Calculated free testosterone in men: comparison of four equations and with free androgen index.

BACKGROUND: Serum testosterone remains the most important investigation in the diagnosis of androgen deficiency in men. Most of the circulating testosterone is bound to albumin and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), whereas free testosterone accounts for approximately 2% of total testosterone. Because direct measurement of free testosterone is impractical in routine practice, several equations are used to provide clinically useful estimates of free testosterone concentration. This study aimed to (1) obtain locally derived reference limits for total testosterone and calculated free testosterone (CFT) concentrations, and (2) critically evaluate the equations commonly used to estimate free testosterone. METHODS: Serum total testosterone, SHBG and albumin were assayed in morning blood samples obtained from 126 healthy men (aged 20-45 years) known to have normal semen analysis. CFT concentrations calculated using four published methods (i.e. the Sodergard, Nanjee-Wheeler, Vermeulen and Ly-Handelsman equations) were compared with one another and the free androgen index. RESULTS: Reference intervals for total testosterone and CFT by the Vermeulen equation were 9.4-31.0 nmol/L and 0.245-0.785 nmol/L (2.5-97.5 percentile), respectively. CFT values varied considerably with the four equations examined. Mean biases ranged from 5.8 to 56.0%; the Nanjee-Wheeler and Ly-Handelsman equations yielded positive and negative biases, respectively, against the other equations. Free androgen index was shown to correlate poorly with CFT (r2=0.21-0.46) and over-estimate the CFT at low SHBG concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We have used various equations to derive reference ranges for CFT in healthy men aged 20-45 years. We suggest that CFT be incorporated into the investigation regimen for suspected hypogonadism when total testosterone results are equivocal.

High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnosis of myocardial infarction using a high sensitivity troponin I assay and sex specific diagnostic thresholds in men and women with suspected acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Regional cardiac centre, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=1126, 46% women). Two cardiologists independently adjudicated the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by using a high sensitivity troponin I assay with sex specific diagnostic thresholds (men 34 ng/L, women 16 ng/L) and compared with current practice where a contemporary assay (50 ng/L, single threshold) was used to guide care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The high sensitivity troponin I assay noticeably increased the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women (from 11% to 22%; P<0.001) but had a minimal effect in men (from 19% to 21%, P=0.002). Women were less likely than men to be referred to a cardiologist or undergo coronary revascularisation (P<0.05 for both). At 12 months, women with undisclosed increases in troponin concentration (17-49 ng/L) and those with myocardial infarction (≥50 ng/L) had the highest rate of death or reinfarction compared with women without (≤16 ng/L) myocardial infarction (25%, 24%, and 4%, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although having little effect in men, a high sensitivity troponin assay with sex specific diagnostic thresholds may double the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women and identify those at high risk of reinfarction and death. Whether use of sex specific diagnostic thresholds will improve outcomes and tackle inequalities in the treatment of women with suspected acute coronary syndrome requires urgent attention.

Implications of lowering threshold of plasma troponin concentration in diagnosis of myocardial infarction: cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between troponin concentration, assay precision, and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary centre in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 2092 consecutive patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome were stratified with a sensitive troponin I assay into three groups (<0.012, 0.012-0.049, and ≥0.050 µg/L) based on the 99th centile for troponin concentration (0.012 µg/L; coefficient of variation 20.8%) and the diagnostic threshold (0.050 µg/L; 7.2%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: One year survival without events (recurrent myocardial infarction, death) in patients grouped by troponin concentration. RESULTS: Troponin I concentrations were <0.012 µg/L in 988 patients (47%), 0.012-0.049 µg/L in 352 patients (17%), and ≥0.050 µg/L in 752 patients (36%). Adoption of the 99th centile would increase the number of people receiving a diagnosis of myocardial infarction from 752 to 1104: a relative increase of 47%. At one year, patients with troponin concentrations of 0.012-0.049 µg/L were more likely to be dead or readmitted with recurrent myocardial infarction than those with troponin concentrations <0.012 µg/L (13% v 3%, P<0.001; odds ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 7.9). Compared with troponin ≥0.050 µg/L, patients with troponin 0.012-0.049 µg/L had a higher risk profile but were less likely to have a diagnosis of, or be investigated and treated for, acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSION: Lowering the diagnostic threshold to the 99th centile and accepting greater assay imprecision would identify more patients with acute coronary syndrome at risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death but would increase the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by 47%. It remains to be established whether reclassification of these patients and treatment for myocardial infarction would improve outcome.

Clinical performance of the Roche cobas e411 automated assay system for thyrotropin-receptor antibodies for the diagnosis of Graves' disease.

BACKGROUND: The clinical performance of the Roche cobas e411 automated assay for the measurement of thyrotropin (TSH)-receptor antibodies (TRAbs) for the diagnosis of Graves' disease was evaluated in the setting of new referrals to a specialized thyroid clinic. METHODS: The final diagnosis of 102 new patients attending their first outpatient appointment at a thyroid clinic was correlated with the TRAbs result. In all cases, the diagnosis was made independently of the TRAbs result by the same consultant (ADT) based on clinical examination, thyroid function tests (TSH, free thyroxine, total triiodothyronine measured on Architect; Abbot Diagnostics), and a technetium-99m uptake and scan. TRAbs were measured using the cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics). The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay were determined and compared with other published performance characteristics of the assay. RESULTS: Optimal sensitivity (95%) and specificity (98%) were obtained using a cut-off of 1.6 IU/L. The positive and negative predictive values at this cut-off were calculated as 98% and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a cut-off of 1.6 IU/L, considered independently of thyroid function tests, the Roche cobas e411 automated immunoassay for TRAbs is a convenient, sensitive and specific tool for the differential diagnosis of hyperthyroidism.

Clinical and radiological features of patients with macroprolactinaemia.

OBJECTIVES: Macroprolactin is a complex of prolactin (PRL) and IgG and may account for a significant proportion of cases of 'idiopathic hyperprolactinaemia'. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence and clinical features of macroprolactinaemia in patients diagnosed with hyperprolactinaemia in our region, with a view to determining how patients with macroprolactinaemia should be investigated and managed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An Immuno-1 automated immunoassay system with polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation was used to identify macroprolactin, with a recovery of 700 mU/l. The clinical records of 51 (44 female) were available for retrospective review. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of patients was 39.5 (18-82) years. The median (range) concentrations for the various forms of PRL were: total PRL 1130 mU/l (728-5116), monomeric PRL 240 mU/l (50-656) and macroprolactin 895 mU/l (381-4854). Classical symptoms of hyperprolactinaemia were present in 39% of patients, although in many there were other possible explanations for their symptomatology. Pituitary adenomas were identified in six out of 36 people who underwent neuroimaging. Five of these patients had a microadenoma and one had a 10-mm macroadenoma (although, in this patient macroprolactin was identified after the discovery of the tumour). There was no relationship between macroprolactin concentrations and the presence of hyperprolactinaemic symptoms or neuroimaging abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Macroprolactinaemia is a common occurrence in patients with hyperprolactinaemia, but associated symptomatology may not necessarily be linked. The neuroimaging abnormalities were also probably incidental findings and it is questionable whether neuroimaging is necessary when significant macroprolactinaemia is identified and the concentration of monomeric PRL is not elevated (using the Immuno-1 assay system, following PEG precipitation).