Robust control for convection suppression in a fluid layer: The effects of boundary properties, actuator lag, and major parameter uncertainties.

The robustness of control is a requirement to maintain a fluid layer at conductive equilibrium heated to a highly supercritical condition. Robustness determines how much uncertainties, or design parameter mismatches, can be tolerated. Both linear stability analysis and three-dimensional fully nonlinear simulations are used for the study of the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller. The parameter mismatches from the nominal conditions are introduced into the plant model, while the LQG compensator assumes nominal conditions. The mismatches arise from boundary properties, actuator lag, sensor level uncertainty, and wall thickness, as well as from the major parameters such as Prandtl number, Rayleigh number, wave number, and truncation number in the reduced-order model. The results suggest that the LQG compensator action can preserve closed-loop stability at over ten times the critical Rayleigh number, provided that the mismatches in the sensor level and wall thickness are small. Mismatches in the Prandtl number and wall material properties have little impact. Mismatches in Rayleigh number and wave number are relatively benign compared with the sensor and thickness parameters. Techniques for measuring the plant output temperature at multiple levels with sufficient accuracy may be an implementation challenge.

Phase I-phase II trial of N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid given by intravenous infusion and 5-fluorouracil given by bolus injection.

A phase I clinical trial of N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartic acid (PALA) and 5-fluorouracil (FUra) was performed on 30 patients. PALA was given as a 15-minute iv infusion once daily for 5 days, and FUra was given as a bolus injection on days 2, 3, 4, and 5. Cycles of treatment were repeated every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity was manifested by stomatitis and diarrhea. Skin rash was observed also but was not dose limiting. No consistent hematopoietic or renal toxicity was observed. Seventeen patients with disseminated metastatic melanoma and measurable disease were evaluated for response. One partial response was seen; however, the response was associated with significant toxicity, and the treatment could not be repeated. Stable disease was observed in 3 patients with melanoma, 1 patient with colon carcinoma, and 1 patient with ovarian carcinoma. Our findings suggest that the clinical activity of PALA and FUra given according to the above schedule for melanoma is less than 25% (P less than 0.05). Pharmacokinetic studies of FUra revealed no consistent effect of PALA pretreatment on FUra disappearance in plasma. The mean FUra elimination half-line in plasma was 7.11 +/- 0.84 minutes (SEM), which is no different from that reported for FUra alone. The recommended doses on this schedule for phase II studies are 1,000 mg PALA/m2/day iv daily for 5 days and 200 mg FUra/m2/day iv on days 2, 3, 4, and 5.

Pharmacokinetics of the cardioprotector ADR-529 (ICRF-187) in escalating doses combined with fixed-dose doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: Although doxorubicin is an anticancer agent with a wide spectrum of activity, therapy with this anthracycline must often be discontinued at a time of benefit to the patient because of the drug's cumulative cardiotoxicity. ICRF-187 (ADR-529, dexrazoxane) is a bisdioxopiperazine compound that protects against cardiac toxicity induced by doxorubicin. PURPOSE: Our objectives in this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ADR-529 (which uses a different vehicle than ICRF-187) when given with a fixed doxorubicin dose and to determine whether ADR-529 alters doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) preceded by administration of ADR-529 in escalating dosages (i.e., 60, 300, 600, 750, and 900 mg/m2) to groups of three to nine patients. ADR-529 was administered over a 15-minute period beginning 30 minutes before doxorubicin treatment; the protocol was repeated every 3 weeks. Blood was sampled frequently for drug levels, which were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography with fluorescence (doxorubicin) and electrochemical detection (ADR-529). RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in four of six previously treated patients at an ADR-529 dose of 600 mg/m2; the dose ratio of ADR-529 to doxorubicin was 10:1. For three additional patients with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen, 600 mg/m2 was tolerated, but grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in four of six patients who received an ADR-529 dose of 900 mg/m2 and in three of four patients at a dose of 750 mg/m2. Doxorubicin's estimated terminal half-life was 39.5 +/- 18.3 (mean +/- SD) hours; the area under the curve for plasma concentration of drug x time (AUC) was 1.74 +/- 0.40 (micrograms/microL) x hour. Total-body clearance was 598 +/- 142 microL/m2 per minute (N = 20), and it did not vary with ADR-529 dose. Estimated distribution and elimination phase half-lives for plasma ADR-529 were 0.46 +/- 0.30 hours and 4.16 +/- 2.94 hours, respectively. Total-body clearance was 111 +/- 87 microL/m2 per minute (N = 18); AUC was linear (r2 = .92), and the clearance rate was constant (r2 = .18) from 60 to 900 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Myelotoxicity was dose limiting for ADR-529 at 600-750 mg/m2 when given with a fixed dose of doxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 (dose ratios of ADR-529 to doxorubicin ranged from 10:1 to 12.5:1). When used in combination, ADR-529 did not perturb doxorubicin's distribution, metabolism, or excretion; therefore, other mechanisms of cardioprotection must be involved. IMPLICATIONS: We recommend that an ADR-529 dose of 600 mg/m2 be given with single-agent doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 in future studies.

Plasma pharmacokinetics of adriamycin and adriamycinol: implications for the design of in vitro experiments and treatment protocols.

The plasma pharmacokinetics of Adriamycin and adriamycinol following a 15-min infusion of 75 mg/sq m of Adriamycin were studied in ten patients previously untreated with Adriamycin. The disappearance kinetics of Adriamycin could adequately be described by a biexponential equation with an initial half-life of 8-min and a terminal half-life of 30 hr. The major drug exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) occurs during the terminal phase where drug concentrations are generally less than 10(-7) M (0.05 micrograms/ml). An improvement in the high-performance liquid chromatography sensitivity facilitated the determination of the terminal phase. The plasma kinetics of adriamycinol, the major and only known active metabolite of Adriamycin, show a rapid initial increase in plasma concentration followed by a slow decline which parallels that of Adriamycin during the terminal phase. The relative drug exposure of adriamycinol to Adriamycin was approximately 50%. The relationship between the measured plasma drug levels and free drug available for distribution into tissues was studied by comparing the plasma binding characteristics of Adriamycin and adriamycinol. A constant 20 to 25% of the total plasma concentrations of both Adriamycin and adriamycinol was freely diffusible over the whole range of observed concentrations, 20 nM to 2 microM. Thus, the free drug exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) of tumor and host tissues in vivo can be determined from these plasma measurements, since the free drug exposures in plasma and in extracellular fluid are equivalent. These results can also serve as a guide for the design of clinically relevant in vitro studies of Adriamycin and adriamycinol. The pharmacokinetic parameters determined in this study have been used to simulate plasma concentration-time courses for a variety of Adriamycin treatment schedules. Alternatives are suggested which reduce peak plasma Adriamycin concentration while antitumor area under the concentration-time curve is maintained.

Lack of effect of cyclophosphamide on the immunogenicity of a melanoma antigen vaccine.

Melanoma antigen vaccines are a conceptually attractive approach to prevent or delay disease recurrence in patients with surgically resected malignant melanoma. However, the immunogenicity of current vaccines is relatively low. Cyclophosphamide, when given in low doses prior to antigen exposure, is an immunomodulator which has been shown to enhance both humoral and cellular antitumor responses in animals and humans. We conducted a prospective, randomized, clinical trial to study whether pretreatment with cyclophosphamide augments the immunogenicity of a polyvalent, allogeneic, melanoma antigen vaccine in patients with melanoma and low tumor burden. Forty-five patients with resected stage II melanoma (regional metastases) were randomly allocated to treatment with melanoma vaccine or melanoma vaccine plus cyclophosphamide. All patients received the same dose and schedule of vaccine immunizations; those randomized to cyclophosphamide received 300 mg/m2 i.v. 3 days prior to each vaccine immunization. Cellular immune responses were evaluated by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin reactivity to a test dose of vaccine at baseline (prior to treatment) and following the fourth immunization. Humoral immune responses were measured by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiographic analysis of indirect immunoprecipitates of patients' sera at the same time points. Twenty-four patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide pretreatment and 21 to vaccine alone; 22 and 18 patients were evaluable in each group, respectively. Differences were statistically nonsignificant with respect to either cellular (DTH) or humoral (antibody) responses between the two groups. DTH responses were induced in 16 of 22 (73%) and 15 of 18 (83%) patients treated with cyclophosphamide plus vaccine and vaccine alone, respectively. The mean posttreatment augmentation in DTH response in the cyclophosphamide group was 9.5 mm, compared with 9.9 mm in the vaccine-only group. Eight of 12 (66%) cyclophosphamide-pretreated patients and 9 of 12 (75%) vaccine-only patients produced increased titers of antimelanoma antibodies following treatment. No differences were observed between the groups in disease-free or overall survival. In summary, low-dose cyclophosphamide pretreatment failed to augment the immunogenicity of a polyvalent, allogeneic, melanoma vaccine in patients with completely resected early-stage melanoma.

Phase I and pharmacological studies of 5-fluorouracil administered intraperitoneally.

A Phase I study was conducted of 5-fluorouracil administered i.p. in a 2-liter volume of 1.5% Inpersol. The drug was administered via Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheters to ten patients with tumors confined to the i.p. space. Dialysis concentrations ranged from 5 micro M to mM. Complications of the dialysis procedure alone included mild abdominal discomfort and 2 cases of gram-negative bacterial peritonitis, both easily controlled with antibiotics. 5-Fluorouracil caused the same pattern of toxicity as when administered by other routes. There was no local or central nervous system toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity included pancytopenia and mucositis at a dialysis concentration of 4.5 to 5 mM administered for eight consecutive 4-hr exchanges. There were two documented responses in eight evaluable patients. 5-Fluorouracil concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Peritoneal fluid concentrations decline in a first-order fashion with a half-life of 1.6 hr. The mean permeability area product was 14 ml/min. A mean of 82% of drug was absorbed in 4 hr. Plasma levels rise over the first 30 to 45 min and decline in a nonlinear fashion. Plasma levels are substantially lower than are peritoneal fluid levels. Mean 4-hr peritoneal fluid concentration was 298 times the simultaneously measured plasma levels. Total body clearance ranged from 0.9 to 15 liters/min and declined with increasing dialysate concentration. We conclude the i.p. route is a relatively safe way to deliver high concentrations and large amounts of drug to the i.p. cavity with a significant pharmacological advantage over conventional routes of administration.

Phase I clinical trial of 9,10-anthracene dicarboxaldehyde (Bisantrene) administered in a five-day schedule.

Bisantrene is a substituted anthracene derivative which preclinically demonstrated a spectrum of activity similar to that of doxorubicin but without associated cardiotoxicity. A Phase I evaluation of the drug has been performed using daily i.v. administrations for 5 days. Sixty courses of treatment were administered to 23 patients at doses from 2.5 to 90 mg/sq m/day. Courses were repeated at 4-week intervals. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukopenia and local cutaneous reactions. The leukopenia was dose related, noncumulative, and of brief duration. Local reactions occurred in 14 of 37 courses administered at doses greater than 60 mg/sq m and in 13 patients resulted in clinical cellulitis of the infused extremity. Gastrointestinal side effects were mild. No alopecia or cardiotoxicity was observed. Two mixed responses were obtained in patients with hypernephromas. Using a daily schedule for 5 days, approximately 40% more drug can be delivered per course than by single-day i.v. administration. However, with this schedule, local cutaneous reactions may prove additionally dose limiting. Phase II studies of Bisantrene in a daily i.v. schedule for 5 days are planned at a dose of 80 mg/sq m/day to be repeated every 4 weeks.

Portal levels and hepatic clearance of 5-fluorouracil after intraperitoneal administration in humans.

Intrahepatic tumor is a major problem in clinical oncology. While direct intravascular infusions provide high local drug concentrations and variable rates of tumor response, they are limited by technical considerations and complications. In this study, we have tested whether high portal venous and hepatic arterial concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra) can be achieved by administering drug via peritoneal dialysis. Four patients with metastatic colon carcinoma had a Tenckhoff catheter surgically implanted. During dialysis therapy with 4 mM 5-FUra, simultaneous samples of peritoneal fluid and of portal venous, hepatic venous, and peripheral venous, and arterial blood were obtained, and 5-FUra concentrations were determined. Mean peak portal vein drug concentrations were 60 microM and exceeded the measured concentrations in the other vessels. Total drug exposures as measured by concentration x time (mM x min) during Exchange 1 were: portal, 3.8 +/- 0.65; hepatic vein, 0.97 +/- 0.44; peripheral vein, 0.90 +/- 0.32; and arterial, 1.1 +/- 0.26. During Exchange 7, total drug exposures were: portal, 6.3 +/- 1.4; hepatic vein, 2.5 +/- 1.3; peripheral vein, 2.3 +/- 1.1; and arterial, 2.7 +/- .85. The fraction of i.p. drug that exited the peritoneal cavity through the portal venous system ranged from 0.29 to 1.0. This variation resulted in part from uncertainty in estimating portal blood flow and gastrointestinal drug elimination. Calculated hepatic extraction was 67% (range, 0.23 to 0.89). Extrahepatic metabolism was demonstrated. Measured 5-FUra concentrations compared favorably to values predicted by a pharmacokinetic model for 5-FUra. Dialysis therapy (i.p.) with 5-FUra provides a means of achieving high drug concentrations for treating both i.p. and intrahepatic tumor. Further clinical testing of this route of administration is warranted.

Phase I trial of escalating dose doxorubicin administered concurrently with alpha 2-interferon.

The clinical use of alpha 2-interferon and doxorubicin is based on in vitro and preclinical in vivo observations of synergistic antitumor efficacy. To test this combination a Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the concurrent use of alpha 2-interferon and doxorubicin was initiated in patients with malignant solid tumors. Each 5-wk treatment cycle consisted of 3 wk of drug administration and 2 wk of rest. The alpha 2-interferon was administered s.c. at a constant dose of 10 million IU/m2 on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays in all patients while the doxorubicin was administered weekly beginning with a dose of 5 mg/m2 and escalated to the maximum tolerated dose of 25 mg/m2. At least three evaluable patients were entered at each dose level, and no dose escalations were allowed within patients. The dose-limiting toxicities were granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Hepatic enzyme elevations and systemic symptoms due to interferon occurred at all dose levels. None was severe or dose limiting, and all were reversible. These toxicity data suggest that the hepatotoxic effects of interferon do not enhance doxorubicin toxicity when given by this dose and schedule. Doxorubicin plasma levels were measured at each dose level. The recommended dose of doxorubicin is 25 mg/m2 per wk when administered with 10 million IU/m2 of interferon in this schedule. This schedule allows for the administration of a greater total dose of doxorubicin than has been achieved when given every 3 wk with the same dose and schedule of alpha 2-interferon in a parallel study.

A reassessment of the role of second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Thirty-nine patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent second-look laparotomy (SLL) at New York University Medical Center and 11 eligible patients who did not undergo reexploration were retrospectively studied with follow-up from 24 to 105 months after diagnosis. Sixteen patients (41%) were found to have macroscopic disease, six (15%) microscopic tumor, and 17 (44%) no disease at SLL. Five of 22 patients who received further therapy based on positive SLL findings have remained without clinical evidence of disease 17 to 65 months after SLL. Nine of 17 patients with negative SLL, in whom treatment was stopped, recurred 8 to 52 months after SLL, five in extraperitoneal sites only. Five of 11 patients not undergoing SLL recurred 16 to 39 months after diagnosis, four intraperitoneally. There was no significant difference in survival between the second-look and no second-look groups for the period of study. Clinical trials are needed to determine if SLL influences longer-term survival and if continued treatment is indicated in a high-risk subgroup despite negative SLL. The value of SLL is limited by the efficacy of second line therapy. The role of routine SLL outside an investigational setting is questioned.

4'Epidoxorubicin (epirubicin): activity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Doxorubicin provides the most consistent response rate in hepatocellular carcinoma. We therefore initiated a trial with its analog 4'epidoxorubicin. Eighteen patients, all without prior treatment, were given the drug as a single agent every 3 weeks with dose escalation whenever possible. Five patients were treated by six-hour infusion and 13 by intravenous (IV) bolus injection, with the median dose being 90 mg/m2. The patients were of diverse ethnic background and included some with underlying cirrhosis and hepatitis B surface antigenemia. Three patients had partial remissions (6, 12, 48 weeks) for a response rate of 17%. Four patients also had prolonged stable disease (14, 26, 27, 38 weeks). Toxicity was mild, although cardiac toxicity developed in three patients at 685, 825, and 1,460 mg/m2 cumulative dose. The response to 4'epidoxorubicin in this study appears to be equivalent to the reported response rates for doxorubicin, with decreased toxicity.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in women with advanced breast cancer: an active regimen with limiting neurotoxicity.

PURPOSE: A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and make further observations about the toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast with no more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously on day 3 until WBC recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four patients entered the trial. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients (43%) had no prior chemotherapy and 41 had no chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The median number of cycles administered per patient was five (range, one to seven). There were five complete responses (CRs) (11.9%) and 17 partial responses (PRs) (40.5%), with an overall response rate of 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.4% to 68.0%). Nine patients had stage III disease. The response rate for this group was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.0% to 92.5%), with three CRs and three PRs. Among 35 patients with stage IV disease, there were two CRs and 14 PRs, with an overall response rate of 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8% to 66.5%). Overall, the median response duration was 10.6 months. Thirty patients (68%) developed transient grade 4 neutropenia. Cumulative neuropathy was the major dose-limiting toxicity. After five cycles of chemotherapy, 96% of patients had at least grade 1 neurotoxicity and 52% had at least grade 2 neurotoxicity. One patient had a toxic death after cycle 1 of therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen. However, the cumulative neurotoxicity was significant and dose-limiting in the majority of patients.

Phase I trial of low-dose continuous topotecan infusion in patients with cancer: an active and well-tolerated regimen.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan for a 21-day infusion schedule, repeated every 28 days, in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of four patients received continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan in escalated duration with doses beginning at 0.20 mg/m2/d for 7 days. Forty-four patients with a histologic diagnosis of cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with infusions of topotecan for a total of 115 cycles and 1,780 patient-days of infusion. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was two (range, one to eight). All patients were heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiation. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelo-suppression, with thrombocytopenia greater than neutropenia seen at the dose level of 0.70 mg/m2/d for 21 days. At the MTD of 0.53 mg/m2, ten patients were treated for a total of 20 courses, resulting in one episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two grade 3 leukopenias. This dose regimen was well tolerated, with minimal nonhematologic toxicity. Local infusion port complications developed in two patients and two had bacteremia, including one patient with repeated local skin infections. Objective responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population for patients with ovarian cancer (two partial responses and one mixed response in six patients), breast cancer (one partial response and one mixed response in two patients), and for one patient each with renal and non-small-cell lung cancer (two partial remissions). CONCLUSION: Twenty-one-day topotecan infusion is well tolerated at 0.53 mg/m2, with dose-intensity exceeding other schedules for administration of topotecan. The DLT is hematologic, with thrombocytopenia somewhat exceeding leukopenia. Objective responses were observed in seven patients with breast, ovarian, renal, and non-small-cell lung cancer.

Consolidation with intraperitoneal cisplatin in first-line therapy of advanced ovarian cancer.

Seventy-five patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with a combined modality regimen of systemic, induction chemotherapy followed by intraperitoneal therapy (IPT). All patients underwent initial surgery for staging and/or cytoreduction followed by cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) for 5 days and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 4 every 3 to 4 weeks for two to four cycles. Patients were then evaluated for IPT and, if eligible, had an intraperitoneal (IP) catheter placed. IPT consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 in 2 L on day 1 and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 2 every 3 weeks for three to six cycles. Patients who demonstrated a clinical complete response (CCR) were then referred for second-look laparotomy (SLL). Of 71 patients who completed the induction phase, 53 (75%) were eligible for IPT, and 49 patients entered the therapy phase. Toxicity of the combined modality approach was acceptable and did not differ from our previous experience using the same drugs systemically. Thirty-two of the 49 patients who completed IPT achieved a CCR, which was confirmed by SLL in 20 patients. Twenty recurrences were documented in the 32 CCR patients, 13 occurred in patients after SLL. Projected median survival of all patients is 38 months. Median survival correlated with amount of residual disease following initial surgery (23 months for bulky v 45 months for minimal residual; P less than .001) and with performance status ([PS]; 24 months for PS 2, 3 v greater than 46 months for PS O; P less than .001). Patients who presented with bulky tumors were less likely to reach the consolidation IPT phase. Incorporation of IP cisplatin into the first-line regimen for treatment of ovarian cancer does not appear to have major impact on the survival of all treated patients when compared with our historical control series. Combined IV and IPT cisplatin and cyclophosphamide is feasible with acceptable toxicity. Its impact on response and survival may be limited to only "good-prognosis" patients.

Pilot trial of cisplatin, radiation, and WR2721 in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a New York Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A phase I trial of WR2721 was initiated to determine the maximal safe dose for incorporation into a consecutive 5-day schedule of cisplatin administered concurrently with radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: WR2721 was administered at 340 to 910 mg/m2/d immediately before cisplatin. Cisplatin was administered at 20 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks in combination with external-beam radiation therapy and at 100 mg/m2 after each brachytherapy treatment. Pelvic radiation consisted of external-beam therapy to a dose of 39.6 Gy, followed by brachytherapy with cesium 137 tandem and ovoid insertions to deliver 80 Gy to point A and 55 Gy to point B. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled; 19 were assessable. The dose-limiting toxicity of WR2721 was hypotension. No patients developed serious sequelae, but hypotension required a reduction in the dose of WR2721 at the highest dose level tested. The major grade 3 or 4 toxicities included transient azotemia (five of 19), leukopenia (nine of 19), vomiting (four of 19), and neurotoxicity (two of 19). One patient experienced an anaphylactic reaction to cisplatin. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of WR2721 administered in conjunction with cisplatin on a daily x 5 schedule plus radiation therapy is 825 mg/m2/d for 5 days.

ICRF-187 permits longer treatment with doxorubicin in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To test potential protection by ICRF-187 against cumulative doxorubicin-dose-related cardiac toxicity, we conducted a randomized clinical trial in 150 women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received fluorouracil (5FU) 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 21 days intravenously (IV) (control regimen, 74 patients), or the same regimen preceded by ICRF-187 1,000 mg/m2 IV (experimental regimen, 76 patients). RESULTS: We previously reported that ICRF-187 in this dose and schedule provides cardiac protection and does not substantially alter the noncardiac toxicity or antitumor efficacy of the control regimen. In this updated analysis of the entire patient cohort, we provide additional support for these findings and demonstrate that patients in the ICRF-187 group received more cycles (median, 11) and higher cumulative doses (median, 500 mg/m2) of doxorubicin than patients in the control group (median, nine cycles, P less than .01; and 441 mg/m2, P less than .05). Twenty-six patients in the ICRF-187 group received doxorubicin doses of at least 700 mg/m2, and among them, 11 patients received 1,000 mg/m2 or more. Only three patients in the control group received doxorubicin doses of 700 mg/m2; the maximum dose administered to one patient in this group was 950 mg/m2. ICRF-187 cardiac protection was demonstrated by difference in incidence of clinical congestive heart failure (CHF; two patients in the ICRF-187 group v 20 in the control group; P less than .0001) and by differences in resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) determined by multigated radionuclide (MUGA) scan from baselines and that required patient removal from study (five patients in the ICRF-187 group had a decrease in LVEF to less than 0.45 or a decrease from the baseline LVEF of 0.20 or more v 32 in the control group; P less than .000001). Among the 30 patients who had an assessable endomyocardial biopsy at cumulative doxorubicin 450 mg/m2, none of 16 in the ICRF-187 group and six of 14 in the control group had a score of 2 (P less than .05). ICRF-187 cardiac protection was observed in patients with and without prior chest-wall radiation or other risk factors for developing doxorubicin cardiac toxicity. CONCLUSION: By protecting against cumulative doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity, ICRF-187 permits significantly greater doses of doxorubicin to be administered to patients with greater safety.

Activity and pharmacodynamics of 21-Day topotecan infusion in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. New York Gynecologic Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Twenty-one-day topotecan infusion was administered as second-line therapy in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer (based on our prior favorable phase I experience) to determine its activity, time to progression, and pharmacodynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ovarian cancer patients with measurable lesions and one prior platinum-containing regimen were eligible. Topotecan 0.4 mg/m(2)/d 21-day continuous ambulatory intravenous infusion, with appropriate dose modifications for toxicity, was administered every 28 days. Weekly blood levels of topotecan and topoisomerase-1 (topo-1) levels in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were determined for pharmacodynamic correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were entered onto the study (six cisplatin-refractory, five relapsing within < 6 months and 13 relapsing > 6 months after platinum-based therapy). A total of 128 cycles of topotecan (median, four cycles per patient; range, one to 12 cycles) were administered. The major toxicity was neutropenia (29% grade 3 in all cycles and 4% grade 4). One episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (4%) occurred. Fifty-two percent of the patients had anemia that required transfusions. Eight of 23 patients with measurable disease (35%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 54%) had partial responses (PRs) lasting longer than 1 month. Two of these patients had minor residual computed tomographic changes but had clinical complete remissions that lasted up to 53 weeks while they were not undergoing further therapy. One patient with nonmeasurable disease had a PR (by CA-125 criteria) that lasted 6 months, for an overall response rate of 38% in nine of 24 patients (95% CI, 18% to 57%). The median time to progression was 26 weeks. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in free PBMC topo-1 level at weeks 2 and 3 of drug administration. There was a strong statistical correlation between the decrease in free topo-1 levels and increasing area under the curve (AUC) for topotecan. This was confirmed in a pharmacodynamic model. CONCLUSION: Twenty-one-day infusion is a well-tolerated method of administering topotecan. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrate correlations between (1) the week of infusion and the PBMC topo-1 level, (2) the AUC of topotecan and the decrease in topo-1 levels, and (3) the change in topo-1 level and the neutrophil nadir. The objective response rate of 35% to 38% (95% CI, 15% to 57%) in this small multicenter study is at the upper level for topotecan therapy in previously treated ovarian cancer. Prolonged topotecan administration therefore warrants further investigation in larger, randomized studies comparing this 21-day schedule with the once-daily-for-5-days schedule.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of paclitaxel plus doxorubicin and dexrazoxane in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerable dose (MTD) of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion that could be used in conjunction with doxorubicin and dexrazoxane, and to determine the effect of dexrazoxane on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with advanced breast cancer received dexrazoxane (600 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 15 minutes), followed 15 minutes later by doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 IV), followed 15 minutes later by paclitaxel (150 or 175 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 3 hours) in cohorts of three to six patients using a standard phase I design without (group A) and with (group B) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Treatment continued until there was a substantial decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), congestive heart failure, progressive disease, or physician discretion to discontinue. RESULTS: The MTD of paclitaxel was 150 mg/m2, and adjunctive therapy with G-CSF was required to prevent febrile neutropenia. Dexrazoxane had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel or doxorubicin. After a median cumulative doxorubicin dose of 360 mg/m2 (range, 60 to 870 mg/m2), no patient developed congestive heart failure or had a decrease in LVEF below normal. An objective response occurred in all five patients with locally advanced breast cancer and in eight of 20 patients (40%; 95% confidence interval, 19% to 61%) with metastatic breast cancer. CONCLUSION: When combined with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and dexrazoxane (600 mg/m2), paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion had an MTD of 150 mg/m2, and G-CSF was required to prevent febrile neutropenia. Dexrazoxane had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel or doxorubicin. No patient in this trial had a decrease in the LVEF below normal, compared with about 20% to 50% of patients treated with doxorubicin and paclitaxel without dexrazoxane in other trials.

Intraperitoneal carboplatin: favorable results in women with minimal residual ovarian cancer after cisplatin therapy.

From August 1985 to November 1989 we conducted a trial of intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin including a dose-escalation design in 25 women with advanced gynecologic malignancies. All had extensive prior therapy with cisplatin (median cumulative dose, 525 mg/m2). Carboplatin was administered IP in 2 L of 1.5% dextrose with a 4-hour dwell time every 4 weeks for six cycles at a starting dose of 200 mg/m2. Patients with reduced creatinine clearance (30 to 60 cc/min) were escalated more slowly than those with high (greater than 60 cc/min) clearance. Thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting and often more severe in patients with compromised renal function; there was no local drug toxicity. The median time of follow-up is 25 months. Complete responses (CRs) were documented in six of 23 assessable patients (26%) by repeat laparotomy, and an additional 11 patients (48%) had no disease evident by noninvasive restaging. Five of the CRs and six of the patients with no clinically evident disease have relapsed from 3 to 40 months after therapy. Six patients (26%) are alive and free of disease 8 to 47 (median, 20) months after therapy. IP carboplatin is effective against relapsed ovarian cancer, even after prior cisplatin therapy.

Cardioprotection with dexrazoxane for doxorubicin-containing therapy in advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane (DZR) used in a doxorubicin-based combination therapy in advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1988 and January 1991, 534 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to two multicenter, double-blind studies (088001 and 088006). Patients received fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with either DZR (DZR-to-doxorubicin ratio, 10:1) or placebo (PLA) every 3 weeks and were monitored with serial multiplegated acquisition (MUGA) scans. RESULTS: The hazards ratio (HR) of PLA to DZR for a cardiac event, which was predefined ejection fraction changes or congestive heart failure (CHF), was 2.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61 to 4.27; P < .001) for 088001 and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.01 to 3.96; P = .038) for 088006. The objective response rates for 088001 were 46.8% for DZR and 60.5% for PLA, a difference of 14% (95% CI, -25% to -2%; P = .019), and for 088006 were 53.7% for DZR and 49.3% for PLA, a difference of 4% (95% CI, -13% to 22%; P = .63). Time to progression and survival were not significantly different between treatment arms in either study. Toxicities on the DZR arms included lower granulocyte and platelet counts at nadir (P = .009 and P = .004, respectively) and more pain on injection (P = .001), with no difference in the rates of fever, infection, or hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: DZR had a significant cardioprotective effect as measured by noninvasive testing and clinical CHF. One of the two studies (088001) showed a lower response rate with DZR, but time to progression and survival were not significantly different. DZR is the first agent shown to reduce cardiotoxicity from doxorubicin.