SEG: Segmentation Evaluation in absence of Ground truth labels.

Identifying individual cells or nuclei is often the first step in the analysis of multiplex tissue imaging (MTI) data. Recent efforts to produce plug-and-play, end-to-end MTI analysis tools such as MCMICRO1- though groundbreaking in their usability and extensibility - are often unable to provide users guidance regarding the most appropriate models for their segmentation task among an endless proliferation of novel segmentation methods. Unfortunately, evaluating segmentation results on a user's dataset without ground truth labels is either purely subjective or eventually amounts to the task of performing the original, time-intensive annotation. As a consequence, researchers rely on models pre-trained on other large datasets for their unique tasks. Here, we propose a methodological approach for evaluating MTI nuclei segmentation methods in absence of ground truth labels by scoring relatively to a larger ensemble of segmentations. To avoid potential sensitivity to collective bias from the ensemble approach, we refine the ensemble via weighted average across segmentation methods, which we derive from a systematic model ablation study. First, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept and the feasibility of the proposed approach to evaluate segmentation performance in a small dataset with ground truth annotation. To validate the ensemble and demonstrate the importance of our method-specific weighting, we compare the ensemble's detection and pixel-level predictions - derived without supervision - with the data's ground truth labels. Second, we apply the methodology to an unlabeled larger tissue microarray (TMA) dataset, which includes a diverse set of breast cancer phenotypes, and provides decision guidelines for the general user to more easily choose the most suitable segmentation methods for their own dataset by systematically evaluating the performance of individual segmentation approaches in the entire dataset.

Circulating Neoplastic-Immune Hybrid Cells Predict Metastatic Progression in Uveal Melanoma.

Background: Uveal melanoma is an aggressive cancer with high metastatic risk. Recently, we identified a circulating cancer cell population that co-expresses neoplastic and leukocyte antigens, termed circulating hybrid cells (CHCs). In other cancers, CHCs are more numerous and better predict oncologic outcomes compared to circulating tumor cells (CTCs). We sought to investigate the potential of CHCs as a prognostic biomarker in uveal melanoma. Methods: We isolated peripheral blood monocular cells from uveal melanoma patients at the time of primary treatment and used antibodies against leukocyte and melanoma markers to identify and enumerate CHCs and CTCs by immunocytochemistry. Results: Using a multi-marker approach to capture the heterogeneous disseminated tumor cell population, detection of CHCs was highly sensitive in uveal melanoma patients regardless of disease stage. CHCs were detected in 100% of stage I-III uveal melanoma patients (entire cohort, n = 68), whereas CTCs were detected in 58.8% of patients. CHCs were detected at levels statically higher than CTCs across all stages (p = 0.05). Moreover, CHC levels, but not CTCs, predicted 3 year progression-free survival (p < 0.03) and overall survival (p < 0.04). Conclusion: CHCs are a novel and promising prognostic biomarker in uveal melanoma.

Effects of agrochemical pollution on schistosomiasis transmission: a systematic review and modelling analysis.

BACKGROUND: Agrochemical pollution of surface waters is a growing global environmental challenge, especially in areas where agriculture is rapidly expanding and intensifying. Agrochemicals might affect schistosomiasis transmission through direct and indirect effects on Schistosoma parasites, their intermediate snail hosts, snail predators, and snail algal resources. We aimed to review and summarise the effects of these agrochemicals on schistosomiasis transmission dynamics. METHODS: We did a systematic review of agrochemical effects on the lifecycle of Schistosoma spp and fitted dose-response models to data regarding the association between components of the lifecycle and agrochemical concentrations. We incorporated these dose-response functions and environmentally relevant concentrations of agrochemicals into a mathematical model to estimate agrochemical effects on schistosomiasis transmission. Dose-response functions were used to estimate individual agrochemical effects on estimates of the agrochemically influenced basic reproduction number, R0, for Schistosoma haematobium. We incorporated time series of environmentally relevant agrochemical concentrations into the model and simulated mass drug administration control efforts in the presence of agrochemicals. FINDINGS: We derived 120 dose-response functions describing the effects of agrochemicals on schistosome lifecycle components. The median estimate of the basic reproduction number under agrochemical-free conditions, was 1·65 (IQR 1·47-1·79). Agrochemical effects on estimates of R0 for S haematobium ranged from a median three-times increase (R0 5·05, IQR 4·06-5·97) to transmission elimination (R0 0). Simulations of transmission dynamics subject to interacting annual mass drug administration and agrochemical pollution yielded a median estimate of 64·82 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost per 100 000 people per year (IQR 62·52-67·68) attributable to atrazine use. In areas where aquatic arthropod predators of intermediate host snails suppress transmission, the insecticides chlorpyrifos (6·82 DALYs lost per 100 000 people per year, IQR 4·13-8·69) and profenofos (103·06 DALYs lost per 100 000 people per year, IQR 89·63-104·90) might also increase the disability burden through their toxic effects on arthropods. INTERPRETATION: Expected environmental concentrations of agrochemicals alter schistosomiasis transmission through direct and indirect effects on intermediate host and parasite densities. As industrial agricultural practices expand in areas where schistosomiasis is endemic, strategies to prevent increases in transmission due to agrochemical pollution should be developed and pursued. FUNDING: National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health.