Importance of infarct-related artery patency for recovery of left ventricular function and late survival after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of late infarct-related artery patency for recovery of left ventricular function and late survival after primary angio-plasty for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Infarct-related artery patency is thought to improve late survival by its effect on preservation of left ventricular function. Patency may also enhance late survival by preventing left ventricular dilation and reducing arrhythmias, independent of myocardial salvage. However, most studies have not shown patency to be an independent predictor of survival when late left ventricular function is taken into account. METHODS: We followed up 576 hospital survivors of acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty for 5.3 years. Ejection fraction and infarct-related artery patency were determined at follow-up catheterization at 6 months. Predictors of late cardiac survival were determined using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Patients with patent arteries had more improvement and a better late ejection fraction than patients with occluded arteries (56.3% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.001). In patients with acute ejection fraction < 45%, late survival was better in those with patent versus occluded arteries (89% vs. 44%, p = 0.003), but patency was not a significant predictor after improvement in ejection fraction was taken into account. In patients with a large anterior infarction, patency was a significant independent predictor of late survival. CONCLUSIONS: Infarct-related artery patency is important for recovery of left ventricular function, and in patients with acute ejection fraction < 45%, patency is important for late survival. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that the survival benefit is due primarily to the effect of patency on recovery of left ventricular function. In patients with a large anterior infarction, patency appears to provide an additional late survival benefit independent of myocardial salvage. These observations support the need for additional clinical trials of late reperfusion in patients with a large anterior infarction.

Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of time to reperfusion for outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Survival benefit of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is strongly dependent on time to treatment. Recent observations suggest that time to treatment may be less important for survival with primary angioplasty. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=1,352) with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty were followed for up to 13 years. Paired acute and follow-up ejection fraction data were obtained at cardiac catheterization in 606 patients. RESULTS: Reperfusion was achieved within 2 h in 164 patients (12%). Thirty-day mortality was lowest with early reperfusion (4.3% at <2 h vs. 9.2% at > or = 2 h, p=0.04) and was relatively independent of time to reperfusion after 2 h (9.0% at 2 to 4 h, 9.3% at 4 to 6 h, 9.5% at >6 h). Thirty-day-plus late cardiac mortality was also lowest with early reperfusion (9.1% at <2 h vs. 16.3% at > or = 2 h, p=0.02) and relatively independent at time to reperfusion after 2 h (16.4% at 2 to 4 h, 16.9% at 4 to 6 h, 15.6% at >6 h). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was greatest in the early reperfusion group and relatively modest after 2 h (6.9% at <2 h vs. 3.1% at > or =2 h, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Time to reperfusion, up to 2 h, is important for survival and recovery of left ventricular function. After 2 h, recovery of left ventricular function is modest and survival is relatively independent of time to reperfusion. These data suggest that factors other than myocardial salvage may be responsible for survival benefit in patients treated with primary angioplasty after 2 h.

Emergency coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Results from a community hospital.

Emergency coronary angioplasty was performed in 127 patients presenting to a community hospital with acute myocardial infarction. Reperfusion and successful dilatation were performed in 117 patients (92%) at 3.3 +/- 1.8 hours from the onset of pain. Eleven patients (8.6%) died, ten patients (7.9%) developed reocclusion, and ten patients (7.9%) required coronary bypass surgery during the initial hospitalization. Late restenosis occurred in 36% (27/76) of patients restudied or 27% (27/100) of patients at risk for restenosis. Ejection fraction improved in patients with patent vs occluded vessels (8.4% +/- 8.2% vs -4.1% +/- 6.0%) and improved most in anterior vs inferior vs posterolateral infarcts (11.0% +/- 8.4% vs 6.8% +/- 6.4% vs 2.6% +/- 7.5%). Posthospitalization follow-up in all patients (mean, 13.4 months) revealed only one late death. Of the patients followed up, 83% had no angina, and 17% of patients had mild angina. Our experience demonstrates that coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction can be performed in the community hospital by an experienced cardiovascular laboratory team with a high success rate, a low reocclusion rate, an improvement in ejection fraction, and an excellent long-term prognosis. The community hospital setting allows early access to patients and creates the potential for early reperfusion and myocardial salvage.

Benefit of coronary reperfusion before intervention on outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has become the preferred reperfusion strategy for acute myocardial infarction in most institutions with interventional facilities and experienced operators. The benefit of establishing coronary reperfusion, with or without pharmacologic therapy, before primary angioplasty has not been established. Consecutive patients (n = 1,490) with acute myocardial infarction treated with aspirin and heparin followed by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were followed for 13 years. Follow-up angiography was obtained in 737 patients at 7.7 months. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 to 3 flow in the infarct artery at initial angiography was present in 18.3% of patients, and TIMI 0 to 1 flow in 81.7% of patients. Baseline variables were similar between the 2 groups, except patients with initial TIMI 2 to 3 flow had significantly less cardiogenic shock (1.7% vs 9.4%, p <0.0001) and a lower incidence of depressed ejection fraction <40% (12.6% vs 19.9%, p = 0.007). Procedural success was better in patients with initial TIMI 2 to 3 flow (97.4% vs 93.8%, p = 0.02), and catheterization laboratory events were less frequent. Patients with initial TIMI 2 to 3 flow had lower peak creatine kinase values (1,328 vs 2,790 IU/L, p <0.0001), higher acute ejection fraction (54.3% vs 51.6%, p = 0.05), higher late ejection fraction (59.2% vs 54.9%, p = 0.004), and lower 30-day mortality (4.8% vs 8.9%, p = 0.02). These data indicate that when reperfusion occurs before primary angioplasty, outcomes are strikingly better with less cardiogenic shock, improved procedural outcomes, smaller infarct size, better preservation of left ventricular function, and reduced mortality. This should encourage new strategies to establish reperfusion before "primary" angioplasty with "catheterization laboratory friendly" platelet inhibitors and/or low-dose thrombolytic drugs.

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The benefit of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction in high-risk patients has not been well documented. Consecutive patients (n = 1,490) with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary PTCA from 1984 to 1997 were prospectively enrolled in an ongoing registry. Catheterization laboratory events occurred during or after intervention in 88 patients (5.9%), including ventricular fibrillation in 59 patients (4.0%), cardiopulmonary arrest in 46 patients (3.1%), and prolonged hypotension in 33 patients (2.2%). Cardiogenic shock was the strongest predictor of catheterization laboratory events (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.58 to 3.02) followed by low ejection fraction (<30%) (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.15) and congestive heart failure (CHF) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.07). IABC used before intervention was associated with fewer catheterization laboratory events in patients with cardiogenic shock (n = 1 19) (14.5% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.009), in patients with CHF or low ejection fraction (n = 119) (0% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.10), and in all high-risk patients combined (n = 238) (1 1.5% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.05). IABC was a significant independent predictor of freedom from catheterization laboratory events (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.79). These data support the use of IABC before primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction in all patients with cardiogenic shock, and suggest that prophylactic IABC may also be beneficial in patients with CHF or depressed left ventricular function.

Benefit of late coronary reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction and persistent ischemic chest pain.

The benefit of thrombolytic therapy given late after the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been controversial because of low reperfusion rates and limited myocardial salvage. Persistent chest pain has been used as a criteria for late intervention, but there is little documentation to validate this practice. Clinical outcomes and myocardial salvage were evaluated in 74 patients with AMI and persistent chest pain who underwent late reperfusion (> 6 hours) with direct coronary angioplasty, and these were compared with outcomes in 460 patients with early reperfusion (< or = 6 hours). Patients with late reperfusion had a high infarct artery patency rate (96%), a low hospital mortality rate (5.4%), and a low incidence of reinfarction (1.4%) and recurrent ischemia that were similar to patients with early reperfusion. Patients with late reperfusion had surprisingly good recovery of left ventricular function with improvement in ejection fraction from 50% to 60% at follow-up angiography. Patients with late reperfusion had a greater incidence of collateral flow (45% vs 22%, p < 0.001) and a lower value of peak creatine kinase (1,357 vs 2,057 U/liter, p < 0.001) than patients with early reperfusion. This study emphasizes the importance of persistent chest pain as a marker of continued myocardial viability in patients who present late after AMI. These data suggest that the probable mechanism of continued viability is preserved flow to the infarct zone. Patients with AMI and persistent chest pain may benefit from reperfusion therapy beyond 6 to 12 hours.

Outcomes of direct coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in candidates and non-candidates for thrombolytic therapy.

Coronary angioplasty without prior thrombolytic therapy was performed in 383 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they were candidates or non-candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Patients were not considered thrombolytic candidates if they: (1) presented in cardiogenic shock, (2) were greater than or equal to 75 years of age, (3) had had coronary artery bypass surgery or, (4) had a reperfusion time of greater than 6 hours. Thrombolytic and nonthrombolytic candidates had similar rates of reperfusion (92 vs 88%), nonfatal reinfarction (6.0 vs 5.9%) and recurrent myocardial ischemia (1.8 vs 0%). Thrombolytic candidates had a lower mortality rate (3.9 vs 24%, p less than 0.0001) and a lower incidence of bleeding (4.6 vs 10.9%, p less than 0.05). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up angiography was 4.4% in thrombolytic and 10.5% in nonthrombolytic candidates (p less than 0.002). Ejection fraction improved most in patients with anterior wall AMI (7.7% in thrombolytic candidates, 15.1% in nonthrombolytic candidates) and in patients with reperfusion times greater than 6 hours (14.2%). These outcomes suggest that direct coronary angioplasty is a viable alternative method of reperfusion in patients with AMI who are candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Nonthrombolytic candidates are a high-risk group of patients. Direct coronary angioplasty may be beneficial in certain subgroups, especially for patients in cardiogenic shock and for patients presenting greater than 6 hours after the onset of chest pain with evidence of ongoing ischemia.

Timing and mechanism of death determined clinically after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

We reviewed the timing and mechanism of death in 1,184 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary angioplasty from 1984 to 1995. Of 98 deaths, 48 (49%) occurred early on day 0 or 1. The mechanisms of death were pump failure in 60 patients (61%), reinfarction in 7 patients (7.1%), left ventricular rupture in 5 patients (5.1%), arrhythmia in 3 patients (3.1%), other cardiac causes in 5 patients (5.1%), stroke in 6 patients (6.1%), anoxic encephalopathy in 7 patients (7.1%), and procedure-related deaths in 5 patients (5.1%). The strongest predictors of mortality were cardiogenic shock and unsuccessful reperfusion. Our data indicate that mortality after primary angioplasty, like thrombolytic therapy, is highest in the early hours and is usually due to pump failure. In contrast to thrombolytic therapy, the incidence of death from myocardial rupture and bleeding complications is low. Future treatment strategies will need to focus on the large number of patients with early death due to pump failure, especially patients with cardiogenic shock.

Quantitative exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy for predicting angina recurrence after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

The aim of this prospective study was to determine the value of quantitative exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy for predicting short-term outcome in patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Quantitative exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy was performed 2.2 +/- 1.2 weeks after successful PTCA in 68 asymptomatic patients, 64 (94%) of whom had class III or IV angina before the procedure. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at a mean of 10 +/- 2 months and all were followed for at least 6 months; 45 patients (66%) remained asymptomatic during follow-up and 23 (34%) developed recurrent class III or IV angina at a mean of 2.6 +/- 1.2 months. Multivariate analysis of 22 clinical, angiographic and exercise test variables revealed that thallium-201 redistribution, any thallium scan abnormality, presence of a distal stenosis and treadmill time were the only significant predictors of recurrent angina after PTCA. Using a stepwise discriminant function model, thallium-201 redistribution was the only significant independent predictor. Despite its prognostic value relative to other variables as a predictor, thallium redistribution at 2 weeks after PTCA was only detected in 9 of the 23 patients (39%) who subsequently developed recurrent angina, although only 2 of the 45 patients (9%) who remained asymptomatic during follow-up demonstrated thallium-201 redistribution at the time of early testing. After repeat angiography was performed in 17 of the 23 patients with recurrent angina, 14 (82%) demonstrated restenosis and 3 (18%) had worse narrowing distal to or remote from the site of dilatation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Importance of a patent infarct-related artery for hospital and late survival after direct coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

The importance of a patent infarct-related artery (IRA) for hospital and late survival was examined in 383 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct coronary angioplasty. At hospital discharge, 317 of 348 patients (91%) had a patent IRA and mean follow-up left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was 58%. Cardiac survival after hospital discharge at 1, 3 and 6 years was 99, 95 and 90%. Patency of the IRA was the most important determinant of hospital mortality: patent versus occluded IRA, 5 vs 39% mortality, p less than 0.001. Follow-up LVEF was the most important determinant of late cardiac mortality: follow-up LVEF greater than or equal to 45 versus less than 45%, 2 versus 24% mortality, p less than 0.001. Patency of the IRA was not a significant predictor of late cardiac mortality in the group as a whole: patent versus occluded IRA, 4.7 versus 6.5% mortality, p = 0.67. In the subgroup of patients with depressed initial LVEF less than 45%, patency was a significant predictor of late cardiac mortality: patent versus occluded IRA, 9.2 versus 40% mortality, p = 0.03. Patients with a patent IRA had better recovery of LV function than patients with an occluded IRA (follow-up LVEF 58.5 versus 47.6%, p less than 0.001). When late cardiac mortality was adjusted for differences in follow-up LVEF, patency was no longer a significant predictor of late mortality. Our results indicate patency of the IRA is the most important determinant of hospital survival, and LV function (measured after recovery) is the most important determinant of late cardiac survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Importance of time to reperfusion on outcomes with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (results from the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial).

The mortality benefit of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is strongly dependent on time to treatment. Recent observations suggest that time to treatment may be less important with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients with AMI of <12 hours duration, without cardiogenic shock, who were treated with primary PTCA from the Stent PAMI Trial (n = 1,232) were evaluated to assess the effect of time to reperfusion on outcomes. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow was achieved in a high proportion of patients regardless of time to treatment. Improvement in ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months was substantial with reperfusion at <2 hours but was modest and relatively independent of time to reperfusion after 2 hours (<2 hours, 12.3% vs > or =2 hours, 4.2%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in 1- or 6-month mortality by time to reperfusion (6-month mortality: <2 hours [5.5%], 2 to <4 hours [4.6%], 4 to <6 hours [4.5%], >6 hours [4.2%], p = 0.97). There were also no differences in other clinical outcomes by time to reperfusion, except that reinfarction and infarct artery reocclusion at 6 months were more frequent with later reperfusion. The lack of correlation between time to treatment and mortality in patients without cardiogenic shock suggests that the survival benefit of primary PTCA may be related principally to factors other than myocardial salvage. These data may also have implications regarding the triage of patients with AMI for primary PTCA.

Influence of vessel size on early and late outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Small vessel size is associated with worse outcomes after elective angioplasty, but the effect of vessel size on outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction has not been studied. We evaluated outcomes in 1,490 consecutive patients treated with primary angioplasty comparing patients with small (< 3.0 mm) versus large ( 3.0 mm) vessels. Outcomes were worse in patients with small vessels with lower procedural success rates (92% versus 96%; p = 0. 002), higher rates of reinfarction (5.5% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.07), more late reocclusion (12.5% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.002), less improvement in ejection fraction (1.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.04), lower follow-up ejection fraction (53.7% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.03), and higher 30-day and late mortality (12.5% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.0002). The higher mortality can be explained by a higher baseline risk profile combined with worse procedural results and higher rates of reocclusion and reinfarction. These data stress the importance of developing new strategies to improve procedural and late outcomes after primary angioplasty in patients with small vessels.

Preoperative left ventricular wall stress, ejection fraction, and aortic valve gradient as prognostic indicators in aortic valve stenosis.

Patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may dramatically improve after aortic valve replacement, but operative risk is high. In an earlier study, all patients with low preoperative wall stress and low ejection fraction, or with low aortic valve gradient, died or had persistent heart failure after operation. Because wall stress is difficult to calculate, we reassessed its effect and the effect of other preoperative characteristics on outcome in 66 consecutive catheterization patients with predominant aortic stenosis referred for valve replacement. Despite ejection fraction that was inordinately low compared with afterloading wall stress in nine patients, seven patients improved with surgery. All three patients with ejection fraction less than 20% improved after surgery. Two of three patients with mean aortic valve gradients of less than 30 mm Hg improved. Mortality was 33% in patients with mean gradient less than 30 mm Hg and 19% with mean gradient less than 50 mm Hg. In the 54 patients with calculated aortic valve areas of less than or equal to 0.8 cm2, 1 (2%) had continuing heart failure, while 6 of 12 (50%, P less than .01) patients with aortic valve areas of 0.9-1.2 cm2 had continued symptoms of or died of heart failure. Patients who died or failed to improve after operation were older (71 +/- 9 years) than those who improved (65 +/- 9 years, P = .02). We conclude that wall stress calculations do not predict which patients with aortic stenosis will benefit from aortic valve replacement and that poor left ventricular function and low mean aortic valve gradient do not absolutely preclude operation. On the other hand, low gradient, non-critical valve area, and advanced age are all relative contraindications to aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis.

Factors that predict improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Acute and follow-up angiograms were analyzed in 75 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with emergency coronary angioplasty to determine factors that might predict improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction. Ejection fraction improved 8.4 +/- 8.2% in 60 patients who maintained patent infarct vessels at follow-up angiography, compared with -4.1 +/- 6.0% in 15 patients who developed reocclusion (p less than .001). In patients with patent infarct vessels, univariate analysis revealed the following significant predictors of improvement in ejection fraction: initial ejection fraction (r = -.38, p less than .003) subtotal vs total stenosis (12.9 +/- 9.3% vs 6.9 +/- 7.3%, p less than .02), infarct vessel (left anterior descending 11.0 +/- 8.4%, right 6.8 +/- 6.4%, circumflex 2.6 +/- 7.5%, p less than .02), and time to follow-up study (less than or equal to 15 days vs greater than 15 days) (4.8 +/- 5.8% vs 9.8 +/- 8.6%, p less than .03). Reperfusion time (less than or equal to 2 hr vs greater than 2 hr) predicted improvement when subtotal stenoses and stuttering infarctions were excluded (10.6 +/- 7.0% vs 4.9 +/- 6.9, p less than .03). Multivariate analysis showed initial ejection fraction and subtotal vs total stenosis to be independent predictors. Patients with anterior infarctions, low initial ejection fractions, and subtotal stenoses or reperfusion times less than or equal to 2 hr are likely to benefit most from coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Heart disease is a major cause of illness and death in women. To understand better the role of estrogen in the treatment and prevention of heart disease, more information is needed about its effects on coronary atherosclerosis and the extent to which concomitant progestin therapy may modify these effects. METHODS: We randomly assigned a total of 309 women with angiographically verified coronary disease to receive 0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen per day, 0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day, or placebo. The women were followed for a mean (+/-SD) of 3.2+/-0.6 years. Base-line and follow-up coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS: Estrogen and estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate produced significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (9.4 percent and 16.5 percent, respectively) and significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (18.8 percent and 14.2 percent, respectively); however, neither treatment altered the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. After adjustment for measurements at base line, the mean (+/-SE) minimal coronary-artery diameters at follow-up were 1.87+/-0.02 mm, 1.84+/-0.02 mm, and 1.87+/-0.02 mm in women assigned to estrogen, estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, and placebo, respectively. The differences between the values for the two active-treatment groups and the value for the placebo group were not significant. Analyses of several secondary angiographic outcomes and subgroups of women produced similar results. The rates of clinical cardiovascular events were also similar among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neither estrogen alone nor estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate affected the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in women with established disease. These results suggest that such women should not use estrogen replacement with an expectation of cardiovascular benefit.