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). However, no significant increase in SMR was observed for mortality due to malignancy. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis study highlights a 1.522-fold increase in SMR in patients with RA compared to that in the general population, irrespective of sex or region. Additionally, a notable increase in mortality associated with specific causes, including CVD, respiratory disease, infection, and CVA, underscores the critical need for targeted interventions to manage these heightened risks in patients with RA.

Association between functional FCGR3A F158V and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and responsiveness to rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between the functional Fc gamma receptor 3 A (FCGR3A) V158F and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and rituximab therapy in patients with autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant articles. We conducted a meta-analysis of the association between FCGR3A V158F and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and responsiveness to rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases. RESULTS: Eleven studies, consisting of 661 responders and 267 non-responders for FCGR3A V158F polymorphism and 156 responders and 89 non-responders for FCGR2A R131H polymorphism, were included. The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between the FCGR3A V allele and responsiveness to rituximab (odds ratio [OR] = 1.600, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.268-2.018, P < 0.001). Furthermore, associations were found using the dominant and homozygous contrast models. Subgroup analysis showed an association between the FCGR3A V allele and responsiveness to rituximab in European, RA, ITP, small (<50) and large (≥50) groups, and short- (≤6 months) and long-term follow-up periods (≥6 months). These associations were also found in recessive, dominant or homozygous contrast models. Meta-analysis revealed no association between the FCGR2A R allele and responsiveness to rituximab (OR = 1.243, 95% CI = 0.825-1.873, P = 0.229). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the FCGR3A F158V polymorphism is associated with better responsiveness to rituximab therapy in patients with autoimmune diseases, indicating that individuals carrying the FCGR3A V allele will likely respond better to rituximab. However, FCGR2A R131H polymorphism was not associated with better response to rituximab.

Association between Susceptibility to Systemic Lupus Erythematous and Polymorphisms in miR-146a and miR-499: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether miR-146a and miR-499 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. We performed a meta-analysis on the association of miR-146a rs2910164, rs2431697, rs57095329, and miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphisms with susceptibility to SLE. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies from 17 reports, with 18,910 patients and 29,622 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed no association between SLE and the rs2910164 C allele (odds ratio [OR] = 0.999, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.816-1.222, p = 0.990). Stratification by ethnicity indicated no association between the miR-146a C allele and SLE in Arab or Latin American populations. The meta-analysis revealed an association between SLE and the miR-499 rs374644 CC + CT genotype in the overall group (OR = 1.313, 95% CI = 1.015-1.698, p = 0.038). Furthermore, meta-analysis revealed a significant association between SLE and the miR-146a rs2431697 C allele in the overall group (OR = 0.746, 95% CI = 0.697-0.798, p = 0.038). The miR-146a rs2431697 C allele is protective against SLE risk. Stratification by ethnicity indicated an association between the miR-146a rs2431697 C allele and SLE in Asian and European, but not Arab populations. The meta-analysis showed an association between the miR-146a rs57095329 G allele and SLE in Asian, but not Arab populations. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the miR-146a rs2431697 polymorphism is a protective factor against the risk of SLE, and that the miR-146a rs57095329 and miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to SLE. However, miR-146a rs2910164 was not associated with susceptibility to SLE.

Treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus with baricitinib: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of baricitinib in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register to find relevant publications. Using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of baricitinib in patients with active SLE who did not respond well to standard treatments. RESULTS: A total of 1849 individuals (1235 experimental participants and 614 controls) from three RCTs on baricitinib were included. A reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score in the baricitinib 4 mg group was greater than the placebo group's reduction (odds ratio [OR] = 1.407, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.123-1.763, p = .003). The baricitinib 4 mg group significantly outperformed the placebo group in terms of SLEDAI-2K remission of arthritis or rash (OR = 1.327, 95% CI = 1.059-1.663, p = .014). Other effectiveness outcomes such as the SRI4 response did not substantially improve in the baricitinib 4 mg group when compared with the placebo group. And there were no significant increase in the efficacy outcomes in the baricitinib 2 mg group than in the placebo group. However, there was a substantially higher incidence of severe adverse events (SAE) and serious infections in the baricitinib 4 mg group (OR = 1.493, 95% CI = 1.002-2.225, p = .049; OR = 2.303, 95% CI = 1.147-4.622, p = .019) compared to the placebo group. There were no differences between the baricitinib 2 mg and placebo groups in any of the safety outcome data. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis reveals that baricitinib 4 mg is beneficial for treating active SLE in terms of a reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score and SLEDAI-2K remission of arthritis or rash. However, the higher frequency of SAEs and serious infections was observed in the group receiving baricitinib 4 mg.

Associations between blood IL-33 levels and IL-33 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the relationship between circulating interleukin-33 (IL-33) levels and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) along with polymorphisms in the IL-33 gene and SLE susceptibility. METHOD: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases (to May 2023) were searched for relevant publications. Using a meta-analysis we investigated serum/plasma IL-33 levels in patients with SLE and controls, and the relationship between IL-33 rs1929992, rs1891385, rs7044343, rs1095498, and rs10975579 polymorphisms and the risk of developing SLE. RESULTS: Nine studies focusing on 1,935 patients with SLE were included. IL-33 levels were significantly higher in the SLE group than in the control group (SMD = 2.140, 95% CI = 1.068-3.212, p < .001). Asian, European, and Arab groups have shown increased IL-33 levels in SLE populations, according to ethnic stratification. Regardless of the sample size, variable adjustment, data format, or publication year, the subgroup analysis showed significantly higher IL-33 levels in the SLE group. This meta-analysis supported the significance of the link between SLE and the IL-33 rs1891385 C allele (OR, 1.525; 95% CI, 11.310-1.777; p = .010). A similar association was found between the IL-33 rs1891385 C/A polymorphism and SLE, using homozygote comparisons and dominant and recessive models. However, this meta-analysis found no association between the IL-33 polymorphisms rs1929992, rs7044343, rs1095498, and rs10975579 and susceptibility to SLE. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis identified significantly higher levels of circulating IL-33 in patients with SLE as well as an association between IL-33 rs1891385 and SLE.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and toll-like receptor 9 polymorphisms: A meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether polymorphisms in toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) contribute to vulnerability to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant articles. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association between the TLR9 rs187084, rs352139, rs352140, and rs5743836 polymorphisms and SLE risk. RESULTS: A total of 5447 patients with SLE and 6588 control participants across 26 trials from 24 articles were included. The TLR9 rs187084 T allele was significantly associated with SLE (odds ratio, 1.146; 95% confidence interval, 1.033-1.273; p = 0.010). In a meta-analysis, the TLR9 rs187084 T allele was associated with SLE in the Asian population but not in the Arab population, demonstrating the existence of ethnicity-specific effects. Using homozygote contrast and recessive models, the researchers also found that the TLR9 rs187084 T/C polymorphism was associated with SLE. The TLR9 rs352139 G allele was not associated with SLE in this meta-analysis. After accounting for ethnic differences, we found that the TLR9 rs352139 G allele was not associated with SLE in Asians and Arabs. Furthermore, homozygote contrast and dominant models found no association between the TLR9 rs352139 G/A polymorphism and SLE. TLR9 polymorphisms at rs352140 and rs5743836 were not associated with an increased risk of SLE in any genetic prediction model, including people of Asian, European, or Latin American ancestry. CONCLUSIONS: SLE susceptibility is associated with the TLR9 rs187084 polymorphism in the Asian population and the rs187084, rs352139, rs352140, and rs5743836 polymorphisms in the Asian, European, and Latin American populations, respectively.

Associations between circulating interleukin-17 levels and Behcet's disease and between IL-17 gene polymorphisms and disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically investigate the relationship between circulating interleukin-17 (IL-17) levels and Behçet's disease (BD) and the associations between polymorphisms in IL17 genes and BD susceptibility. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant articles. We performed a meta-analysis of serum/plasma IL-17 levels in BD patients and controls and evaluated the associations between IL17A rs4711998, rs8193036, and rs2275913 and IL17F rs763780 and rs2397084 polymorphisms and the risk of BD. RESULTS: Twelve studies, involving 901 patients with BD and 1,131 controls, were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that circulating IL-17 levels were significantly higher in the BD group than in the control group (SMD = 1.422, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.689-2.155, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis by data type indicated higher IL-17 levels in the BD group in both the original and calculated data populations. Stratification by publication year revealed significantly lower vitamin D levels in the SSc group in both recent and older publication years. No significant differences in IL-17 levels were observed between the active and inactive disease groups. We found no evidence of associations between BD and IL17A rs2275913, L17F rs763780, or rs2397084 polymorphisms. However, a significant association was found between BD and IL17A rs4711998 and rs8193036 polymorphisms in the pooled cohort of affected individuals compared to that in pooled controls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.347, 95% CI = 1.043-1.741, p<0.001; OR = 0.691, 95% CI = 0.542-0.880, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed significantly higher circulating IL-17 levels in BD patients and showed evidence of associations between IL17A rs4711998 and rs8193036 polymorphisms and BD.

Associations between interleukin 17A and 17F polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility: A meta-analysis.

Owing to their role in inflammatory reactions and immunological responses as well as their chromosomal location, interleukin (IL) 17A and 17F are regarded as candidate causal genes associated with asthma. The aim of this study was to determine whether IL17 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to asthma. We used the PubMed/Medline and Embase databases to search for studies reporting IL17 polymorphisms in patients with asthma and healthy controls. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the associations between IL17A rs8193036 (-737C/T), rs2275913 (-197G/A), rs3819024 (A/G), rs3748067 (C/T), and rs4711998 (A/G) and IL17F rs763780 (7488A/G), rs2397084 (T/C), rs1889570 (C/T), rs11465553 (G/A), and rs1266828 (T/C) polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility. A total of 20 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results revealed the IL17A rs8193036 CC genotype was associated with asthma susceptibility (odds ratio [OR] = 1.490, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.027-2.161, p = .036). However, stratification by ethnicity indicated no association between this polymorphism and asthma in European and Asian subjects. Furthermore, no association was found between this polymorphism and asthma using the allele contrast, dominant or homozygous contrast models. No evidence of an association was found between any of the other IL17A and IL17F polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that, among the studied polymorphisms, only the CC genotype of IL17A rs8193036 is associated with asthma susceptibility.

Relative Remission and Low Disease Activity Rates of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Upadacitinib, and Filgotinib versus Methotrexate in Patients with Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Naive Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The relative efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in producing remission and low disease activity (LDA) states remains unknown since there are currently no trials that provide direct comparisons among JAK inhibitors in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the relative remission and LDA rates of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to those of methotrexate (MTX) in DMARD-naive patients with RA. METHOD: We conducted Bayesian network meta-analysis and included information from direct and indirect comparisons from randomized controlled trials that examined remission (Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints using C-reactive protein level [DAS28-CRP] <2.6) and LDA (DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2) produced by tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib monotherapy, and MTX in patients with DMARD-naive RA. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials, comprising 2,185 patients, met the inclusion criteria. This network meta-analysis showed that treatment with tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib achieved a significantly higher remission rate than that with MTX (odds ratio [OR] = 4.13, 95% CI = 2.88-6.02; OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.17-4.13; OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.10-3.50; OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.27-3.53). The ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of achieving remission (SUCRA = 0.985), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (SUCRA = 0.574), baricitinib 4 mg (SUCRA = 0.506), filgotinib 200 mg (SUCRA = 0.431), and MTX (SUCRA = 0.004). Moreover, treatment with tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib achieved significantly higher LDA rate than that with MTX. The ranking probability for LDA was similar to that for remission; upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest probability of achieving LDA, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX. CONCLUSIONS: Upadacitinib seems to be one of most effective interventions for achieving remission and LDA in DMARD-naive patients with RA based on the comparative analysis, and there are differences in remission and LDA rates induced by different JAK inhibitors.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Biological Agents in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have described randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of various biological agents used in induction therapy for lupus nephritis. OBJECTIVES: We designed this study to assess the relative efficacy and safety of some of these biological agents in patients with lupus nephritis. METHOD: We collected data from RCTs that examined the efficacy and safety of any biological agents for lupus nephritis and then used these data to complete a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the direct and indirect evidence from these studies. RESULTS: We identified nine RCTs evaluating rituximab, abatacept, belimumab, anifrolumab, obinutuzumab, ocrelizumab, and low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) across 1,480 patients. Low-dose IL-2, obinutuzumab, rituximab, and belimumab achieved complete remission in a significant proportion of respondents when compared with that in the control. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that low-dose IL-2 had the highest probability of achieving complete remission, followed by obinutuzumab, rituximab, belimumab, anifrolumab, abatacept, ocrelizumab, and the control. The risk of serious adverse events (SAE) tended to be lower for low-dose IL-2, rituximab, belimumab, and obinutuzumab than for the control. SUCRA-based ranking indicated that IL-2 had the highest probability of being safe, followed by rituximab, belimumab, obinutuzumab, control, anifrolumab, abatacept, and ocrelizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose IL-2 was the most effective induction treatment for patients with lupus nephritis and had the lowest potential for SAE. Higher complete remission rates and a more favorable safety profile suggest that low-dose IL-2, obinutuzumab, rituximab, and belimumab may be superior to the current control as treatments for lupus nephritis.

Effectiveness of paraffin bath therapy for the symptoms and function of hand diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Paraffin bath therapy is noninvasive and is widely used in various hand diseases. Paraffin bath therapy is easy to use, has fewer side effects, and can be applied to various diseases with different etiologies. However, there are few large-scale studies of paraffin bath therapy, and there is insufficient evidence of its efficacy. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of paraffin bath therapy for pain relief and functional improvement in various hand diseases through a meta-analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We searched for studies using PubMed and Embase. Eligible studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) patients with any diseases of the hand; (2) comparison between paraffin bath therapy and no paraffin bath therapy; and (3) sufficient data on changes in the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, pulp-to-pulp pinch strength, or Austrian Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand index before and after paraffin bath therapy. Forest plots were drawn to visualize the overall effect. Jadad scale score, I2 statistics, and subgroup analyses were used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of five studies included 153 patients who were treated and 142 who were not treated with paraffin bath therapy. The VAS were measured in all 295 patients included in the study, while the AUSCAN index was measured in the 105 patients with osteoarthritis. Paraffin bath therapy significantly reduced the VAS scores (mean difference [MD], -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.93 to -0.60). In osteoarthritis, paraffin bath therapy significantly improved grip and pinch strength (MD -2.53; 95% CI 0.71-4.34; MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.71-0.83) and reduced the VAS and AUSCAN scores (MD -2.61; 95% CI -3.07 to -2.14; MD -5.02; 95% CI -8.95 to -1.09). DISCUSSION: Paraffin bath therapy significantly reduced the VAS and AUSCAN scores, and improved grip and pinch strength in patients with various hand diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Paraffin bath therapy is effective for alleviating pain and improving function in hand diseases, thereby improving quality of life. However, owing to the small number of patients included in the study and its heterogeneity, a further large-scale, well-structured study is needed.

Comparative efficacy and safety of infliximab and its biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis presenting an insufficient response to methotrexate : A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative efficacy and safety of infliximab and its biosimilars in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who showed an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing the efficacy and safety of infliximab biosimilars versus the originator product in patients with active RA despite receiving MTX. RESULTS: Overall, 7 RCTs involving 3168 patients, including 7 biologic agents, met the inclusion criteria. The NI-071 was listed at the top left of the diagonal of the league table because it was associated with the most favorable surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response rate. SB2 was listed at the bottom right of the diagonal of the league table because it was associated with the least favorable results. Based on SUCRA, NI-071 had the highest probability of being the best treatment agent in terms of the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.731), followed by ABP 710, CT-P13, BCD-055, infliximab, Exemptia, PF-06438179, and SB2 (SUCRA = 0.311). Although statistically non-significant differences in safety ranking were observed for serious adverse events (SAEs) among the treatment options, ABP 710 presented the highest safety probability (SUCRA = 0.739) while BCD-055 showed the lowest safety profile (SUCRA = 0.289). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in ACR20 response rates and SAEs were detected between infliximab biosimilars and the originator in the investigated study populations.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adalimumab biosimilars and adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis presenting an insufficient response to methotrexate: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the relative efficacy and safety of adalimumab and biosimilars in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presenting an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining efficacy and safety of adalimumab biosimilars versus adalimumab in patients with active RA despite MTX therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 8 RCTs involving 3577 patients, including 8 biologic types, met the inclusion criteria. MSB11022 is listed at the top left of the diagonal of the league table, as it was associated with the most favorable surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response rate; FKB327 is listed at the bottom right of the diagonal of the league table, as it was associated with the least favorable results. Based on SUCRA, MSB11022 presented the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.623), followed by PF-06410293, CinnoRA, BI 695501, ABP 50, Exemptia, SB5, adalimumab, and FKB327 (SUCRA = 0.390); no difference was observed in ACR20 response rates between biosimilars and adalimumab. Although statistically non-significant, differences in safety ranking were observed for serious adverse events (SAEs) among the interventions, with MSB11022 presenting the highest probability of being safe (SUCRA = 0.865) and Exemptia the lowest (SUCRA = 0.300). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was detected between adalimumab biosimilars and the originator in terms of ACR20 response rates and SAEs in the studied patients.

Relative effectiveness and safety of interleukin-6 and Janus kinase inhibitors versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The relative efficacy and tolerability of interleukin­6 (IL-6) and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapies were compared with those of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of IL­6 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and adalimumab in patients with RA and inadequate responses to MTX. RESULTS: Seven RCTs, which included 4428 patients (1066 for IL­6 inhibitors and 3362 for JAK inhibitors), met the inclusion criteria. IL­6 inhibitors were placed at the top left of the league table diagonal (Odds ratio, OR 1.43; 95% CrI 1.12-1.82) as these were correlated with the most beneficial ACR20 response rate. Conversely, the placebo was placed at the bottom right of the league table diagonal as it was correlated with the least desirable effects. IL­6 and JAK inhibitors produced a substantial ACR20 response relative to adalimumab. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) revealed that treatment with IL­6 inhibitors had the greatest ability to reach the ACR20 response rate (SUCRA = 0.826), followed by treatment with JAK inhibitors (SUCRA = 0.672) and adalimumab (SUCRA = 0.001). The ACR50 and ACR70 rates displayed patterns similar to the ACR20 response rate. With regard to serious adverse events (SAEs), the SUCRA rating likelihood showed that adalimumab was likely to be the best intervention, followed by JAK and IL­6 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Both IL­6 and JAK inhibitors are more effective than adalimumab and have similar effects in patients with RA and an inadequate response to MTX. Adalimumab is likely to be safer than JAK and IL­6 inhibitors.