Cisplatin: process and future.

One of the most important anticancer agents is cisplatin (CDDP). Numerous studies with a CDDP-based combination have been reported over the last 30 years. The use of CDDP in the 1980s and 1990s showed responses in advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Over the years it was found that the side effects of this agent (particularly nephrotoxicity) were a common problem. Agents such as carboplatin, taxanes, gemcitabine, irinotecan and pemetrexed proved to be effective in NSCLC with reduced or no nephrotoxicity. The administration of these newer agents improved several side effects, but without improving efficacy. When prophylactic (adjuvant) treatment for NSCLC was introduced, CDDP was the agent selected, which indicated the value of the drug. Recently, a novel formulation of CDDP, liposomal cisplatin, which has shown very low toxicity, no nephrotoxicity and equal effectiveness was produced; its importance is its higher effectiveness than standard CDDP in lung adenocarcinoma.

High-dose tamoxifen in breast cancer bone metastasis.

High-dose tamoxifen was used as a treatment for bone metastasis in 16 patients with breast cancer. All of them had been pretreated with hormonal therapy, including lowdose tamoxifen. The results were extremely positive with clinical amelioration and also disappearance of osteolysis in 5 patients.

Maintenance chemotherapy or not in ovarian cancer stages IIIA, B, C, and IV after disease recurrence.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer may have a high percentage of residual disease after chemotherapy. It is questionable whether second or more lines of chemotherapy are needed in patients with slow-growing residual disease. In the present trial we compared the median survival of patients with residual or recurrent disease who received 1-2 lines of chemotherapy with those who received 3-9 lines. METHODS: Two hundred and five patients with advanced stage IIIA, B, C and IV ovarian cancer were divided into two groups based on the number of chemotherapy lines they received. All patients had prior first-line chemotherapy; the criteria for recruitment in the study were: a) residual or recurrent disease and b) failure to respond to first-line therapy. Group A included patients who received 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy and group B, 3-9 lines. RESULTS: The median survival of group A was 76 months and of group B 53 months (p<0.001). Complete response (CR) was observed in 80 out of the 193 7lpar;41.45%) evaluable patients, partial response (PR) in 37 (19.17%), stable disease (SD) in 54 (27.987percnt;) and progressive disease (PD) in 22 (11.40%) patients. CONCLUSION: In ovarian cancer patients with advanced disease, multiple chemotherapy lines (3=9) offer no advantage over 1 or 2 lines, with respect to overall survival.

Metastatic lung disease treated with pemetrexed-docetaxel combination chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: According to the ASCO guidelines 4 cytotoxic agents are used in colorectal cancer. Numerous agents have not been used or tested and thus their effectiveness is not known. Herein we present the preliminary data of a trial whose objective was to investigate the effectiveness to 2 combined agents in patients with heavily pretreated adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Ten patients have been recruited up until now. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was the primary disease in 7 patients, gastric cancer in 2, and endometrial adenocarcinoma in one. All patients had undergone at least 2 lines of previous chemotherapy during 2-3 years before the trial. The lungs were the only or main site of metastases in all patients. Chemotherapy agents used were pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), repeated every 3 weeks, with a plan to administer 6 cycles. RESULTS: The mean number of cycles were 3 (range 1-6). Total number of cycles 33. No serious toxicity was detected. One patient had complete response, 3 partial response, 5 stable disease, 1 disease progression. Median survival was 6 months (range 2-12+ months). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of the pemetrexed-docetaxel combination in heavily pretreated adenocarcinoma patients justifies their use when no other alternative exists.

Liposomal cisplatin combined with paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal cisplatin is a new formulation developed to reduce the systemic toxicity of cisplatin while simultaneously improving the targeting of the drug to the primary tumor and to metastases by increasing circulation time in the body fluids and tissues. The primary objectives were to determine nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal side-effects, peripheral neuropathy and hematological toxicity and secondary objectives were to determine the response rate, time to tumor progression (TTP) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly allocated to receive either 200 mg/m² of liposomal cisplatin and 135 mg/m² paclitaxel (arm A) or 75 mg/m² cisplatin and 135 mg/m² paclitaxel (arm B), once every 2 weeks on an outpatient basis. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were assessable for toxicity, response rate and survival. Nine treatment cycles were planned. RESULTS: Arm A patients showed statistically significant lower nephrotoxicity, grade 3 and 4 leucopenia, grade 2 and 3 neuropathy, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. There was no significant difference in median and overall survival and TTP between the two arms; median survival was 9 and 10 months in arms A and B, respectively, and TTP was 6.5 and 6 months in arms A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal cisplatin in combination with paclitaxel has been shown to be much less toxic than the original cisplatin combined with paclitaxel. Nephrotoxicity in particular was negligible after liposomal cisplatin administration. TTP and survival were similar in both treatment arms.

Treatment of colorectal cancer with and without bevacizumab: a phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this phase III trial was to compare chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2004 till September 2008, 222 treatment-naive patients were enrolled and divided into 2 arms: 114 arm A patients were treated with leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab, and 108 arm B patients were treated as above without bevacizumab. All patients were stage IV with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: The median overall survival of arm A patients was 22.0 months (95% CI: 18.1-25.9) and 25.0 months (CI: 18.1-31.9) for arm B patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 arms (p = 0.1391). No statistically significant difference between the 2 arms regarding the response rate was observed: partial response, 42 patients (36.8%) and 38 patients (35.2%) for arms A and B, respectively. Hematologic toxicity did not differ in the comparison of the 2 arms. Nonhematologic toxicity in arm A involved hypertension in 23 (20.2%) of the patients and proteinuria in 7 (6.1%); 3 patients experienced hemorrhage and 1 patient intestinal perforation. None of these side effects was observed in arm B patients. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in median overall survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab plus a combination therapy (arm A) and those treated with the combination only, without bevacizumab (arm B), was observed.

Lung carcinoid tumor biology: treatment and survival.

A carcinoid tumor is a rare malignant disease which can be cured when localized and treated by surgery. Chemotherapy is not effective, and somatostatin is used for palliation. Rarely is the disease aggressive, and thus does not contribute to a shortening of patient survival. The aim of this study was to define the treatment and survival of patients with primary lung carcinoid tumors. Forty-three patients (26 males, 17 females; median age 43 years, range 11-73 years), from 1993 to 2007, were included in this study. All patients had histologically confirmed carcinoid tumors. The site of the disease at diagnosis was the lung in all 43 patients. All patients underwent surgery which involved mainly typical or sleeve lobectomy. Eight patients had a pneumonectomy. One patient had the primary tumor excised for palliation as there were metastases in the liver. Somatostatin palliative treatment was administered to 4 patients; 1 with liver and 3 with lung recurrence. Two of the 43 patients died within 2 years after surgery. The median survival was not reached as all patients, apart from 2, were alive after a median follow-up of 5 years (mean survival 159 months). As a rule, a carcinoid tumor is an extremely slow-growing disease with some rare exceptions. All of our patients had primary lung disease. All, apart from 2, were alive at the end of the study, and 93% were without recurrence for a duration of 6 months to 13 years. The patients with liver metastases who underwent no specific treatment had a median survival as long as 8 years.

Governmental strategies for cancer control, prevention, care and management in Greece.

The Greek government through the Ministry of Health and the World Health Organisation (WHO) are concerned about the increase in cancer cases and are implementing actions related to its control. The WHO produced a guide which is a response to the World Health Assembly Resolution on Cancer Prevention and Control, adopted in May 2005. This WHO guide calls on member states to intensify action against cancer by developing and reinforcing cancer control programs. The Greek Ministry of Health has established a strategy unit and relevant health policies. The need to act comes from the fact that 11 million new cancer cases are diagnosed yearly, worldwide. The most common deaths globally are from lung cancer (1.3 million), from gastric cancer (1 million), liver cancer (662.000), colorectal cancer (665.000) and breast cancer (502.000), yearly. Some cancers in Greece are more common. There are certain risk factors on the basis of which one can take preventative measures related to the numerous chemical, biological and natural factors in the environment. Recently, the Greek Ministry of Health organized a national plan of action against cancer. This starts with monitoring scientific societies and social groups and organizations in order to promote prevention as well as an improvement in the quality of cancer management. The targets are the collection of reliable information, primary and secondary prevention, effective treatment and a better quality of life for the patient.

Long-term survival of patients with carcinoid tumor and liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To determine long-term survival and long-term stable disease in patients with atypical carcinoid tumor with liver metastases. METHODS: From 1993 till 2008, the records of 56 patients with atypical carcinoid were reviewed. Nine of them who had liver metastases were analysed. All patients had carcinoid tumors confirmed histologically. Treatment, including chemotherapy and somatostatin, was given as palliative therapy of short duration. RESULTS: The median survival of 9 patients was 50 months (range 12-156). Three of 9 (33.33%) patients died of disease, at 12, 48 and 50 months. The remaining 6 patients are alive after 36, 40, 108, 120, 156 and 156 months, practically without treatment and experiencing a high quality of life. CONCLUSION: Six of 9 (66.66%) patients are alive having received almost no treatment for many years.

Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase III trial in high-risk breast cancer patients was conducted, to further explore the impact of dose-density in the adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. The safety analysis is presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2000 until June 2005, 1121 node-positive patients were randomized to sequential dose-dense epirubicin 110 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel (Taxol, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA) 250 mg/m(2) (group A), or concurrent epirubicin 83 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 187 mg/m(2) (group B), both followed by three cycles of 'intensified' combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given prophylactically with the dose-dense treatments. RESULTS: Median dose intensity of epirubicin and paclitaxel was double in group A, as designed, with significantly less cycles administered at full dose (P < 0.001). Median cumulative dose of all drugs and total treatment duration, however, were identical between groups. Severe taxane-related toxic effects were more frequent in group A, while severe thrombocytopenia was low and present only in group A. There were no differences in the rates of other hematological toxic effects, including febrile neutropenia. The rates of secondary malignancies were low. CONCLUSION: Both regimens as used in the present study are well tolerated and safe. The rates of severe taxane-related toxic effects and thrombocytopenia, although low overall, are significantly increased with the dose-dense sequential regimen.

Weekly administration of topotecan-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the weekly administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients; our objectives were to determine efficacy, toxicity and survival. METHODS: The chemotherapy agents, topotecan and paclitaxel were administered on a weekly basis for 3 consecutive weeks, every 28 days. The plan was to give three courses (each course included three once-weekly infusions). The dose of topotecan was 1.75 mg/m(2) and of paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2). RESULTS: From January 2004 until January 2006, 45 patients were enrolled in this multicenter trial; 44 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age was 60 years old (range 39-82 years) and performance status was 0-2. Thirty-nine patients were in stage III and 5 in stage IV. All patients had been pretreated with carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with paclitaxel. Complete and partial responses were seen in 39% of the patients, stable disease in 43% and progressive disease in 18%; median survival time was 9 months, range 2-24+ months, (95% CI: 7.9-10.2). There was a notable absence of grade 3 toxicity except for neutropenia in 11% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of topotecan and paclitaxel administered on a weekly basis is a well-tolerated chemotherapy schedule. The response rate of 39% is quite high for patients with pretreated ovarian cancer.

Capecitabine (Xeloda) as monotherapy in advanced breast and colorectal cancer: effectiveness and side-effects.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a fluoropyrimidine which is transformed to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at the tumor site. The aim of the present study was to estimate the efficacy of this agent in pretreated patients with advanced breast and colorectal cancer, and to determine the response rate and adverse reactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (median age 65 years, range 27-80 years), 24 with breast cancer, 17 with colorectal cancer and one with a pancreatic islet tumor were included. Capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 twice daily for two weeks every 21 days. No other agent or supportive treatment was planned. RESULTS: A partial response was observed in 29.16% of the patients with breast cancer and in 11.76% of the patients with colorectal cancer. Stable disease was observed in 58.33% and 70.59% of the breast cancer and colorectal patients, respectively. Adverse reactions were very mild with respect to myelotoxicity and GI tract toxicity. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was observed in three patients (7.14%). Hypertriglyceridemia, an unusual side-effect, was observed in 5/12 patients who were tested for serum cholesterol triglycerides. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is a well tolerated treatment with low toxicity, rendering a partial response in 29.16% and 11.76% of patients with breast and colorectal cancer, respectively.

Surgical management in lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a non-aggressive slow-growing disease. Surgery is often considered for the management of metastases. Chemotherapeutical agents may offer tumor reduction but radical tumor remission can only be achieved by surgery. The aim of the present study was to show the evolution of patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer, treated with surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-nine (male 327, female 252, median age 60 years [range 30-87 years], disease stage IV) patients with colorectal cancer were evaluated. Histology showed adenocarcinoma with 94% moderate differentiation. Sixty-six patients (11.40%) had only lung metastasis (single or multiple deposits). Of these 66 patients, 57 were treated with surgery (pneumonectomy, lobectomy or nodule excision) and in 52/57 (91.23%) the tumor was removed. RESULTS: In 29 patients (50.88%) the disease recurred 8 months after surgery, at the earliest; however, no recurrence was observed in 28 patients (49.12%) during 2-8 years of follow-up after the operation. Five-year survival was 32.69%. CONCLUSION: Metastectomy of lung metastasis from primary colorectal cancer may achieve long-term survival without recurrence in a large percentage of patients.

Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Based on previous experience, we combined topotecan with paclitaxel (weekly administration) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our primary objective was to determine the response rate and survival and our secondary objective, the safety of the regimen. METHODS: From October 2003, until March 2005, 45 patients all with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. All patients were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive. Both agents were infused on day 1 of every week once for three consecutive weeks, every 28 days. Three infusions were considered as one course. The treatment plan was to give three courses (nine infusions) and then to evaluate the response. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2) was infused for 30 min and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) for 90 min; these doses had been established as the maximum tolerated dose in a previous phase I-II trial. RESULTS: Eighteen/45 (40%) patients responded, 2 (4.4%) complete responses and 16 (35.6%) partial responses. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had stable disease, and 6 (13.3%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months and median time to tumor progression 9 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in two patients (in these two patients, the dose of both drugs was reduced by 25% and G-CSF was given), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one patient and grade 4 anemia in one patient. CONCLUSION: This novel combination of topotecan-paclitaxel in a weekly administration rendered a 40% response rate, with very low toxicity in stages IIIA, IIIB and IV NSCLC patients.

Second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer in a modified administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Our main objective was to investigate the response rate in pretreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received a weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel; our secondary objectives were to assess toxicity and survival. METHODS: Topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 was combined with paclitaxel 70 mg/m2; these cytotoxic agents were administered once every week (day 1) for 3 consecutive weeks (one cycle), and repeated every 28 days (three infusions per cycle) for a minimum of three cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled, 41 of whom were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median number of cycles was two (range 1-6). Eleven/forty-one (26.83%) patients responded: one complete response and ten partial responses; the median duration of response was 4 months (range 2-8 months); the median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 4.2-9.8). Myelotoxicity was the most common adverse reaction (grade 3 neutropenia in 19.5% of the patients and grade 4 in 7.32%). Non-hematologic toxicities varied from 2.44% to 9.76%. No patient had to stop treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Topotecan combined with paclitaxel, given on day 1 on a weekly basis, produced a response rate of 26.83% in pretreated patients with SCLC. Myelotoxicity, particularly neutropenia, was the main adverse reaction, but in a minority of patients.

Angiosarcoma of the heart: case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Primary angiosarcoma of the heart is an extremely rare malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 32-year-old female with primary angiosarcoma of the heart at an advanced stage with lung and bone metastases is presented. The tumor showed extensive expression of c-erb-B2 and a moderate expression of c-kit. Chemotherapy (cisplatin, epirubicin and ifosfamide) was administered. Herceptin as well as glivec were added to the above combination. RESULTS: There was a good partial response and the lung deposits almost disappeared. The duration of response was 6 months. CONCLUSION: This case of angiosarcoma of the heart is presented because of the extreme rarity of this disease, and its responsiveness to chemotherapy in combination with imatinib and herceptin.

Alternate paclitaxel-gemcitabine and paclitaxel-vinorelbine biweekly administration in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, 3 cytotoxic agents were combined as front-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. All 3 drugs have been used in other 2-agent combinations and have been shown to be effective as first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one (53 male, 8 female, median age 65 years old) out of 67 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Eighty percent of the patients were stage IIIB and IV and 20% were inoperable stage IIIA. In order to obviate toxicity as much as possible, paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 was combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for the first cycle, and 2 weeks later with vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, for the second cycle; this alternate schedule was repeated every 2 weeks for 9 cycles. RESULTS: No complete responses were observed; there was a 37.7% partial response rate and stable disease in 31.1% of the patients. The median survival was 13 months and 1-year survival, 53%. Myelotoxicity involved grade 3 neutropenia in 3.3% of the patients and grade 4 in 1.6%. CONCLUSION: Adverse reactions were few in this alternate administration of paclitaxel-gemcitabine and paclitaxel-vinorelbine in NSCLC patients; in more than half of the patients there was long median and 1-year survival.

Primitive neurectodermal tumors: a case of extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma of the small intestine and review of the literature.

This is a review of extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma (ES) which includes a new, extremely rare case. The literature was examined with respect to determining the locations of extraosseous ESs, the incidence per site and in total and the criteria which confirm the similarity between extraosseous and osseous ES. ES sites were detected in several organs and tissues, mainly in the trunk, extremities and the retroperitoneal region. Studies confirmed that osseous and extraosseous ES are identical chromosomally and histologically. ES of the small intestine, described here, has not been previously documented in the literature. Along with the other different documented sites, a new location of primary extraosseous ES is also reported here.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerance of single-agent docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three chemotherapy-naive patients (median age, 65 years) with histologically confirmed pancreatic cancer were treated, after appropriate premedication, with docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m(2)/d subcutaneously days 2 through 10) every 3 weeks. World Health Organization performance status was 0 to 1 in 28 patients (85%) and 2 in 5 patients (15%). Twenty-nine patients had stage III and IV disease. RESULTS: One complete response (3%) and one partial response (3%) were observed for an overall response rate of 6% (95% confidence interval, 2.1% to 14.2%). Nineteen patients (58%) had stable disease and 12 (36%) had progressive disease. The duration of the two objective responses was 10 and 28 weeks, and the median time to tumor progression was 20 weeks. The median overall survival was 36 weeks. The actuarial 1-year survival was 36.4%. The performance status improved in seven of 21 assessable patients (24%) and pain improved in 14 of 21 (67%) assessable patients; five patients (29%) experienced weight gain during treatment. Disease-related asthenia, anorexia, vomiting, and diarrhea improved in 29%, 15%, 67%, and 47% of the assessable patients, respectively. Serum concentrations of CA 19-9 were decreased by more than 50% in seven patients (35%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in four patients (12%) and eight patients (24%), respectively, with two episodes of febrile neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 asthenia occurred in three patients. CONCLUSION: Although docetaxel has a marginal objective activity in pancreatic cancer, it seems to have an important effect on tumor growth control, conferring a clinical benefit.

Irinotecan combined with docetaxel in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: This is a phase II study where a novel chemotherapy combination was tested in pre-treated breast cancer patients: docetaxel and irinotecan have already been established as agents for breast and colorectal cancer, respectively. METHODS: Forty-eight (median age 54 years, range 26-77 year) patients, all evaluable, were enrolled. All patients had been pre-treated with anthracycline-combined chemotherapy, 30 of whom were also treated with paclitaxel and 2 with docetaxel. World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0-2. The dominant metastasis was in the liver (54.17%), in the lungs (27.08%), in soft tissues (12.50%) and in the skeleton (6.25%). Treatment involved irinotecan infusion 200 mg/m(2) for 90 min and docetaxel infusion 80 mg/m(2) for 90 min, repeated once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five (52.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.95-66.21) patients showed responses: 3 complete (6.25%, 95% CI 0-13.05) and 22 (45.83%, 95% CI 31.74-59.92) partial; the most responsive metastases were observed at the liver site (53.85%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 18 patients (37.50%); 14 (29.17%) patients developed anaemia and three (6.25%), thrombocytopenia. Concerning non-haematologic toxicity, alopecia and fatigue were common; grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only one (2.08%) patient. CONCLUSION: The irinotecan-docetaxel combination produces quite a high response rate in pre-treated advanced breast cancer patients.