[Curative Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma - Disease, Diagnostics, Therapy in 2022]. / Kurative Therapie des Ösophaguskarzinomes.

Curative Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma - Disease, Diagnostics, Therapy in 2022 Abstract. Surgical resection remains the gold standard for non-metastatic carcinoma of the lower and middle third of the esophagus. Locally advanced tumors (T3) are pretreated neoadjuvantly (radiochemotherapy) or perioperatively (chemotherapy). A differentiated primary staging and an interdisciplinary case presentation are of essential importance today. The individual risk assessment, the pre-habilitation and the individualized treatment play a major role. Clinically, the further advancement of access minimization - through laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and robot-assisted procedures and the associated reduction of access trauma - as well as the treatment of this entity in high volume centers are clearly in the foreground. For cervical carcinomas definitive radiotherapy is often the better alternative, both for tumor biological reasons and for reasons of the increase in complications during surgery.

Outcome Quality After Colorectal Cancer Resection in Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers­Patient-Reported and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In this observational study, patient-reported outcomes and short-term clinical outcome parameters in patients with colorectal cancer were studied 12 months after the start of treatment. Outcomes were also compared across German Certified Colorectal Cancer Centres. METHODS: Data were collected from 4239 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone elective tumor resection in one of 102 colorectal cancer centers and had responded to a quality-of-life questionnaire before treatment (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29). 3142 (74.1%) of these patients completed a post-treatment questionnaire 12 months later. Correlation analyses were calculated and case-mix adjusted comparisons across centers were made for selected patient-reported outcomes, anastomotic insufficiency, and 30-day-mortality. RESULTS: At 12 months, mild improvements were seen in mean quality-of-life scores (66 vs. 62 points), constipation (16 vs. 19), and abdominal pain (15 vs. 17). Worsening was seen in physical function (75 vs. 82) and pain (22 vs. 19). Better patient-reported outcomes at 12 months were associated with better scores before treatment. Better results in at least three of the five scores were associated with male sex, higher educational level, higher age, and private health insurance. Major worsening of fecal incontinence was seen among patients with rectal cancer without a stoma. The largest differences across centers were found with respect to physical function. Anastomotic insufficiency was found in 4.3% of colon cancer patients and 8.2% of rectal cancer patients. 1.9% of patients died within 30 days after their resection. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can use these findings to identify patients at higher risk for poorer patient-reported outcomes. The differences among cancer centers that were found imply that measures for quality improvement would be desirable.