Long-term, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of topical alprostadil cream in male patients with erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Alprostadil is approved for treatment of male erectile dysfunction (ED) by injection or urethral insertion. Topical delivery of alprostadil offers an improved alternative. AIM: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of topical alprostadil cream. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, long-term study in 1,161 patients (998 double-blind rollover; 163 naïve) with ED. For the first 4 weeks, patients could administer eight doses of 200 mcg alprostadil to the penis meatus before intercourse (up to 2 per/week). Patients then self-selected to administer 300 or 100 mcg doses if hypo-responsive or hyper-responsive, respectively, or 200 mcg if no change, for up to 9 months (2 doses/week). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety evaluated patient/partner adverse events (AEs), changes in vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and electrocardiograms. Efficacy assessed International Index of Erectile Function, Sexual Encounter Profile, Patient Self Assessment of Erection, and Global Assessment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Approximately 12% of patients discontinued due to hypo-/hyper-responsiveness, 16% withdrew consent for a variety of reasons, and less than 5% discontinued because of AEs. The majority of patients (73%) selected 300 mcg alprostadil as the final dose. The most common AEs involved application site burning or erythema (12.2%), meatal or glans pain (4.4%), and prolonged or painful erection (1.3%). Only 5 (0.4%) patients reported a prolonged erection of >or=4 hours (priapism). Vaginal burning or itching (2.1%) was reported most frequently by partners. The majority of patients (74%) demonstrated an overall improvement in erectile function on most end-points, especially after adjusting dose strength to their individual responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Topical alprostadil cream was considered effective and safe by most patients and their partners, with most AEs limited to the application site. Dose adjustment to 300 mcg alprostadil facilitated the greatest improvement in erectile function in the majority of patients. A separate report will integrate patient data from the open-label extension and prior double-blind studies.

Efficacy and tolerability of dapoxetine in treatment of premature ejaculation: an integrated analysis of two double-blind, randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: No drugs are approved for treatment of premature ejaculation. Our aim was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of on-demand dapoxetine in patients with severe premature ejaculation. METHODS: We determined the efficacy of dapoxetine in a prospectively predefined integrated analysis of two 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials of identical design done independently, in parallel, at 121 sites in the USA. Men with moderate-to-severe premature ejaculation in stable, heterosexual relationships took placebo (n=870), 30 mg dapoxetine (874), or 60 mg dapoxetine (870) on-demand (as needed, 1-3 h before anticipated sexual activity). The primary endpoint was intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) measured by stopwatch. Safety and tolerability were assessed. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00211107 and NCT00211094. FINDINGS: 672, 676, and 610 patients completed in the placebo, 30 mg dapoxetine, and 60 mg dapoxetine groups, respectively. Dapoxetine significantly prolonged IELT (p<0.0001, all doses vs placebo). Mean IELT at baseline was 0.90 (SD 0.47) minute, 0.92 (0.50) minute, and 0.91 (0.48) minute, and at study endpoint (week 12 or final visit) was 1.75 (2.21) minutes for placebo, 2.78 (3.48) minutes for 30 mg dapoxetine, and 3.32 (3.68) minutes for 60 mg dapoxetine. Both dapoxetine doses were effective on the first dose. Common adverse events (30 mg and 60 mg dapoxetine, respectively) were nausea (8.7%, 20.1%), diarrhoea (3.9%, 6.8%), headache (5.9%, 6.8%), and dizziness (3.0%, 6.2%). INTERPRETATION: On-demand dapoxetine is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for men with moderate-to-severe premature ejaculation.

Correlation of improved erectile function and rate of successful intercourse with improved emotional well-being assessed with the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and stratified by age.

BACKGROUND: The quality of life consequences of erectile dysfunction (ED) include depression, anxiety, and loss of self-esteem. The Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire is a validated, patient-administered, psychometric instrument specific to ED. OBJECTIVE: To determine correlations between erectile function (EF), intercourse success, and emotional well-being measured with the SEAR questionnaire in men treated with sildenafil citrate for ED and stratified by age (< 50 years, 50-65 years, and > 65 years). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an open-label, flexible-dose trial of sildenafil (25, 50 and 100 mg) administered for 10 weeks to 382 men with ED (mean +/- SD age, 55 +/- 13 years; mean ED duration, 4 years), which was conducted at 62 centers in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis (by intent-to-treat, n = 368) of the change from baseline to the week-10 endpoint in the SEAR questionnaire Self-Esteem subscale, the intercourse success rate (percent of occasions at which an erection that lasted long enough for successful intercourse was achieved), and their correlation. RESULTS: For the overall population, there was mean +/- SD improvement (p < 0.0001, paired t-tests) in the Self-Esteem subscale (56 +/- 25 to 79 +/- 22) and intercourse success rate (21 +/- 30% to 70 +/- 36%), which showed positive correlation (p < 0.0001). Secondary outcomes (i.e., EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function; event log frequency of erection hard enough for sexual intercourse and of ejaculation/orgasm) also improved (p < 0.0001) and correlated positively with the SEAR Self-Esteem subscale and Sexual Relationship domain (p < 0.05 for all correlations). All 10 correlations were positive (p < 0.05) in men aged 50 to 65 years, eight were positive in men aged > 65 years, and six were positive in men aged < 50 years. The most common treatment-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate headache (12% of patients), vasodilatation (7%), and rhinitis (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Men treated with sildenafil for ED demonstrated improved erectile function and an increased intercourse success rate, which correlated positively with improvement in SEAR measures of self-esteem and sexual relationship.

Sexual functioning and satisfaction in nonresponders to testosterone gel: Potential effectiveness of retreatment in hypogonadal males.

There is a slow but continuous decline in testosterone (T) levels with age, with a substantial percentage of males exhibiting T levels in the hypogonadal range. This age-dependent decline in circulating androgens is associated, in large part, with reduced sexual functioning and libido. The effectiveness of TestimR 1% (Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Norristown, Pennsylvania) topical T gel was evaluated in older hypogonadal males who failed to experience satisfactory symptom relief after treatment with AndroGelR 1% (Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Marietta, Georgia). In this open-label study, consecutive subjects were assigned randomly to experimental treatment with Testim 1% (5 g) or to maintenance therapy (control group) with AndroGel 1% (5 g). Seventy-six experimental subjects and 75 control subjects were followed for 4 weeks to evaluate improvements in sexual functioning and satisfaction. Changes from baseline in the 5 domains of the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory were compared between groups. The mean percentage improvement favored the experimental treatment in sexual drive (23% vs 16%, P < 0.3), erectile function (32% vs 8%, P < 0.03), ejaculatory function (11% vs 9%, P < 0.4), problem assessment (47% vs 12%, P < 0.01), and sexual satisfaction (62% vs 23%, P < 0.02). A greater percentage of subjects also reported satisfaction with the experimental treatment (55% vs 33%, P < 0.02), and these subjects were less likely to require upward dose titration at the final follow-up visit (53% vs 72%, P < 0.03). Consideration of Testim 1% gel in patients who have an inadequate response to prior T therapy is encouraged, although it is difficult to estimate the contribution of nonspecific study effects (eg, placebo) in this trial.

Sexual dysfunction: male and female issues.

In March 1998, a new sexual revolution began. It was at that time that Viagra, a pill for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction, was introduced. Release of this medication not only allowed scientists to identify the basic physiology of erectile functioning but also for the first time allowed men to reverse the natural aging process of loss of an erection. This, unfortunately, failed to address the other most important part of sexual relations: the female partner. It is not until recently that we have begun to recognize the vast importance of the couple's relationship. This paper reviews the pathophysiology of both male and female sexual dysfunctions and their relationships. It describes the testing process that is involved in the ideology and management of sexual dysfunction. The treatment options reviewed include the use of the older methods for male sexual dysfunction, as well as the new pharmacologic treatments and their potential. The treatment of female sexual dysfunction is also addressed.

Randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of sildenafil in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction: efficacy at 8 and 12 hours postdose.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the period of responsiveness to sildenafil. METHODS: Under a double-blind protocol, men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] Erectile Function domain score, 11 to 25) were randomized to sildenafil (100 mg) or placebo and attempted intercourse 8 hours (range, 7 to 9 hours) postdose (first 4-week phase) and 12 hours (11 to 13 hours) postdose (second 4-week phase after treatment crossover). The primary outcome was the per-patient proportion (PPP; least squares means [95% confidence interval]) of affirmative responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (SEP3: "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?"). RESULTS: For sildenafil (n = 174) versus placebo (n = 177), baseline values were similar but the PPP of successful intercourse attempts increased to 76% (69% to 82%) versus 50% (43% to 57%) in phase 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2) and 79% (72% to 85%) versus 52% (44% to 60%) in phase 2 (OR = 3.5), and the PPP of Erection Hardness Score 4 erections (completely hard and fully rigid) was 41% (34% to 48%) versus 10% (7% to 15%) in phase 1 (OR = 6.2) and 44% (37% to 51%) versus 17% (12% to 23%) in phase 2 (OR = 4.0). Thus, at 12 hours, the odds of successful intercourse tripled and of a completely hard erection quadrupled. The sildenafil group achieved greater (P <0.001) PPP of successful penetration (SEP2), satisfaction with erection hardness (SEP4), and satisfaction with the sexual experience (SEP5); improvement in IIEF domain scores; and treatment satisfaction on the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In men with mild to moderate ED, responsiveness to sildenafil may persist much longer than 4 hours.

An evaluation of semen characteristics in men 45 years of age or older after daily dosing with tadalafil 20mg: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 9-month study.

OBJECTIVES: Assess the effects on spermatogenesis of daily tadalafil 20mg over three spermatogenesis cycles in men >or= 45 yr. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority study, healthy men (or with mild erectile dysfunction) were randomized to receive tadalafil 20mg (n=125) or placebo (n=128) for 9 mo followed by a 6-mo, treatment-free period. Semen and serum samples were provided at baseline and every 10-12 wk. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with >or= 50% reduction in sperm concentration at end point. Secondary outcomes included sperm concentration, number per ejaculate, motility and morphology; serum concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormones; and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 253 men enrolled, 191 (75%) completed treatment phase: 2 of 96 (2.1%, placebo) and 12 of 95 (12.6%, tadalafil) subjects had >or= 50% reduction in sperm concentration. Tadalafil was noninferior to placebo because the upper 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions of tadalafil and placebo subjects with a >or= 50% reduction in sperm concentration was 17.5%, significantly less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 20% (p=0.015). Ninety-four percent (179 of 191) of men completed the 6-mo, treatment-free period: Baseline sperm concentration levels were restored in 8 of 12 (tadalafil) and 1 of 2 (placebo) men. There were no significant differences between groups in secondary end points. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and myalgia. Twelve (9.6%) tadalafil and seven (5.5%) placebo subjects discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no deleterious effects of 9 mo of daily tadalafil 20mg on spermatogenesis or hormones related to testicular function in men >or= 45 yr.

Phase 1/2 dose-escalation study of a GM-CSF-secreting, allogeneic, cellular immunotherapy for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study evaluated multiple dose levels of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The immunotherapy, based on the GVAX platform, consisted of 2 allogeneic prostate-carcinoma cell lines modified to secrete granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). METHODS: Dose levels ranged from 100 x 10(6) cells q28d x 6 to 500 x 10(6) cells prime/300 x 10(6) cells boost q14d x 11. Endpoints included safety, immunogenicity, overall survival, radiologic response, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, and serum GM-CSF pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Eighty men, median age 69 years (range, 49-90 years), were treated. The most common adverse effect was injection-site erythema. Overall, the immunotherapy was well tolerated. A maximal tolerated dose was not established. The median survival time was 35.0 months in the high-dose group, 20.0 months in the mid-dose, group, and 23.1 months in the low-dose group. PSA stabilization occurred in 15 (19%) patients, and a >50% decline in PSA was seen in 1 patient. The proportion of patients who generated an antibody response to 1 or both cell lines increased with dose and included 10 of 23 (43%) in the low-dose group, 13 of 18 (72%) in the mid-dose group, and 16 of 18 (89%) in the high-dose group (P = .002; Cochran-Armitage trend test). CONCLUSIONS: This immunotherapy was well tolerated. Immunogenicity and overall survival varied by dose. Two phase 3 trials in patients with metastatic HRPC are underway.

New advances in the treatment of hypogonadism in the aging male.

The signs and symptoms of low testosterone in the aging male include erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, mood disturbances such as depression, loss of muscle mass, osteoporosis, and increase in body fat. Many of these signs and symptoms were previously believed to be part of the normal aging process, and only recently has treatment of low testosterone in the aging male been shown to provide long-term physical and mental improvement. In the past, oral and injectable testosterone delivery methods had disadvantages that limited their use, but the introduction of transdermal testosterone patches has allowed testosterone to be delivered into the circulation in a consistent fashion. Long-term use of these patches over the last 3 to 10 years has been effective in maintaining sexual function and bone and muscle mass, and from short-term studies it does not appear that testosterone treatment puts men at risk for the development of prostate cancer. A new topical gel formation (Testim) has been designed to provide consistent transdermal absorption of testosterone over 24 hours after a single dose.

An open-label study of abarelix in men with symptomatic prostate cancer at risk of treatment with LHRH agonists.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of abarelix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, to provide an alternative treatment to bilateral orchiectomy in men with advanced prostate cancer symptoms and to evaluate its safety, clinical and biochemical efficacy, and effects on prostate-specific antigen and serum hormone levels. METHODS: For 168 days, 81 patients from 17 centers received monthly intramuscular injections of open-label abarelix 100 mg (at least one dose). Patients were evaluated for the avoidance of bilateral orchiectomy, efficacy, disease response, percentage of change in prostate-specific antigen level, change in the intensity of pain, neurologic compromise, and other efficacy variables. Safety was evaluated through reports of adverse events and abnormal laboratory values. RESULTS: No patients required bilateral orchiectomy, but 2 patients were withdrawn from the study because of treatment-related events and were considered as failures to avoid orchiectomy. Treatment produced an 88% (38 of 43) objective response rate on day 85. Sixty-five (90%) of 72 patients experienced improvement in the pain score and/or analgesic use, urinary obstruction, urinary catheter removal, hydronephrosis, and/or azotemia. No patient with impending neurologic compromise at study entry developed spinal cord compression. The median reduction from the baseline prostate-specific antigen value was 75% on day 15 and greater than 95% from day 57 onward. Abarelix was well tolerated, and adverse events were the sequelae of advanced prostate cancer, comorbid medical disorders, or medical castration. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that abarelix provides a safe and effective medical alternative to surgical castration in symptomatic patients with advanced prostate cancer without the risk of the clinical flare associated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, crossover design trial of the efficacy and safety of Zestra for Women in women with and without female sexual arousal disorder.

Zestra for Women is a botanical feminine massage oil formulated to enhance female sexual pleasure and arousal when applied to the vulva. We conducted this randomized, double-blinded, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zestra for Women compared to placebo oil in 10 women with and 10 women without female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) in conditions of home use in conjunction with sexual activities. Subjects were screened by physical examination, sex therapist interviews, and questionnaires. We randomized qualified subjects to treatment paths and gave them 5 doses of test article and diaries to use at home. At Visit 2, we assessed them by questionnaires and gave them 5 doses of crossover test article and diaries to use at home. At the final visit, we assessed them with questionnaires. We assessed safety by adverse event reports and primary efficacy by responses to a diary question regarding satisfaction with arousal. Secondary efficacy instruments included remaining diary questions, recall-based questionnaires, global assessment questions, and a consumer-testing questionnaire. All 20 subjects completed the study. Three subjects reported single incidences of mild genital burning sensations lasting 5-30 min after use of Zestra for Women. Both normal and FSAD women showed statistically significant improvements, relative to placebo, in level of arousal, level of desire, satisfaction with arousal, genital sensation, ability to have orgasms, and sexual pleasure. Although FSAD women showed greater magnitude of response, the presence of FSAD had no effect on response rates. Zestra for Women was just as effective in women using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants as in women not using antidepressants. Zestra for Women improved sexual function in normal and FSAD women under conditions of home use.

Topical alprostadil cream for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a combined analysis of the phase II program.

OBJECTIVES: To present a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety data of two recently completed Phase II studies examining a novel alprostadil topical cream for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Patients (n = 303) with ED of at least 3 months' duration were randomized to receive placebo or 50, 100, 200, or 300 microg alprostadil in two nearly identical 11-dose, multicenter, at-home studies of a novel topical cream containing alprostadil and a proprietary skin permeation enhancer. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in erectile function domain score from baseline to the final visit. Secondary endpoints included changes in scores for questions 3 and 4 of the International Index of Erectile Function and standard diary analyses. Safety was assessed by analysis of adverse events, changes in laboratory test results, and physical examination findings. RESULTS: The mean baseline parameters for the erectile function score, ED history, and secondary diagnoses suggested no significant differences among the treatment groups. The changes from baseline to the final visit erectile function scores were 0.98 +/- 0.84, 3.4 +/- 1.3, 3.4 +/- 0.88 (P <0.05), 5.3 +/- 0.92 (P <0.001), and 9.4 +/- 1.43 (P <0.001) for the ascending dose groups. Most secondary efficacy endpoints were significant for the 200 and 300-microg dose groups. Dose-related trends in efficacy were observed. Adverse events were localized to the application site, were of mild or moderate intensity, and were of short duration. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest topical alprostadil cream, when combined with a novel dermal permeation-enhancer, to be a potentially useful agent for the treatment of ED.

A phase 3, multicenter, open label, randomized study of abarelix versus leuprolide plus daily antiandrogen in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We compared the endocrinological and biochemical efficacy of abarelix depot, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with that of a widely used combination of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist and a nonsteroidal antiandrogen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 255 patients were randomized to receive open label 100 mg. abarelix depot or 7.5 mg. leuprolide acetate intramuscularly injection on days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113 and 141 for 24 weeks. Patients in the abarelix group received an additional injection on day 15 and those in the leuprolide acetate group received 50 mg. bicalutamide daily. Patients could continue treatment with study drug for an additional 28 weeks. The efficacy end points were the comparative rates of avoidance of testosterone surge (greater than 10% increase) within 7 days of the first injection and the rapidity of achieving reduction of serum testosterone to castrate levels (50 ng./dl. or less) on day 8. Patients were monitored for adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: Abarelix was more effective in avoidance of testosterone surge (p <0.001) and the rapidity of reduction of testosterone to castrate levels on day 8 (p <0.001) than combination therapy. No significant difference was seen between the groups in the initial rate of decline of serum prostate specific antigen or the ability to achieve and maintain castrate levels of testosterone. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Abarelix as monotherapy achieves medical castration significantly more rapidly than combination therapy and avoids the testosterone surge characteristic of agonist therapy. Both treatments were equally effective in reducing serum prostate specific antigen, and achieving and maintaining castrate levels of testosterone.