RESUMO
Many countries project that they will have difficulty to meet their demand for primary care based on an inadequate supply of primary care doctors. There are many reasons for this, and they tend to vary by country. The policy options available to these countries are to increase the number of local primary care doctors, recruit doctors from other countries, ration primary care, shift more primary care to specialists, or authorize other disciplines to provide primary care. This article examines lessons learned in the United States over the past 50 years and proposes that expanding the use of nurse practitioners is the best solution when measured by feasibility, costs, ethics, and scope of the care delivered. Using nurse practitioners trained in country meets the World Health Organization global code of practice regarding the international recruitment of health personnel.
Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Profissionais de Enfermagem/tendências , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Profissionais de Enfermagem/provisão & distribuição , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Estados UnidosRESUMO
ABSTRACT: In this commentary, we describe current policy trends and their implications for the health of populations in the Southern and rural United States. We outline policy changes that threaten the prevention, care, and treatment of people at risk for HIV or with HIV and sociopolitical factors contributing to these policy trends. We also issue a call-to-action for individuals with Southern and rural US policy expertise and lived or living experience to collaboratively engage on a systematic policy analysis to thoroughly document relevant policies and deepen our understanding of the influences behind these policies. Finally, we provide examples of individual, community, and national level resiliency and courage-strategies that inspire advocacy and hope in the face of policy setbacks.
Assuntos
Epidemias , Infecções por HIV , Política de Saúde , População Rural , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Resiliência PsicológicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in pregnancy traditionally included two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus 1 protease inhibitor (PI). Recently, integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) have been approved for use in pregnancy. We sought to compare the rate of undetectable VL near delivery in pregnant HIV-infected women receiving INSTI-based versus PI-based cART. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study (January 2010-March 2017) of pregnant HIV-infected pregnancies receiving care in a single obstetric infectious disease clinic. Included pregnancies (total = 171; INSTI - group = 111, PI - group = 60) had at least 2 VL (before and after intervention) during pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of undetectable VL near delivery. RESULTS: We found comparable rates of undetectable HIV VL near delivery in pregnancies treated with INSTI-cART (74/111, 66.7%) compared to PI-cART (34/60, 56.7%; [adjusted p = .116, RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.92-2.59]). Compared to the PI-group, pregnancies in the INSTI-group showed lower median HIV VL near delivery (20 versus 50 copies/mL; adjusted p = .0454) and greater VL reduction (adjusted p = .0185). There were 3/171 (1.75%) infants diagnosed with HIV, 1 in the INSTI-group and 2 in the PI-group (p = .5635, RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.10-2.53). CONCLUSION: Pregnant HIV-infected women receiving either INSTI- or PI-based cART achieved comparable rates of undetectable HIV VL near delivery with similar perinatal transmission.