Development and Validation of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassay as a Highly Specific Tool for Determining Past Exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics) was developed to provide accurate, reliable detection of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, and agreement with a vesicular stomatitis virus-based pseudoneutralization assay for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay. Sensitivity and agreement between Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay and pseudoneutralization assay measurements were evaluated using samples from patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, a majority of whom were hospitalized. Specificity was evaluated using samples from routine diagnostic testing/blood donors collected before December 2019 and thus deemed negative for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using samples containing a wide range of potentially cross-reacting analytes, purchased from commercial vendors. For sensitivity and specificity, point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Agreement between the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay and the pseudoneutralization assay was calculated. The sensitivity of the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay in patients with prior PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was 99.5% (95% CI, 97.0 to 100.0%) at ≥14 days post-PCR confirmation. Overall specificity (n = 10,453) was 99.80% (95% CI, 99.69 to 99.88%). Only 4/792 samples containing potential cross-reacting analytes were reactive with the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay, resulting in an overall specificity in this cohort of 99.5% (95% CI, 98.6 to 99.9%). Positive, negative, and overall agreement (n = 46) between the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay and the pseudoneutralization assay were 86.4% (95% CI, 73.3 to 93.6%), 100% (95% CI, 34.2 to 100%), and 87.0% (95% CI, 74.3 to 93.9%), respectively. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay demonstrated high sensitivity (99.5% at ≥14 days post-PCR confirmation) and specificity (99.80%), supporting its use as a tool for identification of past SARS-CoV-2 infection, including use in populations with low disease prevalence.

In Search of the SARS-CoV-2 Protection Correlate: Head-to-Head Comparison of Two Quantitative S1 Assays in Pre-characterized Oligo-/Asymptomatic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative serological assays detecting response to SARS-CoV-2 are needed to quantify immunity. This study analyzed the performance and correlation of two quantitative anti-S1 assays in oligo-/asymptomatic individuals from a population-based cohort. METHODS: In total, 362 plasma samples (108 with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]-positive pharyngeal swabs, 111 negative controls, and 143 with positive serology without confirmation by RT-PCR) were tested with quantitative assays (Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 QuantiVac enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [EI-S1-IgG-quant]) and Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S [Ro-RBD-Ig-quant]), which were compared with each other and confirmatory tests, including wild-type virus micro-neutralization (NT) and GenScript®cPass™. Square roots R of coefficients of determination were calculated for continuous variables and non-parametric tests were used for paired comparisons. RESULTS: Quantitative anti-S1 serology correlated well with each other (true positives, 96%; true negatives, 97%). Antibody titers decreased over time (< 30 to > 240 days after initial positive RT-PCR). Agreement with GenScript-cPass was 96%/99% for true positives and true negatives, respectively, for Ro-RBD-Ig-quant and 93%/97% for EI-S1-IgG-quant. Ro-RBD-Ig-quant allowed distinct separation between positives and negatives, and less non-specific reactivity versus EI-S1-IgG-quant. Raw values (95% CI) ≥ 28.7 U/mL (22.6-36.4) for Ro-RBD-Ig-quant and ≥ 49.8 U/mL (43.4-57.1) for EI-S1-IgG-quant predicted NT > 1:5 in 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest both quantitative anti-S1 assays (EI-S1-IgG-quant and Ro-RBD-Ig-quant) may replace direct neutralization assays in quantitative measurement of immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 in certain circumstances. However, although the mean antibody titers for both assays tended to decrease over time, a higher proportion of Ro-RBD-Ig-quant values remained positive after 240 days.

In Search of the SARS-CoV-2 Protection Correlate: Head-to-Head Comparison of Two Quantitative S1 Assays in Pre-characterized Oligo-/Asymptomatic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative serological assays detecting response to SARS-CoV-2 are needed to quantify immunity. This study analyzed the performance and correlation of two quantitative anti-S1 assays in oligo-/asymptomatic individuals from a population-based cohort. METHODS: In total, 362 plasma samples (108 with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR]-positive pharyngeal swabs, 111 negative controls, and 143 with positive serology without confirmation by RT-PCR) were tested with quantitative assays (Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 QuantiVac enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [EI-S1-IgG-quant]) and Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S [Ro-RBD-Ig-quant]), which were compared with each other and confirmatory tests, including wild-type virus micro-neutralization (NT) and GenScript®cPass™. Square roots R of coefficients of determination were calculated for continuous variables and non-parametric tests were used for paired comparisons. RESULTS: Quantitative anti-S1 serology correlated well with each other (true positives, 96%; true negatives, 97%). Antibody titers decreased over time (< 30 to > 240 days after initial positive RT-PCR). Agreement with GenScript-cPass was 96%/99% for true positives and true negatives, respectively, for Ro-RBD-Ig-quant and 93%/97% for EI-S1-IgG-quant. Ro-RBD-Ig-quant allowed distinct separation between positives and negatives, and less non-specific reactivity versus EI-S1-IgG-quant. Raw values (95% CI) ≥ 28.7 U/mL (22.6-36.4) for Ro-RBD-Ig-quant and ≥ 49.8 U/mL (43.4-57.1) for EI-S1-IgG-quant predicted NT > 1:5 in 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest both quantitative anti-S1 assays (EI-S1-IgG-quant and Ro-RBD-Ig-quant) may replace direct neutralization assays in quantitative measurement of immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 in certain circumstances. However, although the mean antibody titers for both assays tended to decrease over time, a higher proportion of Ro-RBD-Ig-quant values remained positive after 240 days. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00475-x.

Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are an evolutionarily conserved family of cell membrane receptors that are part of the innate immunity system playing an important role as a first response to tissue injury. TLR2 and TLR4 are constitutively expressed on renal epithelium, and their expression is enhanced following renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Genetic deletion of either TLR2 or TLR4 protects from renal I/R injury. However, it is not known whether deletion of both combined protects the kidney more than a deletion of either one alone. Therefore, we performed renal I/R injury in mice lacking TLR2, TLR4, and TLR2/4, respectively. Our results demonstrate that there are no significant differences regarding protection from renal I/R injury in TLR2/4((-/-)) compared with either TLR2((-/-)) or TLR4((-/-)) gene-targeted mice as determined by histological evaluation and renal functional parameters. Furthermore, there was no difference in the number of apoptotic tubular cells and in nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kappaB) between the TLR-gene-targeted groups. In parallel, in vitro experiments did not demonstrate an additional effect of the double genetic deletion compared with the single gene deletion with respect to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-8 production in hypoxic isolated proximal tubular epithelial cells of the respective animals. In conclusion, a double genetic deletion of TLR2 and TLR4 confers a similar protection following renal I/R injury compared with single deletions of TLR2 and TLR4.

The serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 in hypoxic renal injury.

The serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (SGK1) is a serine threonine protein kinase activated through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) pathway and counteracting apoptosis. Protein expression and activation of SGK1 are increased in various models of cell stress. The present study explored the role of SGK1 in renal hypoxia/ischemia induced apoptosis. HEK 293 cells were exposed in vitro to hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R), which increased SGK1 transcript levels, SGK1 protein abundance and SGK1 phosphorylation. H/R injury further enhanced the percentage of apoptotic cells, an effect significantly blunted by prior SGK1 overexpression. In vivo renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury increased SGK1 transcript levels and SGK1 protein abundance. I/R enhanced apoptosis, an effect significantly more pronounced in gene targeted mice lacking SGK1. In conclusion, SGK1 is up-regulated and counteracts apoptosis following H/R in vitro and ischemia In vivo.

The A20 gene protects kidneys from ischaemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing pro-inflammatory activation.

Ischaemia followed by reperfusion (I/R) can induce inflammation and injury and is a risk factor for delayed graft function and rejection of transplanted kidneys. Inflammation is regulated by NF-kappaB transcription factors which induce pro-inflammatory molecules in endothelial cells (EC). We examined whether A20, a negative regulator of NF-kappaB, can protect kidneys from I/R injury. To mimic the fluctuations in endothelial oxygenation that occur during I/R we exposed cultured human umbilical vein EC (HUVEC) to hypoxia (1% O(2) for 4 h) followed by re-oxygenation (21% O(2) for 1 h-24 h). We observed transient expression of pro-inflammatory molecules (E-selectin, VCAM-1 and IL-8) and sustained expression of A20 in HUVEC exposed to hypoxia/re-oxygenation. The effect of A20 on endothelial responses to hypoxia/re-oxygenation was assessed. We observed that pre-treatment of HUVEC with an adenovirus containing A20 (Ad-A20) suppressed activation of NF-kappaB and induction of pro-inflammatory molecules by hypoxia/re-oxygenation, whereas a control adenovirus had little or no effect. Thus the induction of A20 may form a negative feedback loop in pro-inflammatory signalling in cells exposed to hypoxia/re-oxygenation. To validate our cell culture experiments we examined the role of A20 in renal responses to I/R. We observed that A20 was induced in rat kidneys exposed to I/R. Moreover, pre-treatment of animals with Ad-A20 significantly reduced acute tubular necrosis, renal expression of VCAM-1 and NF-kappaB activation in response to I/R, whereas pre-treatment with control adenovirus did not. Our observations suggest that A20 maintains physiological homeostasis in kidneys exposed to I/R by protecting them from inflammation and injury.

ICOS/B7RP-1 interference in mouse kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Activated T cells play a key role in allograft rejection. T cell activation requires signaling via the T cell receptor as well as costimulatory signals. Inducible costimulatory molecule (ICOS), with its ligand B7RP-1, is a recently discovered costimulatory molecule of the CD28 family. The role of this signaling pathway during the early phases of kidney allograft rejection is not clear so far. METHODS: Kidneys were orthotopically transplanted from BALB/c to C57BL/6 mice. Animals were assigned to five experimental groups: blocking anti-ICOS monoclonal antibody, ICOS fusion protein, anti-B7RP1 monoclonal antibody, B7RP-1 fusion protein, and control immunoglobulin G. RESULTS: Survival was significantly reduced in animals treated with ICOS monoclonal antibody (mAb) and B7RP-1 Fc as compared with controls. These animals had also a lower number of apoptotic graft infiltrating T cells, whereas the expression of intracellular interferon-gamma in CD3CD4 T cells was increased. Animals treated with ICOS Fc and B7RP-1 mAb had similar survival and numbers of apoptotic T cells as compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the blockade of ICOS with ICOS mAb or B7RP-1 Fc reduced the amount of apoptosis of infiltrating lymphocytes and resulted in continuous inflammatory processes with progressive tissue damage and graft failure.

The effect of FK778 on the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy in a rat model.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) still belongs to the leading causes of graft loss over the long term. The leflunomide derivative FK778 is a novel immunosuppressant with improved pharmacokinetic properties that effectively prolonged graft survival in several transplantation models. In the present study, we investigated the effects of FK778 at different phases after transplantation on the progression of CAN. METHODS: Fisher 344 kidneys were orthotopically transplanted into Lewis recipients. Recipients were treated with FK778 (5 mg/kg/day) over different time periods (early: days 0-10 only, continuous: day 0 to week 24, or late: weeks 16-24 only posttransplantation). Proteinuria was measured every 4 weeks, whereas grafts were harvested at 24 weeks posttransplantation for morphological and immunohistochemical analysis as well as transforming growth factor-beta and platelet derived growth factor-B chain expression. RESULTS: Continuous treatment with FK778 ameliorated the progression of CAN, whereas late treatment reduced proteinuria and resulted in a similar grade of CAN as compared to animals with continuous treatment. In contrast, FK778 given only during the early phase after transplantation had no effect on the progression of CAN as compared to controls. CONCLUSION: In summary, FK778 is a potent immunosuppressive drug that can delay the progression of CAN, even when given at later stages after transplantation.

Evaluation of a 5-Marker Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Setting.

PURPOSE: In initial studies that included colorectal cancer patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy, we had identified a serum marker combination able to detect colorectal cancer with similar diagnostic performance as fecal immunochemical test (FIT). In this study, we aimed to validate the results in participants of a large colorectal cancer screening study conducted in the average-risk, asymptomatic screening population. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We tested serum samples from 1,200 controls, 420 advanced adenoma patients, 4 carcinoma in situ patients, and 36 colorectal cancer patients with a 5-marker blood test [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)+anti-p53+osteopontin+seprase+ferritin]. The diagnostic performance of individual markers and marker combinations was assessed and compared with stool test results. RESULTS: AUCs for the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas with the 5-marker blood test were 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-0.87] and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53-0.59), respectively, which now is comparable with guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) but inferior to FIT. With cutoffs yielding specificities of 80%, 90%, and 95%, the sensitivities for the detection of colorectal cancer were 64%, 50%, and 42%, and early-stage cancers were detected as well as late-stage cancers. For osteopontin, seprase, and ferritin, the diagnostic performance in the screening setting was reduced compared with previous studies in diagnostic settings while CEA and anti-p53 showed similar diagnostic performance in both settings. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the 5-marker blood test under screening conditions is inferior to FIT even though it is still comparable with the performance of gFOBT. CEA and anti-p53 could contribute to the development of a multiple marker blood-based test for early detection of colorectal cancer.

Administration of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist ameliorates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Interleukin (IL)-1 is a major contributor to inflammation and apoptosis during ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Its deleterious effects are primarily mediated by the activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). Receptor-binding and signaling of IL-1 can be blocked by the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). The aim of our study was to characterize effects and mechanisms of IL-1ra administration on inflammation, apoptosis, and infiltration in renal I/R injury. Renal ischemia was induced in Lewis rats by clamping of the left renal artery for 45 min. Kidneys were removed for histological and molecular analysis 24 h or 5 days after reperfusion. IL-1ra ameliorated I/R induced renal injury and inflammation. Furthermore, the number of apoptotic tubular cells was lower in IL-1ra-treated animals 24 h after ischemia, which was paralleled by a Bax/Bcl-2 mRNA ratio towards anti-apoptotic effects. IL-1ra reduced the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNA at 24 h and 5 days and that of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression at 24 h in the ischemic reperfused kidneys. Our results indicate that IL-1ra treatment ameliorates renal I/R injury and this protective effect might be mediated by reduced induction of NF-kappaB mediated MCP-1, ICAM-1, and a decreased ratio between Bax and Bcl-2 mRNA expression.