Constipation and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: Results from Thailand PDOPPS.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely recognized as valuable predictors of clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Our study aimed to explore the connections between patient-reported constipation and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We assessed constipation in patients across 22 facilities participating in the Thailand Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) from 2014 to 2017. Constipation diagnosis utilized objective assessment tools such as the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) and a self-reported questionnaire known as the constipation severity score (CSS). The BSFS is a 7-level scale that visually inspects feces based on texture and morphology, while the CSS measures constipation duration and severity using a 5-point Likert scale for various factors. We employed Cox proportional hazards model regression to determine the associations between constipation and clinical outcomes, including mortality, hemodialysis (HD) transfer and peritonitis. RESULTS: Among 975 randomly selected PD patients from 22 facilities, 845 provided written informed consent, and 729 completed CSS questionnaire. Constipation was prevalent in the PD population (13%), particularly among older patients, those who were caregiver dependent, had diabetes and poorer nutritional status (indicated by lower time-averaged serum albumin, potassium, creatinine and phosphate concentrations). Twenty-seven percent of which experiencing symptoms of constipation for over a year. Notably, self-reported constipation at baseline was significantly associated with a shorter time to first peritonitis and higher rates of peritonitis and death. However, no significant association was found between constipation and HD transfer after adjusting for various factors, including age, gender, PD vintage, comorbidities, shared frailty by study sites and serum albumin. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported constipation independently correlated with increased risks of peritonitis and all-cause mortality, though no such correlation was observed with HD transfer. These findings underscore the need for further investigation to identify effective interventions for constipation in PD patients.

Effects of calcium supplements on the risk of renal stone formation in a population with low oxalate intake.

It has been speculated that calcium supplement in subjects with low oxalate intake might increase the risk of calcium stone formation due to an increase in calcium absorption without a significant reduction in oxalate absorption. There have been no human studies addressing specifically the effects of taking calcium supplements in populations whose dietary oxalate is low. This study was conducted to determine the effects of calcium supplements on the risk of calcium stone formation in a population with low oxalate intake. Thirty-two healthy male navy privates, 22.7 +/- 1.9 (mean +/- SD) years old, who had oxalate intake of less than 1 mmol/day, a serum creatinine of less than 150 micromol/l, and no history of renal stones, participated in the study. Dietary oxalate was controlled to be under 1 mmol/day throughout the study. Twenty-four hour urine collections for the determination of urinary constituents were obtained at baseline and after taking calcium supplements. Detection of calcium oxalate was performed to assess the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation. The urinary excretion of calcium was significantly elevated above baseline values while taking the calcium supplements (3.48 +/- 2.13 vs 5.17 +/- 2.61 mmol/d, p < 0.05) and urinary oxalate was significantly decreased when the subjects took calcium supplements compared to the corresponding baseline value (0.13 +/- 0.05 vs 0.17 +/- 0.07 mmol/d, p = 0.01). Urinary citrate was significantly elevated when the subjects took calcium supplements compared to the baseline (0.83 +/- 0.57 vs 0.64 +/- 0.39 mmol/d, p = 0.03). There was no significant alteration in the activity products of calcium oxalate while taking the calcium supplements (0.54 +/- 0.25 vs 0.57 +/- 0.22, p = 0.54). The effect of calcium supplements with meals, for the reduction of the risk of calcium stone formation, was unchanged, even in a population whose oxalate intake is rather low. Taking calcium supplements resulted in a reduction in urinary oxalates and an elevation in urinary citrates. Both alterations in urinary constituents counterbalanced the elevation in urinary calcium which resulted from the calcium supplements.

Schedule of taking calcium supplement and the risk of nephrolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Variation in the timing of calcium supplement may affect gastrointestinal absorption of both calcium and oxalate differently and may associate with variable risk of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. There are few human studies addressing specifically the appropriate time for taking calcium supplement. Therefore, this study was performed to compare calcium bioavailability and the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation for calcium supplement taken with meal vs. taken at bedtime. METHODS: Thirty-two healthy male navy privates, 22.7 +/- 1.9 years old (mean +/- SD), who had normal renal function (serum creatinine less than 150 umol/L) and no history of renal stone, participated in the study. The subjects were randomly allocated into two groups of 16 each. Group A took 1 g of calcium carbonate with meal, 3 times/day; and group B took 3 g/day of calcium carbonate at bedtime. After taking the regimens for 1 week, followed by 1 month of washout period, crossover between both groups was done. The diet was controlled throughout the study. Twenty-four-hour urine collections for the determination of urinary constituents were obtained at baseline and after taking both regimens of calcium supplement. Activity product for calcium oxalate was determined to assess the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation. RESULTS: Urinary excretions of calcium were significantly elevated above the baseline values when taking calcium supplement both with meal (3.48 +/- 2.13 mmol/day vs. 5.17 +/- 2.61 mmol/day, P < 0.05) and at bedtime (3.09 +/- 1.70 mmol/day vs. 5.08 +/- 2.34 mmol/day, P < 0.05). There was no difference between the two regimens in the urinary calcium excretions. The urinary oxalate was decreased significantly when the subjects took calcium supplement with meal compared with the corresponding baseline value (0.13 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.17 +/- 0.07 mmol/d, P= 0.01). In contrast, there was no alteration in urinary oxalate when calcium supplement was taken at bedtime compared to the baseline values (0.15 +/- 0.05 mmol/day vs. 0.15 +/- 0.06 mmol/day, P= 0.9). Compared with the corresponding baseline values, there was no significant increase in the activity product for calcium oxalate when taking calcium with meal (0.54 +/- 0.25 vs. 0.57 +/- 0.22, P= 0.54), but it was increased significantly when calcium supplement was taken at bedtime (0.47 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.72 +/- 0.27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Calcium supplement should be taken with meal in order to avoid increasing the risk of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis.