Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Genet Med ; 16(4): 281-5, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24009001

RESUMO

The clinical use of noninvasive prenatal testing to screen high-risk patients for fetal aneuploidy is becoming increasingly common. Initial studies have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, and there is hope that these tests will result in a reduction of invasive diagnostic procedures as well as their associated risks. Guidelines on the use of this testing in clinical practice have been published; however, data on actual test performance in a clinical setting are lacking, and there are no guidelines on quality control and assurance. The different noninvasive prenatal tests employ complex methodologies, which may be challenging for health-care providers to understand and utilize in counseling patients, particularly as the field continues to evolve. How these new tests should be integrated into current screening programs and their effect on health-care costs remain uncertain.


Assuntos
Aneuploidia , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Feminino , Doenças Fetais/genética , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/economia
5.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 26(18): 1799-803, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23662746

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the addition of group education regarding maternal serum screening and diagnostic testing for aneuploidy and neural tube defects improves patient knowledge and affects the uptake of testing compared to individual education alone. METHOD: We conducted a prospective study of 443 obstetric patients to assess knowledge of prenatal testing options based on individual provider counseling (n = 331) or provider counseling with supplemental group education (n = 112). We used a chi-square test to compare the number of correct survey answers between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline knowledge. Patients receiving group education showed a statistically significant improvement in knowledge. After initiation of group education, the uptake of maternal serum screening declined while the uptake of amniocentesis remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Group education in addition to individual counseling to discuss prenatal testing options appears to be effective in improving knowledge compared to individual provider counseling alone. Improved knowledge may affect uptake of prenatal screening tests due to more informed decision making.


Assuntos
Conhecimento , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Adulto , Aneuploidia , Tomada de Decisões , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Feminino , Aconselhamento Genético , Humanos , Defeitos do Tubo Neural/diagnóstico , Grupo Associado , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA