Robotic-Assisted Pelvic Surgery: Early Outcomes in a Single Institution.

Introduction: This article reports the authors' experience with their first 50 consecutive robotic pelvic procedures, aiming to determine the feasibility and safety of adopting robotic pelvic surgery. Robotic surgery offers several benefits for minimally invasive surgery, but its applicability is hindered by cost and limited regional experience. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of robotic pelvic surgery. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective review of our initial experience with robotic surgery for colorectal, prostate, and gynaecologic neoplasia, between June and December 2022. The surgical outcomes were evaluated in terms of perioperative data, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Intraoperative complications were recorded, and postoperative complications were evaluated at 30 days and 60 days after surgery. The feasibility of the roboticassisted surgery was assessed by measuring the conversion rate to laparotomy. The safety of the surgery was evaluated by recording the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: Fifty robotic surgeries were performed over 6 months, including 21 interventions for digestive neoplasia, 14 gynaecologic cases, and 15 prostatic cancers. Operative time ranged from 90 to 420 minutes, with two minor complications and two grade II Clavien-Dindo complications. One patient required prolonged hospitalization and an end-colostomy, deriving from an anastomotic leakage requiring reintervention. No thirty-day mortality or readmissions were reported. Conclusion: The study found that robotic-assisted pelvic surgery is safe and has a low rate of transfer to open surgery, making it a suitable addition to conventional laparoscopy.

Evaluation of Immediate Inflammatory Response in Thoracoscopic Esophageal Resection versus Open Approach - A Prospective Study.

Introduction: There is an immune response after major surgery and inflammatory complications following complex surgery have a direct impact on morbidity and mortality. Currently, we do not have clinical tools to predict in which subset of patients a major complication will occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate dynamics of C-reactive protein (CRP), presepsin and procalcitonin in patients in which esophagectomy was performed either through video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or open approach. Methods: We conducted a prospective study on 27 patients with a mean age of 61.48 +-6.80 years, 13 patients with VATS and 14 with open approach, most of the patients were on stage III esophageal cancer (81%) and in all cases neoadjuvant treatment was performed. Results: There were increased levels of CRP, presepsin and procalcitonin after both arms of the study with significantly higher values for the open approach and with the same dynamic curves. In 3 cases there were extremely elevated levels of procalcitonin in the absence of a septic complication, in all cases a major complication occurred. Conclusion: Video assisted thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization induces a less immune response, even with the association of laparotomy. An elevated postoperative procalcitonin level can be an early indicator of a major postoperative complication.