Stabilisation of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients before liver transplantation predicts post-transplant survival.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a severe complication of liver cirrhosis associated with excess short-term mortality rates. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a potentially life-saving therapeutic modality for acute-on-chronic liver failure patients, but selection of transplant candidates with an acceptable post-transplant outcome is difficult. AIM: To assess the risk of liver transplantation in patients with ACLF, and to determine parameters that predict post-transplant survival in this patient cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all 250 patients with cirrhosis who underwent their first liver transplantation between 2009 and 2014 at our institution, and assessed post-transplant outcomes. RESULTS: Of 250 cirrhotic liver transplant recipients, 98 patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for acute-on-chronic liver failure in the 3-month pre-transplant period. Compared to non-ACLF patients, ACLF was associated with significantly higher short-term morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (90-day patient survival 96.1% non-ACLF vs 72.4% ACLF patients, P < 0.0001). Clinical improvement in the pre-transplant period, as defined by recovery of at least one previously failed organ system, was observed in 37 of 98 acute-on-chronic liver failure patients, mostly within several days after diagnosis. Most notably, clinical improvement prior to liver transplantation was associated with excellent post-transplant survival rates that approximated non-ACLF transplant recipients. Following the 90-day post-transplant period, patient survival and long-term graft functions were comparable between ACLF and non-ACLF liver transplant recipients for up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Acute-on-chronic liver failure predicts adverse outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation. Given the dismal prognosis without transplantation, however, our results indicate that ACLF patients can be transplanted with comparably good outcomes, in particular patients who improve under conservative therapeutic measures.

Selection of the living liver donor.

Living related liver transplantation offers several advantages in comparison to transplantation of cadaver organs. To achieve maximal donor safety evaluation, selection criteria and complications of the donor operation were retrospectively analyzed in living donors of segmental liver transplants. Seventy-three liver donor candidates were evaluated between October 1991 and June 1994. The median age of 42 mothers and 31 fathers was 31 years (range, 19-50 years). The median volume of the left lateral liver lobe comprised 230 ml (100-350 ml). Twenty-four of 73 (33%) donor candidates were not accepted for living donation. Rejection was due to unsuitability of the donor's liver as a graft (n = 13) or due to an increased risk for living donation (n = 11). Of 35 living donations performed so far, one was a full left hemihepatectomy and 34 were left lateral segmentectomies. The length of the donor operation was, on average, 4.3 hr. No heterologous blood was needed. Postoperative complications included death due to pulmonary embolism (n = 1), seizure due to a previously undiagnosed ependymoma (n = 1), bile duct injury (n = 1), incisional hernia necessitating late revision (n = 2), and duodenal ulcer (n = 2). Long-term follow-up revealed no persistent complications. Using our standardized protocol, 33% of young, presumably healthy donor candidates were rejected for living donation.

Using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts to control variceal bleeding before liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in controlling bleeding from esophageal varices in patients awaiting liver transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective, uncontrolled trial. SETTING: University medical center with an active liver transplant program. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients referred for liver transplantation with either active variceal hemorrhage or recurrent variceal hemorrhage despite sclerotherapy; four patients had been previously treated with surgical portosystemic shunts. INTERVENTION: An intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created via a transjugular approach to the hepatic veins using expandable, flexible metallic stents. MEASUREMENTS: Portal pressures before and after the creation of the shunt, the direction of portal blood flow at differing diameters of the shunts, procedure-related complications, and outcome in terms of survival, liver transplantation, and recurrent variceal bleeding. MAIN RESULTS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was placed successfully in 13 patients, and bleeding was controlled acutely in all 13. After the procedure, the mean portal pressure decreased from 34 +/- 8.9 cm H2O to 22.4 +/- 5.4 cm H2O (P less than 0.001). No complications were associated with the procedure; however, two patients died of causes unrelated to the procedure. Seven patients subsequently underwent liver transplantation and are doing well, and three patients are being managed conservatively. Bleeding recurred in one patient 102 days after the procedure secondary to shunt occlusion caused by neointimal proliferation. CONCLUSION: Placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is apparently safe and effective therapy for variceal hemorrhage in patients referred for liver transplantation.