Positive end-expiratory pressure prevents the loss of respiratory compliance during low tidal volume ventilation in acute lung injury patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the decay of respiratory system compliance (Cpl,rs) due to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation in acute lung injury (ALI) patients. SETTING: General ICU in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eight ALI patients with a lung injury score greater than 2.5. INTERVENTION: Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with an average VT of 8.5 +/- 0.4 mL/kg, were applied at three levels of PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O). Before each PCV and VCV period, lung volume history was standardized by manual hyperinflation maneuvers. MEASUREMENTS: We measured Cpl,rs at time 0 (start), 10, 20, and 30 (end) min from the beginning of each PCV and VCV period. Gas exchange and hemodynamic data were collected at end. RESULTS: At PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O, we observed a progressive Cpl,rs decay with both PCV and VCV modes. At PEEP 5 cm H2O, we detected a higher Cpl,rs decrease during PCV, due to a higher Cpl,rs at start, compared with VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, Cpl,rs did not decrease significantly. Cpl,rs values measured at end as well as oxygenation and hemodynamic data did not differ between PCV and VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, PCV provided lower PaCO2 than VCV. CONCLUSIONS: A PEEP of at least 15 cm H2O was needed to prevent Cpl,rs decay. The progressive Cpl,rs loss we observed at lower PEEP probably reflects alveolar instability.

Effects of periodic lung recruitment maneuvers on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.

OBJECTIVE: We wished to investigate whether volume recruitment maneuvers (VRMs) could improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, ventilated at relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). SETTING: General intensive care unit (ICU) located in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 15 PEEP responder ARDS patients undergoing continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPPV) with sedation and muscle paralysis. INTERVENTIONS: We identified a low (9.4 +/- 3 cmH2O) and a high (16.0 +/- 2 cmH2O) level of PEEP associated with target oxygenation values. Using a custom modified mechanical ventilator, we applied in random order three steps lasting 30 min: (1) CPPV at the low PEEP level (CPPV(LO)); (2) CPPV at the high PEEP level (CPPV(HI)); (3) CPPV at low PEEP with the superimposition of periodic VRMs (CPPV(VRM)). VRMs were performed twice a minute by increasing PEEP to the high level for two breaths. Each brace of two breaths was spaced 30 seconds from the preceding one. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We measured gas exchange, hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics, and the end expiratory lung volume (EELV). Compared to CPPV(LO), CPPV(VRM) resulted in higher PaO2 (117.9 +/- 40.6 vs 79.4 +/- 13.6 mmHg, P < 0.01) and EELV (1.50 +/- 0.62 vs 1.26 +/- 0.50 l, P < 0.05), and in lower venous admixture (Q(VA)/Q(T)) (0.42 +/- 0.07 vs 0.48 +/- 0.07, P < 0.01). During CPPV(HI), we observed significantly higher PaO2 (139.3 +/- 32.5 mmHg) and lower Q(VA)/Q(T) (0.37 +/- 0.08) compared to CPPV(LO) (P < 0.01) and to CPPV(VRM) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VRMs can improve oxygenation and alveolar recruitment during CPPV at relatively low PEEP, but are relatively less effective than a continuous high PEEP level.

Tracheal mucus velocity remains normal in healthy sheep intubated with a new endotracheal tube with a novel laryngeal seal.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal mucus velocity (TMV), an index of mucociliary clearance, is reduced markedly in patients intubated with standard endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with high-compliance low-pressure (hi-lo) cuffs. The authors developed a new ultra-thin walled ETT in which the inflatable cuff is replaced with a no-pressure seal, positioned at the level of the larynx. The seal consists of 12 to 20 toroidal layers of thin polyurethane film ("gills") at the level of the vocal cords and prevents both air leak and fluid aspiration. The authors hypothesized that ETTs with the new laryngeal seal may impair TMV less than ETTs with inflated hi-lo cuffs do. METHODS: The TMV was measured in seven healthy female sheep by radiographically tracking the motion of small discs of tantalum inserted into the trachea through a bronchoscope. The TMV was measured in spontaneously breathing sheep before intubation (baseline) and after intubation with either a hi-lo ETT (control group) or after intubation with a new ETT with gills (study group). Four to six weeks later, the studies were repeated, but the sheep that were previously in the control group served as the study group, and those in the study group served as controls. RESULTS: Baseline TMV did not differ in the two groups. In the control group, TMV decreased significantly (by 67%) from baseline. In the study group, TMV did not differ significantly from baseline and remained steady during 3 h of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The TMV does not change in sheep intubated with new ETTs with gills. The new ETT's may help promote a normal mucociliary clearance in patients who require ventilation.

Efficacy of tracheal gas insufflation in spontaneously breathing sheep with lung injury.

Tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) decreases dead space (V D) and can be combined with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to decrease minute volume (VE) and effort of breathing. In 11 anesthetized sheep, we induced acute lung injury (ALI) through oleic acid (OA) infusion and studied the effects of TGI combined with CPAP (CPAP-TGI) at different TGI flows and with catheters of different designs. Sheep were randomized to two groups: Group A (n = 7) was placed on CPAP and CPAP-TGI at 10 and 15 L/min of insufflation flow delivered through a reverse thrust catheter (RTC). Group B (n = 4) was placed on CPAP and CPAP-TGI at a flow of 10 L/min delivered through a RTC, and through a straight flow catheter (SFC). Compared with CPAP alone, CPAP-TGI resulted in significantly lower VD, VE, pressure time product, and work of breathing. We found no additional benefit from TGI flow of 15 L/min, compared with 10 L/min, and no statistically significant difference between the SFC and the RTC. In conclusion, TGI can be combined with CPAP in this model of ALI to reduce ventilation and effort of breathing.

Pressure support ventilation in patients with acute lung injury.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the success rate of pressure support ventilation (PSV) in acute lung injury patients undergoing continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPPV), to study physiologic changes after the transition from CPPV to PSV, and to investigate differences between patients who succeed and patients who fail PSV according to predetermined criteria. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: General intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: We studied 48 patients having acute lung injury, as defined by a PaO2/F(IO2) <300 mm Hg and the presence of bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph, and ventilated with CPPV. We included patients with PaO2 >80 mm Hg, at positive end-expiratory pressure of <15 cm H2O and with F(IO2) up to 1.0. INTERVENTIONS: After enrollment, PSV was instituted and patients were strictly monitored during the following 48 hrs. Subjects who met any of the predefined PSV failure criteria during this period were returned to CPPV (Group F). PSV was continued in the remaining patients (Group S). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamics measurements were collected before switching from CPPV to PSV and were repeated at 24 hrs after beginning PSV, or immediately before return to CPPV in Group F patients. The physiologic deadspace volume to tidal volume ratio (V(D)/V(T)) was obtained by the Enghoff's equation from the measurement of the mixed expired CO2 fraction. PSV resulted in a significant PaCO2 decrease (49.2+/-10.9 mm Hg to 44.4+/-7.2 mm Hg) and significant increases in minute volume (V(E))(9.0+/-2.3 L/min to 12.0+/-4.0 L/min) and arterial blood pH (7.405+/-0.054 to 7.435+/-0.064), with stable oxygenation and hemodynamics. In patients who were hypercapnic (PaCO2 >50 mm Hg) during CPPV, the V(E) increase was higher than in normocapnic patients. In the latter patients, PaCO2 and pH did not change significantly going from CPPV to PSV. A total of 38 patients (79%) were allocated to Group S and the remaining 10 patients were included in Group F. In Group S, positive endexpiratory pressure of 9.4+/-2.9 cm H2O (range, 3-14 cm H2O) and a PSV level of 14.9+/-3.8 cm H2O (range, 9-22 cm H2O) were applied. In Group F, positive end-expiratory pressure of 8.9+/-3.1 cm H2O (range, 5-15 cm H2O) and a PSV level of 21.6+/-4.6 cm H2O (range, 16-31 cm H2O) were adopted. Compared with Group S, Group F had a longer duration of intubation (20.2+/-19.2 days vs. 9.2+/-13.5 days), a lower static compliance of the respiratory system (30.4+/-16.5 mL/cm H2O vs. 41.7+/-15.0 mL/cm H2O), and a higher V(D)/V(T) (0.70+/-0.09 vs. 0.52+/-0.10), but similar oxygenation and positive end-expiratory pressure. V(E) was higher in Group F during both CPPV and PSV. CONCLUSIONS: In a relatively high proportion of the investigated patients, PSV was successful. The institution of PSV led to no major changes in oxygenation or in hemodynamics. PSV was associated with increases in V(E) and respiratory frequency. In patients who had been hypercapnic during CPPV, PaCO2 decreased despite a compensated pH. Compared with PSV success patients, patients who failed PSV appeared to be sicker, as shown by the higher duration of respiratory support, increased ventilatory needs, and decreased respiratory system compliance, despite similar arterial oxygenation and positive end-expiratory pressure.