RESUMO
Sex differences in cerebral aneurysm occurrence and characteristics have been well described. Although sex differences in outcomes following ischemic stroke have been identified, the effect of sex on outcomes following hemorrhagic stroke, and in particular, aneurysm treatment has been less studied. We describe the current state of knowledge regarding the impact of sex on treatment and outcomes of cerebral aneurysms. Although prior studies suggest that aneurysm prevalence and progression may be related to sex, we did not find clear evidence that outcomes following subarachnoid hemorrhage vary based on sex. Last, we identify areas for future research that could enhance understanding of the role sex plays in this context.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Intracraniano/patologia , Aneurisma Intracraniano/terapia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/patologia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/terapia , Aneurisma Roto , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/epidemiologia , Masculino , Prevalência , Caracteres Sexuais , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are often associated with high-flow intranidal fistulas (INFs). Although INF embolization has been suggested to provide higher reduction of total AVM flow compared with regular pedicle embolization, this effect has not previously been quantified. The aim of this study was to characterize the effect of AVM INF embolization on total AVM flow. METHODS: This study is an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective case series of patients from 2010 to 2022 with AVMs, both with and without INFs, who underwent quantitative magnetic resonance angiography and endovascular embolization. RESULTS: Twenty patients accounted for 35 separate embolization sessions: 13 patients with INFs underwent a total 21 embolizations and 12 patients without INFs had 14 embolizations. No significant differences were found between groups on age, sex, laterality, drainage pattern, and Spetzler-Martin grade. However, AVMs with INFs were larger than the control group (12.7 vs 8.37 cm 3 , P = .049). Baseline pre-embolization AVM flow significantly differed between AVM with INF vs control groups (522 vs 320 cc/min, P = .005). Similarly, postembolization AVM flow also differed between AVM with INF and control groups (392 vs 224 cc/min, P = .008), with a larger decrease in flow per vessel per embolization session within the AVM INF group compared with controls (101.5 vs 33.2 cc/min, P < .001). Repeated measure analysis of variance showed significant differences pre-embolization and postembolization AVM flow between those with INFs vs controls ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study represents the first to examine the effect of INF embolization on total AVM flow. AVMs with INFs showed higher baseline flow, and targeted embolization toward INFs significantly lowered AVM flow in comparison with controls without INFs. The results of this study emphasize the importance of recognizing the presence of INFs within AVMs and their embolization to reduce AVM flow as part of a multistep management paradigm.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Fístula , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/complicações , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is often used as adjuvant therapy to microsurgical resection to reduce the high-risk features of bAVMs such as large size and high flow. However, the effect of preoperative embolization on surgical performance and patient outcome has shown mixed results. Heterogeneity in treatment goals, selection criteria, and unpredictable changes in bAVM hemodynamics after partial embolization may account for these uncertain findings. In this study we use an objective quantitative technique to assess the impact of preoperative embolization on intraoperative blood loss (IBL). METHODS: Patients with bAVM treated with microsurgical resection only or in combination with preoperative embolization from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if quantitative magnetic resonance angiography was performed prior to any treatment. Correlation of baseline bAVM flow, volume, and IBL was evaluated between the two groups. Additionally, bAVM flow prior to and after embolization was compared. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included, 31 of whom required preoperative embolization (20 had more than one session). Mean bAVM initial flow (362.3 mL/min vs 89.6 mL/min, p=0.001) and volume (9.6 mL vs 2.8 mL, p=0.001) were significantly higher in the preoperative embolization group; flow decreased significantly after embolization (408.0 mL/min vs 139.5 mL/min, p<0.001). IBL was comparable between the two groups (258.6 mL vs 141.3 mL, p=0.17). Linear regression continued to show a significant difference in initial bAVM flow (p=0.03) but no significant difference in IBL (p=0.53). CONCLUSION: Patients with larger bAVMs who underwent preoperative embolization had comparable IBL to those with smaller bAVMs undergoing only surgical treatment. Preoperative embolization of high-flow bAVMs facilitates surgical resection, reducing the risk of IBL.