Laboratory approach for vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia diagnosis in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare adverse effect characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis occurring after COVID-19 vaccination. VITT pathophysiology is not fully unravelled but shows similarities to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is characterized by the presence of antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex, which can activate platelets in an FcγRIIa-dependent manner, whereas IgG-antibodies directed against PF4 play an important role in VITT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We characterized all clinically suspected VITT cases in the Netherlands from a diagnostic perspective and hypothesized that patients who developed both thrombocytopenia and thrombosis display underlying mechanisms similar to those in HIT. We conducted an anti-PF4 ELISA and a functional PF4-induced platelet activation assay (PIPAA) with and without blocking the platelet-FcγRIIa and found positivity in both tests, suggesting VITT with mechanisms similar to those in VITT. RESULTS: We identified 65 patients with both thrombocytopenia and thrombosis among 275 clinically suspected VITT cases. Of these 65 patients, 14 (22%) tested positive for anti-PF4 and PF4-dependent platelet activation. The essential role of platelet-FcγRIIa in VITT with mechanisms similar to those in HIT was evident, as platelet activation was inhibited by an FcγRIIa-blocking antibody in all 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that only a small proportion of clinically suspected VITT patients with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis have anti-PF4-inducing, FcɣRIIa-dependent platelet activation, suggesting an HIT-like pathophysiology. This leaves the possibility for the presence of another type of pathophysiology ('non-HIT like') leading to VITT. More research on pathophysiology is warranted to improve the diagnostic algorithm and to identify novel therapeutic and preventive strategies.

Comparative analysis of thrombin generation platforms for patients with coagulation factor deficiencies: A comprehensive assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) assess the overall functionality of the hemostatic system and thereby provide a reflection of the hemostatic capacity of patients with disorders in this system. Currently, four (semi-)automated TGA platforms are available: the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram, Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay, ST Genesia and Ceveron s100. In this study, we compared their performance for detecting patients with congenital single coagulation factor deficiencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled patient samples, healthy control samples and normal pooled plasma were tested on all four platforms, using the available reagents that vary in tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations. The TGA parameters selected for analysis were peak height and thrombin potential. Results were normalized by using the calculated mean of healthy controls and a correction for between-run variation. Outcomes were presented as relative values, with the mean of healthy controls standardized to 100 %. RESULTS: Across all platforms and reagents used, thrombin potentials and peak heights of samples with coagulation factor deficiencies were lower than those of healthy controls. Reagents designed for bleeding tendencies yielded the lowest values on all platforms (relative median peak height 19-32 %, relative median thrombin potential 19-45 %). Samples representing more severe coagulation factor deficiencies generally exhibited lower relative peak heights and thrombin potentials. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombin generation assays prove effective in differentiating single coagulation factor deficient samples from healthy controls, with modest discrepancies observed between the platforms. Reagents designed for assessing bleeding tendencies, featuring the lowest tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations, emerged as the most suitable option for detecting coagulation factor deficiencies.

Antibodies against Platelet Glycoproteins in Clinically Suspected VITT Patients.

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but severe complication following COVID-19 vaccination, marked by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Analogous to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), VITT shares similarities in anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG-mediated platelet activation via the FcγRIIa. To investigate the involvement of platelet-antibodies in VITT, we analyzed the presence of platelet-antibodies directed against glycoproteins (GP)IIb/IIIa, GPV and GPIb/IX in the serum of 232 clinically suspected VITT patients determined based on (suspicion of) occurrence of thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis in relation to COVID-19 vaccination. We found that 19% of clinically suspected VITT patients tested positive for anti-platelet GPs: 39%, 32% and 86% patients tested positive for GPIIb/IIIa, GPV and GPIb/IX, respectively. No HIT-like VITT patients (with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis) tested positive for platelet-antibodies. Therefore, it seems unlikely that platelet-antibodies play a role in HIT-like anti-PF4-mediated VITT. Platelet-antibodies were predominantly associated with the occurrence of thrombocytopenia. We found no association between the type of vaccination (adenoviral vector vaccine versus mRNA vaccine) or different vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, BTN162b2) and the development of platelet-antibodies. It is essential to conduct more research on the pathophysiology of VITT, to improve diagnostic approaches and identify preventive and therapeutic strategies.