C-reactive Protein Levels and Cardiovascular Outcomes After Febuxostat Treatment in Patients with Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: Post-hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: Inflammation plays an important role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, leading to poor clinical outcomes. Hyperuricemia is associated with the activation of the Nod-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome. Here, we investigated whether inhibition of inflammation using febuxostat lowered the risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the randomized trial, Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy (FREED). In total, 1067 patients (736 men and 331 women) were included in the analysis. We compared the serial changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels between febuxostat and non-febuxostat groups and assessed the correlation between the changes in uric acid (UA) and hs-CRP levels after febuxostat treatment. We also determined whether febuxostat could reduce a hard endpoint, defined as a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Serum UA levels in the febuxostat group were significantly lower than those in the non-febuxostat group after randomization (p < 0.05). However, hs-CRP levels were comparable between the two groups during the study. No significant correlation was observed between the changes in UA and hs-CRP levels after febuxostat treatment. The hard endpoints did not differ significantly between the two groups. In patients with baseline hs-CRP levels > 0.2 mg/dL or those administered 40 mg of febuxostat, the drug did not reduce hs-CRP levels or decrease the hard endpoint. CONCLUSION: Febuxostat reduced the UA levels but did not affect the CRP levels, and therefore may fail to improve cardiovascular outcomes after treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT01984749). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01984749.

Optimal uric acid levels by febuxostat treatment and cerebral, cardiorenovascular risks: post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Hyperuricaemia is recognized as an independent risk marker for cardiovascular and renal diseases. However, uric acid is a powerful free-radical scavenger, and the optimal level of serum uric acid (SUA) determining outcomes is unknown. This study explored whether interventional treatments for excessive SUA reduction were harmful and what constituted the optimal lowering of SUA levels for the prevention of events in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial (Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy [FREED]) in which 1070 older patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia were enrolled and allocated to febuxostat (n = 537) or non-febuxostat treatment group (n = 533). We assessed the relationship between the endpoint (withdrawal or study completion) SUA levels and clinical outcomes. Primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cerebral and cardiorenovascular events. RESULTS: In the febuxostat group, patients achieving SUA levels ≤4 mg/dl (hazard ratio: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.05, 3.87]), >4 to ≤5 mg/dl (2.12 [1.07, 4.20], >6 to ≤7 mg/dl (2.42 [1.05, 5.60]), and >7 mg/dl (4.73 [2.13, 10.5]) had significantly higher risks for a primary composite event than those achieving SUA levels >5 to ≤6 mg/dl (P = 0.003 [log-rank test]). This J-shaped relationship applied to patients with renal impairment (P = 0.007 [Gray's test]) and was not significant in the non-febuxostat treatment group (P = 0.212 [log-rank test]). CONCLUSION: Optimal SUA level by febuxostat treatment is 5-6 mg/dl for reducing all-cause mortality, cerebral, cardiovascular and renal events. Excessive SUA reduction may be harmful in older hyperuricaemic populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01984749.

Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy.

AIMS: To compare the occurrence of cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events in patients with hyperuricaemia treated with febuxostat and those treated with conventional therapy with lifestyle modification. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre, prospective, randomized open-label, blinded endpoint study was done in 141 hospitals in Japan. A total of 1070 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. Elderly patients with hyperuricaemia (serum uric acid >7.0 to ≤9.0 mg/dL) at risk for cerebral, cardiovascular, or renal disease, defined by the presence of hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, renal disease, or history of cerebral or cardiovascular disease, were randomized to febuxostat and non-febuxostat groups and were observed for 36 months. Cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events and all deaths were defined as the primary composite event. The serum uric acid level at endpoint (withdrawal or completion of the study) in the febuxostat (n = 537) and non-febuxostat groups (n = 533) was 4.50 ± 1.52 and 6.76 ± 1.45 mg/dL, respectively (P < 0.001). The primary composite event rate was significantly lower in the febuxostat group than in non-febuxostat treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.750, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.592-0.950; P = 0.017] and the most frequent event was renal impairment (febuxostat group: 16.2%, non-febuxostat group: 20.5%; HR 0.745, 95% CI 0.562-0.987; P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Febuxostat lowers uric acid and delays the progression of renal dysfunction. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01984749).

Achieving LDL cholesterol target levels <1.81 mmol/L may provide extra cardiovascular protection in patients at high risk: Exploratory analysis of the Standard Versus Intensive Statin Therapy for Patients with Hypercholesterolaemia and Diabetic Retinopathy study.

AIMS: To assess the benefits of intensive statin therapy on reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with hyperlipidaemia and retinopathy in a primary prevention setting in Japan. In the intension-to-treat population, intensive therapy [targeting LDL cholesterol <1.81 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL)] was no more effective than standard therapy [LDL cholesterol ≥2.59 to <3.10 mmol/L (≥100 to <120 mg/dL)]; however, after 3 years, the intergroup difference in LDL cholesterol was only 0.72 mmol/L (27.7 mg/dL), and targeted levels were achieved in <50% of patients. We hypothesized that the intergroup difference in CV events would have been statistically significant if more patients had been successfully treated to target. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This exploratory post hoc analysis focused on intergroup data from patients who achieved their target LDL cholesterol levels. The primary endpoint was the composite incidence of CV events. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incidence of the primary endpoint in patients who achieved target LDL cholesterol levels in each group. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 1909 patients (intensive: 703; standard: 1206) who achieved target LDL cholesterol levels. LDL cholesterol at 36 months was 1.54 ± 0.30 mmol/L (59.7 ± 11.6 mg/dL) in the intensive group and 2.77 ± 0.46 mmol/L (107.1 ± 17.8 mg/dL) in the standard group (P < 0.05). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, the composite incidence of CV events or deaths associated with CV events was significantly lower in the intensive than the standard group (HR 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.82; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests that achieving LDL cholesterol target levels <1.81 mmol/L may more effectively reduce CV events than achieving target levels ≥2.59 to <3.10 mmol/L in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and diabetic retinopathy.

Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Elderly Patients With Vascular Risk Factors: Japanese Primary Prevention Project.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The effect of aspirin in primary prevention of stroke is controversial among clinical trials conducted in Western countries, and no data are available for Asian populations with a high risk of intracranial hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of aspirin on the risk of stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in the Japanese Primary Prevention Project (JPPP). METHODS: A total of 14 464 patients (age, 60-85 years) with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus participated and were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 100 mg of aspirin or no aspirin. The median follow-up period was 5.02 years. RESULTS: The cumulative rate of fatal or nonfatal stroke was similar for the aspirin (2.068%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.750-2.443) and no aspirin (2.299%; 95% CI, 1.963-2.692) groups at 5 years; the estimated hazard ratio was 0.927 (95% CI, 0.741-1.160; P=0.509). Aspirin nonsignificantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (hazard ratio, 0.783; 95% CI, 0.606-1.012; P=0.061) and nonsignificantly increased the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.463; 95% CI; 0.956-2.237; P=0.078). A Cox regression adjusted by the risk factors for all stroke, which were age >70 years, smoking, and diabetes mellitus, supported the above result. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin did not show any net benefit for the primary prevention of stroke in elderly Japanese patients with risk factors for stroke, whereas age >70 years, smoking, and diabetes mellitus were risk factors for stroke regardless of aspirin treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00225849.

Differences between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in lipid-lowering action and effect on glucose metabolism in Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients with concurrent diabetes. Lipid-lowering with highly potent statins in hyperlipidemia with type 2 diabetes patients (LISTEN) study ­.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the differences between standard-dose statins effects on glucose level and lipids in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS AND RESULTS: The 1,049 patients were randomly assigned to either the rosuvastatin group or atorvastatin group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the effect on non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and HbA1c at 12 months. However, physicians tended to switch to more intensive therapy for DM in the atorvastatin group. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin 5 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg have a similar lowering effect on non-HDL-C, but might be different in terms of adverse effect on glucose levels.

Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in Japanese patients 60 years or older with atherosclerotic risk factors: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases is an important public health priority in Japan due to an aging population. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether daily, low-dose aspirin reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events in older Japanese patients with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Japanese Primary Prevention Project (JPPP) was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. Patients (N = 14,464) were aged 60 to 85 years, presenting with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus recruited by primary care physicians at 1007 clinics in Japan between March 2005 and June 2007, and were followed up for up to 6.5 years, with last follow-up in May 2012. A multidisciplinary expert panel (blinded to treatment assignments) adjudicated study outcomes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to enteric-coated aspirin 100 mg/d or no aspirin in addition to ongoing medications. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Composite primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes (myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular causes), nonfatal stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic, including undefined cerebrovascular events), and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included individual end points. RESULTS: The study was terminated early by the data monitoring committee after a median follow-up of 5.02 years (interquartile range, 4.55-5.33) based on likely futility. In both the aspirin and no aspirin groups, 56 fatal events occurred. Patients with an occurrence of nonfatal stroke totaled 114 in the aspirin group and 108 in the no aspirin group; of nonfatal myocardial infarction, 20 in the aspirin group and 38 in the no aspirin group; of undefined cerebrovascular events, 3 in the aspirin group and 5 in the no aspirin group. The 5-year cumulative primary outcome event rate was not significantly different between the groups (2.77% [95% CI, 2.40%-3.20%] for aspirin vs 2.96% [95% CI, 2.58%-3.40%] for no aspirin; hazard ratio [HR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77-1.15]; P = .54). Aspirin significantly reduced incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction (0.30 [95% CI, 0.19-0.47] for aspirin vs 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42-0.81] for no aspirin; HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.31-0.91]; P = .02) and transient ischemic attack (0.26 [95% CI, 0.16-0.42] for aspirin vs 0.49 [95% CI, 0.35-0.69] for no aspirin; HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.32-0.99]; P = .04), and significantly increased the risk of extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization (0.86 [95% CI, 0.67-1.11] for aspirin vs 0.51 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72] for no aspirin; HR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.22-2.81]; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Once-daily, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction among Japanese patients 60 years or older with atherosclerotic risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225849.

Effect of Luseogliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, and Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on the Quality-of-Life and Treatment Satisfaction of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT Study).

INTRODUCTION: The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction have not been directly compared. This sub-analysis of a randomized-controlled trial with an SGLT2i, luseogliflozin, and DPP-4is compared their effects on QOL and treatment satisfaction of patients. METHODS: This study recruited 623 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were drug-naïve or treated with antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is. The patients were randomized into luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed for 52 weeks. This sub-analysis assessed QOL and treatment satisfaction using Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q) version 2 in the drug-naïve subgroup who were drug-naïve at baseline and with monotherapy with luseogliflozin or DPP-4i throughout the observation period (256 patients) at 24 and 52 weeks and in the add-on subgroup who were treated with OHAs other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is (204 patients) at baseline, 24 and 52 weeks. RESULTS: In the drug-naïve subgroup, total (50.8 ± 8.2 in luseogliflozin group and 53.1 ± 10.0 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.048) and somatic symptom scores (22.4 ± 5.0 in luseogliflozin group and 24.4 ± 5.8 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.005) at 52 weeks (but not at 24 weeks) were significantly higher in DPP-4i group than in luseogliflozin group. In add-on subgroup, changes in total (3.3 ± 7.8 in luseogliflozin group and 0.9 ± 7.6 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.030) and treatment convenience (1.2 ± 3.9 in luseogliflozin group and - 0.6 ± 4.2 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.002) from baseline to 24 weeks (but not at 52 weeks) were significantly greater in luseogliflozin group than in DPP-4i group. The QOL related to safety or glycemic control was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should pay attention to side effects of SGLT2is to maintain the patients' QOL when SGLT2is are initiated or added-on. Add-on of luseogliflozin increased patients' QOL more than DPP-4is. Considering patients' QOL and treatment satisfaction is important for selecting SGLT2is or DPP-4is. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030128 and jRCTs031180241.

Impacts of Febuxostat on Cerebral and Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Patients with Hyperuricemia: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

A recent meta-analysis found no benefit of uric acid-lowering therapy including febuxostat on death, cardiovascular events, or renal impairment. However, there may be populations that benefit from febuxostat in reducing mortality and cerebral and cardiovascular events. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinical benefit of febuxostat in elderly patients stratified by age using Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy (FREED) data. FREED was a randomized study involving patients aged 65 years or older with hyperuricemia and risk factors for cerebral, cardiovascular, or renal diseases. A total of 1,070 patients were included in this post hoc analysis, divided into 2 age groups: 65-74 years and ≥ 75 years. Patients were randomized into febuxostat and non-febuxostat groups, with uric acid levels monitored for 36 months. The primary composite end point included cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events. In patients aged between 65 and 74 years, febuxostat significantly reduced the risk of future cerebral and cardiorenovascular events. However, no effects of febuxostat were found in the older population aged ≥ 75 years. Heterogeneity in potential interactions between the age and febuxostat treatment was particularly observed in non-fatal cerebral and cardiovascular events and all-cause death. Patients aged ≥ 75 years exhibited more pre-existing factors associated with cerebral and cardiorenovascular events than those aged 65-74 years. The effectiveness of febuxostat varies by age group, with potential benefits for patients aged 65-74 years. The effects of febuxostat are complex and it is important to consider patient characteristics in its clinical use.

[Current status of and regional differences in CKD management and medical cooperation in Japan: from the results of a nationwide questionnaire survey for primary care physicians].

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to figure out the current status of and regional differences in CKD management and medical cooperation in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey on CKD management for primary care physicians (PCPs) from December 2012 to March 2013. The questionnaire included 36 items about CKD management and medical cooperation. In order to compare the current status of CKD care and cooperation, we divided the country into 11 areas; Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Koshin-etsu, Hokuriku, Chubu-Tokai, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu and Okinawa. RESULTS: 28,200 sets of questionnaires were delivered to PCPs throughout Japan, and 2,287 (8.1%) doctors responded. Doctors at clinics accounted for 86.5%, and 90.9% were non-nephrologists. Regional differences were evident in the following items regarding CKD management; urinalysis at the first examination, measurement of urinary protein/albumin excretion, frequency of blood testing, counselling with eGFR, prescription of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA). Urinalysis at the first examination was relatively rare in Koshin-etsu and Kanto (p < 0.01), and counseling with eGFR was relatively rare in Tohoku, Shikoku and Koshin-etsu (p = 0.05). Regional differences regarding medical cooperation were evident in the following items; functional level of cooperation, critical path, presence of consulting nephrologist, personal relationship, satisfaction with the nephrologists' reaction to referral, CKD involvement in Specific Medical Checkup/Specific Medical Guidance. Functional level of cooperation was higher in Chugoku, Okinawa, Chubu-Tokai and Hokuriku, and lower in Shikoku, Koshin-etsu and Kinki (p < 0.05). Serum creatinine measurement in the Specific Medical Checkup was involved more frequently in Okinawa, Shikoku, Kanto, Chubu-Tokai, Kyushu and Hokuriku, and less frequently in Tohoku, Chugoku and Kinki (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We elucidated the current status of CKD management by PCPs and medical cooperation in Japan. Effective actions to improve CKD care must be proposed on the basis of these data, especially the existing regional differences.

[Influence of physicians' subspecialty and training history on CKD management and medical cooperation: from the results of a nationwide questionnaire survey for primary care physicians].

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to elucidate how the subspecialty and training history of primary care physicians(PCPs) influence CKD management and medical cooperation in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey on CKD management for PCPs from December 2012 to March 2013. The questionnaire included 32 items about CKD management and medical cooperation. PCPs' subspecialties were categorized as follows: general internal medicine, nephrology, cardiology, diabetology/endocrinology, gastroenterology, pulmonology, neurology, neurosurgery, hematology, collagen disease/rheumatology, allergology. The PCPs' training history of nephrology was classified into three categories: none, experienced, active-nephrologist. Response distributions for each question were compared between the PCPs' subspecialties and the three categories of training history. RESULTS: 2,287 out of 28,200 PCPs (8.1%) of all 47 prefectures responded. The majority (86.5%) of responders were PCPs at clinics, and 90.9% were non-nephrologists. The PCPs' subspecialty influenced the response distributions in the following questions: utilization of the CKD guidebook, urinalysis at the first and follow-up examinations, frequency of blood testing, counselling with eGFR, self-monitoring of blood pressure, prescription and cessation of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, anemia treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA). The PCPs' training history of nephrology had a strong impact on various aspects of CKD management. The PCPs' subspecialties also influenced the responses regarding medical cooperation of CKD: relationship with nephrologists, utilization of critical path, criterion of patient referral, requests for nephrologists, discontent with the nephrologists' response. CONCLUSION: We elucidated that the PCPs' subspecialty and training history of nephrology substantially influenced CKD management and medical cooperation in Japan. Effective promotion activities to improve CKD management and medical cooperation should be proposed on the basis of these data.

Overall Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Luseogliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors: Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT study).

INTRODUCTION: Evidence of a direct comparison between dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remains lacking, and no clear treatment strategy or rationale has been established using these drugs. This study aimed to compare the overall efficacy and safety of DPP-4is and the SGLT2i luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Patients with T2DM who had not used antidiabetic agents or who had used antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is were enrolled in the study after written informed consent had been obtained. The enrolled patients were subsequently randomly assigned to either the luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed up for 52 weeks. The primary (composite) endpoint was the proportion of patients who showed improvement in ≥ 3 endpoints among the following five endpoints from baseline to week 52: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients were enrolled in the study and subsequently randomized to either the luseogliflozin or DPP-4i groups. The proportion of patients who showed improvement in ≥ 3 endpoints at week 52 was significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group (58.9%) than in the DPP-4i group (35.0%) (p < 0.001). When stratified by body mass index (BMI) (< 25 or ≥ 25 kg/m2) or age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), regardless of BMI or age, the proportion of patients who achieved the composite endpoint was significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group than in the DPP-4i group. Hepatic function and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were also significantly improved in the luseogliflozin group compared with the DPP-4i group. The frequency of non-serious/serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed the overall efficacy of luseogliflozin compared with DPP-4is over the mid/long term, regardless of BMI or age. The results suggest the importance of assessing multiple aspects regarding the effects of diabetes management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031180241.

Febuxostat and renal outcomes: post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial.

Effect of urate-lowering on renal outcomes in patients at high-risk for cardiovascular disease with hyperuricemia without gout is not known. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial (Febuxostat for Cerebral and　CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy [FREED]). The FREED trial enrolled 1070 asymptomatic, hyperuricemic elderly patients with at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease, divided into febuxostat (n = 537) and non-febuxostat (n = 533) groups. We compared the effect of these treatments on renal outcomes including 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, new onset of microalbuminuria and development or worsening macroalbuminuria. The relative risk of developing or worsening macroalbuminuria was 56% lower in the febuxostat group (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82; P = 0.0098). However, the risks for other outcomes were comparable. In patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia without gout, febuxostat reduces the risk of development or worsening of macroalbuminuria.

Effect of febuxostat on clinical outcomes in patients with hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported on the FREED study, which found that febuxostat reduced the risk of adverse clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia without gout. We have now investigated outcomes in subgroups of FREED patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of 1070 patients randomized to the febuxostat or non-febuxostat group and followed for 36 months. RESULTS: At baseline, 234 patients (21.9%) had a history of CVD, including 86 patients with stroke (36.8%), 90 with coronary artery disease (38.5%), 74 with heart failure (31.6%), and 25 with vascular disease (10.7%). The risk for the primary composite endpoint, i.e., cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events and all deaths, was higher in patients with CVD than in those without CVD (34.2% vs 23.7%; p < 0.001). Treatment with febuxostat lowered rates of the primary composite endpoint in patients with CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.601, 95% CI 0.384 to 0.940, p = 0.026), and these effects were consistently observed in subgroups with and without CVD (p = 0.227 for treatment by subgroup interaction). Furthermore, in the subgroup with CVD, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the febuxostat group than in the non-febuxostat group (HR 0.160, 95% CI 0.047 to 0.547, p = 0.004), with a significant subgroup interaction (p = 0.007 for treatment by subgroup interaction). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia without gout, febuxostat reduces the risk of the composite of cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events and death in the secondary prevention setting.

Rationale, design, and baseline data of the Japanese Primary Prevention Project (JPPP)-a randomized, open-label, controlled trial of aspirin versus no aspirin in patients with multiple risk factors for vascular events.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of atherosclerotic disease has become an important public health priority in Japan due to the aging of the population and changes in diet and lifestyle factors. METHODS: The Japanese Primary Prevention Project (JPPP) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial that is evaluating primary prevention with low-dose aspirin in Japanese patients aged 60 to 85 years with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus. The study cohort will be followed for a mean of 4 years. The primary end point is a composite of death from cardiovascular causes (including fatal myocardial infarction [MI], fatal stroke, and other cardiovascular death), nonfatal stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), and nonfatal MI. Key secondary end points include a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal MI, transient ischemic attack, angina pectoris, or arteriosclerotic disease requiring surgery or intervention; each component of the primary end point; noncerebrovascular and noncardiovascular death; and extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization. End point assessment is done by a central adjudication committee that is blinded to treatment assignments. RESULTS: Enrollment began in March 2005 and was completed in June 2007. A total of 14,466 patients were randomly allocated to receive enteric-coated aspirin, 100 mg/d, or no aspirin. At randomization, the study cohort had a mean (SD) age of 70.6 (6.2) years; 57.8% were women, 85.0% had hypertension, 71.7% had dyslipidemia, and 33.9% had diabetes. In the study cohort, 80.4% of patients had > or =3 risk factors. CONCLUSION: The JPPP is the largest primary prevention trial of aspirin in a Japanese population that is investigating whether the benefit of aspirin in reducing risk of vascular events outweighs any bleeding risk in elderly patients with multiple risk factors.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor-induced changes in body composition and simultaneous changes in metabolic profile: 52-week prospective LIGHT (Luseogliflozin: the Components of Weight Loss in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) Study.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how changes in body composition induced by sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment correlate with metabolic profile changes. We aimed to clarify how metabolic profile changes correlate with body component changes, and if SGLT2 inhibitor treatment causes sarcopenia and bone mineral content (BMC) loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Moderately obese Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, treated with luseogliflozin for a year, were observed prospectively and evaluated for body composition changes. We analyzed the changes in the individual body components during treatment, and their correlation with other clinical variables. RESULTS: The efficacy analysis set comprised 37 of 43 enrolled patients. The total fat mass significantly decreased early in the treatment at and after week 4, with a mean decrease of -1.97 kg (95% confidence interval -2.66 to -1.28) at week 24. The visceral fat area at week 24 showed an average downward trend, although this was not significant. The changes in visceral fat area in individual patients showed a significant negative correlation with the extent of the baseline visceral fat area (r = -0.399, P = 0.023). The skeletal muscle mass index showed a significant but small change at and after week 36. The BMC profile showed a transient significant decrease only at week 12. No significant change in BMC was noted at other time-points. CONCLUSIONS: Luseogliflozin treatment brought about favorable changes in body composition and metabolism of moderately obese Japanese type 2 diabetes patients, accompanied by body fat reduction, and minimal muscle and BMC reduction.

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A focus on hypoglycemia.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a focus on hypoglycemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who started sitagliptin therapy and were followed for 52 weeks were enrolled in the Impact of Sitagliptin on Diabetes Mellitus in Japanese Elderly Patients study. The frequency of hypoglycemia and knowledge of hypoglycemia were analyzed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 5,130 patients (aged 73.8 ± 6.1 years) were analyzed. A significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin (-0.7 ± 1.1%, P < 0.001) and glycoalbumin levels (-2.2 ± 3.8%, P < 0.001) was observed at week 52. The percentage of patients with hypoglycemia did not increase from the baseline (3.3%) to week 52 (2.8%) of sitagliptin administration. Hypoglycemia incidence was significantly higher for combination therapy with insulin (odds ratio 17.75, P < 0.001) or sulfonylurea (odds ratio 2.22, P < 0.001). The increase in sitagliptin dose for combination therapy with antidiabetic drug(s) increased the percentage of patients with hypoglycemia (5.6% in sitagliptin increased subgroup, 2.4% in sitagliptin maintained subgroup, P < 0.01). The awareness of hypoglycemia symptoms and attitude to carry glucose as a countermeasure to prevent hypoglycemia increased during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin did not increase the percentage of patients with hypoglycemia among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, hypoglycemia occurred more frequently in add-on therapy to sulfonylurea or when the sitagliptin dose was increased in combination therapy, showing that sitagliptin should be used with caution.

Influence of blood pressure on the effects of low-dose asprin in elderly patients with multiple atherosclerotic risks.

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the efficacy of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) for primary prevention of cardiovascular events is influenced by blood pressure (BP) using data from patients aged 60-85 years with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or diabetes, but without cardiovascular disease of the Japanese Primary Prevention Project. METHODS: All patients had received aspirin (100 mg/day) or no aspirin. BP subgroups were defined as low (average SBP from the baseline to the year of the events <130 mmHg), moderate (≥130 and <140 mmHg), and high (≥140 mmHg). The mean duration of follow-up was 5.02 years. RESULTS: In hypertensive patients (n = 12 278) aspirin had no significant impact on the primary outcome of death from cardiovascular disease, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. On the other hand, aspirin increased the incidence of serious extracranial hemorrhage [hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-2.77; P = 0.0064] and tended to increase hemorrhagic stroke (hazard ratio, 1.75; CI, 0.99-3.07; P = 0.053). Aspirin had no effect on the primary outcome in any of the BP subgroups, and was associated with increased hemorrhagic stroke in the high BP group (hazard ratio, 3.51; CI, 1.29-9.51; P = 0.014); serious extracranial hemorrhage was elevated or tended to elevate in the moderate (hazard ratio, 2.53; CI, 1.18-5.45; P = 0.017) and high (hazard ratio, 2.14; CI, 1.00-4.56; P = 0.050) BP groups. CONCLUSION: In aged Japanese hypertensive patients, these data demonstrated no overall benefit of low-dose aspirin therapy although treatment was associated with an elevated risk of hemorrhagic events.

Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: Subanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial (JPPP-70).

INTRODUCTION: This post hoc subanalysis of the randomized Japanese Primary Prevention Project investigated whether once-daily low-dose aspirin versus no aspirin reduced the risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients aged ≥ 70 years with atherosclerotic risk factors. METHODS: Patients aged < 70 years (young-old) or ≥ 70 years (old) with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes participated between 2005 and 2007. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin once daily or no aspirin plus standard of care. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes plus nonfatal stroke and nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was a composite of the primary outcome plus transient ischemic attack, angina pectoris, and arteriosclerotic disease requiring medical or surgical intervention. Old (n = 7971) and young-old (n = 6493) patients were followed up for a median 5.02 years. RESULTS: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of primary (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.74-1.16]; P = 0.50) or secondary (0.85 [0.70-1.04]; P = 0.11) outcomes in patients aged ≥ 70 years. In old men with high-density lipoprotein < 40 mg/dL, treatment with low-dose aspirin was associated with a reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint compared with the group not receiving aspirin (10/260 vs 22/250; HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20-0.93]; P = 0.03). This subgroup was also found to contain significant larger proportions of patients with elevated body mass index, patients with diabetes mellitus, and smokers (P < 0.001). Old patients also showed differences in bleeding outcomes. Serious extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than in the non-aspirin-treated group (35 [0.88%] vs 18 [0.45%]; HR 1.96 [1.11-3.46]; P = 0.020). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non-aspirin-treated group (63 [1.58%] vs 18 [0.45%]; relative risk [RR] 3.5 [2.08-5.90]; P < 0.0001). Cerebral hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage) tended to occur more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non-aspirin-treated group (22 [0.55%] vs 11 [0.28%]; RR 2.01 [0.97-4.14]; P = 0.058). Cerebral hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in old patients than in young-old patients (33 [0.41%] vs 10 [0.15%]; HR 2.7 [1.34-5.53]; P = 0.0055). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in a slightly higher proportion of old patients compared with young-old patients (81 [1.02%] vs 53 [0.82%]; RR 1.2 [0.88-1.76]; P = 0.21). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of the primary or secondary outcomes in old patients. Aspirin treatment may have reduced CVEs within a high CVE risk elderly population subgroup. Aspirin treatment in such a group requires caution, because of the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, severe extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization or transfusion, and gastrointestinal bleeding in old patients receiving aspirin therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00225849].

Indomethacin inhibits cell growth of medullary thyroid carcinoma by reducing cell cycle progression into S phase.

Indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has been reported to inhibit the growth of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) cells in vitro. However, the mechanism of inhibition of MTC cell growth by indomethacin and its potency have yet to be revealed. We examined the effect of indomethacin on three different MTC cell lines (TT cells, DRO 81-1 cells and HRO 85-1 cells) and two non-MTC cells. The mechanism of indomethacin action in MTC cells was investigated by analyzing intracellular prostaglandin level, apoptosis, and cell cycle in TT cells. Indomethacin inhibited cell growth of all three MTC cell lines but not normal thyroid cells or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells. Indomethacin at 10 microM or greater showed a dose response inhibition of cell growth. Indomethacin at 25 muM, a putative therapeutic serum indomethacin level, showed potency similar to 100 to 200 nM sunitinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. To examine whether prostaglandin depletion might determine the inhibition of MTC cell growth, we created different prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in TT cells using three different NSAIDs. A profound PGE2 depletion by indomethacin-ester, a potent cyclooxygenase (COX) II inhibitor, showed the least inhibition of cell growth. Indomethacin did not increase apoptosis of TT cells. Indomethacin, but not naproxen or indomethacin-ester, reduced cell cycle progression into S phase; this was unrelated to the degree of PGE2 depletion. The expression of phosphorylated retinoblastoma (pRb) protein that shifts cells from G(1) to S phase was reduced after exposure to indomethacin. In conclusion, indomethacin has specific anti-tumor effect on MTC cells, probably by reducing cell cycle progression into S phase rather than by prostaglandin depletion. Since no drug therapy is currently available for MTC, indomethacin may be one of the therapeutic candidates.