Gunshot Trauma Patients Have Higher Risk of PTSD Compared With Blunt Trauma and Elective Populations: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outpatient Orthopaedic Care.

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been extensively studied in patients who have experienced natural disasters or military conflict, but there remains a substantial gap in knowledge about the prevalence of PTSD after civilian orthopaedic trauma, especially as related to firearms. Gun violence is endemic in the United States, especially in urban centers, and the mental impact is often minimized during the treatment of physical injuries. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients who experience gunshot wound (GSW) trauma have higher PTSD screening scores compared with patients with blunt or other trauma (for example, motor vehicle and motorcycle accidents or stab wounds) and those with elective conditions (for example, arthritis, tendinitis, or nerve compression)? (2) Are PTSD scores correlated with pain scores in patients with GSW trauma, those with non-GSW trauma, and patients with elective orthopaedic symptoms? METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adults older than 18 years of age presenting to an orthopaedic clinic over an 8-month period between August 2021 and May 2022. All patients presenting to the clinic were approached for inclusion (2034 patients), and 630 new or postoperative patients answered study surveys as part of routine care. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the orthopaedic condition with which they presented, whether gunshot trauma, blunt trauma, or elective orthopaedic symptoms. Overall, the results from 415 patients were analyzed, including 212 patients with elective orthopaedic symptoms, 157 patients with non-GSW trauma, and 46 patients with GSW trauma. Clinical data including demographic information were collected at the time of appointment and abstracted along with results from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, short screening questionnaire, which uses a 7-item scale scored from 0 to 7 (with higher scores representing worse symptoms), and from the numeric rating scale for pain (range 0 to 10). Both questionnaires were routinely administered by medical assistants at patient intake. The proportions of patients completing PTSD scoring were 45% (95) in the elective group, 74% (116) in the group with non-GSW trauma, and 85% (39) in the group with GSW trauma (p = 0.01). We compared the PTSD scores across the three groups and then dichotomized the scores as a negative versus positive screening result at a value of ≥ 4 with further comparative analysis. The correlation between pain and PTSD scores was also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with GSW trauma had higher mean ± SD PTSD scores compared with those who had non-GSW trauma (4.87 ± 4.05 versus 1.75 ± 2.72, mean difference 3.21 [95% CI 1.99 to 4.26]; p < 0.001) and those who presented with elective conditions (4.87 ± 4.05 versus 0.49 ± 1.04, mean difference 4.38 [95% CI 3.50 to 5.26]; p < 0.001). When dichotomized for positive or negative PTSD screening results, patients with GSW trauma had a higher risk of having PTSD (64% [25 of 39]) compared with patients with non-GSW trauma (27% [31 of 116], relative risk 2.40 [95% CI 1.64 to 3.51]; p < 0.001) and compared with patients with elective conditions (4% [4 of 95], relative risk 15.22 [95% CI 5.67 to 40.87]; p < 0.001). Pain scores were correlated with PTSD scores only for patients with non-GSW trauma (ρ = 0.37; p < 0.0001). No correlation with pain scores was present for patients with GSW (ρ = 0.24; p = 0.16) or patients with elective conditions (ρ = -0.04; p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: In an orthopaedic clinic population, the prevalence of positive screening for PTSD was highest in the population sustaining gunshot trauma as compared with blunt or other trauma and elective orthopaedic conditions. Interestingly, pain scores correlated with PTSD screening only in the patients with non-GSW trauma. These differences suggest a substantial difference in the populations at risk of PTSD after trauma. Overall, the psychological impacts of gun trauma are poorly understood. The next step would be to prospectively study the differences and timelines of PTSD screening in patients with GSW trauma in comparison with patients with blunt or other trauma to better define the treatment needs in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Are Social Deprivation and Low Traditional Health Literacy Associated With Higher PROMIS CAT Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) may be used to assess an individual patient's perspective of their physical, mental, and social health through either standard or computer adaptive testing (CAT) patient questionnaires. These questionnaires are used across disciplines; however, they have seen considerable application in orthopaedic surgery. Patient characteristics associated with PROMIS CAT completion have not been examined within the context of social determinants of health, such as social deprivation or health literacy, nor has patient understanding of the content of PROMIS CAT been assessed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What patient demographics, including social deprivation, are associated with completion of PROMIS CAT questionnaires? (2) Is health literacy level associated with completion of PROMIS CAT questionnaires? (3) Do patients with lower health literacy have a higher odds of completing PROMIS CAT without fully understanding the content? METHODS: Between June 2022 and August 2022, a cross-sectional study was performed via a paper survey administered to patients at a single, urban, quaternary academic medical center in orthopaedic subspecialty clinics of foot and ankle, trauma, and hand/upper extremity surgeons. We considered all English-speaking patients aged 18 or older, including those with limited reading and/or writing abilities, as eligible provided they received an iPad in clinic to complete the PROMIS CAT questionnaire as part of their routine standard clinical care or they completed the questionnaire via a patient portal before the visit. In all, 946 patients were considered eligible during the study period and a convenience sample of 36% (339 of 946) of patients was approached for inclusion due to clinic time constraints. Fifteen percent (52 of 339) declined to participate, leaving 85% (287 of 339) of patients for analysis here. Median (range) age of study participants was 49 years (35 to 64). Fifty-eight percent (167 of 287) of study participants self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or African American and 26% (75 of 287) as non-Hispanic White. Even proportions were observed across education levels (high school graduate or less, 29% [82 of 287]; some college, 25% [73 of 287]; college graduate, 25% [71 of 287]; advanced degree, 20% [58 of 287]). Eighteen percent (52 of 287) of patients reported an annual income bracket of USD 0 to 13,000, and 17% (48 of 287) reported more than USD 120,000. Forty-six percent (132 of 287) of patients worked full-time, 21% (59 of 287) were retired, and 23% (66 of 287) were unemployed or on disability. The primary outcome of interest was self-reported PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion grouped as: fully completed, partially completed, or no part completed. Overall, self-reported PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion proportions were: 80% (229 of 287) full completion, 13% (37 of 287) partial completion, and 7% (21 of 287) no part completed. We collected the National Area Deprivation Index (ADI) score and the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF) as part of the study survey to associate with level of completion. Additionally, patient understanding of PROMIS CAT was assessed through Likert-scaled responses to a study survey question that directly asked whether the patient understood all of the questions on the PROMIS CAT questionnaire. Responses to this question may have been limited by social desirability bias, and hence may overestimate how many individuals genuinely understood the questionnaire content. However, the benefit of this approach was it efficiently allowed us to estimate the ceiling effect of patient comprehension of PROMIS CAT and likely had a high degree of specificity for detecting lack of comprehension. RESULTS: ADI score adjusted for age was not associated with PROMIS CAT completion (partial completion OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.98 to 1.01]; p = 0.72, no part completed OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.99 to 1.03]; p = 0.45). Patients with lower health literacy scores, however, were more likely to not complete any part of their assigned questionnaires than patients with higher scores (no part completed OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.97]; p = 0.02). Additionally, 74% (26 of 35) of patients who did not fully understand all of the PROMIS CAT questionnaire questions still fully completed them-hence, 11% (26 of 229) of all patients who fully completed PROMIS CAT did not fully understand the content. Among patients self-reporting full completion of PROMIS CAT with health literacy data (99% [227 of 229]), patients with inadequate/marginal health literacy were more likely than patients with adequate health literacy to not fully understand all of the questions (21% [14 of 67] versus 8% [12 of 160], OR 3.26 [95% CI 1.42 to 7.49]; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Within an urban, socioeconomically diverse, orthopaedic patient population, health literacy was associated with PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion. Lower health literacy levels increased the likelihood of not completing any part of the assigned PROMIS CAT questionnaires. Additionally, patients completed PROMIS CAT without fully understanding the questions. This indicates that patient completion does not guarantee comprehension of the questions nor validity of their scores, even more so among patients with low health literacy. This is a substantive concern for fidelity of data gathered from PROMIS CAT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical implementation of the PROMIS CAT in orthopaedic populations will benefit from further research into health literacy to increase questionnaire completion and to ensure that patients understand the content of the questions they are answering, which will increase the internal validity of the outcome measure.

Lactic acid levels are associated with morbidity, length of stay, and total treatment costs in urban trauma patients with lower extremity long bone fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Lactic acid is well studied in the trauma population and is frequently used as a laboratory indicator that correlates with resuscitation status and has thus been associated with patient outcomes. There is limited literature that assesses the association of initial lactic acid with post-operative morbidity and hospitalization costs in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of lactic acid levels and alcohol levels post-operative morbidity, length of stay and admission costs in a cohort of operative lower extremity long bone fractures, and to compare these effects in the ballistic and blunt trauma sub-population. METHODS: Patients presenting as trauma activations who underwent tibial and/or femoral fixation at a single institution from May 2018 to August 2020 were divided based on initial lactate level into normal, (< 2.5) intermediate (2.5-4.0), and high (> 4.0). Mechanism of trauma (blunt vs. ballistic) was also stratified for analysis. Data on other injuries, surgical timing, level of care, direct hospitalization costs, length of stay, and discharge disposition were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome assessed was post-operative morbidity defined as in-hospital mortality or unanticipated escalation of care. Secondary outcomes included hospital costs, lengths of stay, and discharge disposition. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients met inclusions criteria. Average age was 34.1 ± 13.0 years old, with patients remaining hospitalized for 8.8 ± 9.5 days, and 35.2% requiring ICU care during their hospitalization. Patients in the ballistic cohort were younger, had fewer other injuries and had higher lactate levels (4.0 ± 2.4) than in the blunt trauma cohort (3.4 ± 1.9) (p = 0.004). On multivariate regression, higher lactate was associated with post-operative morbidity (p = 0.015), as was age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.033). ISS, ballistic versus blunt injury mechanism, and other included laboratory markers were not. Lactate was also associated with longer lengths of stay, and higher associated direct hospitalization cost (p < 0.001) and lower rates of home disposition (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: High initial lactate levels are independently associated with post-operative morbidity as well as higher direct hospitalization costs and longer lengths of stay in orthopedic trauma patients who underwent fixation for fractures of the lower extremity long bones. Ballistic trauma patients had significantly higher lactate levels compared to the blunt cohort, and lactate was not independently associated with increased rates of post-operative morbidity in the ballistic cohort alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Do preoperative glucose levels predict risk of complications in orthopaedic surgery?

PURPOSE: Post-operative hyperglycemia is a known risk factor for post-surgical complications. The predictive value of pre-operative blood glucose levels, however, is less understood. This study aimed to determine if pre-operative screening blood glucose levels affect the rate of post-operative infection or wound complications. We also investigated if case urgency or anatomic location alters this relationship. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate patients treated between 2018 and 2021. Subjects ≥ 18 years with closed, non-infected orthopaedic diagnoses requiring surgery were included. Case urgency, demographics, comorbidities, blood glucose level within twelve h prior to surgery, and hemoglobin A1c level within 3 months of surgery, were collected. Infections and wound complications were recorded as outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 775 subjects with a mean age of 61 (range 18-96) were identified, including 543 elective and 232 trauma patients, with a mean pre-operative fasting glucose value of 127.7 mg/dL (range, 49-388 mg/dL) and average HbA1c of 6.9%. The odds of infectious complications were increased by a factor of 1.01 for every 1-point increase in blood glucose (95% CI 1.01-1.02; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative blood glucose levels greater than 137 mg/dL were associated with an increase in wound complications, but not deep infections. Infection rates stratified by anatomic site and case urgency were not impacted by pre-operative glucose levels. The increased risk of poor wound healing in patients with pre-operative hyperglycemia demonstrates that day of surgery point-of-care blood glucose screening can be a useful risk stratification tool.

Is Hand Therapy Associated With a Delay in Surgical Treatment in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis?

PURPOSE: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) causes functional disability and an increased health care burden in the aging population. The role of therapy in thumb CMC OA has been minimally analyzed in the literature. We hypothesized that patients treated with therapy for thumb CMC OA would demonstrate reduced rates of surgery for this diagnosis. METHODS: We queried a national insurance dataset for all patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code for thumb CMC OA, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. A 2:1 propensity-matched cohort of patients with CMC OA who did not receive therapy versus a therapy cohort was created, with a minimum of two sessions of hand therapy for inclusion. The primary outcome was the rate of thumb CMC OA surgery occurring within 2 years of diagnosis; time to surgery and use of thumb CMC injections were secondary outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for undergoing surgical treatment. RESULTS: After matching, the therapy cohort comprised 14,548 patients, with a matched group of 28,930 patients who did not undergo therapy. In the overall sample, the rate of surgery within 2 years was 22.5%. Two-year surgical treatment rates were significantly higher for those who did not undergo therapy when compared with those who did (29.3% vs 13.1%). Patients treated with therapy had a significantly longer time to surgery, with no difference in the rate of surgery after one year. In multivariable regression of all included variables, lack of therapy intervention had the highest odds of surgery for thumb CMC OA (odds ratio 4.3). CONCLUSIONS: We present the findings of a large insurance database evaluating the association of therapy with rates of surgical treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. On average, those treated with therapy had longer times to surgery, and the 2-year surgery rates for patients diagnosed with thumb CMC arthritis were significantly higher in those who did not undergo therapy treatment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Salvage of Chronic Syndesmosis Instability: A Retrospective Review With Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Malreduced syndesmotic injuries lead to poor outcomes. No consensus exists regarding preferred surgical treatment. This study aims to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing distal tibiofibular arthrodesis or stabilization. Retrospective review identified patients undergoing distal tibiofibular arthrodesis or stabilization between 2003 and 2019. Surgical factors, revision surgeries, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score ankle-hindfoot scores were collected. Radiographs were independently evaluated by 4 surgeons. Seventy patients were included. Mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score scores (n = 33) improved from 48 ± 16 preoperatively to 85 ± 14 (p < .001) at a median follow-up of 31.1 months. Mean Kellgren scores (n = 47) increased from 2.1 ± 1 to 2.5 ± 1 (p < .001) and the mean medial clear space decreased from 3.2 mm ± 0.8 mm to 2.8 mm ± 0.8 mm (p <.001) with no differences between the arthrodesis and stabilization groups. Zero patients progressed to arthroplasty or fusion. Patients demonstrated significant functional improvement after distal tibiofibular arthrodesis and stabilization. Progression of arthritis, while statistically significant, was not clinically significant.

Effect of nailing technique on length of stay in isolated ballistic femoral shaft fractures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate length of stay, postoperative mobilization and discharge disposition following intramedullary nailing of ballistic femoral shaft fractures stratified by nailing technique. METHODS: All adult patients with isolated ballistic femoral shaft fractures between May 1, 2018, and September 1, 2021, were reviewed. The final cohort included 69 ballistic femur fractures in 69 patients. Of the 69 patients included, 29 were treated with retrograde nailing while 40 were treated with antegrade nailing. RESULTS: The average length of stay of patients treated with antegrade nailing was 2.55 days (SD 1.3 days) compared with 3.45 days (SD 2.3 days) for patients treated with retrograde nailing; this was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Median steps on POD1 for antegrade nailing were 20 and 8 for retrograde. There was no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the two cohorts. All patients were discharged home. CONCLUSION: The average length of stay for patients who underwent antegrade nailing was significantly shorter when compared with the retrograde nailing. Patients in the antegrade cohort mobilized further than the retrograde cohort in the immediate postoperative setting. We found no significant difference in VAS pain scores between the two cohorts.

A comparison of the incidence of concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in ballistic versus blunt femur fractures.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in ballistic femur fractures and compare this to similar non-ballistic blunt fractures. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single Level 1 trauma academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients treated for a ballistic or blunt femur fracture presenting to our institution between May 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020, were included. In all, 270 femur fractures were identified. We excluded 73, including 29 pediatric fractures and 44 geriatric peritrochanteric fractures. The final cohort included 197 femur fractures in 187 patients. Of the 197 femur fractures included, 68 were ballistic and 129 were blunt mechanism. RESULTS: Four ipsilateral femoral neck fractures were identified in the ballistic fracture cohort. There was no significant difference between ipsilateral femoral neck fractures associated with blunt femur fractures when compared with ballistic fractures, 7.7 versus 5.8%, respectively. We identified one occult femoral neck fracture that was associated with a ballistic 32-B3 femoral shaft fracture. The ipsilateral femoral neck fracture associated with the 32-B3 ballistic femoral shaft fracture was not identified on plain films (Fig. 3A, B) and review of CTA during initial trauma workup. Identification of this fracture intra-operatively changed the treatment plan from standard proximal locking to recon proximal locking for this case. Patients included in the blunt fracture cohort were more likely to be poly-trauma patients with a higher rate of associated fractures. CONCLUSIONS: We detected no difference in rate of associated femoral neck fracture between blunt and ballistic femur fractures. These fractures can be missed on initial evaluation, which may lead to a delayed diagnosis and alter treatment plans. The authors conclude that treating surgeons must remain vigilant with a high index of suspicion for occult femoral neck fractures in patients who suffer ballistic femoral shaft fractures. Low-energy ballistic injuries should not rule out the possibility of an occult femoral neck fracture.

Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fractures in the older population: timing of intervention may improve patient outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates complication rates following treatment modalities of THA for acetabular fractures in the older population. METHODS: A national insurance database was used to identify acetabular fracture patients of age > 50 who underwent THA treatment within two years of fracture. Four subgroups were identified: primary THA < 2 months after injury (acute THA), primary THA > 2 months after injury (delayed THA), simultaneous ORIF and THA, and conversion THA after ORIF (THA after ORIF). A 3:1 match was performed between these subgroups and patients undergoing THA for non-fracture causes. Patients were matched based on age, gender and the diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, obesity or tobacco use. Complication rates were compared, including hospital readmission, revision, infection and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: In total, 3807 patients met inclusion criteria and were matched with 11,421 controls. Compared to controls, acute THA and delayed THA patients had significantly increased rates of all complications (OR ranges 1.45 - 2.82, p < 0.001). Simultaneous ORIF and THA and THA after ORIF patients had significantly increased rates of revision, infection and DVT (OR ranges 1.76 - 3.96, p ranges < 0.001 - p = 0.031). Compared to delayed THA, acute THA patients had significantly higher rates of readmission (OR = 1.16, p = 0.021) and DVT (OR = 1.89, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior literature, THA after acetabular fracture is associated with higher complication rates than THA for non-fracture causes. Acute THA following acetabular fracture is also associated with higher rates of readmission and DVT than delayed THA.

Bilateral femur fractures are associated with concomitant femoral neck fracture.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of femoral neck fractures in patients who have sustained bilateral femur fractures compared to unilateral femur fractures. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients treated for a femur fracture between May 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 were included. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients sustained bilateral femur fractures (11%) and 166 sustained unilateral femur fractures. Fifteen associated ipsilateral femoral neck fractures were identified. Eight of the 15 (53%) associated femoral neck fractures were observed in patients who sustained bilateral femur fractures. Eight of the 21 patients with bilateral femur fractures, 42 fractures in total, had an associated ipsilateral femoral neck fracture (38% of patients; 19% of fractures, respectively), while only seven of the 166 patients (4%) with a unilateral femur fracture had an associated femoral neck fracture (p < 0.001). Of the 208 femur fractures, 19 (9%) were open fractures. Ten of the 21 patients with bilateral femur fractures, 42 fractures in total, were identified to have an open femur fracture (48% of patients, 24% of fractures), while only nine of the 166 (5%) unilateral femur fractures were open (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate an association between bilateral femur fractures, open femur fractures, and associated femoral neck fractures. Surgeons treating these injuries should maintain a high index of suspicion for associated ipsilateral proximal.

Isolated ballistic femoral condyle fractures: a case series of eighteen patients.

PURPOSE: Ballistic fractures of the femoral condyles are rare injuries with limited literature to help guide treatment. The purpose of this study is to report on the presentation, management, and outcomes for patients with isolated ballistic condylar fractures. METHODS: Eighteen patients between ages 16 and 65 with low-energy ballistic injuries isolated to the femoral condyles (OTA 33B) were included, 15 with CT imaging. Clinical records and imaging were reviewed, as well as treatment strategy. Fractures were classified by AO/OTA classification. Outcome and follow-up data were gathered at outpatient appointments and telephone calls. RESULTS: Of the 18 patients, 78% were treated operatively (61% with open reduction and internal fixation, 17% with removal of foreign body alone). There were two instances of traumatic vascular injury and no neurologic injuries. Furthermore, there were no identified infections. Only 58% of the patients had follow-up for more than 6 weeks with average KOOS Jr. Score of 50, and average VAS pain score of 5.2. CONCLUSIONS: Ballistic femoral condyle fractures are rare Orthopaedic injuries seen in relatively high frequency at our institution. Most (78%) were treated operatively and with few complications. These fractures are not easily classified according to common classification schemes and may benefit from more rigorous study to guide treatment and anticipate outcomes.

Gunshot-related lower extremity nerve injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of nerve injury associated with lower extremity ballistic trauma, the associated skeletal and soft tissue injuries, and the rate of neurologic recovery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical center. PATIENTS: This was an institutional review board approved retrospective cohort study of patients over 16 years of age presenting with ballistic-related traumatic injury to the lower extremities between May 2018 and May 2019. All patients identified with lower extremity ballistic trauma were included in this study. The rate of nerve palsy, associated skeletal injury, and operative fixation were recorded for each anatomic zone. Rates of associated concomitant vascular injury, fracture, and compartment syndrome were collected through a review of the electronic medical records. Chart review was performed to evaluate outcomes and nerve recovery. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (21 extremities, 21/148, 14%) were diagnosed by attending physicians, fellowship-trained in orthopedic trauma, as having ballistic-related nerve injuries. Seventy-three percent of patients with a documented neurologic injury (11/15) demonstrated complete nerve recovery as measured by the MRC and sensory scale assessment at most recent follow-up, while the rest demonstrated no improvement in their neurologic deficits from presentation. The rate of associated vascular injury in patients with lower extremity nerve palsies was 38% (8/21). While the rate of vascular injury in the absence of neurologic injury was 3% (4/127). CONCLUSIONS: This series of lower extremity nerve injuries in a large sample of urban lower extremity ballistic trauma noted a high rate of concomitant nerve injuries. An associated diagnosis of a vascular injury appears to portend a higher risk of neurologic injury. Treating surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for associated vascular injury in patients presenting with a ballistic lower extremity nerve palsy.

How do surgeons decide when to treat proximal humerus fractures with operative versus nonoperative management?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the underlying factors that drive the decision for surgeons to pursue operative versus nonoperative management for proximal humerus fractures (PHF) and if fellowship training had an impact on these decisions. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Society to assess differences in patient selection for operative versus nonoperative management of PHF. Descriptive statistics were reported for all respondents. RESULTS: A total of 250 fellowship trained Orthopaedic Surgeons responded to the online survey. A greater proportion of trauma surgeons preferred nonoperative management for displaced PHF fractures in patients over the age of 70. Operative management was preferred for older patients with fracture dislocations (98%), limited humeral head bone subchondral bone (78%), and intraarticular head split (79%). Similar proportions of trauma surgeons and shoulder surgeons cited that acquiring a CT was crucial to distinguish between operative and nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: We found that surgeons base their decisions on when to operate primarily on patient's comorbidities, age, and the amount of fracture displacement when treating younger patients. Further, we found a greater proportion of trauma surgeons elected to proceed with nonoperative management in patients older than the age of 70 years old as compared to shoulder surgeons.

Gunshot-Related Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

PURPOSE: Gunshot wounds can result in a spectrum of injuries to nerves, with little data to guide definitive treatment. We performed a retrospective evaluation of gunshot-related upper extremity injuries in an urban trauma center to analyze epidemiology, associated injuries, and short-term outcomes. We hypothesized that gunshot-related injuries would involve soft tissue cavitation, inducing axonotmesis and neuropraxia rather than neurotmesis injuries. METHODS: All patients over the age of 16 with upper extremity gunshot trauma from May 2018 to May 2019 were identified through the University of Chicago orthopaedic and general surgery trauma databases. Initial nerve injuries were identified by physical examination. Patient demographic data, soft tissue and skeletal injury, treatment modality, and return of function were collected. RESULTS: Ballistic injuries in 1302 patients were treated over 12 months. We identified 126 upper extremity gunshot injuries in 117 patients. Thirty-eight upper extremities (38 patients) had a documented nerve deficit (38/126, 30%) with a follow-up rate of 94% (34/36) at a mean of 351 days after injury (median, 202 days; range, 13-929 days). One patient had a subacute transradial amputation, and 1 patient was deceased at final follow-up. The presence of vascular injury and fracture increased the rate of neurologic injury after gunshot injuries. At the most recent follow-up, 68% (23/34) of patients with upper extremity injury had improvement in nerve function as measured by objective clinical assessment, with 24% (8/34) experiencing full recovery at an average of 368 days (median, 261 days; range, 41-929 days). CONCLUSIONS: Nerve injury after ballistic trauma to the upper extremity is common. Vascular injury and fractures were associated with a higher risk of nerve injury. Short-term improvement in nerve function was seen in over half the cohort, suggesting a predominance of neuropraxic effects. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Understanding postoperative rehabilitation preferences in operatively managed proximal humerus fractures: do trauma and shoulder surgeons differ?

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common, and their incidence is increasing as the population ages. Despite this, postoperative rehabilitation remains unstandardized and little is known about surgeon preferences. The aim of this study was to assess differences in postoperative rehabilitation preferences and patient education between orthopedic trauma and shoulder surgeons. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons to assess differences in postoperative rehabilitation preferences and patient counseling. Descriptive statistics were reported for all respondents, trauma surgeons, and shoulder surgeons. Chi-square and unpaired 2-sample t tests were used to compare responses. Multinomial regression was used to further elucidate the influence of fellowship training independent of confounding characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 293 surgeons completed the survey, including 172 shoulder and 78 trauma surgeons. A greater proportion of trauma surgeons preferred an immediate weightbearing status after arthroplasty compared to shoulder surgeons (45% vs. 19%, P = .003), but not after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (62% vs. 75%, P = .412). A greater proportion of shoulder surgeons preferred home exercise therapy taught by the physician or using a handout following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) (21% vs. 2%, P = .009). A greater proportion of trauma surgeons began passive range of motion (ROM) <2 weeks after 2-part fractures (70% vs. 41%, P < .001). Conversely, a greater proportion of shoulder surgeons began passive ROM between 2 and 6 weeks for 2-part (57% vs. 24%, P < .001) and 4-part fractures (65% vs. 43%, P = .020). On multinomial regression analysis, fellowship training in shoulder surgery was associated with preference for a nonweightbearing duration of >12 weeks vs. 6-12 weeks after ORIF. Similarly, fellowship training in shoulder surgery was associated with increased odds of preferring a nonweightbearing duration of <6 weeks vs. no restrictions and >12 weeks vs. 6-12 weeks after arthroplasty. Training in shoulder surgery was associated with greater odds of preferring a nonweightbearing duration prior to beginning passive ROM of 2-6 weeks vs. <2 weeks or >6 weeks for 2-part fractures, but not 4-part fractures. CONCLUSION: Trauma surgeons have a more aggressive approach to rehabilitation following operative PHF repair compared to shoulder surgeons regarding time to weightbearing status and passive ROM. Given the increasing incidence of PHFs and substantial variations in reported treatment outcomes, differences in rehabilitation after PHF treatment should be further evaluated to determine the role it may play in the outcomes of treatment studies.

Factors influencing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: do shoulder and trauma surgeons differ?

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty (HA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), or nonoperatively. Given the mixed results in the literature, the optimal treatment is unclear to surgeons. The purpose of this study was to survey orthopedic shoulder and trauma surgeons to identify the patient- and fracture-related characteristics that influence surgical decision-making. METHODS: We distributed a 23-question closed-response email survey to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Questions posed to respondents included demographics, surgical planning, indications for ORIF and arthroplasty, and the use of surgical augmentation with ORIF. Numerical and multiple-choice responses were compared between shoulder and trauma surgeons using unpaired t-tests and χ2 tests, respectively. RESULTS: Respondents included 172 shoulder and 78 trauma surgeons. When surgery is indicated, most shoulder and trauma surgeons treat 2-part (69%) and 3-part (53%) PHFs with ORIF. Indications for managing PHFs with arthroplasty instead of ORIF include an intra-articular fracture (82%), bone quality (76%), age (72%), and previous rotator cuff dysfunction (70%). In patients older than 50 years, 90% of respondents cited a head-split fracture as an indication for arthroplasty. Both shoulder and trauma surgeons preferred RSA for treating PHFs presenting with a head-split fracture in an elderly patient (94%), pre-existing rotator cuff tear (84%), and pre-existing glenohumeral arthritis with an intact cuff (75%). Similarly, both groups preferred ORIF for PHFs in young patients with a fracture dislocation (94%). In contrast, although most trauma surgeons preferred to manage PHFs in low functioning patients with a significantly displaced fracture or nonreconstructable injury nonoperatively (84% and 86%, respectively), shoulder surgeons preferred either RSA (44% and 46%, respectively) or nonoperative treatment (54% and 49%, respectively) (P < .001). Similarly, although trauma surgeons preferred to manage PHFs in young patients with a head-split fracture or limited humeral head subchondral bone with ORIF (98% and 87%, respectively), shoulder surgeons preferred either ORIF (54% and 62%, respectively) or HA (43% and 34%, respectively) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ORIF and HA are preferred for treating simple PHFs in young patients with good bone quality or fracture dislocations, whereas RSA and nonoperative management are preferred for complex fractures in elderly patients with poor bone quality, rotator cuff dysfunction, or osteoarthritis. The preferred management differed between shoulder and trauma surgeons for half of the common PHF presentations, highlighting the need for future research.

Cannabis use patterns among patients with upper extremity conditions at the time of legalization in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Recreational cannabis use was legalized in Canada in 2018. Cannabis use patterns and patient attitudes toward cannabis use, particularly in the context of these legal changes, are not well understood. Our aim was to evaluate baseline cannabis use patterns and attitudes at the time of legalization among patients with upper extremity conditions in Canada. METHODS: In 2018, we conducted a multicentre cross-sectional survey study of 1561 patients with upper extremity conditions at 7 surgical centres. Participants were asked whether they currently use cannabis. If yes, they were asked questions regarding usage patterns and perceptions of cannabis use, including likelihood of use, safety and comfort discussing it with their physician. RESULTS: In the 6 months after legalization, 790 (51%) participants felt that cannabis was safer than prescription narcotics, with 450 (29%) currently using cannabis. Reasons for cannabis use included pain (56%), stress (51%) and recreation (42%). Of the 1105 patients not using cannabis, 267 (24%) were more likely to consider it after legalization. Of the 450 cannabis users, 73 (16%) had been using it for less than 6 months, 206 (46%) stated they were more comfortable discussing cannabis with their physician after legalization and 195 (43%) were using cannabis more than 4 times per week. CONCLUSION: Many patients with upper extremity conditions were regularly using cannabis. Patients were more comfortable discussing cannabis with their physician than before legalization. Treating surgeons should be aware of these trends and expect to receive questions regarding cannabis use.

Tibial alignment following intramedullary nailing via three approaches.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of malalignment in patients undergoing IMN for tibial shaft fractures treated with the extra-articular lateral parapatellar, suprapatellar, and infrapatellar approaches. METHODS: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical centre. Quality of reduction was assessed using the following three parameters: (1) < 10°of angulation in orthogonal radiographic views (2) < 5 mm of displacement between the major fracture fragments (3) < 5 mm of gap between the major fracture fragments. A good reduction was one that met all 3 criteria, an acceptable reduction met 2 criteria, and a bad reduction met one or none of the criteria. All patients treated consecutively for tibial shaft fractures between June 1, 2019 and June 1, 2020 were identified. The final cohort included 57 tibia fractures in 56 patients. Of the 57 tibia fractures, 8 (14%) were proximal third, 32 (56%) were middle third, and 17 (30%) were distal third fractures. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in angulation, displacement, or gapping with respect to surgical approach utilized or location of fracture (proximal or distal tibia fractures) on one-way ANOVA. Quality of reduction was rated as "good" in 48 (84%) of the cases (19 supra, 13 infra, and 16 lateral). Nine reductions (16%) met only two of the three reduction quality criteria and were considered acceptable reductions. These included 2 suprapatellar (1 > 5 mm displacement, 1 > 5 mm gapping), 4 infrapatellar (4 > 5 mm displacement), and 3 lateral extra-articular parapatellar (2 > 5 mm displacement and 1 > 5 mm gapping). No reductions were determined to be bad according the Baumgaertner et al. criteria. There was no significant difference in the rate of combined fibula fractures or the rate of fibular fixation between the three cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, no significant difference was found in fracture reduction angulation, displacement, and gapping in patients treated with an IMN with respect to approach for diaphyseal or metadiaphyseal tibial shaft fractures.

Chronic Preoperative Opioids Are Associated With Revision After Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: We sought to clarify the relationship between chronic preoperative opioids and complications following rotator cuff repair. Specifically, we assessed revision, a definitive postoperative end point for surgical outcome. METHODS: This study used PearlDiver, a United States national insurance claims database. All patients undergoing rotator cuff repair from 2008 to 2018 were identified and stratified based on a minimum of 2 opioid prescriptions within the 6 months before surgery, with 1 prescription occurring within 0 to 3 months before surgery and a second prescription within 4 to 6 months before surgery. Univariate logistic regressions of risk factors were conducted, followed by multivariate analysis of comorbidities, including ongoing preoperative opioids, any preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescriptions, age, sex, diabetes, tobacco, and obesity. RESULTS: In total, 28,939 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were identified, of whom 10,695 had opioid prescriptions within both 0 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months before index rotator cuff repair, whereas 18,244 had no opioid prescriptions within the 6-month preoperative period. In total, 977 (3.4%) patients underwent revision within 6 months, which increased to 1311 (4.5%) within 1 year of the index procedure. In the multivariate analysis controlling for age, preoperative NSAID prescriptions, tobacco, diabetes, obesity, and sex, we observed a significant association between chronic preoperative opioid prescriptions and rotator cuff repair revision (6-month odds ratio 1.12; P = .021, 1-year odds ratio 1.43; P < .001) following index procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We report increased rates of revision within both 6 months and 1 year in patients with prolonged preoperative opioid prescriptions. The opioid cohort had greater rates of preoperative NSAID use and tobacco use, which also were observed to be independent risk factors for revision at both timepoints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Retrospective comparative study.

Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Other Than Aspirin Is Associated With Increased Risk for Procedural Intervention for Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare rates of procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) among patients who were not prescribed any pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis compared with patients who were prescribed aspirin and to patients who were prescribed other agents. METHODS: A search of a national insurance claims database was performed to identify all patients who underwent ACLR from 2007 to 2017 who were active within the database at a minimum of 6 months before and 18 months after their surgery. The primary outcome studied was a subsequent procedure for arthrofibrosis, manipulation under anesthesia, and lysis of adhesions (MUA/LOA). Patients who filled a prescription for aspirin, low-molecular weight heparin, direct factor Xa inhibitors, fondaparinux, and warfarin within 2 days after their surgery were included and those who filled a prescription within 3 months before surgery were excluded. Thromboprophylaxis status was defined as no thromboprophylaxis, aspirin, and any agent other than aspirin. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between prophylaxis status and MUA/LOA. RESULTS: Of the 14,081 patients in our final surgical population, 191 patients had MUA/LOA and 13,890 patients did not. In total, 499 patients were prescribed pharmacologic prophylaxis. Rates of MUA/LOA across groups were 1.3% in the group with no thromboprophylaxis, 1.9% in the group prescribed aspirin, and 4.3% in the group prescribed any agent other than aspirin. Only the group prescribed an agent other than aspirin was significantly associated with subsequent procedure for arthrofibrosis (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3-4.8, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were prescribed a pharmacologic agent other than aspirin had a 2.6 times greater likelihood of requiring a procedural intervention for arthrofibrosis following ACLR compared with patients who were not prescribed a thromboprophylaxis agent LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.