Preoperative medial meniscus extrusion on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with a tendency toward varus shifting of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate serial changes in postoperative alignment over 5 years after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and to identify risk factors associated with alterations in the postoperative weight-bearing line WBL ratio. METHODS: Patients who underwent OWHTO during 2011-2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were (1) follow-up duration ≥5 years and (2) serial postoperative long-standing hip-to-ankle radiographs to evaluate alignment alterations. The WBL ratio was measured preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years postoperatively to evaluate serial changes. Alterations in the WBL ratio were analyzed using a linear mixed model, considering potential risk factors including International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades of each compartment, and medial meniscus extrusion (≥3 mm). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society (KS) objective and functional scores, and the correlations between clinical outcomes and alignment alteration were examined. RESULTS: A total of 78 knees were investigated. During the study period, the overall WBL ratio decreased by 5.5 ± 7.2%, signifying varus shifting, from 58.6 ± 11.5% at 3 months post-surgery to 51.5 ± 12.7% at 5 years post-surgery. Based on univariate regression analyses, ICRS grade of the medial compartment and medial meniscus extrusion were included in a linear mixed model regarding alignment alteration. The model identified medial meniscus extrusion as a significant risk factor after adjusting for time (p <0.001). Medial meniscus extrusion also had a significant interaction with time (p <0.001), indicating greater alignment alteration in cases of medial meniscus extrusion. The extrusion was noted in 68 out of 78 knees. CONCLUSION: In the midterm following OWHTO, the overall alignment had a tendency toward varus shifting. A linear mixed model found that preoperative medial meniscus extrusion on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with the tendency.

Risk Factor for Clinical Failure of Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplant: Early vs Late Graft Tear.

BACKGROUND: Graft tears are common postoperative findings in meniscal allograft transplant (MAT). Graft tear in medial MAT may be different from that of lateral MAT, considering the difference between medial meniscal tears and lateral meniscal tears. Moreover, medial MAT is frequently accompanied by ligament reconstruction, which is associated with graft tear. The effect of graft tear on the long-term survivorship of medial MAT has not been investigated. HYPOTHESIS: Graft tear would adversely affect the survivorship of medial MAT and the effect would be different according to the timing of graft tear. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 55 patients undergoing medial MAT between June 2019 and March 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were reviewed to identify graft tears, and the timing of their occurrence was investigated. Postoperative MRI was performed routinely during the first postoperative year and every 2 years thereafter. The patients were classified into a no graft tear (NT) group, early graft tear (occurring within 1 year; ET) group, and late graft tear (occurring 1 year after surgery; LT) group. The survival rate of medial MAT was estimated according to graft tear, with a failure being defined as (1) reoperations including arthroplasty, realignment osteotomy, revision MAT, and meniscectomy (>50% of the graft or to the zone of the meniscocapsular junction) or (2) Lysholm score <65. Clinical scores were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 8.6 ± 5.3 years. During that period, clinical failures occurred in 6 (10.9%) patients. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 94.0% (95% CI, 90.6%-97.4%). Graft tears were seen in 18 patients: 6 patients in the ET group and 12 patients in the LT group. The median time when the graft tear was noted on MRI scans was 5.5 months (range, 1-11 months) postoperatively in the ET group and 99.5 months (range, 19-264 months) postoperatively in the LT group. Five patients in the ET group had root tears, whereas 9 patients in the LT group had complex or horizontal tears. The 5-year survival rate of the ET group was 62.5% (95% CI, 41.2%-83.8%), which was significantly lower than that of the NT group (96.8%; 95% CI, 93.6%-99.9%) and the LT group (85.7%; 95% CI, 72.5%-98.9%; P = .002). The mean postoperative Lysholm scores were 85.6 ± 17.9 in the NT group, 93.0 ± 2.8 in the ET group, and 79.3 ± 11.6 in the LT group, showing no significant difference between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .058). CONCLUSION: Clinical relevance of graft tear that occurred after medial MAT was dependent upon its timing. ET was a risk factor for clinical failure, whereas LT did not adversely affect graft survivorship. Lysholm scores did not differ according to graft tear.

Midterm Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Revision Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

Background: It is unknown whether the outcomes achieved in the early period after revision lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (RLMAT) are maintained through the midterm period. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent RLMAT. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We reviewed the outcomes of 19 RLMATs in 18 patients with at least 5 years of follow-up data. The mean follow-up period was 6 ± 1.1 years (range, 5-8.5 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and the Tegner activity level. Radiographic progression of arthritis was measured by the absolute and relative joint space widths on 45° of knee flexion posteroanterior radiographs preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up.Failure was defined as meniscocapsular separation, removal, or tear of more than half of the meniscal allograft on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Of the 18 patients, 3 underwent ≥2 RLMATs. The survival rate was evaluated according to the number of revision surgeries. Results: For knees with an intact meniscus transplant at the final follow-up, the modified Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly improved compared with preoperatively, but the Tegner activity level was unchanged. No significant differences were found in the absolute and relative joint space widths postoperatively. There were 6 failures within 3 years after RLMAT; the overall 5-year survival rate was 68.4% (13/19 knees). All failed knees showed bucket-handle tear patterns on MRI due to meniscocapsular healing failure. The survival rate decreased as the number of RLMATs increased-73.3% for a first RLMAT (n = 15 knees), 66.7% for a second RLMAT (n = 3 knees), and 0% for a third RLMAT (n = 1 knee). Midterm MRIs of 8 well-healed RLMATs showed evidence of meniscal degeneration; nonetheless, this did not affect clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The midterm results of RLMATs demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 68.4% and positive clinical and radiological outcomes for failed MATs despite unimproved activity levels. Inadequate meniscocapsular healing was the leading cause of failure, and it needs to be carefully considered when performing RLMATs.